Twin Peaks thread

If you can track it down, read the Secret Diary of Laura Palmer. While it contradicts the show in some points, it's still a damn good read and a great insight into Laura's character.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: GeorgeDaMoose
If you can track it down, read the Secret Diary of Laura Palmer. While it contradicts the show in some points, it's still a damn good read and a great insight into Laura's character.

Im thinking about giving it a read,I've also got the blue ray cut of Fire Walk With Me and i heard it adds a bit more on her story.
 
If you can track it down, read the Secret Diary of Laura Palmer. While it contradicts the show in some points, it's still a damn good read and a great insight into Laura's character.

It's on my Amazon Wishlist. I might buy it for myself after Christmas.
 
I started watching this show at the behest of my wife. And so far I really like it. I will finish watching season 1 at least.

But I have to say... well, with how much people go on and on about Twin Peaks... it's good. I guess I expected it to be better.
 
I started watching this show at the behest of my wife. And so far I really like it. I will finish watching season 1 at least.

But I have to say... well, with how much people go on and on about Twin Peaks... it's good. I guess I expected it to be better.

It has a very devoted fanbase because of how revolutionary it was at the time,* and because David Lynch. If you grew up watching serialized mystery boxes and don't particularly care for Lynch, it's still a well-made entertaining show with some memorable characters and scenes, but it probably won't resonate as much.

It's also a pastiche of the prime time soap opera (with a parody of a soap opera within the show to drive the point home), so I guess that affects how you view it, too. But that only lasts up to a point, then it gets weird.

* The Simpsons parodied it at least twice, if that tells you how much of an impact it had.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: TheDarknessGrows
It has a very devoted fanbase because of how revolutionary it was at the time,* and because David Lynch.
This was more or less my conclusion as well. I just need to remember that this show represents a lot of firsts. And then my other "issue" is that I know a bunch of David Lynch's other works already.

It is a very enjoyable show though. Better than most other junk out there.
 
Still my favorite television show. Most shows are only good when they are good, but Twin Peaks is still good when it sucks.
I felt it was great when it was good, but forgettable when it was not. I'm not going to mention the forgettable stuff because I barely remember it, and also because it's probably someone's favorite side plot and I don't want to start an internet slapfight over some tertiary character's abortive storyline. But (deleted because all of it would be a spoiler), that stuff is top tier TV.

I have a love-apathy relationship with Lynch; I love getting glimpses into his mind, I'm apathetic about the hours of filler and dream logic. Actually, I dislike the dream logic, but I respect its incorporation since almost no one else does it. And sometimes it does produce something that I really like in isolation.
 
Back