- Joined
- Jan 27, 2021
What the people privileged to be on TV should stand for while in the public eye. Speaking Truth to Power, rather than speaking Power at the masses. The increasingly-rare increasingly-government-given right to speak truth and to seek the truth, rather than an anarchism of allowing just anyone to say whatever they want and not abridging the freedom of speech online, rather than a fascism allowing free publishing using the modern day equivalent of the printing press like with Stormfront or Infowars; an absurdity of a so-called right of the people to peaceably to assemble when the government is telling you that its dangerous, or hopefully soon too petitioning the Government for a redress of grievances rather than via the media which are both safer and responsible than we are with that power. Just by sure to spell that last part as Mediatization (The mass movement for media to infect everything) and not Mediatisation (The installation of intermediates between you and power), if you don't use the 'Z' key enough they might call you a Russian.
Yet, the Disinformation Governance Board is here and seemingly Elon Musk brought it forth, and just like the news media before it, they were supposed to keep the People informed, keep the Lies out, and keep the Republic secured. However if the news media were the original party to oppose yellow journalism and bias, why were they replaced? Perhaps, due to their manifest troubles internally both in situational credibility and in resulting public legitimacy? Perhaps instead their manifest troubles were a useful tool in the golden age of TV to keep them in line with the government and cooperative like that persistent rumor I hear in my circles that Elise Stefanik will be the next speaker of the house as a false compromise decided ahead of time since her Harvard college years could be used to control her? After all, gone are Yale's Skull and Bones dog-and-pony-show to filter and see who'll be a team player instead of a talker. Gone are the single digits of Channels and no ability for any of us to speak with each other directly. Is Journalism just dead, and is Elon Musk joking about their demise by buying up Twitter to replace them?

(I hope the rumors are true, and this is the next Speaker of the House. The republic would be dead, and I'm just joking about it on Kiwifarms.)
Maybe the world is kinder and more simpler than I make it out to be, and theories about conspiracies just aren't true, and instead the media are just fuck-ups when it comes to credibly refuting Russia or perhaps domestic speculations that could usefully be subjected to a name-calling of 'Russian Bot'? Either way, the death of the media needs a gentile voice to tell them they were the bestest boy, just the sweetest girl, as the Vet gets the needle ready. Even if their readers, or those in power, were made uncomfortable by their antics over the years, they shouldn't be. So Trevor Noah is the best at telling them what they want to hear, right as the Disinformation Governance Board takes care of the one reason the executive branch keeps them around, and long after the people grew tired of their shit. What a blessing it is to be told how great things are when the Atomic Clock is closer than ever and nobody has a house or a spouse to huddle in and with. Now we finally leave the age of the Pundit and completely enter the Age of the Influencer, brought to us by the
A Disinformation Governance Board of which the DHS has said would "protect privacy, civil rights, and civil liberties" as part of its duties. Yet the DHS also declined requests to clarify the scope of the new Disinformation Governance Board. Supporters of Obama's 2016 Countering Information Warfare Act inside the Defense Department have publicly expressed their desire to weaken the interpretation of domestic propaganda protections, laws which prevent the United States Department of State from gathering information necessary to develop targeted propaganda messaging and prevent them from explicitly attempting to influence opinions. The Washington Post and the International Business Times reported that after the 2016 United States presidential election, worries grew that propaganda spread and organized by the Russian government swayed the outcome of the election, and representatives in the United States Congress authorized funding of $160 million over a two-year-period to safeguard the National security of the United States by advancing legislation to monitor incoming propaganda from external threats within the National Defense Authorization Act. Not the 2020 United States presidential election, efforts were made to fortify and ensure freedom and bald eagles flew proudly and defiantly that day. We have to be careful to say that today and only more so tomorrow and thereafter.
I'll just follow any order on how to speak about the 2020 election.
Last edited:

