Fartificial Insmelligence
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2020
At least the comments on that post are shitting on OP haha
Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.
- Thread starter Real Mayun
- Start date
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2022
This is going to be so fucking great to watch! Archives at the ready lads, time to harvest the salt.
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2021
From r/honesttransgender
This dude is dancing around getting it. Note he does say he experiences dysphoria
Some people, who also seem reasonable, come in to say, yes, society is not going to warp itself around our narc gravity fields all the time, so being able to accept that is probably a good thing, even if you commit to transitioning
But then....
It always reverts to deaths and this indescribable internal pain that dysphoria produces. The poster here is right though, it is a mental illness, one that should be treated psychiatrically and not with plastic surgery and enabling behavior. If this person is serious, then they shouldn't be in public or on the internet at all.
This dude is dancing around getting it. Note he does say he experiences dysphoria
Some people, who also seem reasonable, come in to say, yes, society is not going to warp itself around our narc gravity fields all the time, so being able to accept that is probably a good thing, even if you commit to transitioning
But then....
It always reverts to deaths and this indescribable internal pain that dysphoria produces. The poster here is right though, it is a mental illness, one that should be treated psychiatrically and not with plastic surgery and enabling behavior. If this person is serious, then they shouldn't be in public or on the internet at all.
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2021
enjoy:
TERF or TRA? I'm leaning towards TERF, successfull trolling though, judging by the comments on a usually very TRA-friendly sub.
some comments:
(was deleted)
look at all those downvotes
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2020
As a Bloodborne fan, its so hard for me to like the demake. On the one hand its technically sort of impressive and neat for about 5 minutes on the otherhand, I feel like doing it in PS1 graphics ruins the amount of small details to the aesthetic that the game has and fuck me did it have to be made by such an attention whoring faggot. I adored Bloodborne Alpha and to a point retail for its lighting and scenery, the statues all trough the game are well details and always made my mind wander. When you dumb it down to PS1 I dont know, it just seems less awe inspiring. Feels like some dudes out of Wyoming wanted to make a Nightmare Creatures inspired game back in 1999 rather then Gothic Eldritch Horror game in the Mid 2010s.
I cant wait for his 15 minues to be up so he can fade into obscurity. Also of course he have to have the mandatory BLM and ACAB because thats how you know hes woke and sensitive. Makes me want to vomit and I pray to god almighty a woman never lets him touch her. Sorry if MATI, I just like Bloodborne.
Dromedary
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2021
@Prolego said: On a positive note, some rebellious soul at the Guardian has managed to sneak in the news about trannies being sent to women's prisons:
OK, it's only in some obscure corner of a weekend supplement,
No, Guardian Blind Date is really popular! Internationally even, a lot of people will read this. ( And The Guyliner does really funny recaps of the Blind Date that are widely read too.) So, based horny granny will get eyeballs. I'm really surprised the fuckin' Graundian (sic) allowed this, the paper that's so cuntily woke they forbid the word actress as a slur. Assholes.
(Sorry couldn't reply directly, I've no idea where the Reply button went on your post.)
Last edited:
behindyourightnow
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 17, 2021
Some random L's on Twitter:
Huh, wow, maybe it's because most cats look the same whether they are boy cats or girl cats, and humans don't have an ingrained evolutionary reason to be able to tell them apart at a glance?
I think you're onto something with the last sentence though. But why would anyone not truly think of this masculine icon as a he/him?
WE MUST ERASE ALL OF OUR EMOTIONS RELATED TO CREEPY MEN, BECAUSE IT MAKESCREEPY MEN TRANSWOMEN FEEL A BIG SAD
CHANGE YOUR THOUGHTS. CHANGE YOUR FEELINGS. WORDS AND ACTIONS ARE NOT ENOUGH. YOU MUST FEEL LIKE WE ARE WOMEN. THIS IS AN EXTREMELY REASONABLE THING TO ASK.
Of course, being narcissists, they give nary a thought to why women (and children, and sometimes other men!) might have negative feelings about a particular male. They care not at all about the fact that such suspicions have a protective element, and that the "avoid creepy men" sixth sense allows many women and children to escape rape and abuse every single day. Or that teaching children to be suspicious of adults that make them feel funny is a vital part of keeping them safe from predators.
None of that matters. It's all about whether I feel comfortable pissing on a toilet seat at work. Other people are not real.
Huh, wow, maybe it's because most cats look the same whether they are boy cats or girl cats, and humans don't have an ingrained evolutionary reason to be able to tell them apart at a glance?
I think you're onto something with the last sentence though. But why would anyone not truly think of this masculine icon as a he/him?
WE MUST ERASE ALL OF OUR EMOTIONS RELATED TO CREEPY MEN, BECAUSE IT MAKES
CHANGE YOUR THOUGHTS. CHANGE YOUR FEELINGS. WORDS AND ACTIONS ARE NOT ENOUGH. YOU MUST FEEL LIKE WE ARE WOMEN. THIS IS AN EXTREMELY REASONABLE THING TO ASK.
Of course, being narcissists, they give nary a thought to why women (and children, and sometimes other men!) might have negative feelings about a particular male. They care not at all about the fact that such suspicions have a protective element, and that the "avoid creepy men" sixth sense allows many women and children to escape rape and abuse every single day. Or that teaching children to be suspicious of adults that make them feel funny is a vital part of keeping them safe from predators.
None of that matters. It's all about whether I feel comfortable pissing on a toilet seat at work. Other people are not real.
Edit: I don't think there is a problem with trying to examine one's unconscious bias about a group in general. If you were raised to believe that all Asians are filthy vermin, then it's healthy as you grow up to reexamine those beliefs and where they came from and whether they are true, so that hopefully you can adjust your beliefs and grasp who the real vermin are (the Italians).
This guy, however, is demanding people do this specifically in the context of males invading women's spaces and not respecting their boundaries. There is a reason women and children have automatic feelings of him being a "threat," but he gives no shits about that because he is a narc who despises women.
This guy, however, is demanding people do this specifically in the context of males invading women's spaces and not respecting their boundaries. There is a reason women and children have automatic feelings of him being a "threat," but he gives no shits about that because he is a narc who despises women.
Last edited:
Satina
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2021
The replies read like they were posted by literal bots. Like scam messages that try to make you buy a book or shady supplement online.
Poor dad.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
All this is logical. We've already rejected rational thinking for lived experiences. It's well past time to come for the lived experiences that are problematic and uphold oppression.
"You can't be an ally ... when you disagree with us ... If you can't interrogate those reactions"
Being constantly affirmed by others is a right. Trans rights are human rights. Those who refuse to affirm, and we know they are feeling it even if they deny they are thinking it, are violating human rights.
The irony of course as endless numbers of people have pointed out, if you accept the poststructuralist metanarrative it self-refutes. When everything is oppression, nothing is. Accepting any narrative means you are furthering oppression. May does not interrogate her own reactions to expose the transmisogynist (and other endless forms of) oppression she imposes on the marginalized by accepting transfems and thus gender as a whole as a valid narrative.
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2019
Honestly, if most trans people had this approach then I really doubt there'd be a backlash that the movement seem to be having right now. But then again, I doubt there would be as much grooming or demands to enter female sports as males. Since 95% of the current day trans movement seem to consist of autists/cluster bs with low empathy and zero self-awareness it's a race to the bottom.
behindyourightnow
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 17, 2021
The tranny jannies playing desperate whack-a-mole with all the transphobia on Reddit recently brings me so much joy. Reddit troons are incapable of reining themselves in at all; that would involve admitting to themselves that the evil TERFs might have had a point. So all they can do is clamp down on people's reactions to their behavior.enjoy:
TERF or TRA? I'm leaning towards TERF, successfull trolling though, judging by the comments on a usually very TRA-friendly sub.
View attachment 2955564
some comments:
View attachment 2955565
View attachment 2955566
(was deleted)
look at all those downvotes
View attachment 2955568
And after that extreme negative reaction even on a trans-friendly mainstream sub like AITA, do any of the local trannies and handmaidens question the behavior of the creepy troon that prompted that reaction? No, the creep did nothing wrong, and it's all the TERFs' fault.
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2021
Why the hate on CDs and sissies?:
Crossdressers and sissies appropriate a trans identity because they're too cowardly to admit they're men in women's clothing. The kind of absurd hypocrisy to be expected from a tranny, lmao:
"Sissies are the porn version of egg_irl.":
What the f**k are sissies?!:
Sissy/forced fem fetishes are just like women having rape fantasies, or some stupid shit like that:
Sample of the rape commentor's profile: Egg cracked from sissy porn. Bimbofication and degradation kinks. Antiwork, polyamory. Every fucking transbiaNEETcoomercel stereotype:
New take on the AGP concept of faceless men: Gender euphoria from the idea of watching yourself in the mirror get fucked by a mannequin with a dildo:
Transitioning has turned me into an emoji-slinging slut and given me bad grammar, teehee!:
"Restricting my vocabulary in girl mode feels right.":
Transphobes need to die. We should kill them. We're enraged beasts fighting back. The usual whiny incel violent rhetoric:
Crossdressers and sissies appropriate a trans identity because they're too cowardly to admit they're men in women's clothing. The kind of absurd hypocrisy to be expected from a tranny, lmao:
"Sissies are the porn version of egg_irl.":
What the f**k are sissies?!:
Sissy/forced fem fetishes are just like women having rape fantasies, or some stupid shit like that:
Sample of the rape commentor's profile: Egg cracked from sissy porn. Bimbofication and degradation kinks. Antiwork, polyamory. Every fucking transbiaNEETcoomercel stereotype:
New take on the AGP concept of faceless men: Gender euphoria from the idea of watching yourself in the mirror get fucked by a mannequin with a dildo:
Transitioning has turned me into an emoji-slinging slut and given me bad grammar, teehee!:
"Restricting my vocabulary in girl mode feels right.":
Transphobes need to die. We should kill them. We're enraged beasts fighting back. The usual whiny incel violent rhetoric:
Last edited:
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2018
I love these so much, there was one posted in here some time back (probably more than a year) with tons of responses where they were all talking about how they try to sound like teen girls when writing and how empowering it felt because there was no way you could read that kind of text as anything BUT feminine. FAST WORD MANY GRAMMER ERROR MUCH GIRL
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2021
That's what I find interesting about the interaction. People in the trans community asking for reasonable consideration of the feelings of others are shouted down by talk of the extreme pain a dysphoria sufferer who needs to feel 100% identical to a "cis" person feels.
I realize this is Kiwi Farms and everything, so opinions are going to vary on other types of "oppression", but it's just notable to me that the trans narrative starts with appealing to an internal distress/pain that doesn't originate from anybody else's actions. Someone could not be misgendered if they didn't have the "wrong body" to starts with. If other groups are asking "don't step on my toe", a trans person is arguing "it causes me psychic anguish when I'm not allowed to step on your toe". It puts a primacy on the internal experience of the trans person as mattering more than it does for anyone else. Their pain is always assumed (due to the good old 41%) to somehow trump whatever anyone else is feeling. Power leveling a little here, but I've been going through a tough time over the last year and a bit since my father passed away. I wasn't able to see him for much of his illness due to lockdowns and visitor limits. Sometimes when people talk about their families, especially dads talking about kids, I feel these surges of deep sadness.
Stuff like that is part of life, and while I have sometimes asked to change the conversation, I do not demand that any discussion I am a part of instantly stop and acknowledge my internal strife. And these are people I know, coworkers and friends who all know what has happened, for the most part. I bring this up because it realty does seem like trans people don't think others suffer internal distress, or at the very least that it doesn't matter. Like that dude having "girly" experiences with the friend's daughter. Somehow her discomfort (and let's be honest, more like distress and terror at this man) doesn't mean anything to the trans person. It's like the women in that scenario were just dolls enabling his fantasy.
This belief that you can browbeat everyone around you for something as small as pronouns is insane. It is narcissistic. It's the only description for it. Their comfort matters, the comfort of even little girls does not.
Last edited:
Muggsy
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2021
It's plain old manipulation. When the ultimatum is based on something they'll do to themselves, like a suicide threat, it's just emotional manipulation. It's amazing these arguments aren't seen for just how abusive they are.
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2022
Trannies remind us of insufferable and immature little siblings we're lucky not to have (condolences to people who actually have trans siblings and are against it). Like an annoying little brother who begs his sister to paint his face like a clown and begs his big brother to coddle him all the time.
Rotter
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2020
Link/Archive
The Thought Police are here
Criticise the trans lobby and you can expect the cops to come round to ‘check your thinking’.BRENDAN O'NEILL
CHIEF POLITICAL WRITER
1st February 2022
Orwell tropes are overused. I’m guilty of it myself. And yet there are times when only a Nineteen Eighty-Four reference will do. The police questioning of Scottish charity worker Nicola Murray is one of those times. After Ms Murray issued a statement saying that her domestic-violence charity would no longer refer women to the Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre, because of ‘deeply concerning comments’ made by the trans woman who runs the centre, the police came knocking. ‘We need to speak to you to ascertain what your thinking was behind making your statement’, they told Murray. Police officers visiting a woman’s home and grilling her over her ‘thinking’? Yep, we need Orwell for this.
Ms Murray’s crimethink was to feel uncomfortable with comments made by Mridul Wadhwa, the trans woman who is CEO of the Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre (ERCC). Last year, Wadhwa said some women who experience sexual abuse and rape are ‘bigoted people’ and they should expect to be ‘challenged’ on their bigotries if they turn up at the crisis centre looking for help. Sexual violence is ‘not [a] discerning crime’, said Wadhwa. It ‘happens to bigoted people as well’. And ‘if you bring unacceptable beliefs that are discriminatory in nature [to the crisis centre], we will begin to work with you on your journey of recovery from trauma… but please also expect to be challenged on your prejudices’. In short – if you’re a woman who doesn’t believe that someone born male can become a woman, and who doesn’t want to see blokes of any sort in a rape-crisis centre, then you’re a ‘bigot’ and your trauma therapy will come with a side order of woke lecturing.
Not surprisingly, many campaigners against sexual violence were horrifed by Wadhwa’s comments. In my view, the very idea of a rape-crisis centre being run by a biological male is pretty disturbing. But the fact that that biological male is also happy to brand some rape victims as ‘bigots’ who essentially need re-education is just despicable. Women turn up at rape-crisis centres for urgent assistance following a terrible exprience, not to be interrogated on how au fait they are with the latest beliefs and decrees of the cranky cult of genderfluidity.
Ms Murray runs Brodie’s Trust, a charity that provides help to women who have experienced the loss of a pregnancy through domestic violence or a forced termination. In September, in the wake of Wadhwa’s comments, she said Brodie’s Trust ‘cannot in all conscience send vulnerable women to [the ERCC]’. She made the perfectly reasonable point that it is not for sexual-violence charities to police vulnerable women’s thoughts. ‘We have no interest in our clients’ religion, sexuality [or] political views’, she said. And so she said she would no longer ‘signpost’ vulnerable women to a centre whose CEO was openly threatening to police and correct vulnerable women’s beliefs.
The police didn’t see it as reasonable, though. In November, detectives from Edinburgh knocked on Ms Murray’s door. They had in their possession screenshots of her tweets and a printout of the statement made by Brodie’s Trust. Get your head around that – actual police officers printed out a statement made by a charity and went around to the charity founder’s home to talk to her about it. This is banana republic stuff. The officers confirmed to Ms Murray that she hadn’t said anything ‘hateful’ – ‘there isn’t a crime here’. So why were they in her home waving around printouts of her comments, she asked? ‘Because we need to speak to you to ascertain what your thinking was behind your statement’, they said.
This was an act of thoughtpolicing. In 21st-century Britain, officers of the law believe they have the right and the responsibility to peer into people’s minds and excise problematic thoughts – such as, erm, that we shouldn’t refer to rape victims as ‘bigots’ and tell them off for their allegedly backward beliefs. This isn’t even the first time the woke THINKPOL has lashed out at people who harbour unapproved thoughts. Who can forget the case of Harry Miller, who was contacted by Humberside cops in 2019 after he retweeted a trans-sceptical limerick? Miller was told that he hadn’t committed a crime but officers nonetheless had to ‘check [his] thinking’. Think-checking sounds a little less scary than thoughtpolicing, but it’s the same thing.
Scotland in particular seems to have a serious problem with woke authoritarianism. It has become the tinpot tyranny of right-on thought. Alongside Nicola Murray, there’s Marion Millar too, who was arrested last year for directing threatening behaviour at certain individuals and for being aggravated by prejudice relating to transgender identity. In other words, she’s a critic of the Scottish government’s plan to bring in gender self-ID. The charges against Ms Millar were dropped in October, as it suddenly dawned on Scottish officialdom that persecuting a woman for her political beliefs is not a great look.
Scotland under the SNP has also passed a highly controversial hate-speech law that could seriously meddle with freedom of speech. It has punished football fans for ‘offensive’ chanting and singing. It flirted with the idea of assigning a ‘named person’ from the state to watch over the welfare of every child born in Scotland. And its institutions seem thoroughly captured by the unforgiving, intolerant ideology of transgenderism. Police Scotland recently confirmed that they would log rapes committed by men who claim to be women as having been commited by women. An erasure of reality and manipulation of language worthy, dare I say it, of Big Brother. As JK Rowling pithily put it: ‘War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength. The Penised Individual Who Raped You Is a Woman.’
The broader, more awkward truth here is that it isn’t only a few overexcited cops in Edinburgh and Humberside who are engaging in think-checking. Wokeness itself is a species of thoughtpolicing. And the trans ideology is very often at the forefront of this thoughtpolicing. Indeed, the Newspeak of the trans worldview, which cajoles us to use people’s preferred pronouns and to say things like ‘uterus-haver’ rather than woman and ‘chestfeeding’ rather than breastfeeding, is not, as activists claim, about making sure trans people feel respected and validated. Rather, it is about controlling how the rest of us think, as well as speak, about the issues of sex, gender, family, community and so much more. The war on ‘problematic’ words is about thought-control. After all, if you alter the language people are allowed to use, you can also change how they think.
This is straight out of Nineteen Eighty-Four, too. ‘Don’t you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?’, the torturer O’Brien says to Winston Smith. ‘In the end we shall make thoughtcrime literally impossible, because there will be no words in which to express it.’ That’s where we’re heading with sex and gender – to a situation where so many words will have been erased or problematised or deemed ‘inappropriate’ that it will become difficult even to think certain things, such as that people with penises are men, biological sex is real, and rape victims should not be called ‘bigots’. To save free thought itself, we need to stand up against every single assault on language. ‘Woman’, ‘man’, ‘mother’, ‘breastfeeding’, ‘rapists are male’, ‘Wadhwa’s comments were deeply concerning’ – keep saying it all; keep using the right words.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
I doubt it had ever occurred to them that much of their depression and suicides are due to their totally impossible expectations. I'm not even talking about the physical aspect: to have everyone "respect you for who you are" is quite unrealistic, even for normal people.
To brainwash women at their most vulnerable, most emotionally tumultuous, and at their lowest self-esteem. I wonder why more trannies haven't thought of that and opened their rape crisis centers.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2020
Trannies are made to be at the top of the oppression stack.
Their "oppression" is all internal. As opposed to racism or sexism, where you still have to offer some evidence, however flimsy, of misconduct or wrongdoing, trannies can be in the most comfortable situation in the world and still claim oppression because of "dysphoria". Read: a completely unverifiable, asymptomatic mental condition. And worse, dysphoria doesn't actually do anything. It just makes them "feel bad". It's not like Tourette's', OCD, panic or severe autism, where the behavior can't be convincingly faked for long periods of time. It's the final form of the people who were complaining about "my depression" back when "stress" had stopped making headlines and depression was the next big thing the media decided to talk about.
On top of that trannies are very often white men, which makes them "safer". The woke would never admit it, but they're deathly scared of the "minorities" they claim to speak for. They get uppity, you see. White men in drag, though? They're "safe". So what they're degenerate perverts? Half of woke crowd is, too.
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2016
Hasn't Scotland gone to shit to the point you'd think of Trainspotting as the good ol' days? And this is what cops are doing?