Culture UK Government pledges to crackdown on wet-wipes - They're called "Baby-wipes" mate.

https://globalnews.ca/news/4194273/britain-wet-wipes-ban-plastic-waste/

After focusing on disposable straws in its crusade against plastic waste, the British government has turned its attention toward wet wipes.

The government now says that wet wipes — used for multiple purposes such as cleaning babies, removing makeup and wiping hands — are another single-use product that is causing too much waste.

That means manufacturers will either have to stop selling the products, or figure out how to make them biodegradable.

The Department of Economics, Food & Rural Affairs (DEFRA) said Monday the move could occur in the next 25 years as part of Prime Minister Theresa May’s bid to end the use of all “avoidable plastic waste” by 2042.

The ban would also include other products such as cotton swabs that are often flushed down the toilet and end up in water systems.

May has encouraged other Commonwealth countries to join in on the movement.

“Plastic waste is one of the greatest environmental challenges facing the world, which is why protecting the marine environment is central to our agenda at the Commonwealth heads of government meeting,” May said in a statement ahead of a Commonwealth summit in April.

But at the time Prime Minister Justin Trudeau skirted questions over whether Canada would join in.

Days later on Earth Day, Environment Minister Catherine McKenna launched Canada’s Dialogue on Plastic Waste.

The dialogue is meant to gather Canadians’ views on how the country can curb plastic waste.

“I look forward to working with our partners here at home and our G7 counterparts and others abroad to make sure plastics are reused and recycled smartly in a way that benefits both our economy and our environment,” McKenna said in an April 22 statement.

Research by Water UK, which oversees water and sewage companies in the country, found that wipes made up 93 per cent of waste causing sewer blockages in the country.

The blockages are dubbed “fatbergs,” and also consist of components such as oil or grease, feminine hygiene products and plastic wrappers.

The December 2017 report flagged that wet wipes are often flushed down toilets, despite being marked “do not flush.”

Several Canadian organizations have also expressed similar concerns. Among them is Water Canada, which said in an April 2017 statement that even products labelled “flushable” may not completely break down.

The organization has called for an international standard for products classified as flushable.

Parents aren’t happy about possible ban
While the possible ban on wet wipes aims to benefit the environment, British parents blasted the move online as unintentionally making their lives difficult.

One parent said he’s never flushed a wet wipe down the toilet, while another said they should be considered an “essential item” for new parents.


Can't say I disagree with the governments policy. Those fatbergs are probably expensive to destroy.

In all likelihood, it'll mainly be upper middle class liberals that have to "suffer" without a luxury for the greater good for once. Hopefully the government doesn't regulate diets based on the health of the sewer system...
 
Parents aren’t happy about possible ban
While the possible ban on wet wipes aims to benefit the environment, British parents blasted the move online as unintentionally making their lives difficult.

Have they started moving against disposable diapers yet? My eyes cross at the thought of those going away.
 
I bet it's those pahjeets flushing wet wipes down the toilet since the toilet looks like some kind of miracle disposal.
 
They can build an entirely new rail network under London but they can't update their century old sewer system, London is both figuratively and literally a cess pool.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Derp Potato
Anybody that uses them in the first place probably has problems.

I consider them soylent-tier products. People keep trying to rename from baby wipes to be more manly.





But it's so easy...

This is the most awful antisocial shit I have ever seen on YouTube.

If you do this, not today, not tomorrow, but within a year or two, your whole fucking neighborhood is going to have sewage backing up into their homes. Because people are stupid and don't think about disasters like sewage backups, lots of them will have family photos and other sentimental value items stored at basement or crawlspace level. Lots will have pets that explore the backup before a human sees it. People will get sick, so will animals.

The neighborhood will smell, and almost no insurance covers water damage, which sewer backups are, so everyone will have the choice of trying to rip up shit-saturated carpets themselves and probably dealing with persistent odor issues or hiring crime scene cleaners at great expense to clean up the shit in a way that retains your home's value.

Flushing grease makes you an antisocial monster. Only a thirteen year old or an exceptional individual would think otherwise.
 
You're not wrong in principle, but I'm pretty sure saying "wet wipes begone!" is a lot, lot cheaper than trying to improve the infrastructure. Upgrading just the UK's sewage treatment systems to handle modern waste would easily cost countless of billions.
Of course you don't have to upgrade everything, but even the simplest things could make a difference, and our hindered by more regulation.

Sounds about right. Environmentalism is the ultimate "Limosine Liberal" concern, even if immigration and refugees has temporarily eclipsed it. It benefits certain major corporations at the expense of the lower classes who now have to pay more for products.
The irony is Third World immigrants have bigger carbon footprints, albeit not as much as the hypocritical celebrity environmental spergs.

But perhaps the stupidest part, environmentalism would have solved itself if they hadn't gone all exceptional and embraced anti-nuclear policies. Nuclear energy is the cheapest and greenest form of energy available, and "renewable energy" can't even compete. Only three nuclear power plants suffered any real issues, with one of those (Chernobyl) being because of utter idiots in charge and one of those (Fukushima) being because of a nearly unprecedented disaster. Compare that to all the coal ash spills globally, and the people who die of "Chinese smog" and shit. Environmentalists repeatedly shoot themselves in the foot.
Yeah, and after Three Mile Island, the Carter administration pushed for solar energy and failed miserably. The only real problem with nuclear energy is what to do with all the radioactive waste.

It's too bad that people are focused on solving problems the simplest and most boneheaded way as possible. I bet with today's tech you could build a sewer system capable of handling wet wipes, tampons, and whatever other (than) shit is flushed down there. But no one does, even though many sewer systems are a century old.
Out of sight, out of mind. It's the same with waste management, whereas dumping trash into a landfill is easier than waste-to-energy. With all the sperging over sea level rise and need to upgrade and install more storm sewers, you'd think sanitary sewers would be addressed.
 

Infrastructure for an ever increasing population just isn't sexy and as cool to build/upgrade as opposed to a new office park or condos.

Sure, people harp on trying to ban cars/BBQs/etc, but everything else that literally everyone uses on a daily basis? Nah. Fuck that. Too much money, amirite?
 
Infrastructure for an ever increasing population just isn't sexy and as cool to build/upgrade as opposed to a new office park or condos.
IDK, the Hoover Dam was big shit when it was built. Civil engineering used to be an art, but now it's all about value engineering and corrupt politicians can pocketing the difference anyway. Why do you think it costs so many millions and takes so long to build a simple bridge which collapses?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Marvin
Back