US sues Adobe for hiding termination fees and making it difficult to cancel subscriptions

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
L - A

Aisha Malik 10:08 AM PDT • June 17, 2024
GettyImages-95799630.jpg

The U.S. Department of Justice has filed a lawsuit against Adobe alleging that the company deceives consumers by hiding the early-termination fee and making it difficult for people to cancel their subscriptions.
In the complaint filed on Monday, the DOJ wrote that “Adobe has harmed consumers by enrolling them in its default, most lucrative subscription plan without clearly disclosing important plan terms.”

The government says Adobe pushed consumers toward the “annual paid monthly” subscription without informing them that canceling the plan in the first year would cost hundreds of dollars.
Adobe only discloses the early-termination fees when subscribers attempt to cancel, and turns the early-termination fee into a “powerful retention tool” by trapping consumers in subscriptions that they no longer want, the complaint says.

“During enrollment, Adobe hides material terms of its APM plan in fine print and behind option textboxes and hyperlinks, proving disclosures that are designed to go unnoticed and that most consumers never see,” according to the complaint. “Adobe then deters cancellations by employing an onerous and complicated cancellation process.”
Adobe says it plans to refute the claims in court.
“Subscription services are convenient, flexible and cost effective to allow users to choose the plan that best fits their needs, timeline and budget,” said Adobe’s General Counsel and Chief Trust Officer Dana Rao, in a statement. “Our priority is to always ensure our customers have a positive experience. We are transparent with the terms and conditions of our subscription agreements and have a simple cancellation process.”

The DOJ’s complaint says Adobe has violated federal laws designed to protect consumers. The government is seeking “injunctive relief, civil penalties, equitable monetary relief, as well as other relief.”

Adobe shifted to a subscription model in 2012 and started requiring consumers to pay for access to the company’s software on a recurring basis. In the past, users could access the company’s software after paying a one-time fee. Subscriptions account for most of the company’s revenue, the Federal Trade Commission notes.
 
Remember, kids. If buying isn't owning, then pirating isn't stealing.
Pirating isn't stealing in any case. When you pirate something, the owner still has what you pirated. You haven't taken anything away from them. All of you've done is infringe on their right to make a copy of it, which may have damaged them in some way (e.g. the profit they would receive from whatever you pirated). And that may not even be a crime. IANAL and there are nuances to consider, like simple downloading vs. a peer-to-peer model, but the bar for criminal copyright infringement is set fairly high. If you aren't in the realm of criminality, your piracy is merely a dispute between two parties.

But donut pirate, it's morally wrong and the fine people at Adobe deserve to be paid for all the hard work they do. Also the statutory damages set by law are absurdly high. I'd rather be caught driving drunk than sued for torrenting a few movies.
 
Well this is great and all how about we get some actual fucking consumer protections in regard to software at all. As it stands now in the US you have no rights, well you do but they begin and end with what the company dictates to you in the EULA. So effectively you have no rights because they are under no obligation to disclose changes to the EULA or TOS.
 
But donut pirate, it's morally wrong and the fine people at Adobe deserve to be paid for all the hard work they do.

I'm still using the version they gave away free on their website years ago. They dropped support for it or they no longer wanted to run the authentication server or something like that. So they put up the full version so people that owned it could still download it. Then days later they actually realized people were just downloading it regardless of previous purchase. Adobe then pitched a shitfit but it was too late.
 
Man it used to be worth pirating adobe's software, once they started switching to the creative cloud only version of their software something about it changed. It just didn't have the same feel to it. Almost like it was a hollow shell of what it used to be, and the amount of problems i had with it was insane. Even the free trial they offer gave me problems.

Fuck adobe, I'm so glad i moved away from their shit years ago. Do i have to have twice as many tools downloaded to get the same functionality? yes but it's so much easier to get shit done.
 
I guess an intern at the Department of justice wanted to make some Facebook memes and were like 'what the fuck is this shit'.

Blocking them from your credit card is a good trick to stop your subscription. Boy, did they stop that subscription!
 
Why not go farther, just make the cancellation fees a few million dollars and say "sorry guys you signed the TOS you gotta pay up".
I didn't cancel my subscription on time (it was several hours late due to timezones) and Adobe wanted me to pay for the rest of the one year in cancellation fees.
That's when I reported the card as lost and pirated it. I pirated their shit when I was a kid too but figured since I have good income, I shouldn't steal.

Wrong. I should.
If you're not a nigger when you use Adobe shit you are a NIGGER (all caps).
 
Good, fuck adobe. I really hate everything being a subscription service and then adobe comes in dry for basic features.

Long ago, we boomers used to call that "purchasing" something.
Woah woah woah, purchasing means ownership, with icky things like actual user rights and protections and stuff like that Adobe just won't allow anyone to have.

Fuck software as a service, fuck games as a service... fuck that whole "as a service" mindset that's rotted the modern corporate world.
Just wait. I'm surprised this hasn't been done already but "owning things is problematic because wh*tes used to own Black slaves. Subscription based services are more sustainable and equitable"
 
Is Adobe even better than Gimp? What's the big deal that makes people want to suffer through Adobe's bullshit?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
The government says Adobe pushed consumers toward the “annual paid monthly” subscription without informing them that canceling the plan in the first year would cost hundreds of dollars.
And THERE is the problem. They set it up as an annual subscription to be paid monthly. This gives the appearance of a monthly subscription you can cancel anytime to the consumer, but in reality it's paying monthly notes on a one year license.

Honestly, the only way to rectify this shit once and for all is a bill or regulation stating that subscription based services must be term limited to their payment frequency (if you pay once a month, it's only good for a month), and outlaw cancellation fees for things like software, because software licensing doesn't require any effort on the licensor to grant or revoke. This is one of the rare occasions where government agencies can ACTUALLY do some good for the general population.
 
Back