War Trudeau plans to invoke Emergencies Act in response to protests: sources - These powers have "never-before" been used.

Act grants cabinet ability to take 'special temporary measures that may not be appropriate in normal times'​


Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has told his caucus he plans on invoking the never-before-used Emergencies Act to give the federal government extra powers to handle the protests across the country, according to sources.

Those sources, who were not authorized to speak publicly, said the prime minister will inform the premiers of his decision this morning.

The Emergencies Act, which replaced the War Measures Act in the 1980s, defines a national emergency as a temporary "urgent and critical situation" that "seriously endangers the lives, health or safety of Canadians and is of such proportions or nature as to exceed the capacity or authority of a province to deal with it."

It gives powers to the prime minister to respond to four different types of emergency scenarios: public welfare (natural disasters, disease), public order (civil unrest), international emergencies and war emergencies.

The act grants cabinet the ability to "take special temporary measures that may not be appropriate in normal times" to cope with an emergency and the resulting fallout during an "urgent and critical situation."

It gives the government extraordinary — but time limited — powers. The act is still contingent on Parliament's approval and subject to the protections of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Jack Lindsay, an associate professor in the applied disaster and emergency studies department at Brandon University in Manitoba, said one of the first steps is for the government to show that the state of affairs constitutes an emergency.

"They're gonna have to basically prove that first hurdle, that it is a national emergency," he said.

"He's basically going to be arguing that these truckers are basically creating a threat to the security of Canada."

Under the act, the government is prohibited from taking control of police forces, said Lindsay

"They do have the grounds to regulate and prohibit public assembly and travel and then regulate or prohibit the use of specific properties," he said.

"I suppose they could put out regulations about where semi-trailers are allowed to park overnight, for example. They can designate protected places like the Ambassador's Bridge or something."

The government can also order or direct any person to render services with compensation, said Lindsay, which could in theory be used to tow trucks blocking streets downtown.

In a meeting with the Liberal caucus on Monday morning, Trudeau said there were no plans to deploy the military, according to the sources.

Invoking the act also triggers an inquest at the end of the declaration.

The move follows a meeting Sunday of the federal cabinet and its Incident Response Group (IRG). Trudeau tweeted late Sunday that the IRG discussed "further actions the government can take to help end the blockades and occupations."

Earlier that day, Emergency Preparedness Minister Bill Blair described the attitude around invoking the Emergencies Act as "appropriate caution" rather than "reticence."

Blair emphasized on CBC's Rosemary Barton Live it was important to make sure that "the appropriate authorities that are with the provinces are fully utilized," and he said the federal government was "prepared to do everything necessary."

The War Measures Act was most famously used in peace times by Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau during the October Crisis.

Corrections​



  • This story has been updated from a previous version that said the prime minister is chairing a cabinet meeting. In fact, it is a caucus meeting.
    Feb 14, 2022 8:38 AM ET
Article
 
Look I get it anti mandate people just want to spread the virus and kill everyone with their anti scientific takes. But maybe don’t feed into their paranoia by playing the very fascist villains they think you are. Maybe talk to them like adults and figure out a way to get through this mess? No? Just accelerate? Ok.
When your reaction to simple protest is to accelerate, they are not the ones pushing extremist action Trudeau and people like yourself are.

Also: Non-violent protest= fascist villains? Then you think people should sit down and talk calmly with people that literally think that? Fuck off. What you really are saying by reading between the lines is people should compromise on YOUR sides terms. That trick doesn't work so well anymore.
 
Again the progressives can't think more then a minute ahead.

Ok so next time our Cons are in power and the natives and their white leaders get uppity about a raidroad or pipeline and start yet another blockade we can just say it's a national emergency and send in the goose steppers while telling everyone that the Liberals did it first so it must ok be.

It's like progressives have fallen into their own PR trap. They'll never get voted out, the other side will never use the tricks they set up and surely the evil Cons would never think to use all these nice tools the Liberals left lying around.

Remember Machiavelli's last advice;

Rule today as if your worse enemy will rule tomorrow.
 
The act is still contingent on Parliament's approval and subject to the protections of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
No it isn't. In fact it explicitly isn't. That charter makes it clear freedom of association and the right to protest is a thing. The very act of invoking any law to do something like this overwrites that right and violates the charter. But thats irrelevant because the charter can be invalidated at any time for any reason the moment the government has a reason to. Its literally explicitly written into the charter that they can do that

Ok so next time our Cons are in power and the natives and their white leaders get uppity about a raidroad or pipeline and start yet another blockade we can just say it's a national emergency and send in the goose steppers while telling everyone that the Liberals did it first so it must ok be.
You're comparing apples and oranges. Those native groups consist of a handful of idiots in the middle of nowhere ranting about a pipleline. They aren't disrupting an entire city and harassing people who live in the area. If these idiots didn't want to get hauled off by the cops and provoke the government into taking these kinds of measures to remove them they should have kept things peaceful and non disruptive. Instead they had a bunch of people acting like idiots, honking constantly, harassing people and the street and doing stupid shit. Keep your people in line during protests or don't be surprised when they end up fucking everything up and getting you blamed for it
 
Look I get it anti mandate people just want to spread the virus and kill everyone with their anti scientific takes. But maybe don’t feed into their paranoia by playing the very fascist villains they think you are. Maybe talk to them like adults and figure out a way to get through this mess? No? Just accelerate? Ok.
They can't help themselves. Which is why we eventually win.

Are you sarcastic all the time because your post history is littered with shit just as dumb as this. Generally people pretending to be retarded only do it some of the time not all of the time.
It's called commitment you absolute retard. You stupid fucking dumb shit motherfucker. Fuck off with your shit-tier takes.
------------------------------

Oh hey here's some non-shitposting. Looks like the vote to end the mandates in Canada just failed. 185-151 to keep mandates in place. LOL
 
Last edited:
I want to be pretty too.
Here's my tit.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220214-140623_Google.jpg
    Screenshot_20220214-140623_Google.jpg
    392.9 KB · Views: 12
I'm starting to think violence is the only effective solution. If you try to protest tyranny, then the state tyrannizes you by making protest illegal, what else is left to do?
Justin and his NDP buddy Singh are trying really hard to create the enemy that they can finally go hard on.
 
No it isn't. In fact it explicitly isn't. That charter makes it clear freedom of association and the right to protest is a thing. The very act of invoking any law to do something like this overwrites that right and violates the charter. But thats irrelevant because the charter can be invalidated at any time for any reason the moment the government has a reason to. Its literally explicitly written into the charter that they can do that


You're comparing apples and oranges. Those native groups consist of a handful of idiots in the middle of nowhere ranting about a pipleline. They aren't disrupting an entire city and harassing people who live in the area. If these idiots didn't want to get hauled off by the cops and provoke the government into taking these kinds of measures to remove them they should have kept things peaceful and non disruptive. Instead they had a bunch of people acting like idiots, honking constantly, harassing people and the street and doing stupid shit. Keep your people in line during protests or don't be surprised when they end up fucking everything up and getting you blamed for it

It's just a dumb solution overall, full of hypocrisies and that doesn't really help.

A) Black Lives Matter disrupted some areas of Canada, though as far as I know there were no riots, just people yelling at others in restaurants here and various marches. The Native Pipeline protests did cause millions in damage, and I can recall native groups across Canada in solidarity also blocking raillines temporarily (I commuted to Toronto via the GoTrain & ViaRail during this time, and due to natives occupying railways in solidarity, there were trains running, but the normal schedule was cut back and severely delated).

This is a matter of scale, though even with regards to scale, principle still applies. One shouldn't pick and choose what economic disruptions one allows to continue on, simply due to what ideology is in vogue at the time.

B) On scale and the methods of this protest, I don't think its accurate to say that this is just a peaceful protest. It implements these methods, but it also combines a bit of a strike, and a bit of an impromptu Trucker's blockade. Everyone should agree that peaceful protesting is fine, that strikes are fine (we live in a capitalist society, if working conditions aren't good, you absolutely have the right to not work in X industry), but on blockades, thats where things get different, where goods and services that other people need to run their businesses are cut off. With the blockade of the ambassador bridge, for example, its rather obvious that both the US and Canada do not want to lose 25% of Canada's US trade, want autoplants to shut down temporarily, etc.

Ive heard people at that bridge justifying it with "Weve been in lockdown for 2 years, surely we can close down these autoplants for a week or so" and I just really don't buy that, it appears to be whataboutism, and noone should have the right to close down business. Should also note, its not just autoplants, but local businesses here and the supply chain crisis is even worse in Ontario.

C) Even if the government can't allow the ambassador bridge to be blocked, the emergency measures act is too far, and was not needed to stop the occupation of the ambassador bridge. Even the language of the act, if you read it, seems to suggest this is too far, because we do not have civil unrest that an individual province cannot handle.

Devil's advocate, but what should have happened was the bridge was reopened, and the rest of the protestors around Canada should have been left untouched.

D) Here's the big thing, much of this all rests on the fact that Trudeau disrespected the Truckers, fled Ottawa, and refused to meet with them. Even if youre a liberal, you must admit that your party has huge coward energy, and where some basic negotiation or even a photo op with meeting with the Truckers and lip service of "we take note of your concerns" would have helped.

When Trudeau fled, creating a void of leadership, when he walked out of parliament multiple times, when he refused to meet with Truckers for the flimsiest of reasons, he did such damage to the image of government, poor as it is, that its no wonder that this protest spiraled across Canada. The conservative leadership stepped down during this, frankly Trudeau will have to after as well.

Add in that the CBC is state funded and basically a propaganda arm of the government, and its being used by the Trudeau government to spread misinformation, and this is just enraging to anyone with a braincell.

Either way, I think the person in the wrong here is Trudeau, for both the federal mandates (and no, theyre not federally dictated, but additional covid relief funding to provinces is dependant upon mandates, so they might as well be), the Covid response, for refusing to meet with the initial protestors and listen to their wishes, walking out of parliament multiple times, fleeing Ottawa, etc.

Just a complete lack of leadership, and then a childish response of "Well I'll just send in the military after I refused to meet with these people".

Fuck Trudeau.
 
Last edited:
You're comparing apples and oranges. Those native groups consist of a handful of idiots in the middle of nowhere ranting about a pipleline. They aren't disrupting an entire city and harassing people who live in the area. If these idiots didn't want to get hauled off by the cops and provoke the government into taking these kinds of measures to remove them they should have kept things peaceful and non disruptive. Instead they had a bunch of people acting like idiots, honking constantly, harassing people and the street and doing stupid shit. Keep your people in line during protests or don't be surprised when they end up fucking everything up and getting you blamed for it
lol how much of a niggercattle do you have to be to say the government can roust peaceful protesters because of a fucking noise complaint

disrupting a city lol far more disruptive protests of the past, inside and outside of cities, recent and not so recent, and many instances of rioting to boot, are celebrated examples in the national civic legends of the english speaking peoples and plenty of other people around the world. most of the rest of the world isn't so passionate about how people causing some kind of a ruckus - and what a non-ruckus this is compared to hundreds of examples - is so damn noble though

until now

if the government can selectively use a public nuisance rap to shut down protests that it doesn't like then you don't live in a free country you live in a niggercattle pen
 
This is so...why is he doing this, at this particular time? He even has pivot room to pretend reversing policies was Because Science since that’s what other countries are going with.

Why is Canada of all places digging in the hardest?
If it was bourgeoise or some eternally victimized minority that riots over the lockdowns they would have been taken down and turdau would be crying while apologizing but there's no fucking way some pleb laborers are going to dictate what the guberment does, they're supposed to do what the educated city dwellers demand they do.
 
This is so...why is he doing this, at this particular time? He even has pivot room to pretend reversing policies was Because Science since that’s what other countries are going with.

Why is Canada of all places digging in the hardest?
I'm tempted to said Trudeau don't want to see the first domino of his mentor, that SOB Karl Schwab and his ugly baby, the Great Reset being scrapped.
 
Back