Disaster US Cybersecurity Head Says There Will Be Errors and Glitches During Midterms - U.S. cybersecurity chief said that "voters should expect “normal” errors and glitches" and that "a water pipe will burst" and that someone "will forget their key to the polling place" and that these are "normal things"

Epoch Times:

U.S. cybersecurity chief Jen Easterly said the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) does “not censor information,” and voters should expect “normal” errors and glitches, such as burst water pipes, during the midterm elections next week.

A week out from the U.S. midterm elections, Easterly, a Biden appointee, has talked about CISA’s role in securing election infrastructure and the risk vector of disinformation and misinformation.

“I want to be really clear about what CISA’s role is in this. You know, we are not an intel agency. We’re not a law enforcement agency,” she said during a talk at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington-based think tank.

“We don’t work with the platforms on what they do around content. That is entirely their decision. It is their terms of service. And I want to be very clear about this: We do not censor information.”

“I want to be very clear,” she added with emphasis. “We do not censor anything. What social media platforms do, what the news does, is entirely their decision.”

CISA, which sits within the Department of Homeland Security, was set up in 2018 to “understand, manage, and reduce risk” to the critical cyber and physical infrastructure Americans rely on every day, Easterly said. This includes election infrastructure.

Errors, Glitches, Burst Water Pipes Are ‘Normal’ in Elections: Easterly​

The cybersecurity chief said voters should expect errors and glitches in the upcoming midterms, which she insisted were normal. As such, she said election officials asked her to pass on a message to Americans.

“There are going to be errors. There are going to be glitches. That happens in every election. But that’s why there are multiple layers of security controls and resilience built into the system,” she said.

“These things are going to happen … somebody will forget their key to the polling place, a water pipe will burst … [These] are normal things. They’re not nefarious,” she added.

Election officials sometimes face physical intimidation as a result of misinformation about election integrity spread by foreign bad actors, Easterly said.

While this makes misinformation and disinformation an ongoing concern for CISA, Easterly said the agency saw no “credible or specific” information about efforts to “disrupt or compromise” election infrastructure this year.

However, she said there continue to be efforts by “foreign adversaries to sow discord among the American people, to undermine confidence in the integration of our elections, and to incite violence against election officials.”

“It’s a significant concern because you think about these adversaries that are trying to sow discord, that are trying to break us apart, about Americans that are trying to undermine, you know, integrity in our elections,” she said.

“We are very concerned about this,” she added.

She noted that elections are not run by the federal government but by state and local officials, who “deserve to be safe.” She said she’s confident CISA has “done everything we can to make election infrastructure as secure and as resilient as possible.”

Lawsuit Alleges CISA ‘Directed Censorship’​

Easterly is one of several key officials in President Joe Biden’s administration ordered to testify under oath in a deposition about their roles in a case alleging collusion between the federal government and Big Tech companies to censor users.

The plaintiffs in the case, the attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri and others, allege that Easterly “supervises the ‘nerve center’ of federally directed censorship,” according to a court filing.

CISA, which sits within the Department of Homeland Security, is accused of “directly flagging misinformation to social-media companies for censorship.”

Further, Easterly is accused of claiming that speech on social media is a form of “infrastructure” which therefore falls within “her agency’s mission to protect ‘infrastructure.'” Easterly is quoted in the court filing as claiming that “the most critical infrastructure is a cognitive infrastructure.”

The lawsuit also notes text messages between Easterly and a former CISA agent, Matt Masterson, who now works at a social media platform, which ultimately centers around how Easterly allegedly “seeks greater censorship and that this would be done by federal pressure on social media platforms to increase censorship.”

Need for Depositions ‘Outweigh’ Burden​

Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki and Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases and Biden’s chief medical adviser, are among the other officials ordered to be deposed.

The White House has sought to block most depositions but not Fauci’s.

Lawyers for the government officials have argued in a motion filed on Oct. 27 that plaintiffs shouldn’t be able to depose Easterly; Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, a Biden appointee; and Rob Flaherty, a deputy assistant to the president.

“The Court’s Depositions Order would require the relevant high-ranking government officials to divert time from their professional duties to prepare for, and participate in, time-consuming depositions,” the motion states.

The plaintiffs assert that Easterly must be deposed because she has “unique knowledge about the scope and nature of communications between CISA, DHS, and other federal officials,” according to a court filing.

They further assert she needs to be deposed because CISA disclosed extensive oral communications and meetings between CISA officials and social media platforms, and plaintiffs believe that as director of the agency, Easterly would have detailed knowledge of what CISA is disclosing.

When the judge originally ordered Easterly to be deposed, he found that any burden imposed on her is “outweighed by the need to determine whether the First Amendment right of free speech was suppressed.”

Article

Statements by U.S. cybersecurity chief Jen Easterly
 
The black pilled part of me also agrees the niggercattle will do nothing and shake their fists at the DNC.

But the rational part of me thinks the maga crowd won't stand for this shit a second time. Especially when the circuses are all woke, people are failing to keep up with bills, and food is becoming more expensive.
Let them try something. The DNC will label them as "Terrorists to be shot on sight" and will start massacring any MAGA who even tries to fight back.
All in the name of preserving our independence, of course. And to own Putin, who is totes in league with Trump.
 
Let them try something. The DNC will label them as "Terrorists to be shot on sight" and will start massacring any MAGA who even tries to fight back.
All in the name of preserving our independence, of course. And to own Putin, who is totes in league with Trump.
the section of the us population that owns most of the guns?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
Why not use paper ballots, if you're getting so scared of "glitches" (or I'd rather say some lines of code that you don't want to be exposed or the machines connecting to the fucking internet) and >muh vatnigger hekking?
Oh yeah, because you're obviously pulling a Billy Mitchell.
 
Let them try something. The DNC will label them as "Terrorists to be shot on sight" and will start massacring any MAGA who even tries to fight back.
All in the name of preserving our independence, of course. And to own Putin, who is totes in league with Trump.
The last time DC massacred citizens it got the federal building in Oklahoma City bombed. Glowies got the message, haven't seen any massacres since then have you?
 
the section of the us population that owns most of the guns?
People with guns < an almost completely pozzed military run by trannies and traitors armed with the latest tech.
And before someone goes "But look at vietnam!"
We have heat sensors, guided missiles, drones, glow-in-the-darks capable of sabotaging ground troops and movement, and of course money.
The population might have more guns, but compared to the military (who are going to follow orders because they won't risk their families lives just to revolt) the average yokel with rifles will be squashed.
Also most burgers are too comfortable with their lives. Even if Biden spat in their mouths they'd do nothing.
 
We have heat sensors, guided missiles, drones, glow-in-the-darks capable of sabotaging ground troops and movement, and of course money.
The population might have more guns, but compared to the military (who are going to follow orders because they won't risk their families lives just to revolt) the average yokel with rifles will be squashed.
ah, this one
 

Attachments

  • afghanistan.jpg
    afghanistan.jpg
    163.2 KB · Views: 46
I thought this was gonna be a Babylon bee article when clicking on the link.
Reality will force the satire company out of business at this rate.
99% of people will never read this article, they have no clue that the machines are insecure.
This isn't the first of its kind. Mainstream media has been saying since 2016 that they weren't secure. For example, in 2016 Vox published a video about all the faults discovered with said machines. Associated Press published a video about similar problems in 2019. Here's one from Fox from five years ago. Tech insider, also five years ago. 5 years ago, CNN confirmed they personally saw the voting machines getting hacked succesfully. The "it's impossible" thing is a very recent political trend. But even recently, FBI and the rest of the feds confirmed that election infrastructure was hacked, although the hackers didn't change anything, and even more recently CISA shared confirmed vulnarabilities list, and once agains confirmed they exist. I remember one other agency saying that there were massive vulnarabilities but they weren't exploited, although I can't find that story anywhere.

Point is, they keep admiting over and over again, and each time they do it, the truth becomes that much harder to supress.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: WonderWino
And that is the thing that makes me hate the GOP. All bluster and no bite.
Arizona's Fox 10 leaked the results early, showing the DNC candidate will "win" by a 2-3% lead, and Kansas will also fall into blue wave hell.
The election will be stolen and nothing will happen. Fat fucking losers like Ted Cruz and the like will cry and shit and piss and cum about "muh integrity" and do nothing because the GOP have to be the good little losers.
And the Government outright told us "Fuck you we're cheating, try something, we'll sic the feds on your whole family"
I am getting dangerously close to outright fedposting.
(Feel free to rate me MATI, I probably deserve it)
Those stats really are just bunk.

They're used as placeholders while they build the basic layouts of on-screen graphics, iirc some are rigged up to autoupdate from your wire service feed, that way you don't need to have some rando retype every number every few minutes. Wire service send down a test run usually a week or two in advance with big warnings of THESE ARE JUST TESTS TURN OFF YOUR AUTOFEED SHIT

Basically every election some local affil screws up and puts them on air, and they're always unrelated to the final results.

Or we only had one term of Obama and Jace was really panicked about Romney making him a 3d dick on the White House instead and we just misunderstood
 
Reality will force the satire company out of business at this rate.

This isn't the first of its kind. Mainstream media has been saying since 2016 that they weren't secure. For example, in 2016 Vox published a video about all the faults discovered with said machines. Associated Press published a video about similar problems in 2019. Here's one from Fox from five years ago. Tech insider, also five years ago. 5 years ago, CNN confirmed they personally saw the voting machines getting hacked succesfully. The "it's impossible" thing is a very recent political trend. But even recently, FBI and the rest of the feds confirmed that election infrastructure was hacked, although the hackers didn't change anything, and even more recently CISA shared confirmed vulnarabilities list, and once agains confirmed they exist. I remember one other agency saying that there were massive vulnarabilities but they weren't exploited, although I can't find that story anywhere.

Point is, they keep admiting over and over again, and each time they do it, the truth becomes that much harder to supress.
These holes in election security will be used against the people, but not for cheating.
Let's assume the left does cheat and somehow loses. A red wave washes over the US.
All the elites have to do is claim Russia helped the GOP win, and BOOM! the results can be tossed in the trash, allowing left wing candidates to take over.
Its a lose-lose scenario for everyone but the WEF niggers.
 
The military would lose in less than a year as most of the grunts would go over to the other side with their gear. And even if they all stayed loyal to a police state they dont have enough people to prevent their being hopelessly outnumbered every time they go out on patrol, or enough people to prevent reprisals on their very vulnerable families
 
All the elites have to do is claim Russia helped the GOP win, and BOOM! the results can be tossed in the trash, allowing left wing candidates to take over.
Oh, yes, I remember when Trump left office in January 2017 because of the Russia accusations. I guess Mike Pence did a good job in his stead, huh?
 
These holes in election security will be used against the people, but not for cheating.
Let's assume the left does cheat and somehow loses. A red wave washes over the US.
All the elites have to do is claim Russia helped the GOP win, and BOOM! the results can be tossed in the trash, allowing left wing candidates to take over.
Its a lose-lose scenario for everyone but the WEF niggers.
They should try just so I can be entertained by the biggest, most abrupt BTFOing in the history of the republic
 
The last time DC massacred citizens it got the federal building in Oklahoma City bombed. Glowies got the message, haven't seen any massacres since then have you?
Not quite a massacre and it was localized but there is the Bundys, which looking at the wikipedia article of course these faggots tried to bring the charges again under new glorious leader. Whether intentional or not I think the dissolution of the family unit will dissaude most people from ever making a stand against anything. It's unlikely to see things completely go to shit in a single person's lifetime, and if you don't have kids to worry about their future why care? Not that I'm any better, I'm certainly not going to put time into anything and risk being fucked by the feds like the Jan 6 lemmings so that retards gluing themselves to walls might possibly reap some benefits.
 
Not quite a massacre and it was localized but there is the Bundys, which looking at the wikipedia article of course these faggots tried to bring the charges again under new glorious leader. Whether intentional or not I think the dissolution of the family unit will dissaude most people from ever making a stand against anything. It's unlikely to see things completely go to shit in a single person's lifetime, and if you don't have kids to worry about their future why care? Not that I'm any better, I'm certainly not going to put time into anything and risk being fucked by the feds like the Jan 6 lemmings so that retards gluing themselves to walls might possibly reap some benefits.
Loneliness makes people more likely to get into risky crazy shit, not less

There wasnt a massacre at all with the Bundys, the BLM got btfo and left in humiliation. In Oregon the one idiot got killed grabbing for his gun in a confrontation with glowies. Every person the feds charged there that took it to trial got acquitted, only the people dumb enough to take a plea got any punishment at all

The attempted trials over the BLM standoff were another hilarious shitshow humiliation of the the government, again the only people who got any punishment were the ones retarded enough to cop a plea. Not even the Ninth Circuit was buying the DOJ's pathetic attempts to restart the Nevada and Oregon cases against the Bundys in 2020
 
Is this article gearing up for 'we are going to cheat as much as we think we can get away with' or early cope for the DNC?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Xarpho's Return
People with guns < an almost completely pozzed military run by trannies and traitors armed with the latest tech.
And before someone goes "But look at vietnam!"
We have heat sensors, guided missiles, drones, glow-in-the-darks capable of sabotaging ground troops and movement, and of course money.
The population might have more guns, but compared to the military (who are going to follow orders because they won't risk their families lives just to revolt) the average yokel with rifles will be squashed.
Also most burgers are too comfortable with their lives. Even if Biden spat in their mouths they'd do nothing.
Don't forget the massive surveillance network built up over the last 30 years that has information on every citizen. Levels of intelligence that the military would have killed for in places like Iraq and Afghanistan. Just look at how quick they come down on anything that appears to be a "right wing conspiracy"
 
You know, I'd be really fucking embarassed if i was the head of CyberSecurity. This isn't the "cover your ass" win like they think it is.

People will see this as you basically admitting that the machines fucking suck and rather than, you know, do your fucking job and try to fix that shit, you're basically saying "oh well, fuck it, it is what it is".

I know reading between the lines it means they are TOTALLY going to cheat, but come the fuck on now, THAT was the best excuse they could come up with?
Oh, this voting poll place overwhelmingly voted against us? Let's burst a water pipe!

Imagine allowing your government to impose insecure, electronic voting machines on you. I thought this sort of tyranny was what muh guns were for, amerisubhumans?
Pretty sure all of this is a safety risk. Thanks for the "warning."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Useful_Mistake
I don't think the DNC will be able to pull off the same stunt as last year (at least not the same extent) due to more suspicion and all that takes money and coordination. So here's my thought--if shenanigans happens and the election is stolen for Democrats, it'd be hard to backpedal on that and say that it was totally secure all along. More likely this is a bid to cast doubt on a GOP win, with Russian Hackers 2.0 coming up next year.
 
This is the third election cycle that will be rigged at a national level. Any “controversial” candidate better have a yuge and bigly margin of victory over the loser or else it will just get snatched away. Anything within five percent is definitely at risk.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Nod Flenders
:story:

The cope, the pure cope on the day after this stolen shitshow from Patriots.win will be undiluted.
No matter how much the left cheats, the right will "nuh-uh, we didn't lose, FED" and "don't be a doomer" their way into doing sweet fuck all about it, as usual.

Pipes will burst, glitches will turn red waves blue, Patriots will just vote harder next time. All will be as normal.
I agree.

Start killing politicians and bankers now.
 
Back