🐱 Trans women cyclists who used to compete as men take first and second place in new 'non-binary' race - leaving young mother in third - Owned

CatParty

B5C15D0D-D133-4B6A-90DD-0021580886F2.jpeg


  • The independent race aimed to be inclusive for trans and non-binary people
  • It was won by Emily Bridges who was pictured on the podium on social media
  • It comes amid a heated row about trans rights in elite sports such as cycling

An 'inclusive' cycling race that saw male-born trans athletes trounce women competitors has been condemned by critics.

The event on Friday finished with two transgenderwomen in first and second places, with a young mother in third.

Gold in the ThunderCrit race at Herne Hill velodrome in South-East London went to Emily Bridges, a trans cyclist who was barred from a woman's race in March and who had competed in men's events only the month before.

In second place was Lilly Chant who, despite identifying as a woman, is still designated as male on official records.

The tournament's best-performing biological woman, Jo Smith, of Thanet, Kent, won bronze and celebrated with her rivals by posing on the winners' podium with her young daughter.

A photograph quickly spread on social media, sparking fury from female athletes and campaigners.

British Cycling, the governing body that has recently found itself embroiled in the controversy around trans competitors, said the event was independent and it had not been involved.

Sharron Davies, who won a swimming silver at the Moscow Olympics in 1980 and has spoken out before on trans athletes, said she was 'very disappointed' at news of the race.

Fiona McAnena, director of sport campaigns at Fair Play For Women, said: 'It's inevitable that if we're going to allow people who have been through male puberty into the category that is supposed to be for females, those people are going to outperform.


'Sport is based on your body, and we have a female category in most sports because male puberty confers such an advantage and it is a lifelong advantage. It cannot be undone.'

In an attempt to devise an 'inclusive' event, the ThunderCrit organisers created two new non-binary races called 'thunder' and 'lightning'.

Its website said: 'Thunder category is for cis men, non-binary people whose physical performance aligns most with cis-men, trans men and women whose physical performance aligns most closely with cis-men.

'Lightning category is for cis-women, non-binary people whose physical performance aligns with cis-women and trans men and women whose physical performance aligns most closely with cis-women.'

Cis – or cisgender – describes a person who still identifies as the gender they were born as. Non-binary refers to people who say they are not solely male or female.

Bridges and Chant competed in the lightning race, despite Bridges being barred by British Cycling from racing against five-times Olympic gold medallist Dame Laura Kenny in March after international sporting bodies claimed she was ineligible.

British Cycling is now reviewing its transgender policy.
 
Imagine standing 3rd place on the podium while you have to explain to your daughter that men are celebrating "beating mommy" by having gay sex with extra steps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CatParty
Well, conservatives don't want females doing sports in the first place, so what's the problem?
I think the mainstream conservative position is that they should only be allowed to compete at the Special Olympics with the rest of their kind.
 
The article says that the race had two categories, one for men/transmen-whowant-to-lose/big-hulking-transwomen/'nonbinary'-men and one for women/transmen/twinky-little-transwomen/'nonbinary'-women, in a clear attempt to try and sort the whole clusterfuck into born-Male and born-Female without outright saying it.

So how did these two still end up in what was clearly meant to be the actually female category? I'm assuming the organizers of this had as little backbone as the organizers of actual women's sports, but seems silly to even bother if you're gonna let them just sign up for wherever they'll have the biggest advantage.
Because people were allowed to identify themselves into a category, except when they are 'cis'.

oh2.png
oh.png
 
So there was no way for this woman to identify into a category where she could have a chance in hell of winning?
I suppose she could have called herself nonbinary like all the other girls if she wanted to pick which one to be in, but since both categories are filled with men... that's a no on having any chance.
 
Back