EU Turks Enraged as Ancestry.com Reveals the Truth: Most of Them Are Greeks - Istanbul BTFO'd

The Turkish DNA Project, an online endeavor to track Turkish genetics, is enraged at the popular genealogy site Ancestry.com and has called for it to be boycotted for stating an inconvenient truth: many, and possibly most, modern Turks are the descendants of the Greeks who once formed the overwhelming majority of the population of the land that is now Turkey. In this as in so many other instances, the truth hurts, but that doesn’t make it any less the truth.


Greek City Times reported that the Turkish DNA Project tweeted: “AncestryDNA prioritizes to demonize the Turkish people and delegitimaze [sic] their presence in Turkey rather than giving information about the genetic structure of the relevant population.” The Turkish DNA Project called upon “all Turks to boycott this company: Ancestry.”

After Greek City Times called attention to the tweet, the Turkish DNA Project took it down, but it still has up a retweet calling for a boycott of Ancestry.com, as well as a tweet fulminating with incandescent rage against Greek City Times’ Athens Bureau chief Paul Antopoulos, whom it calls a “white supremacist.” Very original line of attack you got there, guys.

Greek City Times explained that the Turkish group was enraged “because Ancestry.com correctly highlighted that many Turkish citizens are indeed mostly unrelated to Turkic peoples from Central Asia and are rather native Anatolian people that have been Turkified….Ancestry.com highlighted that after the Ottoman conquest of Pontos in today’s Turkey’s southeastern Black Sea coast, the “Pontian Greeks adopted Turkish language and culture, and many converted to Islam in order to have greater opportunities in Turkish society. Ancestry.com also highlighted that another round of Turkification of Pontian Greeks occurred after the second Russo-Turkish War (1828-29).”

This is not at all surprising, and nowhere even close to a false claim. Throughout history, when Muslims have conquered an area, they relegate the non-Muslims to second-class status, denying them numerous rights and mandating that they pay a tax, the jizya, for the privilege of practicing their religions without being killed. There is one easy way for the subjugated dhimmis to escape this state of humiliation and degradation: they can convert to Islam.

This led to mass conversions, and to the fact that in numerous lands that were once conquered by Muslim armies, most of the Muslim population has non-Muslim ancestors. Egypt was 99% Christian when it was conquered, and is only around 10% Christian now. Where did all the Christians go? They’re still there. They’re the nation’s Muslims. It’s the same in Iran: the Zoroastrians of Persia are still mostly in the country. They’re the Muslims. And likewise in Turkey, most of the Turks are ethnic Greeks who were forcibly converted to Islam, or who willingly converted in order to escape the institutionalized harassment and persecution of dhimmitude.

Turkish journalist Uzay Bulut informed me that Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan himself is from the town of Rize, the Greek name of which is Rizounta. Bulut told me: “His family is from the Potamia town of the city. Their village is Pulihoz. They’re original Greek names of these locations but they were later Turkified by The Turkish Republic. Erdogan himself, too, refers to the village as Potamia. This is such a controversial, taboo topic in Turkey.”

It shouldn’t be, if Erdogan were consistent. He recently declared: “We maintained these lands and made them our homeland with our blood, our flag, and the sound of prayer from the mosques. This is why the re-opening of the Hagia Sophia as a mosque is important, as it is a legacy of conquest.” If he can celebrate that “legacy of conquest,” why can’t he and Turks of like mind celebrate the fact that they are the children and heirs of the Greeks who were conquered by the Turkish invaders? That’s part of the “legacy of conquest,” too.

Bulut observed: “Why are Turkish nationalists so terrified of the truth? Because if they face it, the lies they’ve come up with will be shattered to the ground. Through these lies, hatred has grown which made them commit so many crimes against Greeks, Armenians, Assyrians, Jews and others. Then they will realize that by destroying those peoples, they’ve actually destroyed their own ancestors and cultural heritage. The truth will set us all free and bring much needed peace to the region.”

We can only hope.

Edit:

 
Last edited:
greekgood.jpg


The Copts say they are more than 10% of the population, but even with the benevolent attitude of the current Egyptian government, it's probably not a point they push too hard.
 
Last edited:
This isn't actually a surprise to anyone who knows the history of the region. Like most nomadic Steppe tribes, the Turks didn't have a huge population when they rolled into Anatolia. Add to that the Ottoman Turks considering anyone who was Islamic and not Arabic "Turkish" on their census and you're going to blur a lot of ethnic lines. Just a reminder that Mustafa Kemal was, if I recall correctly, from Bulgaria and had blonde hair and blue eyes.
 
Kebabs invaded Greek anatolia in 1050s and even after collosal fuck ups by Byzantines and help of Crusaders directed by Greedy Venetian merchants Kebabs didnt manage to conquer coastline and Western Anatolia for next 250 years.
So of course most of them are assimilated Greeks.
 
Unfortunately, I will have to dispel those myths. The issue is that modern Greeks have significant Anatolian blood because Minor Asia was never genetically Greek. When Alexander the Great conquered those areas, he Hellenised them, but the genetic substrate remained the same. During Byzantium, many Minor Asian populations were resettled to modern-day Greece to prevent the Slavic element from dominating the area. When the Seljuk Turks conquered Minor Asia they converted those Anatolian populations to Islam. The Seljuks themselves were only a few hundred thousand individuals. They were quickly assimilated by the local populace. When the population exchange happened in 1923, around a million Minor Asians immigrated to Greece, which further reinforced the Anatolian element in the Greek gene pool. Of course, modern Turks have a very small genetic relation with the actual steppe Turks of Central Asia, but that does not make them Greeks. Both the Greeks and the Turks are amalgamations of Slavic, Caucasian, and Anatolian peoples. If a Greek is going to compare himself with a Turk, he will appear as a Turk, now if a Turk tries to do the same he will appear as a Greek. Unfortunately, propaganda and childish nationalist delusions from both sides conceal the truth. As a side note, the decline of the classical Roman Empire resulted in the complete extinction of most Ancient Greeks.

Edit: fixed a few errors.
 
This definitely pisses off the greeks more than the roaches.
It's probably a wash. Turkroaches like to LARP hard as Altaic steppe nomads to the point where the T*rkish army literally claims it's first symbolic founding in the Hunnic Empire so I'm sure they're not happy about actually mostly being Greekoid Anatolian mutts either.

1E551189-2D20-4CBC-B1AA-E4A90B35F440.jpeg
 
Havent read the thread at all yet: But as far as I know DNA ancestry tests are banned in Turkey lol

Read: Yeah not surprised theres no fucking thing as pure bloodline, its just the ultranationalist fags getting mad, I'd just be surprised to see more than 25%~ Greek in my bloodline because as far as my ancestry tree goes its Armenian and Roach, although the town my father-side relatives were born in was a predominantly Rumelian-Armenian one. Eh, who fucking cares, im tempted to get a DNA test and see if my guesses are correct or 100% off.

Placing a bet:
I'll kill myself if im over 3% black.
 
Back