Culture unfuckable hate nerds - yes, young men are losers. they deserve sympathy, not contempt.

Status
Not open for further replies.
(article) (archive)

Unfuckable Hate Nerds​

Yes, young men are losers. They deserve sympathy, not contempt.​

BY WILLIAM DERESIEWICZ
JUNE 28, 2023

“The army of unfuckable hate nerds”—Marc Maron’s term for the mass of young men who pollute the internet with their misogyny. “They play video games all day,” the comedian said on his podcast, “then they watch MMA, then they spend the evening jerking off to … porn, then they put a few hours” into attacking women online.

He’s right, of course. There are hordes of these young men (and, no doubt, of not-so-young ones). They congregate on Twitter, in comment threads, on forums and platforms like Reddit, Discord, Kiwi Farms, and 8kun, the successor to 8chan. They trade in misogyny, racism, antisemitism, and assorted other hatreds. Their words are violent and vile.

But Maron is also wrong. I mean in his response, which is that of so many: to answer hate with hate, contempt with contempt. As opposed to what? As opposed to understanding, just like we extend, at least on the left (and I am on the left), to another set of violent young men, the ones who live in inner cities. Yes, I am calling for sympathy for my brothers in the army of unfuckable hate nerds.

My brothers: I was a young man once. And since there’s now an ever-growing genre of commentary in which feminists speak, with placid condescension, like so many anthropologists (if not entomologists), on the topic of men, especially young men, I thought it might be useful to hear from someone who actually knows what it’s like to be one.

Here’s what it’s like: It sucks. Male privilege? Absolutely, in many contexts, but there are important ways in which young men are clearly underprivileged.

Women are sex objects, goes the cliché, and men are success objects. But success requires many years to achieve, if you ever achieve it at all. Young men, in that respect, are much like older women: Society has little use for them, barely deigns to notice them. I’m not talking about the advertising industry, or the entertainment industry; I’m talking about the day-to-day experience of living in the world. Young women often have a lot of social power, whereas, except for the fortunate few—the born rich, the strikingly handsome, the 6-foot-3—young men have none. Socially speaking, young men are shit, and nobody gives a shit.

Any young woman who is even moderately attractive will be courted, complimented, paid attention to, by women as well as men. Older men will buy them things. People will hang on their words even when they aren’t interesting and laugh at their jokes even when they aren’t funny. They will have entry into places—private clubs, backstage after a show—young men can only press their noses against. They will be able to advance professionally by batting their eyelashes at powerful men. Young men, meanwhile—those losers, those loners, those apes—are left to pick their psychic zits on the periphery.

There’s more. Young women can have sex whenever they want. For most young men, persuading a woman to sleep with them is like trying to crack a safe. You understand that it’s theoretically possible, but you have no idea how to do it. Which means that you’re stuck with your hard-on. Unfuckable? No one needs to tell you that. You are unfucked: unwanted, unattractive; in the most literal sense, unloved.

The mental climate of the typical young man is three parts unrelenting horniness to one part self-disgust. Young women are not the only ones who are taught to hate their bodies. So, if less intensely, are young men. Why else would they lift all those weights? What you are really working out, when you go to the gym, is your dysmorphia. Aella, the OnlyFans star and online commentator, has said that what men look for when they come to her—and her clientele is mostly young—isn’t sex per se but “sexual acceptance.” They want to be assured, in other words, that they aren’t hideous. The fact they have to pay for this says everything you need to know.

Do I sound bitter? I’m channeling my younger self. It’s all worked out for me, I have no complaints, but I am intensely aware that it could have gone a different way. Turn this dial a click to the left, turn that one a click to the right—a little less privilege, a little more emotional instability—and I could have turned into a hate nerd myself. I suspect that a lot of men sense that. What does it feel like to be a young man? It feels like you are Kafka’s cockroach, Dostoevsky’s Underground Man. It feels like you were drawn by Harvey Pekar or R. Crumb. You are an Untermensch, a particle, a stew of envies and resentments, a festering sore. You look, from below, at the happy and lovely and rich. You creep, alone, along a wall. You masturbate as if your life depended on it.

Yes, I made it out. I found success; I reached the fabled land of love. But many men do not; many recognize, and recognize quite early, that they never will. And I was young in the ’80s and ’90s. We know what’s happened since. Blue-collar wages have slumped. Men have lost the education race. Add to that the dating apps, which gamify sex and love and quantify desirability and value. Like everything else on the web, the distribution follows a power law curve, with a small fraction of alphas soaking up the lion’s share of female attention. Add further the misandry that has now become de rigueur wherever the liberal elite holds sway: the ritual (and often gleeful) man-hating, the pathologization of masculinity.

We also know how young men are responding. Some are opting out of manhood by becoming trans or nonbinary. Some are going the other way, reaching for an ersatz hypermasculinity and joining the army of unfuckable hate nerds. Their behavior is disgusting, it is inexcusable, but what do we think is going to make them stop? Telling them to comb their hair, to put down the Xbox, to get a life? Reminding them that they’re unlovable and worthless? They know that already; that is precisely the problem. Hate breeds hate. Revenge is not justice. The hate nerds are human, no less than you and me. We need to treat them like it.
 
Last edited:
That's in my view. I would like to hear your idea of self-improvement though.
I guess for me I've been trying to learn to handle difficult situations. Maybe that's a weird criteria, but if I'm going to be on my own in life anyway, I'm trying to be ready for that. I've been exercising more or less consistently for about a year now (not my first attempt but kettlebells are the first thing I've actually found tolerable). But I'm really focused on health and function, not aesthetics. I've been working on learning how to shoot better, how to negotiate better and deal with difficult people, how to do home improvement stuff. I'm thinking about taking some boxing classes, not because it's likely to ever come up, but because it seems like something people should know how to do just in case.

Maybe women are interested in that sort of thing, maybe they're not. That's not really why I'm doing it. I've given up on trying to impress women directly. It's never worked. Instead I'm trying to focus on things that help me and my friends and family. Maybe that's defeatist, but it's just where I'm at.
 
I guess for me I've been trying to learn to handle difficult situations. Maybe that's a weird criteria, but if I'm going to be on my own in life anyway, I'm trying to be ready for that. I've been exercising more or less consistently for about a year now (not my first attempt but kettlebells are the first thing I've actually found tolerable). But I'm really focused on health and function, not aesthetics. I've been working on learning how to shoot better, how to negotiate better and deal with difficult people, how to do home improvement stuff. I'm thinking about taking some boxing classes, not because it's likely to ever come up, but because it seems like something people should know how to do just in case.

Maybe women are interested in that sort of thing, maybe they're not. That's not really why I'm doing it. I've given up on trying to impress women directly. It's never worked. Instead I'm trying to focus on things that help me and my friends and family. Maybe that's defeatist, but it's just where I'm at.
Those are great goals and I wish you all the best in accomplishing them. it sounds like you're determined because you know the value in those skills. I hope that doesn't sound condescending because I genuinely mean it. It's great to see and hear of others pushing for success. Dealing with difficult people and negotiating are as important as boxing and exercise for all-round skills. Wolf of Wallstreet book and audiobook (by Jordan Belfort himself), any NLP stuff and Chris Voss (you can find his master classes on pirate bay) are good starters for information when it comes to negotiating.

I found, that when I stopped focusing on what I thought others wanted in me, and focused on what I wanted to do, things became much easier. Travelling and meeting new women, talking to them about my travels and asking about them/their history/their travels led me to attracting and forming connections with women that would have been out of my league a few years ago.
 
I agree with all of this. I'm not a right/left person I was just using it as the easier way to describe how I see the split between society is strong vs individual makes strong society.

That's a good point. if you don't need to put in a lot of effort you lose out on pushing yourself. In my experience, men in their 30's have been abandoned and fallen between the cracks of the new way of thinking and the old, traditional style. Leaving is with very role-models or people to look upto/push ourselves against. We have no-one to emulate or to guide, only those who wish to hold us back and push us down. Again, in my experience.
Fair enough, I do agree with your observation on how left/right see society I just think both miss a mark of what they need to acknowledge. *Left back when it wasn't nutjobs.

It's also true many "coaches" for men are false idols and the more savory ones are rare these days. Which has literally hurt young men, a lot of people don't realize without proper guidance young men often don't just form themselves and older men used to know this was something required, but in becoming a bunch of frauds and weaklings their advice became lies instead of reality or truth. The blind leading the blind in a perpetual cycle so to speak. (Or in this case the frauds leading the misguided)
Chivalry, honour, decency, Godliness. were these not virtues men lived up to? Or are we only concentrating on the down-trodden serfs?
I understand where @God of Nothing is coming from even if I disagree. It's not something that can easily be realized in many people and even explaining it isn't so simple. Sometimes it's merely character developement but sometimes for some it's a complete "evolution" of a person or transition from one phase to the next. It's very complex and one of those things where you either realize what it fully means or implies or you don't. If everyone understood it most men wouldn't have any issues in society at least in that regard.

@Spud: Can't quote or use the quote trick for some reason on this part of your post:

It's cringe, every guy knows that our emotions are trying to tell us something but it's not anyone's business but that guy and any other guy he tells, you can tell women as well but their not equipped to help with such problems and won't have respect for you after crying in front of them, not because they mean it it's an evolutionary tactic. Grugette is worrying cause Grug is the one she relies on for safety and he's currently crying on the floor "Grug feel sad Grug find no berry". Meanwhile Grugette has just seen a cave bear in the treeline nearby where Grug and Gruette Jr are playing and she knows she can't fight cave bears so she takes the kids and run leaving Grug behind.

A guy friend on the other hand can still respect you after you cry in front of them and will have the decency to pick you up after you've had enough time to cry and will offer to help in a way that a girl can't. This is because a guy can see a guy's problem from a guy's perspective whereas a girl can only see a guy's problem from a girl's perspective.

I'm not talking about the guys in this case at all, merely the women. The men are no longer caring about women's needs and it's starting to show. I expect men to have some emotional control and maturity and to have available guy friends as women are terrible listeners in that regard oftentimes at least, but that's not what I was meaning at all with my response.

would say no one really knows how to maintain relationships really, everyone is just winging it. Portion of that could be attributed to how over time men have been told to man down and women to man up so both are trying to act as the other but their defective versions trying to make it work when it can't because men and women are fundamentally different.
People used to, but by letting women become irresponsible or basically no expectations or making them handicapped by doing so and creating no expectations we have created a woman worship and nothing can be solved. Some will say this is ok, but realistically it's not. Hence why men are calling this out.

There is nothing wrong with women being held to overwrite their hard wiring in some regards, just as men are because the more men see women will not will lead to men refusing too as well, and that opens a whole other can of worms. There is a deolving of men and women, but only having men focus on themselves ignores that women do not resolve issues on their own and also need guidance which many do not wish to acknowledge. This leads to women's evolution becoming the path of least resistance and also men's.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Shadfan666xxx000
lol, lmao even. Oh no, men are putting themselves first for once how best can we get them back to the plantation caring about the important people.

What do you mean by this?
I have no problem with men caring about their own needs. That's not an issue. A dysfunctional rift between sexes affecting children and families in general is an issue.

Men are babying women to the point they are basically bigger infants and useless than they were prior. A king with no ability of responsibilities or ever held accountable would be a special needs child or something similar, it's also similar to how the black community is being kids gloved in western countries as well and having the same devolution at large.
 
How?

By what means does a man have an authority over a woman?
By their parents babying them and telling them they do no wrong, not being held to the same or similar standards (not equal standards just similar standards), being treated lightly for same offenses, never being disciplined correctly except in rare circumstances and families, and more.

Women often latch onto men in a very parasitical way, but considering women act in ways that give men authority even if they don't like saying that doesn't change what it is. It's like that old comic strip of "What do you want to do tonight." In the same vain men have to make the approach generally, and make the decisions on "what to do tonight." Alongside taking charge on most actions that is the authority they have in guiding women in their lives. That's without fatherly guidance to make sure their daughters aren't useless in the future or used up landwhale whores, or something worse.

The problem with our current society is leaving women to their own devices and ignoring the "authority" structures men have often had over women since the start of time. What a wondeful mess that is by socially engineering ourselves it was mere bigotry or pretending it was bad for both sexes.
 
You sound like the kind of nigga who talks with the cashier while wearing sandals with socks, did you show her your mtg cards too? did she have to call security?
Says the guy who posted a rebuttal to everyone still in this thread. I can guarantee the guy with socks and sandals has got more play than you. He probably chills at home while his baby momma works in Wendys for his ass.
Heck the last women I literally argued on these stances on an open-nonanonymous forum told me she was happily married and then in the same breath wanted to face time with me to have an easiest conversation in others words Jones for a dude to fuck because mr. Happily married wasn't tickling that itch she had.
See, this is the big problem right here. Were getting too paranoid to actually address them. Even if shes DTF, thats a follower you can add to your movement and a key one at that. Theres nothing more solid to make a point with women than social cachet with other women.
 
See, this is the big problem right here. Were getting too paranoid to actually address them. Even if shes DTF, thats a follower you can add to your movement and a key one at that. Theres nothing more solid to make a point with women than social cachet with other women.
I wasn't afraid to address her, I just don't fuck/swoon/get involved with married women like that. I don't wish to permeate the issue I have with modern dating through my own actions because then I'm a part of the problem instead of a solution, I've also got a few follower women as it is, I have no problem debating or even "befriending" such women but I also know when they aren't merely wanting a friendship with their actions and never has a face time led to just following but more than wanting some sexual interaction.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Shadfan666xxx000
That's without fatherly guidance to make sure their daughters aren't useless in the future or used up landwhale whores, or worse.
So a chick without a dad is a red flag that I should avoid cause they can't make good decisions for themselves, okay.
By their parents babying them and telling them they do no wrong,
How is that men's fault, your post before saying it was Men™️ who's babying the whamens now it's the parents. Look here listen, I need a firm answer so I know exactly who to blame for whamens acting like thots or can we just skip to blaming the jews?
ignoring the "authority" structures men have often had over women since the start of time
If it was that easy to ignore this "Authority" then perhaps it wasn't that good in the first place
The problem with our current society is leaving women to their own devices
Heaven forbid you give women the freedom to choose, they might make the wrong choice
 
People used to, but by letting women become irresponsible or basically no expectations or making them handicapped by doing so and creating no expectations we have created a woman worship and nothing can be solved. Some will say this is ok, but realistically it's not. Hence why men are calling this out.

There is nothing wrong with women being held to overwrite their hard wiring in some regards, just as men are because the more men see women will not will lead to men refusing too as well, and that opens a whole other can of worms. There is a deolving of men and women, but only having men focus on themselves ignores that women do not resolve issues on their own and also need guidance which many do not wish to acknowledge. This leads to women's evolution becoming the path of least resistance and also men's.

Having Women act as they do currently is great for business. Women are driving 80% of consumer spending. School curriculum is now based around Womens learning style, because Women are more likely to enter courses and rack up debt. They are great advertising vectors, as they will recommend products to their friends. When directed they can use social media enmasse to cancel people that go against the current social orthodoxy. If they please they can market their body to millions of guys online. And those companies take their cut of the proceeds.

I don't see why the powers that be would attempt to disrupt the great monolith of Women they have under the thumb. A Woman is an influencer, an actvist, an advertiser, a consumer, and a product all rolled into one. Corporations are probably loving this.
 
Last edited:
So a chick without a dad is a red flag that I should avoid cause they can't make good decisions for themselves, okay.

How is that men's fault, your post before saying it was Men™️ who's babying the whamens now it's the parents. Look here listen, I need a firm answer so I know exactly who to blame for whamens acting like thots or can we just skip to blaming the jews?

If it was that easy to ignore this "Authority" then perhaps it wasn't that good in the first place

Heaven forbid you give women the freedom to choose, they might make the wrong choice
1. That's a common issue, yes. Red flag doesn't instantly mean avoid but it means there's a high possibility of said issue you brought up.
2. It's men's fault when a part of the nuclear family because the women are going to create lies for the young man that the older man (father) is supposed to set straight. Women also usually favorite the daughters which creates an issue for young men's developement and healthy relationship with women. In single mom households that rarely happens, but in single fathers the children usually get taught how to behave properly which resides my point. In nuclear families where the fathers baby daughters, they aren't being fathers, they are being weirdo simps or preventing proper developement for their daughters by not scolding them properly.
3. Well women had to use weak men in authority to dismantle it so I'll disagree there let alone brainwashing and other social engineering techniques.
4. If women are punisheed for making the wrong choice I'd agree. They often aren't though instead men are punished for good or bad choices women are merely rewarded or break even.

Having Women act as they do currently is great for business. Women are driving 80% of consumer spending. School curriculum is now based around Womens learning style, because Women are more likely to enter courses and rack up debt. They are great advertising vectors, as they will recommend products to their friends. When directed they can use social media enmasse to cancel people that go against the current social orthodoxy. If they please they can market their body to millions of guys online. And those companies take their cut of the proceeds.

I don't see why the powers that be would attempt to disrupt the great monolith of Women they have under the thumb. A Woman is an influencer, a consumer, and a product all rolled into one. Corporations are probably loving this.
You are fully correct and bring up a great point, however, this is not salvageable or sustainable for very long which is why corporations and more always focus on the short term but always miss the mark for long term.
 
1. That's a common issue, yes. Red flag doesn't instantly mean avoid but it means there's a high possibility of said issue you brought up.
2. It's men's fault when a part of the nuclear family because the women are going to create lies for the young man that the older man (father) is supposed to set straight. Women also usually favorite the daughters which creates an issue for young men's developement and healthy relationship with women. In single mom households that rarely happens, but in single fathers the children usually get taught how to behave properly which resides my point. In nuclear families where the fathers baby daughters, they aren't being fathers, they are being weirdo simps or preventing proper developement for their daughters by not scolding them properly.
3. Well women had to use weak men in authority to dismantle it so I'll disagree there let alone brainwashing and other social engineering techniques.
4. If women are punisheed for making the wrong choice I'd agree. They often aren't though instead men are punished for good or bad choices women are merely rewarded or break even.
Ahh, you're one of those return to tradition buckeroos, yeah your trad life ain't coming back cause people got bored of it and wanted something fresh. The whole idea of men needing authority over women sounds really gay, why would you want someones indentured servitude under the guise of the "trad men have authority over whamens cause trad" no wonder divorce skyrocketed. In the real world we all opt in to our relationships and it works far better because that type of relationship is built on genuine desire for one another rather than it being this man is a good provider so she has to get with him.
 
Ahh, you're one of those return to tradition buckeroos, yeah your trad life ain't coming back cause people got bored of it and wanted something fresh. The whole idea of men needing authority over women sounds really gay, why would you want someones indentured servitude under the guise of the "trad men have authority over whamens cause trad" no wonder divorce skyrocketed. In the real world we all opt in to our relationships and it works far better because that type of relationship is built on genuine desire for one another rather than it being this man is a good provider so she has to get with him.
You do know I'm not a tradcon paticularly right, but that doesn't mean some "tradcon" concepts aren't fully correct. It's like the people that see corporatism or this socialist adoptation and then think any capitalist ideals are dumb and should be thrown out with the bath water and that's just flagrantly wrong.

No one needs to have authority over women, women give authority to men over themselves all of the time without requiring it. Even the women who I've been romantically involved with use this cognitive dissonant claim "I love when I'm with you, you don't tell me what to do you just imply it and then I go at my own speed and often enjoy the suggestion." Lol, no ladies I literally said "come on take off your clothes" that's not a suggestive statement despite your feminized brainwashed mind not wanting to accept ladies like capitulating to demands, same as when I tell them what decision I'm making in a night, where we are going or what have you.

That shit has nothing to do with traditional values and if you think it does, you've already lost the plot to female nature.
 
why would you want someones indentured servitude

Here we go...

5190801-aa44d191b0aa2854d6db23e59c720b88.png
 
You're right and I agree but where I disagree is in the extremes. There are more shitty women out there than every before, but they are more easy to spot and identify than ever before.

Years ago, when there were more attractive women, the real crazies hid amongst them and it could be difficult to see who the real lunatics were until it was too late; years deep into a relationship, sometimes with a house or kid. Nowadays, the real nutters wear purple hair, an extra 4 stone/40kg/80lbs of weight, bad clothes and screech about politics.

Self-improvement should always be number 1, regardless of what's going on around you or in society. Be the best you that you can be should be the default stance. Doing the self improvement for women is setting out on a journey of failure from the first step.
A lot of guys don't know what they need to do to attract women and that's why PUA scammers exist. That and products try to appeal to men by suggesting that women will be sexually attracted to them (like that Tag body spray garbage from the 2000s) if they buy them.

Those nutters always cope by saying "you're just picky and want a perfect ten blonde etc." but in reality they're mentally ill and unpleasant overall. Besides the Instagram model types of women aren't everyone's cup of tea so eh.
This is proof that men are not the only ones who are brainless coomers.
 
Monkey Branching. Where the person sets up a dating account in secret and is chatting with potentially better options. Women seem to be more prone to this.
Fun fact: If she's doing this to her current man, you're next.
I've given up on trying to impress women directly.
Other fun fact: Women are not impressed by attempts to impress women. Not giving a fuck what women think is more impressive.
 
agree that "hyper individualism" and ignoring "unity/community" has destroyed what we once had, but I don't think that net can fully be brought back at this point.
Honestly you might be right. The attempts to do so in youth movements where liminal and short lived at best. I use to be semi-active in punk scenes and those were some of the best times of my life and I found a good amount of romantic and casual partners from them. But sadly those scenes basically killed themselves through retarded bullshit.

I think another thing to simulate it said cultural nets is doing stuff like finding social hobbies that are not jacking off and playing cod. The more people they can meet the higher chances they might find a person to fuck them. Though you might need some social skills before hand. Or you are gonna be the manchild version of the quiet kid.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back