EU Twitter to leave EU pact against disinformation

EU COMMISSIONER

Twitter to leave EU pact against disinformation​

According to EU Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton, the short messaging service Twitter will withdraw from the voluntary EU agreement that all major industry players had agreed with the EU against the spread of disinformation on online networks. There is no comment from Twitter on this yet.
Online since today, 10.00 a.m.

The company can not hide from EU regulations, tweeted Breton on Saturday night. "But the obligations remain. You can run away, but you can't hide." He said that beyond the voluntary commitments, there will be a legal requirement under the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA) from Aug. 25. Violations can cost companies fines of up to six percent of their global turnover.

"Our teams will be prepared for enforcement," Breton stressed. That law provides for respect for media freedom and fundamental rights. It had been passed by the EU Parliament last year and is intended to regulate especially the large online corporations in the EU more strongly.

Users as fact checkers
EU sources had already said on Thursday that US billionaire Elon Musk's company had notified the EU Commission of its intention to withdraw from the voluntary agreement. However, there had not yet been any official communication on the matter. Twitter had argued that it would rather rely on its users than on fact-checkers.

Twitter responded as usual to press inquiries from AP, for example, with an automatic reply without further comment. A request for comment from the news platform "Politico" was answered with a "poop" emoji, according to the report.

New rules under Musk
Since his takeover of Twitter last October, Musk had laid off many employees responsible for moderating content and communicating with Brussels. Musk also had users reinstated who had been banned for spreading disinformation. This included former U.S. President Donald Trump. He also rolled back previous rules to combat misinformation and messed up the verification system and content moderation guidelines.

Musk always stressed removing what he considered too many restrictions on freedom of expression on the platform. Just over two weeks ago, he had announced that he was putting the chief post at Twitter in the hands of advertising expert Linda Yaccarino after a chaotic six months.

Tech giants committed themselves
The code of conduct to combat disinformation in the major Internet platforms was written by the industry companies themselves and agreed with the EU in 2018 and tightened last year. In addition to companies from the advertising industry, Google, Facebook, Twitter, Microsoft and, since 2020, TikTok had committed to comply with it. The goal is to track political advertising and stop the monetization of disinformation.

The code requires regular progress reports with data on lost advertising revenue from disinformation actors. In addition, information must be provided on the number or value of accepted or rejected political ads, as well as identified manipulative behaviors.

Signs that Twitter was unwilling to comply with its obligations under the EU Code of Conduct have been around for some time. Just earlier this year, the EU Commission reprimanded Twitter for failing to provide a full report under the code.
red, ORF.at/agencies

S | A
 
According to EU Internal Market Commissioner Thierry Breton, the short messaging service Twitter will withdraw from the voluntary

tweeted Breton on Saturday night. "But the obligations remain. You can run away, but you can't hide." He said that beyond the voluntary commitments, there will be a legal requirement under the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA) from Aug. 25. Violations can cost companies fines of up to six percent of their global turnover.

That's a strange definition of voluntary if there are obligations to remain, followed by threats for leaving.
 
Twitter had argued that it would rather rely on its users than on fact-checkers.
By no means a perfect system but way better than the nigger tier system they have now.

download (1).jpeg
 
Just fucking block European countries from using Twitter already. If European commissioners are worried about control of the narrative - or "politicians" and "journalists" committing mass suicide because they can't get their dopamine fix on the taxpayers' dime - then they can make their own shitty microblogging platform for them to wank each other off on.
 
Just fucking block European countries from using Twitter already. If European commissioners are worried about control of the narrative - or "politicians" and "journalists" committing mass suicide because they can't get their dopamine fix on the taxpayers' dime - then they can make their own shitty microblogging platform for them to wank each other off on.
Uh no, no, the point is to let EVERYONE's opinions to come through.

If you block conservative opinion being heard then the face of thoughts is sjewed. The same thing happens if you block liberal opinion, any top-down obligatory policing of thought is wrong, that is my opinion for what little it is worth :) I say this with love haha
 
Fucking cucked EU laws make me even more grateful to have voted Brexit every day. No wonder the rest of the EU wants to make an example of us cause that shitshow won't stand long as soon as the other rats start fleeing the ship. Can't wait until it's just Germany paying to keep all the little nigglet countries in it's pocket and the common man votes in Hitler 2.

Cut em off Elon, anyone worth talking to will find another way onto the platform if they so want. Plus you'll get rid of a shit ton of terminal wokes and trannies. Win win.
 
Uh no, no, the point is to let EVERYONE's opinions to come through.

If you block conservative opinion being heard then the face of thoughts is sjewed. The same thing happens if you block liberal opinion, any top-down obligatory policing of thought is wrong, that is my opinion for what little it is worth :) I say this with love haha
While I fully agree on your opinion on liberals and conservatives having the same type of liberty in opinions. Many European countries do not, they want more control on their average citizen, and they already have too much authority over them, if they want more censorship on social media and more rough penalties for wrongthinking, then they totally deserve to be barred from Twitter.

Also, like stated above, it's hardly voluntary if you're getting threats on wanting to leave. Elon must cut off with those retarded countries.
 
Last edited:
Fucking cucked EU laws make me even more grateful to have voted Brexit every day. No wonder the rest of the EU wants to make an example of us cause that shitshow won't stand long as soon as the other rats start fleeing the ship. Can't wait until it's just Germany paying to keep all the little nigglet countries in it's pocket and the common man votes in Hitler 2.

Cut em off Elon, anyone worth talking to will find another way onto the platform if they so want. Plus you'll get rid of a shit ton of terminal wokes and trannies. Win win.
Keep in mind that your government will probably make something as bad, if not worse. They've already prohibited you from protesting and they already can arrest you for causing offense on the Internet, something that the EU is yet to push through.
 
Keep in mind that your government will probably make something as bad, if not worse. They've already prohibited you from protesting and they already can arrest you for causing offense on the Internet, something that the EU is yet to push through.
To be fair, it wasn't this government that pushed through the "grossly offensive" part of the law, that was labour back in 2003. So both parties suck!
 
Just fucking block European countries from using Twitter already.
They shouldn't do that. They should close all European offices and datacenters, but they shouldn't block European users. Twitter should make the EU create the Great Firewall of Europe if they want to ban sites; they shouldn't do their work for them.
 
>implying that not every party in your government has the exact same goal of making you a slave of the state
lol
lmfao
It's true, the party that I support are the only good guys in X's politics. The other party is literally hitler. In any case, the grossly offensivie shit was labour but the tories are planning to add to it though the bill hasn't passed as far as I'm aware. They're all cunts.
 
They shouldn't do that. They should close all European offices and datacenters, but they shouldn't block European users.
The problem is once you expand to infrastructure/offices in foreign countries the cost to undo it rises very quickly. Of course that cost is only going to increase the longer they wait to rip that band-aid off.
Twitter should make the EU create the Great Firewall of Europe if they want to ban sites; they shouldn't do their work for them.
They won't because they cannot. With soft influence and voluntary agreements it's arguable they aren't even forcing anyone to do anything. Trying to force the issue and what that would entail will quickly become unpalatable to EU authorities.

Actually physically locate your servers/datacenters in the US and it's a simple matter of including a forum selection clause in the TOS. Come to our American site to deal with this American firm? In doing so you elect to be under US jurisdiction. The US is a "large economy" in this economic sector and no US court is going to usurp the currently-beneficial status quo. Try and punish US firms and it will quickly rise to a diplomatic issue. It also opens the door for the US to engage in turnabout. US-legal firms could survive online without their European counterparts. The same could not be said for major EU players surviving with an antagonistic US. Twitter cannot into Europe? Fine Europe cannot into the NYSE/CBOT and domestic traders get a built-in front run.

They desparately want major international firms to voluntarily comply. It's the only option they really have. The only thing they have to compel anyone are worthless words. These jurisdictional questions are largely unanswered because those who hate them know the likely answer isn't the one they want. Asked/answered it likely establishes a precedent that they are impotent to stop it. At least not without damaging their own interests even more.
 
Uh no, no, the point is to let EVERYONE's opinions to come through.

If you block conservative opinion being heard then the face of thoughts is sjewed. The same thing happens if you block liberal opinion, any top-down obligatory policing of thought is wrong, that is my opinion for what little it is worth :) I say this with love haha
Yes, but how? Twitter is not the United States. They don't have a standing military. They can't point the barrel of a gun at the EU and tell them to accept freedom of speech or die.

The United States should absolutely put more pressure onto the EU to stop regulating everything, but we don't. That's not Twitter's fault nor is it Twitter's problem. They should just cut their losses and leave instead of facing a fine for their GLOBAL intake, as if the EU has a right to that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Magic Mirror
So its voluntary in the same way joining the union was voluntary then? Remember what happened when the confederacy wanted to leave and all that

If you enter an arrangement of your own free will you have a right to leave it the same way, or it is not and never was voluntary in the first place
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anasa Tristis
Back