Disaster Twitch viewers demand changes as 'topless' meta moves to 'implied nudity' meta

Article

The controversial Twitch ‘topless’ meta has continued to evolve with more streamers switching gears by adding censor bars to their broadcasts to invoke implied nudity.

It’s been a December to remember for Twitch. The Amazon-owned platform has had to deal with two controversial new streaming types and the response has created as much drama as the metas themselves.

It all started when Twitch streamer ‘Morgpie’ went viral for appearing to stream topless, but in an interview with Dexerto, she revealed that she was wearing clothes underneath.

This resulted in Twitch changing its community guidelines to allow for “artistic nudity,” but the site quickly reverted the update after streamers took things too far.

Now, the ante has been upped again as content creators use censor bars to make their streams look more sexual than they are.

On December 19, a Dexerto tweet highlighting streamer Firedancer using censor bars over her bra went viral resulting in other streamers joining in on the action.

twitch-topless-streamer-meta-evolves-1024x576.jpg

Popular hot tub streamer JenFoxxx, formerly known as Indiefoxx, was one such streamer, utilizing censor bars to make it appear as if she was wearing nothing at all.

While this may all be in good fun, that didn’t stop viewers and other streamers from voicing their frustration with the amount of sexual content on the platform.

“Twitch used to be an app for kids btw,” said Kick streamer charc.

“Why not imply a rule to the TOS that both Vtubers and IRL streams need to always show that some type of clothing is being worn? That way, it’s the same for everyone?” suggested artist Kitsunie.

“Twitch has an implied nudity issue that they are refusing to fix,” remarked HUN2R. “Every update they have people just pushing the boundaries as far as they can.”

Others shifted the blame and took issue with the fans watching the content. Parents even chimed in, saying their kids won’t be allowed on the site until their are fixes.

However, not everyone was on board, as some users seemed to voice their approval for the new type of content.

So far, Twitch has yet to comment on this wild new meta and we’ll have to wait and see just how far streamers can push the limit before potential bans are handed out.
 
I've been trying to document the degeneracy of the late stage capitalism west. But then am accused of being a porn peddler. Ironic.
 
  • TMI
Reactions: Pedophobe
That's technically true but I genuinely don't think the women themselves have any interest in teenage boy attention because teen boys don't have any money.
That isn't part of the meta though.

The whores don't care who views - as long as someone does. If you get more viewers (regardless of age) - you'll get more of a push in terms of visibility, which results in more viewers, and so on. The actual money comes in once you've got a decent size audience to milk.

- You can donate small amounts, even kids who can go to a store and buy a gift card for Twitch. If you've got 100 people throwing in $5, that becomes $500.
- You get access to whales that will spend huge amounts of cash trying to get your attention.
- Subscribing on Twitch is easy (and free, technically, if you have an Amazon Prime account). That's another $2.50/month per sub - so if you nab 1,000 suckers that's $2500/month.
- You can link to all of your porn pages on Twitch (via Linktree), so you can put your Amazon Wishlist, Pornhub Gold, Onlyfans, merch store where you sell used socks/panties, whatever - infront of the whole audience constantly.
- You also make money from the ads being served as well and can directly serve them as well (Twitch mandates you run 3 minutes of ads every hour, but you can do more).

It's a "death by 1000 cuts kind of thing" where you get a big audience and take a small bit for all of them rather than targeting people with money for whores (who would be in other places anyhow). People tend to throw money away on Twitch and Twitch incentivizes it massively with leaderboards, badges, emoji, hype trains, and so on.
 
Amazon just needs to open a twitch version of pornhub where they can be as naked as they want and all the thots and coomers would fly into it as fast as flies fly to shit.

I wonder why Twitch just doesn't go all in and make a Porn category?

I mean most of their top "streamers" are nothing more then Only Fan cam whores pretending to play games while milking the shit out of lonely beta males.

I got no issues with women using their bodies to get money from thirsty males, it's a tale as old as time after all, but can we at least by honest about it?
Imagine thinking the Internet needs more porn sites.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
I wonder... I'm not entirely clear about cloud computing, and how sectioned it is. Amazon sells MASSIVE amounts of cloud computing space. They run absolutely enormous data centers across the country, in the US at least (and I assume elsewhere as well). I don't know how or if Twitch servers are integrated with all the rest of what they own, but if they allowed porn and something illegal happened with it, could it result in the servers being seized? And could that affect an unrelated company's data that happened to be in the vicinity? That alone would cause a mass migration from their space, even if it was done accidentally.

Like I said, I don't know how the big cloud servers partition space for each "renter". I know Null bought the physical hardware to support the Farms, to avoid issues with places that rent out cloud server space.
Extremely unlikely in my view, just because Amazon/AWS are known to have their own "Gov Cloud" separate from the rest of the infrastructure, for government owned projects. Add on their massive CIA, etc, contracts, and I doubt the government would even try to seize anything from them. Even if they wanted to, I really doubt AWS wouldn't just hand the info over instead of forcing them to seize something physically.
 
Back