US US fertility rate dropped to record low in 2023, CDC data shows - Women in the United States are having babies less often.

1.png
There were 55 births for every 1,000 women of reproductive age in 2023, CDC data shows, fewer than any other year on record.
Daniel Lee/Moment RF/Getty Images


Women in the United States are having babies less often, and the fertility rate reached a record low in 2023, according to data from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The US fertility rate has been trending down for decades, with particularly steep dips after the Great Recession of 2008. An uptick in 2021 spurred theories about a Covid-19 “baby bump,” but the birth rate has quickly returned to its more consistent downward pattern.

In 2023, the US fertility rate fell another 3% from the year before, to a historic low of about 55 births for every 1,000 females ages 15 to 44, according to final data published Tuesday by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics. Just under 3.6 million babies were born last year, about 68,000 fewer than the year before.

Since 2007, when the fertility rate was at its most recent high, the number of births has declined 17%, and the general fertility rate has declined 21%, according to the new report.

There’s not one particular reason why fertility rates are on the decline in the US, said Sarah Hayford, director of the Institute for Population Research at The Ohio State University. A number of social and economic factors are probably coming into play, she said.

A “package of demographic changes” – people getting married later and less often, spending more years in school and taking longer to get economically established in a steady job, to name a few – align with birth rate trends, said Hayford, who was not involved in the new report.

“People are waiting to have children. And on average, when people wait longer to have children, they end up having fewer children,” she said. “I think there’s also greater social acceptance of not having children or having a smaller family. So as that has become more acceptable, people are more carefully weighing their decision to become parents.”

The CDC data shows that births have continued to shift to older mothers; the birth rate was highest among women ages 30 to 34, with about 95 births for every 1,000 women in this group in 2023.

The data also shows that the teen birth rate dropped to a record low in 2023, with about 13 births for every 1,000 girls ages 15 to 19.

Longstanding trends aside, women in the US have also been facing a massive upheaval of reproductive care in the years since the US Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision overturned Roe v. Wade and revoked the federal right to an abortion.

National-level data may obscure some effects that state abortion bans have had on local birth trends. But an analysis from last year suggests that states with abortion bans had an average fertility rate that was 2.3% higher than states where abortion was not restricted in the first half of 2023, leading to about 32,000 more births than expected.

“The relationship between abortion rights and birth rates is complicated. We’re still seeing the recent trends in abortion policy play out in terms of demographic impact,” Hayford said. “But it turns out abortion access changes people’s plans for having children.”

People’s broader experiences with reproductive health can also shape these decisions, she said.

And the new CDC report shows a worrying trend.

Most pregnant women – about three-quarters – did receive prenatal care starting in their first trimester last year. But the share of women who receive care later – or not at all – has been ticking up in recent years. About 2.3% of pregnant women had no prenatal care in 2023, up 5% from the year before. Nearly 5% of women had prenatal care in only their third trimester, according to the new report.

Article Link

Archive
 
Isn't this good? I thought the point was to reduce carbon footprint and cut down on overpopulation, and we're doing that. Mission accomplished?

Also no SHIT people don't want to have kids, you have to work full-time to support the household and shuffle them off to before-school daycare, have them go through a full day of school, and pick them up from after-school care when you're done wageslaving. You don't even raise your kids, or get to enjoy time with them, they get raised by a fucking tablet watching endless reruns of Bluey mixed with videos of Palestinian children getting blown up and dismembered, when they're not being groomed on Discord and cutting their cocks off and saying they hate you for being transphobic and narcissistic. Congratulations, you demoralized the population so hard they can't dream of a better society, and they collect cats and Funko Pops instead of kids.
 
How is it that the 1965 immigration act was suppose to fix these issues and yet still today almost 60 years later we still have fertility problem? Maybe mass immigration isn't the solution to this problem and maybe our government should start creating policies that can increase the birth rates? Oh wait, every time someone suggests that they get accused of promoting a nazi policy.
 
It’s not a single factor, but the whole environment is effectively an overcrowded depressing Mouse cage prison that’s filthy, and just like mice, people won’t breed.
-density in cities
-microplastics
-endless anti family propaganda
-cost of housing means housing purchase delayed, which means families start later which means fewer kids.
-everyone goes to college which means starting later and fewer kids
-more dangerous society
When you create a nice environment, people will breed. I have a family member who lives in one of those ‘nappy valley’ suburbs in a nicer euro country. Safe and clean, I dont think I’ve ever seen so much as a scrap of litter there. Nice nature, and everyone has 2-4 kids. Literally the entire suburb is couples with kids. It’s like looking into an alternative universe.
Now: is there also a factor that people who want kids gravitate places like that? Is it the mountain air? Probably Yes. But if the entire of the uk was like that, we’d be having a baby boom.
Even feral stray cats want a nice safe place to have kittens and will seek out a safe hiding spot - humans are no different but there are SO few nice safe places.
I’m also increasingly convinced there’s a biological factor too. Maybe children of men is where we’re going.
 
Time to import more feral shitskins with no skills and give them credit cards so they can get into debt and keep making the lines go up!
Iuden.jpg

Pic very fucking relevant. Remember, 109 is not a coincidence. Including the part where they preach about the Holocaust... and never about the 109 expulsions in Public education.
 
I thought the world was about to collapse because of global microwaving, isn't that what everybody was saying? didn't you consider this plus AI about to turn millions obsolete would make people not want to have kids?

I sure as hell am not worried about this gay ass planet (the lolcow of the universe) going to shit after I die........unless someone invents immortality in which case "oh shit...".
I think there’s also greater social acceptance of not having children or having a smaller family
Huge factor, just two gens ago you were a total weirdo for not having kids, people would judge you for it even if you lost your nuts in vietnam and your wife was born without a vagina. Now you're a total chump if you have kids, everybody thinks you're a loser for doing that instead of partying until you're near 50.

Social pressure is massive, it shapes the lives of billions, even non-conformists bend to the pressure of their non-conformist spaces which is why for example all goths look and act the same.
World War 3 AND declining birthrates? Man, I really rolled a fucking 1 on timelines to be in.
Could be worse, you could be in the buttweasels timeline.
ITS CHILDREN OF MEN
Nah in that book/movie it was some weird disease that made everybody sterile, even that author couldn't fathom a world where people simply didn't want to have kids.
and they collect cats and Funko Pops instead of kids.
I'm not one of those pathetic weirdos, I collect ears.
 
Isn't this good? I thought the point was to reduce carbon footprint and cut down on overpopulation, and we're doing that. Mission accomplished?
Now then you mention it, why they don't lobby for letting people driving cars without wearing a seat belt or letting smokers smoking, so they'll die earlier and that will help to reduce carbon footprint and cut down on overpopulation as well?

However, if we cheer for the dropping of the fertility rate of black people in the US, someone will shout "that's racist" for sure.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Male Idiot
Since the article wants to pull up ratios on pregnancy rates why not show the ratio of how many men in the US can support a family vs how many pregnancies they cause? Oh, right, because the article wants you to focus on what women aren't doing instead of what men aren't doing, which is making an adequate amount of money.

The demand to repopulate society remains unchanged although the male populace of the US has. The gov't, and society itself, demands that women breed with losers. American men are, on average, broke and lack a proper education.

Women shouldn't be expected to sacrifice their bodies to provide the next generation to society when that society is full of porn addicted losers who need to shut up and put the fries in the bag.
 
Since the article wants to pull up ratios on pregnancy rates why not show the ratio of how many men in the US can support a family vs how many pregnancies they cause? Oh, right, because the article wants you to focus on what women aren't doing instead of what men aren't doing, which is making an adequate amount of money.

The demand to repopulate society remains unchanged although the male populace of the US has. The gov't, and society itself, demands that women breed with losers. American men are, on average, broke and lack a proper education.

Women shouldn't be expected to sacrifice their bodies to provide the next generation to society when that society is full of porn addicted losers who need to shut up and put the fries in the bag.
Congrats, women won the gender wars. Enjoy the doomed world that has been created as a result of the fallout.
 
Oh, right, because the article wants you to focus on what women aren't doing instead of what men aren't doing, which is making an adequate amount of money.
It's almost as if without Women and Children Men don't have to work as hard and as long hours.

Why should I accept a promotion that means I will work harder and at full time hours? For the Vague "Maybe you will find a slut to fuck" promise?
Vague maybes didn't work on me in school for "Oh if you get straight As maybe you will qualify for scholarships and loans" its not gonna work now.
 
Side effect of the vaccine. The abortion and contreceptive issue in the US is a smoke screen for the real reason women aren't having kids.

The question is, do they not want kids or can they not have kids?
 
Congrats, women won the gender wars. Enjoy the doomed world that has been created as a result of the fallout.
.....*Ahem*.

The demand to repopulate society remains unchanged although the male populace of the US has. The gov't, and society itself, demands that women breed with losers. American men are, on average, broke and lack a proper education.

Women shouldn't be expected to sacrifice their bodies to provide the next generation to society when that society is full of porn addicted losers who need to shut up and put the fries in the bag.
No man owes you his money. You don't deserve his money and you never will. No hoe is entitled to my money and my resources unless I say so. You're a tard.
 
The only reason they even remotely give a fuck is corporations were promised that immigrants would act as replacement labor and turns out someone with an IQ of 75 is going to to be incapable of all but the most simple of tasks.

Immigrants didn't pan out so now corpos want to breed new slaves now now now now now!
 
Back