Culture unfuckable hate nerds - yes, young men are losers. they deserve sympathy, not contempt.

Status
Not open for further replies.
(article) (archive)

Unfuckable Hate Nerds​

Yes, young men are losers. They deserve sympathy, not contempt.​

BY WILLIAM DERESIEWICZ
JUNE 28, 2023

“The army of unfuckable hate nerds”—Marc Maron’s term for the mass of young men who pollute the internet with their misogyny. “They play video games all day,” the comedian said on his podcast, “then they watch MMA, then they spend the evening jerking off to … porn, then they put a few hours” into attacking women online.

He’s right, of course. There are hordes of these young men (and, no doubt, of not-so-young ones). They congregate on Twitter, in comment threads, on forums and platforms like Reddit, Discord, Kiwi Farms, and 8kun, the successor to 8chan. They trade in misogyny, racism, antisemitism, and assorted other hatreds. Their words are violent and vile.

But Maron is also wrong. I mean in his response, which is that of so many: to answer hate with hate, contempt with contempt. As opposed to what? As opposed to understanding, just like we extend, at least on the left (and I am on the left), to another set of violent young men, the ones who live in inner cities. Yes, I am calling for sympathy for my brothers in the army of unfuckable hate nerds.

My brothers: I was a young man once. And since there’s now an ever-growing genre of commentary in which feminists speak, with placid condescension, like so many anthropologists (if not entomologists), on the topic of men, especially young men, I thought it might be useful to hear from someone who actually knows what it’s like to be one.

Here’s what it’s like: It sucks. Male privilege? Absolutely, in many contexts, but there are important ways in which young men are clearly underprivileged.

Women are sex objects, goes the cliché, and men are success objects. But success requires many years to achieve, if you ever achieve it at all. Young men, in that respect, are much like older women: Society has little use for them, barely deigns to notice them. I’m not talking about the advertising industry, or the entertainment industry; I’m talking about the day-to-day experience of living in the world. Young women often have a lot of social power, whereas, except for the fortunate few—the born rich, the strikingly handsome, the 6-foot-3—young men have none. Socially speaking, young men are shit, and nobody gives a shit.

Any young woman who is even moderately attractive will be courted, complimented, paid attention to, by women as well as men. Older men will buy them things. People will hang on their words even when they aren’t interesting and laugh at their jokes even when they aren’t funny. They will have entry into places—private clubs, backstage after a show—young men can only press their noses against. They will be able to advance professionally by batting their eyelashes at powerful men. Young men, meanwhile—those losers, those loners, those apes—are left to pick their psychic zits on the periphery.

There’s more. Young women can have sex whenever they want. For most young men, persuading a woman to sleep with them is like trying to crack a safe. You understand that it’s theoretically possible, but you have no idea how to do it. Which means that you’re stuck with your hard-on. Unfuckable? No one needs to tell you that. You are unfucked: unwanted, unattractive; in the most literal sense, unloved.

The mental climate of the typical young man is three parts unrelenting horniness to one part self-disgust. Young women are not the only ones who are taught to hate their bodies. So, if less intensely, are young men. Why else would they lift all those weights? What you are really working out, when you go to the gym, is your dysmorphia. Aella, the OnlyFans star and online commentator, has said that what men look for when they come to her—and her clientele is mostly young—isn’t sex per se but “sexual acceptance.” They want to be assured, in other words, that they aren’t hideous. The fact they have to pay for this says everything you need to know.

Do I sound bitter? I’m channeling my younger self. It’s all worked out for me, I have no complaints, but I am intensely aware that it could have gone a different way. Turn this dial a click to the left, turn that one a click to the right—a little less privilege, a little more emotional instability—and I could have turned into a hate nerd myself. I suspect that a lot of men sense that. What does it feel like to be a young man? It feels like you are Kafka’s cockroach, Dostoevsky’s Underground Man. It feels like you were drawn by Harvey Pekar or R. Crumb. You are an Untermensch, a particle, a stew of envies and resentments, a festering sore. You look, from below, at the happy and lovely and rich. You creep, alone, along a wall. You masturbate as if your life depended on it.

Yes, I made it out. I found success; I reached the fabled land of love. But many men do not; many recognize, and recognize quite early, that they never will. And I was young in the ’80s and ’90s. We know what’s happened since. Blue-collar wages have slumped. Men have lost the education race. Add to that the dating apps, which gamify sex and love and quantify desirability and value. Like everything else on the web, the distribution follows a power law curve, with a small fraction of alphas soaking up the lion’s share of female attention. Add further the misandry that has now become de rigueur wherever the liberal elite holds sway: the ritual (and often gleeful) man-hating, the pathologization of masculinity.

We also know how young men are responding. Some are opting out of manhood by becoming trans or nonbinary. Some are going the other way, reaching for an ersatz hypermasculinity and joining the army of unfuckable hate nerds. Their behavior is disgusting, it is inexcusable, but what do we think is going to make them stop? Telling them to comb their hair, to put down the Xbox, to get a life? Reminding them that they’re unlovable and worthless? They know that already; that is precisely the problem. Hate breeds hate. Revenge is not justice. The hate nerds are human, no less than you and me. We need to treat them like it.
 
Last edited:
Lol. Maybe. I was fairly Ok. Nothing exceptional, and remember this is the norf in the late eighties. There was no American dating culture. My point is that in my generation it wasnt done to do that and simps we’re not a thing. Actively hassling a girl would have got you beaten by their male family where I grew up. What girls have to deal with now with demands for nudes and stuff is alien to me
Maybe I am an ugly fucker and I am certainly a bit odd in some ways.

Look: maybe IRL you look like the back end of a bus or have six eyes and horns and repel women with fire but we’ve been on threads for a little while now together and you seem perfectly ok to me.
Don’t give up. I met Mr. O far too late in life but if a gremlin like me can do it you can too.
I swear what we need is some kind of kiwi dating agency. People who aren’t looking for tinder hook ups have nowhere to actually meet each other.
noooo this is so dysgenic
 
They're not items on a checklist to achieve I think is the point being made. Grouping "wife and kids" with "house" is kind of a reveal of mindset. They are not things to obtain, and people can sense when you view them that way.
I grouped them that way because I would like to have a family someday. Now to me it just makes sense to include a house with a family. Since I'd like to live somewhere we own where we can safely raise our kids. I didn't intend it to sound like a a checklist or achievement.
Don’t give up. I met Mr. O far too late in life but if a gremlin like me can do it you can too.
That does give me a little hope.
 
Even the richest/best looking men have much lower success rates than the best looking women.

Even the chads are having trouble now.

Fzt8oHuX0AEDnqD.jpg
 
They're not items on a checklist to achieve I think is the point being made. Grouping "wife and kids" with "house" is kind of a reveal of mindset. They are not things to obtain, and people can sense when you view them that way.

I grouped them that way because I would like to have a family someday. Now to me it just makes sense to include a house with a family. Since I'd like to live somewhere we own where we can safely raise our kids. I didn't intend it to sound like a a checklist or achievement.
These items kind of are things people want though. Not as checklist possessions but as items to facilitate the life they want. What’s wrong with aiming for that? The house is FOR the wife and kids.
I wanted a house because I hated living in flats, I wanted a garden, I wanted my own space, I wanted room for kids to grow up in. I wanted a family. To love and be loved by. Space to live and people to love is not checklist possession stuff. The husband and kids and house is the life I wanted. It’s not like having a midlife crisis and a Lambo. When people say they want a wife and a house they’re saying they want a stable life with people around them they love and space to call their own.
 
Look: maybe IRL you look like the back end of a bus or have six eyes and horns and repel women with fire but we’ve been on threads for a little while now together and you seem perfectly ok to me.
plenty of people in life are in the "perfectly ok" category but the erosion of any public place where these people can meet in person regularly and the memetic virus of social media have ruined the ability for these people to meet up and get together. even if they could meet up now, almost everyone has an inflated ego and has trouble figuring out (or accepting) that the 5/10 person across from you is the best you're going to get because you are also a 5/10

the idea that "you're a regular nobody who will probably do nothing of note in your life, but that's okay if you surround yourself with people who love you" seems to be offensive to most people
 
Literally everyone of every race gender or ideology has been told they are not responsible for what happens to them, it's some demonic group that did it all to them. Everyone needs to take responsibility. Men shouldn't be piss bottle guys who never bathe and then scream that women aren't attracted to filthy shitgoblins, women shouldn't pick the worst men imaginable their entire lives and then pretend those were the only ones available and all men are shit, etc.
I fully agree, merely that certain groups are held higher to that standard than others, and simps/m'lady men make it harder in that regard. Which I can feel especially for less experienced men with less charisma. Some guys are still operating on 1960's dating advice which royally screws them over. However, the "b-b-but men rhetoric" has done women no favors in front of men who watch men being destroyed all around them family courts or what not. Getting sex, or even a date isn't the issue, and when the most submissive and likable/tolerable women in western countries I've ran into have been those with a few extra chromosomes that's an issue in the making.

I do think some incels or men who have no experience don't even try and make their basis on claims they hear instead of experience though, so I won't deny there is some responsibility on the men as well, and many men seeing younger men don't even try to mentor or give them advice which is another problem.
Lol. Maybe. I was fairly Ok. Nothing exceptional, and remember this is the norf in the late eighties. There was no American dating culture. My point is that in my generation it wasnt done to do that and simps we’re not a thing. Actively hassling a girl would have got you beaten by their male family where I grew up. What girls have to deal with now with demands for nudes and stuff is alien to me
Maybe I am an ugly fucker and I am certainly a bit odd in some ways.
Simps were a thing it was just weirder then so it wasn't so pronounced. It's what's led to a majority of weak men these days when the strong men died in wars.

The nudes thing isn't always guaranteed dating dynamic, sometimes men test women to see if they're sluts/whores, or to test for general interest. Some men do it to black mail and some men just like the view or like to have sexcapades with a girl they're with so both can have whimsical or even romantic bonding even if it just seems like sex pest behavior, some guys are also just coomers who function on it 24/7 sadly with little self control.

It's merely the cultural shift that has changed how dating, relationships, and attempts to court has become.
 
These items kind of are things people want though. Not as checklist possessions but as items to facilitate the life they want. What’s wrong with aiming for that? The house is FOR the wife and kids.
I wanted a house because I hated living in flats, I wanted a garden, I wanted my own space, I wanted room for kids to grow up in. I wanted a family. To love and be loved by. Space to live and people to love is not checklist possession stuff. The husband and kids and house is the life I wanted. It’s not like having a midlife crisis and a Lambo. When people say they want a wife and a house they’re saying they want a stable life with people around them they love and space to call their own.

you know what's wrong with it, you're just momentarily blinded by your feminine maternal nature. it happens to me too.

these guys are not fixable.
 
Tell me this is satire… thank goodness they do t have kids. Is there any way of even divorcing some parasite like this without losing half your worth? This just makes me angry.

of course it's fake, nobody like that posts to FDS. how would someone married to a plastic surgeon even find FDS?

edit: lol I missed she's a mod. COME ON who believes this. A femcel janny is also married to a gigachad. yes that is believable.
 
These items kind of are things people want though. Not as checklist possessions but as items to facilitate the life they want. What’s wrong with aiming for that? The house is FOR the wife and kids.
I wanted a house because I hated living in flats, I wanted a garden, I wanted my own space, I wanted room for kids to grow up in. I wanted a family. To love and be loved by. Space to live and people to love is not checklist possession stuff. The husband and kids and house is the life I wanted. It’s not like having a midlife crisis and a Lambo. When people say they want a wife and a house they’re saying they want a stable life with people around them they love and space to call their own.
The closest I can do to explain is to relate it to my profession. I am a software engineer, and there are people who want the prestige and title of being a software engineer. Those people don't make it because they're not willing to do what it takes to become one. Then there are the people who want to know how to write code. They enjoy the challenge of learning and solving problems. They enjoy the process of becoming a software engineer, and the end result is the prestige and the title.

The men who are failing don't want a wife because they want to share their life with someone. They want a wife because successful men have women and losers don't. They don't want the career because they enjoy the work, they don't want to do the work at all.
 
Looks like this thread has been derailed from the actual issue. Can't say I'm surprised. No one wants to hear about how this is going to go down or consider it. Really is just all swirling down a drain. All anyone can do is point fingers, speculate, and make excuses for why it's happening at all.
 
Do older men generally go after age-appropriate adult women or do studies consistently show that men of any age tend to fixate on women who are around 21-22? Pretty much any women can tell you that the younger you are the more inappropriate attention you get, and the worst time of your life for inappropriate attention from older men is your early teens. If older men buying 30-something women gifts were that common, men wouldn't be so gleefully memetic about 'the wall'.

Young women ideally wouldn't accept unequal transactions like that, but if young men can get demoralised by the state of society then young women can too. And this whole article is asking for sympathy for those demoralised young men.

Women aren't withdrawing from society, they're withdrawing from dating. Almost the entire article is about dating and relationships. Almost all of these complaints always come down to dating and relationships. If men choose to withdraw from the workplace because they can't get a date, that is an issue of priorities that men need to acknowledge and take responsibility for.
Not clear how old you are, but be assured that in real life women over 30 get "gifts.". What's the big deal? It's normal courting. It's nice. Or it is for most people.

What's all fucked up is applying a reductive transactional overlay to what should be a nice gesture, and to dating/mating in general. This happens on both sides (men and women) and to such a degree sometimes that all goodness is stripped right out.

Some men think women are for sale - and that's either opportunistically good or bad in their view, depending on their own situation, but obviously devalues and does not respect women as whole people. On the other side, many women act or speak in a way that says this is, in fact, what they expect from men, and that men who don't meet their price point have no chance, which is also dehumanizing.

Reducing people to pocketbooks and/or purely fucking/breeding material is a very stupid view and it's causing a lot of folks a lot of self-imposed negativity.
female bullying is social and extremely ruthless and cruel
Sir, do you know where you are? :tomgirl:

Here's the TLP piece on Maron. The reason most foreveralones have the issues they do is that they are engaged in the dynamic described herein with their desired sex objects. The reason TLP stopped writing is the advice he says you can only use in your 40s is something he gave up when he realized people were fucking up so bad in their 20s they weren't even gonna fail in their 40s well enough to recover.

I had a very similar thought a couple pages ago in this thread: if people might spend more time growing themselves into good, solid, contributing people who aim for decent internal quality (quality of mind, quality of endeavor), etc., rather than diagnosing everyone and everything else, they will have a higher baseline level of contentment and sense of worth. If stronger internally, they are less bothered by falling "short" of some ideal than if they define themselves as a series of do/don't haves (and spin into what this linked piece calls "a self-hating, self-defeating loop of narcissistic resentment"). The fixation on identifying an external and/or systemic cause to justify getting sour and resentful* (which - coincidentally I'm sure - also happens to give mental justification for not changing perspective), rather than aiming to live as both solid and agile is a downward spiral. And very much narcissistic in the self-oriented, self-centering (as opposed to clinical) sense.

*with the only apparent alternative being that they are horrible, defective, unloved and unloveable beings (or the belief that others think they are) - which is not true except by choice.
edit: lol I missed she's a mod. COME ON who believes this. A femcel janny is also married to a gigachad. yes that is believable.
FDS was, iirc, started by a person on Lipstick Alley, which at least at the time had a certain hypergamous/transactional element. Idk about this mod or the current mode of FDS, but it wasn't purely "femcel" at inception.

Do I necessarily believe this is literally a real scenario? Nope, but it could be, or could be "approximately" real.
 
It’s going to end in massive social unrest. Or a war, to get rid of all the inconvenient excess young men.

a mass of young men sitting at home with no ability to organize or even get to each other without driving, which they increasingly don't know how to do, is a threat to society how?

now the ones in China are a threat, because they can be mobilized by a state and thrown at me. the ones in the west? the worst thing that happens is they catch a mind virus and do a terrorism. that's bad but it's not going to break the world.

@Friend of Dorothy Parker that's a woman called ogjammies. she's all over reddit as well as LSA. she is not married to anybody giving her any 10k allowance and she doesn't know anybody like that either. you guys, seriously, go outside.
 
I had a very similar thought a couple pages ago in this thread: if people might spend more time growing themselves into good, solid, contributing people who aim for decent internal quality (quality of mind, quality of endeavor), etc., rather than diagnosing everyone and everything else, they will have a higher baseline level of contentment and sense of worth. If stronger internally, they are less bothered by falling "short" of some ideal than if they define themselves as a series of do/don't haves (and spin into what this linked piece calls "a self-hating, self-defeating loop of narcissistic resentment"). The fixation on identifying an external and/or systemic cause to justify getting sour and resentful* (which - coincidentally I'm sure - also happens to give mental justification for not changing perspective), rather than aiming to live as both solid and agile is a downward spiral. And very much narcissistic in the self-oriented, self-centering (as opposed to clinical) sense.
this is effectively asking a large portion of the population to become monks
None of us are naturally like this or can maintain this mindset long enough because human beings are naturally hierarchical. Society itself exists because of our desire to be better and equal to each other. It sounds good on paper but is ultimately a pipe dream.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back