I tried to go to alineaanylitics.com and the website seems to not exist. Are you sure those numbers aren't bullshit.
Page loads fine? You spelled analytics wrong.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I tried to go to alineaanylitics.com and the website seems to not exist. Are you sure those numbers aren't bullshit.
I expect Shadows did sell better. There was almost zero hype for Outlaws even before the game launched as a broken mess, and patches only brought it up to a level of playable. Shadows, from everything I've seen, mostly plays like yet another Assassins Creed game, so you're at least getting what you expect.Theres no way AC: Shadows outsold more than that, unless they seriously think AC has more cultural impact and marketability than Star Wars.
This would have been true if Sekiro, Ghosts of Tsushima and Rise of Ronin didn't exist.Plus, unlike Star Wars, Japan/samurai still hold a relatively high appeal for gamers, despite Ubislop's best efforts to steal their own victory with forcing Yasuke into the game.
It's still true, even when there are better options available. Especially when this is the setting AC fans have wanted since the series began.This would have been true if Sekiro, Ghosts of Tsushima and Rise of Ronin didn't exist.
I'm not entirely sure that would be the case. Doing worse if they had done some other setting in place of AC Shadows.It's still true, even when there are better options available. Especially when this is the setting AC fans have wanted since the series began.
However bad Shadows has sold I dread to think how much worse it would have done if they had gone for some other random time period.
Even Assassin's Creed Mirage established an Internet footprint for a bit because of its "return to form" from its RPG titles and that "it's just a MIRAGE" rap song playing during sequenced assassinations. I haven't heard a peep about Shadows since the forced marketing about two, three months ago.There’s also no cultural imprint. No fan art, no TikTok gameplay vids, no cosplays, no resurgence in trending because somebody found out a neat trick and it went viral. It’s got next to no footprint atp.
That's true, but remember the vast, vast majority of consumers don't follow any kind of gaming news or review stuff. They see new AC game and they buy it or don't based on how they felt about previous entries. Anyone paying attention to how Ubisoft handled PR for Shadows would definitely have been put off, but I think the main reasons the game performed poorly is due to genre fatigue and the fact that (from what I've heard) Valhalla was an absolute slog and deliberately designed to force people into buying boosts and that probably soured a lot of fans (the same way Far Cry 6 killed any interest I have in that series).Remember, a large part of the negative press for the game was Ubisoft marketing "historical accuracy" and proceeding to fuck literally everything up about that including basic shit that casual fans of japan/samurai/ninja shit in general(without being full on weebs) could spot and wonder wtf was going on.
Definitely. I still see people bringing up Concord (never positively and mostly in regard to Marathon) but nobody is talking about Shadows any more except Ubisoft's Twitter when the post those useless 'player engagement' figures.I think I've seen organic discussion around Concord for longer than I did Shadows.
That's normally true yes, but the saturation of AC shadows ending up being discussed in gaming news, social media, reviews that weren't professional outlets, etc. was significantly higher than normal. I'll just point to Star Wars Outlaws and the massive amount of negative attention it received up into launch and the week after where it was practically the laughing stock of the internet, AC Shadows was that for damn near 6 months.That's true, but remember the vast, vast majority of consumers don't follow any kind of gaming news or review stuff. They see new AC game and they buy it or don't based on how they felt about previous entries. Anyone paying attention to how Ubisoft handled PR for Shadows would definitely have been put off, but I think the main reasons the game performed poorly is due to genre fatigue and the fact that (from what I've heard) Valhalla was an absolute slog and deliberately designed to force people into buying boosts and that probably soured a lot of fans (the same way Far Cry 6 killed any interest I have in that series).
Sadly due to Ubisoft's pigheaded refusal to release any kind of worthwhile data we may never know for sure why people didn't buy it, but I remain convinced that Shadows was a case similar to Concord where, even without the DEI shit, it would have failed either way.
Market cap plays a huge role in stock value as well. This heartbeam inch you mentioned has a market cap of 52 million, ubisoft's is 1.29 billion. The number of shares matters.Ubisoft stock is worth $2 a share, Heartbeam Inc aka Compile Heart a shovelware factory that has literally never made a good game ever has stock listed at $1.80 a share.
Yea Ubisoft is doing so well they're just barely outperforming actual shovelware.
Charlie was responsible for one of Ubisoft’s controversies in 2020, where the company used Black Lives Matter imagery in association with an in-game terrorist organization for the mobile game “Elite Squad”.
And again, the vast majority of people aren't terminally online to the point that they pick up on this stuff unless they're already following gaming related topics so the algorithm puts it their way.the massive amount of negative attention it received up into launch and the week after where it was practically the laughing stock of the internet
Everyone I know is more terminally online than I am, and I post here. They're all staring at their phones and perusing TikTok, Twitter or Instagram.the vast majority of people aren't terminally online
That doesn't mean they're seeing what you're seeing. Most of my friends use TikTok and never see anything like I do because they only browse normie content and "safe" memes (not sure TikTok even allows any other kind).Everyone I know is more terminally online than I am, and I post here. They're all staring at their phones and perusing TikTok, Twitter or Instagram.
Speaking of wikipedia historical revisionist Jewstorians... anyone seen Thomas lately?It’s pretty obvious it did dogshit, because no victory laps. In fact, they’re entirely silent. All those defenders, all those amateur historians, all those people who claimed Japan loved it and had no problems at all, all those totally real AC fans who were gonna buy it day 1.
The problem is that doesn't explain the shit performance of Star Wars Outlaws. I think you're vastly underestimating how much of the video game buying public reads things online. There's a reason Nintendo ditched e3 before covid, and then the already dead corpse of e3 limped along after once every other major publisher realized that they don't need it anymore. The average idiot who still preorders at gamestop doesn't follow everything, but they hear about this shit and see the videos on youtube, tiktok, etc. Yes star wars has had problems as a franchise, but it's not that dead(yet).And again, the vast majority of people aren't terminally online to the point that they pick up on this stuff unless they're already following gaming related topics so the algorithm puts it their way.
None of the PR will have improved sales, but I still choose to believe broader cultural fatigue in regards to all goyslop is the main thing causing these generic checklist simulators to fail. Even if you removed the DEI stuff people just don't want this shit any more.