Culture unfuckable hate nerds - yes, young men are losers. they deserve sympathy, not contempt.

Status
Not open for further replies.
(article) (archive)

Unfuckable Hate Nerds​

Yes, young men are losers. They deserve sympathy, not contempt.​

BY WILLIAM DERESIEWICZ
JUNE 28, 2023

“The army of unfuckable hate nerds”—Marc Maron’s term for the mass of young men who pollute the internet with their misogyny. “They play video games all day,” the comedian said on his podcast, “then they watch MMA, then they spend the evening jerking off to … porn, then they put a few hours” into attacking women online.

He’s right, of course. There are hordes of these young men (and, no doubt, of not-so-young ones). They congregate on Twitter, in comment threads, on forums and platforms like Reddit, Discord, Kiwi Farms, and 8kun, the successor to 8chan. They trade in misogyny, racism, antisemitism, and assorted other hatreds. Their words are violent and vile.

But Maron is also wrong. I mean in his response, which is that of so many: to answer hate with hate, contempt with contempt. As opposed to what? As opposed to understanding, just like we extend, at least on the left (and I am on the left), to another set of violent young men, the ones who live in inner cities. Yes, I am calling for sympathy for my brothers in the army of unfuckable hate nerds.

My brothers: I was a young man once. And since there’s now an ever-growing genre of commentary in which feminists speak, with placid condescension, like so many anthropologists (if not entomologists), on the topic of men, especially young men, I thought it might be useful to hear from someone who actually knows what it’s like to be one.

Here’s what it’s like: It sucks. Male privilege? Absolutely, in many contexts, but there are important ways in which young men are clearly underprivileged.

Women are sex objects, goes the cliché, and men are success objects. But success requires many years to achieve, if you ever achieve it at all. Young men, in that respect, are much like older women: Society has little use for them, barely deigns to notice them. I’m not talking about the advertising industry, or the entertainment industry; I’m talking about the day-to-day experience of living in the world. Young women often have a lot of social power, whereas, except for the fortunate few—the born rich, the strikingly handsome, the 6-foot-3—young men have none. Socially speaking, young men are shit, and nobody gives a shit.

Any young woman who is even moderately attractive will be courted, complimented, paid attention to, by women as well as men. Older men will buy them things. People will hang on their words even when they aren’t interesting and laugh at their jokes even when they aren’t funny. They will have entry into places—private clubs, backstage after a show—young men can only press their noses against. They will be able to advance professionally by batting their eyelashes at powerful men. Young men, meanwhile—those losers, those loners, those apes—are left to pick their psychic zits on the periphery.

There’s more. Young women can have sex whenever they want. For most young men, persuading a woman to sleep with them is like trying to crack a safe. You understand that it’s theoretically possible, but you have no idea how to do it. Which means that you’re stuck with your hard-on. Unfuckable? No one needs to tell you that. You are unfucked: unwanted, unattractive; in the most literal sense, unloved.

The mental climate of the typical young man is three parts unrelenting horniness to one part self-disgust. Young women are not the only ones who are taught to hate their bodies. So, if less intensely, are young men. Why else would they lift all those weights? What you are really working out, when you go to the gym, is your dysmorphia. Aella, the OnlyFans star and online commentator, has said that what men look for when they come to her—and her clientele is mostly young—isn’t sex per se but “sexual acceptance.” They want to be assured, in other words, that they aren’t hideous. The fact they have to pay for this says everything you need to know.

Do I sound bitter? I’m channeling my younger self. It’s all worked out for me, I have no complaints, but I am intensely aware that it could have gone a different way. Turn this dial a click to the left, turn that one a click to the right—a little less privilege, a little more emotional instability—and I could have turned into a hate nerd myself. I suspect that a lot of men sense that. What does it feel like to be a young man? It feels like you are Kafka’s cockroach, Dostoevsky’s Underground Man. It feels like you were drawn by Harvey Pekar or R. Crumb. You are an Untermensch, a particle, a stew of envies and resentments, a festering sore. You look, from below, at the happy and lovely and rich. You creep, alone, along a wall. You masturbate as if your life depended on it.

Yes, I made it out. I found success; I reached the fabled land of love. But many men do not; many recognize, and recognize quite early, that they never will. And I was young in the ’80s and ’90s. We know what’s happened since. Blue-collar wages have slumped. Men have lost the education race. Add to that the dating apps, which gamify sex and love and quantify desirability and value. Like everything else on the web, the distribution follows a power law curve, with a small fraction of alphas soaking up the lion’s share of female attention. Add further the misandry that has now become de rigueur wherever the liberal elite holds sway: the ritual (and often gleeful) man-hating, the pathologization of masculinity.

We also know how young men are responding. Some are opting out of manhood by becoming trans or nonbinary. Some are going the other way, reaching for an ersatz hypermasculinity and joining the army of unfuckable hate nerds. Their behavior is disgusting, it is inexcusable, but what do we think is going to make them stop? Telling them to comb their hair, to put down the Xbox, to get a life? Reminding them that they’re unlovable and worthless? They know that already; that is precisely the problem. Hate breeds hate. Revenge is not justice. The hate nerds are human, no less than you and me. We need to treat them like it.
 
Last edited:
I'm not going that deep into it with the freewill and whatnot. Plenty of women will outright demand men pay for dates and gift them expensive things. How is an older man doing precisely that predatory if an age appropriate man doing it is not?

You know if the situation was reversed and some older actress was able to bag Womens favorite 20 yr old actor heartthrob the girls would be sitting in the TMZ comments section with "You go girl!" "Queen Slay!" "GOALS"
 
1. Older men can use purchases as manipulative leverage that older women are more likely to see through than younger women.

2. This is not true and never will be true. In any circumstance, the man has a strength
advantage over the woman, and all he needs is privacy or enablers to act on that.

3. They don't, and I don't; by that I meant that the women that are remaining in the dating game aren't stopping using apps in favour of any popular alternative, because there is no popular alternative. Women are withdrawing from dating apps, but they're not dating in any other kind of way, because there are no safe options. I agree with you about apps not being safe.

4. They're only in the 'dating' phase in that they're not partnered. They're not actually attempting to date at all, they're just technically 'open to dating' because they would if the right guy landed in their lap. I'm in a regional group for [stereotypically female activity] in which everyone is under 40/45ish - two women have husbands, less than ten have boyfriends, three or four are lesbians, and everyone else just isn't looking, out of a group of seventy-five women. None of these women are dating or even thinking about it, but technically, they're still in their 'dating phase'.

5. Using the women from the previous example, pretty much all of them seem to be doing their best to create worthwhile lives full of things they enjoy doing, which includes fulfilling work as much as that's possible, so that they still enjoy life even if it doesn't involve a partner. That men have decided they don't want to do any of that just because they can't date is reflective of their priorities, not the obvious decision to make. If you don't value your everyday life why should anyone want to share it with you?

&

1. If they're an older man then they must be older than the woman in comparison; therefore the woman isn't age-appropriate, but younger. This is how words work. 'Inappropriate' = unwanted or socially frowned upon, such as using material goods to bribe women into sexual favours, or engaging with someone who is much younger and therefore has less life experience than you. You know what these things mean, you're just pretending you don't.

2. The woman is responsible for accepting an unequal transaction, assuming she is not forced into by external circumstances. The man is responsible for offering. Offering a transaction that you know is unequal and predicated on the taker being at a disadvantage to you is not morally neutral.

3. I am not presenting it as the sole reason for anything, but I am acknowledging that it gets the most focus out of possible reasons, in this article and most others.The article is almost exclusively complaining about lack of relationships. The thread exists to discuss what is presented in the article. Have you read the article at all before commenting any of this?
 
Article makes me legitimately MATI not just because of how incredibly condescending it is but also because the author seems to put themselves right up there with Jesus himself.

"These poor unfuckable troglodytes as so awful. This other lefty retard thinks we should ridicule them because of how much they hate women but he's wrong! No, not about how just repulsive these people are lol what are you stupid? We need to reach down to them from on-high and offer them salvation.... somehow. Maybe we can turn them into simps for some tankie thots so their words aren't so vile. But the point is just look at what a good person I am because I'm so compassionate."

Bring on the hats.
 
This is not true and never will be true. In any circumstance, the man has a strength
advantage over the woman, and all he needs is privacy or enablers to act on that.
Then there's no point in arguing with you. You are being disingenuous and have obvious double standards. This entire conversation will only go in circles as you constantly misdirect and make arguments in bad faith.
 
I didn't think male feminists were a thing anymore. I thought they all jumped ship to trannies which are diametrically opposed to feminism in le current year.
There are a couple still hanging around that think relentless mi' ladying is the cheat code to pussy.

No I don't get it either. You'd think the fact that this has literally never worked in human history would cause these guys to reevaluate their strategy.
 
Still, I can still see that a 50 year old dude paying the rent for his 20 year old girlfriend/secretary is a little exploitative. She should be more responsible to not end up in that situation, but I can still see him being a skeevy piece of shit. I don't think those two perspectives are inconsistent.
I don't think it's exploitative at all. 20 year old women are not mindless children, they simply are not attracted to the same things men are. Looks are a nice to have for women, but primarily they want to feel safe and provided for. For some women that's a man who will literally provide for them. For others it's a man who enables or enhances her own career. That can be simply by being supportive and not adding complications, or it can mean literally career help.

For men, they care about 1) a (preferably) early-mid 20's aged , preferably attractive woman who 2) would be a good mother of children. They don't have to actually provide children, but the traits are the same. Patience, curiosity, calm demeanor, nurturing, etc. Far down on that list is ability to make us feel safe or provided for. Our dating/relationship priorities are different. Unfortunately, that tends to pair women with older men who have a better ability to provide for and protect. Even independent or career women desire a man "on their level" i.e. ability to provide. When the competition is between:

1) a sad, passive, immature 20 year old who still lives with his parents/roommates and delivers for uber eats
2) an established 50 year old man with a house, a nice car/truck and some money saved

that 50 year old sounds a lot less creepy. Also a lot of those relationships are made with the understanding that the older man enjoys the rest of his few years left, and then the wife is left in her early 30's with a large inheritance and no husband. Also, no stigma of "whoring around" because widows have always been allowed to move on as far back as I can remember. That's a business decision.

4. They're only in the 'dating' phase in that they're not partnered. They're not actually attempting to date at all, they're just technically 'open to dating' because they would if the right guy landed in their lap. I'm in a regional group for [stereotypically female activity] in which everyone is under 40/45ish - two women have husbands, less than ten have boyfriends, three or four are lesbians, and everyone else just isn't looking, out of a group of seventy-five women. None of these women are dating or even thinking about it, but technically, they're still in their 'dating phase'.
So those women have unrealistic expectations for their age. Or their behavior makes them undateable. Like you said, they would if they could.
5. Using the women from the previous example, pretty much all of them seem to be doing their best to create worthwhile lives full of things they enjoy doing, which includes fulfilling work as much as that's possible, so that they still enjoy life even if it doesn't involve a partner. That men have decided they don't want to do any of that just because they can't date is reflective of their priorities, not the obvious decision to make. If you don't value your everyday life why should anyone want to share it with you?
This is a complete misunderstanding of men and why they are checking out.

1) They are discriminated against heavily in education. Nearly 70% of college students are women and it is because of affirmative action specifically choosing women over men.
2) They are discriminated against in the workplace. Despite being the majority of the population, women are considered "minorities" and receive hiring preferences in nearly every field of employment.
3) They are discriminated against in divorce and paternity. Despite debtor's prisons being illegal in the US, a man can be sentenced to prison indefinitely for failure to pay child support. The burden of child support does not disappear with the loss of a job or income either.
4) They are 75% of all suicides
5) they are 75% of all homeless
6) there are fewer than 100 shelters in the entire US that accept male domestic violence victims.
7) mens-only spaces have been under attack for the last 50 years, to the point they no longer exist. Womens-only spaces are being encoded into law.
8) they are 97% of all workplace deaths, but increasingly they watch inflation destroy their disposable income.

They look at a future where they have no fair prospect of work, education, romance or hope of owning anything. Their outlets for frustration have all been invaded by feminist politics. Sports, games, movies, comics, card games, even dungeons & dragons. Guns, motor vehicles, all are under attack. They are constantly sent the message that being a man and all the things that come with it are toxic, violent, mentally ill and sexist.

Romance was simply the last thing left that most men held onto for trying in this world and that seems increasingly unreachable for many of them. It's the last straw, just the first one you noticed.
 
Last edited:
it's funny how there's a shortage in everything and their response to a group of people with nothing to do or live for is further antagonizing from society
Women are used to being able to bully men into doing anything, including throwing themselves into the meat grinder of WW1. They don't understand that the tactic isn't going to work this time.
 
Women are used to being able to bully men into doing anything, including throwing themselves into the meat grinder of WW1. They don't understand that the tactic isn't going to work this time.
Did that even work last time? Men were being drafted by the scores. I remember one soldier on leave slapping the bitch who had the gall to present it to him.
 
Telling them to comb their hair, to put down the Xbox, to get a life? Reminding them that they’re unlovable and worthless? They know that already; that is precisely the problem
Lol just start competing in the rat race where you need to sell your morals for a slightly better edge that will be immediately taxed by the government and every social interaction will be used against them because they are on the bottom of the political totem pole.

It's the same reason why people don't join the army, the system is broken so fuck it and fuck the grifters who promote it.
 
Do older men generally go after age-appropriate adult women or do studies consistently show that men of any age tend to fixate on women who are around 21-22? Pretty much any women can tell you that the younger you are the more inappropriate attention you get, and the worst time of your life for inappropriate attention from older men is your early teens. If older men buying 30-something women gifts were that common, men wouldn't be so gleefully memetic about 'the wall'.

Young women ideally wouldn't accept unequal transactions like that, but if young men can get demoralised by the state of society then young women can too. And this whole article is asking for sympathy for those demoralised young men.

Women aren't withdrawing from society, they're withdrawing from dating. Almost the entire article is about dating and relationships. Almost all of these complaints always come down to dating and relationships. If men choose to withdraw from the workplace because they can't get a date, that is an issue of priorities that men need to acknowledge and take responsibility for.
To think, all those words for the CNN-tier opinion of "men need to just do better okay". Truly the fabled empathy of women knows no bounds.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back