US Trump Admin Mulls Executive Orders Targeting Debanking - The backlash to "Operation Chokepoint 2.0" has finally arrived.

Article Archive

The Trump administration is reportedly preparing an executive order to block banks from denying services to politically disfavored industries—particularly crypto firms and gun manufacturers, according to CoinTelegraph and the WSJ.

The move comes as part of a broader backlash against what critics are calling “Operation Chokepoint 2.0,” a term that refers to the alleged, informal coordination between financial regulators and banks to “debank” certain legal but politically controversial sectors.

This follows a surge of complaints from crypto entrepreneurs and tech founders, over 30 of whom were reportedly denied banking services during the Biden administration.

The issue gained national attention after the sudden collapse of three major crypto-friendly banks—Silicon Valley Bank, Silvergate, and Signature—in early 2023. Their rapid downfall fueled speculation that government pressure had played a role, with crypto investor Nic Carter calling it a “coordinated effort” to dismantle the digital asset ecosystem through financial exclusion.

In response, President Trump declared at the March 2024 White House Crypto Summit that he would “end Operation Chokepoint 2.0,” vowing to restore neutral banking access regardless of politics. If enacted, the executive order would mark a major escalation in the GOP’s effort to curb what it sees as partisan interference by banks and federal regulators.

The issue has also drawn unusual bipartisan concern. Senator Elizabeth Warren, a frequent critic of Wall Street, stated in a February Senate hearing that “no one should be locked out of the financial system based on who they voted for or what they believe,” adding fuel to a rare moment of agreement across party lines.

Meanwhile, major banks including JPMorgan Chase, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo have met with officials in Texas and Oklahoma to deny allegations that they’ve selectively restricted services to industries like crypto, firearms, and fossil fuels—industries increasingly caught in the political crossfire.

The report says that despite Trump’s pledge, crypto advocates warn the battle is far from over. Caitlin Long, CEO of Custodia Bank, whose firm has faced repeated debanking challenges, said in March that the industry likely won’t see meaningful relief until at least 2026.

With the Federal Reserve maintaining its current stance—and new leadership appointments not possible until early 2025—regulatory hostility could continue, even if other agencies like the OCC and FDIC shift course.
 
it is bad that this is tied to crypto bros.
that entire space is so full of fraud and dishonesty, seeing this association could make a lot of people go "if the people complaining about debanking are a bunch of fraudsters who want to rip people off and commit financial crimes, then maybe debanking isn't such a bad idea"
 
Banks aren't the problem, it's payment processors and credit card companies, Trump is going to have the buck break those bastards for anything to happen.

It is to be hoped that there's somebody close to Trump who knows the difference and can explain it to him (and write the order, and whatever direction Congress needs to craft legislation out of it).
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Fatsuit Shinji
"This is a big problem, big problem from the days of Senile Joe. For example, this Jesus Connor Moonie guy, nice guy, great guy, just wants ppl to be able to say the N word, tranny and hebe on the internets - is that such a bad thing???
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: KiwiFuzz2
It's simply not "legal tender" if you can't exchange it for a good or service because a third party says otherwise. Banks and financial institutions should have zero freedom to do anything like this, even with credit they front you.
 
Banks aren't the problem, it's payment processors and credit card companies, Trump is going to have the buck break those bastards for anything to happen.
It all depends on how the order is written. The payment processers are the squeaky wheel. Not that the banks dont have issues. They deserve buck breaking too. But if the credit card issue isn't adressed, it won't have much affect.
 
Back