US USDA reorganization will move most of its Washington staff ‘closer to’ farmers - Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins is closing several D.C.-area buildings but notably will not pursue a large-scale reduction in force.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/...es-reorganization-relocate-employees-00473539
https://archive.is/puf3I
IMG_4314.webp
By JORDAN WOLMAN, MARCIA BROWN and GRACE YARROW07/24/2025 10:43 AM EDT

Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins on Thursday announced a long-awaited reorganization plan to transfer most of the Washington-area staff to five locations around the country and close a number of key USDA offices in the capital region.
Rollins, speaking in a video message to employees, said USDA will move people to Salt Lake City; Fort Collins, Colorado; Indianapolis; Kansas City, Missouri; and Raleigh, North Carolina. Staff will receive notice about their new assignments in the coming months.

The department will close nearly all of its Washington-area buildings as a result, with the exception of the Whitten and Yates buildings, which are located directly on the National Mall. That includes the South building of USDA’s headquarters, the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center, the George Washington Carver Center and a Food and Nutrition Services facility in Alexandria, Virginia, that has recently had major workplace hazards.

However, there will be no large-scale reductions in force, given that the department has already seen an exodus of 15,364 employees through the administration’s deferred resignation plan, Rollins said.
“This reorganization already recognizes that many USDA employees provide critical frontline services in locations all across our great country that cannot be disrupted,” she added.
Rollins’ move is the latest in a round of shakeups to the federal workforce enacted by the Trump administration as it seeks to dramatically slash what it sees as excess spending and a bloated bureaucracy. The USDA plan, which POLITICO first reported earlier Thursday, comes after the Supreme Court earlier this month allowed agencies to move forward with their reorganization and staff reduction goals, overturning a lower-court stay initially blocking the implementation.

More than 90 percent of the department’s nearly 100,000 employees are already based outside the beltway in county and regional offices, including at regional research facilities, farm loan offices and conservation facilities.
Rollins said this latest plan to relocate even more employees will help USDA better serve its “core constituents” of farmers, ranchers and U.S. producers.
The secretary, in a follow-up press release, also said the move is a cost-saving one. USDA expects to move more than half of its 4,600-person Washington staff, allowing the department to cut workers’ pay: The D.C. region has a nearly 34 percent federal salary locality rate, which increases salaries based on the cost of living, compared to 17 percent in Salt Lake City, for example.

“While this is a strategic and long term decision for USDA, I know that for you, this is an immediate and potentially major change,” Rollins told employees in the video message. “I know that your primary concern at this moment is for you, your families and your colleagues, I want you all to know that this decision was not entered into lightly.”
Congressional Republicans, weeks before the announcement, were clamoring to bring USDA workers and offices to their districts.
But several USDA staffers told POLITICO that the move will further hurt morale.
“This administration [isn’t] interested in supporting staff or even really in the jobs we do,” said one employee granted anonymity in order to speak publicly without fear of repercussions. “If they cared about either of those things, if they cared about serving farmers and ranchers, they wouldn’t have taken away all the staff, tools, and resources we use to serve them.”

A second employee, also granted anonymity to speak candidly, warned that relocating staff out of the Washington area would make oversight more difficult.
“[This] is just going to create an inner circle of powerful employees with access to people in high places and send everyone else out to ‘hubs,’” they said. “They are concentrating power and want fewer witnesses to what they are doing.”
The second employee suggested that moving would be costly for employees and for USDA, and it could force some workers to make the difficult choice to quit.
The first Trump administration moved USDA’s Economic Research Service and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture to Kansas City, Missouri, triggering an exodus of staff. That relocation was later reversed by the Biden administration.
 
“This administration [isn’t] interested in supporting staff or even really in the jobs we do,” said one employee granted anonymity in order to speak publicly without fear of repercussions. “If they cared about either of those things, if they cared about serving farmers and ranchers, they wouldn’t have taken away all the staff, tools, and resources we use to serve them.”
Translation: "No, how dare you make me work an actual job! No, how dare you make me move you where the work is! You don't care about the mission (of letting me sit on my ass and collect a check every week)!"
 
The USDA building in DC is huge and beautiful. I believe it was the largest office building in the world before the Pentagon was built, but it's already 1/3rd empty before this move.

They should consolidate several fed agencies in that building and then dump inferior office buildings. Kick out useless bureaucrats while still saving amazing buildings.
 
I sincerely hope that the reduction in federal gibs jobs in DC will get those useless assholes to move out to California where they belong. The large liberal voting bloc infesting a big circle around DC has made life consistently annoying for the states they reside in, as they inevitably vote blue regardless of the situation outside their expensive gated neighborhoods. Unfortunately, even if they are ousted from government jobs, there are more contract employers there than you could shake a stick at, so I fear most will stay right where they are and just get new jobs working for a company that works for the government.
 
Translation: "No, how dare you make me work an actual job! No, how dare you make me move you where the work is! You don't care about the mission (of letting me sit on my ass and collect a check every week)!"
Its funny cuz' everything they rail against as unacceptably life-disrupting about their job was something they cheerfully told average Americans was easy and expected of them around 2008ish when middle-class unemployment was solved forever so we don't' have to talk about it any more.....
 
The USDA building in DC is huge and beautiful. I believe it was the largest office building in the world before the Pentagon was built
Let's do some DuckDuckGo-ing...
1753477070534.webp
Oh cool, very classic, timeless architecture...let's try another angle...
1753477116732.webp
What the Leviathan fuck...yeah bulldoze the 50 most dismal Brutalist buildings in DC and move them in here, at least that would be a net improvement.
 
Good, we'll see who really wants to "help" when they might have to move to a red state and live surrounded by red staters.

I'm busy wolfing down some much-needed Chinese food while hastily scrolling and I thought this said "surrounded by red taters" and I was like, "Yeah! Your life revolves around potatoes now, bitches! If you don't like it, you can still quit!"
 
In general, there’s little need for most Federal workers to be in DC at this point. We have this thing called the Internet that allows people to collaborate from a distance. DC is notoriously expensive, and hopefully relocating positions to field offices can lower costs down the board.
 
Let's do some DuckDuckGo-ing...
View attachment 7691831
Oh cool, very classic, timeless architecture...let's try another angle...
View attachment 7691836
What the Leviathan fuck...yeah bulldoze the 50 most dismal Brutalist buildings in DC and move them in here, at least that would be a net improvement.
I dont mind the brutalist and art deco architecture of Washington DC i prefer it to any new age eco friendly shitbox architecture that has to be rebuilt in 20 years.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Marvin and Rubick
I dont mind the brutalist and art deco architecture of Washington DC i prefer it to any new age eco friendly shitbox architecture that has to be rebuilt in 20 years.
Art Deco and Brutalism are opposites in my book. Am no artfag but art deco is supposed to celebrate man's achievement, being artistic and decorative. Brutalism says the war is over, everything is bombed out and grey, cities are communes where citizens must be stacked efficiently like bugs in state housing.

One makes you look up in inspiration...
1753562932640.webp
1753562999391.webp
1753563021259.webp

...while the other makes you look up in horror.
1753563095743.webp
1753563166843.webp
1753563467676.webp
 
Last edited:
Let's do some DuckDuckGo-ing...
View attachment 7691831
Oh cool, very classic, timeless architecture...let's try another angle...
View attachment 7691836
What the Leviathan fuck...yeah bulldoze the 50 most dismal Brutalist buildings in DC and move them in here, at least that would be a net improvement.
It's still neo-classical, just applied on a bigger scale. It's probably just dirty.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Marvin
Art Deco and Brutalism are opposites in my book. Am no artfag but art deco is supposed to celebrate man's achievement, being artistic and decorative. Brutalism says the war is over, everything is bombed out and grey, cities are communes where citizens must be stacked efficiently like bugs in state housing.

One makes you look up in inspiration...
View attachment 7696533
View attachment 7696539
View attachment 7696542

...while the other makes you look up in horror.
View attachment 7696553
View attachment 7696574
View attachment 7696575
Years ago, I lived in a brutalist, Soviet era apartment building in a former Soviet country. Totally an ugly concrete shitbox.

DC federal buildings are perhaps big government indulgences but still they're nowhere like shitty socialist brutalism.

Our capital city is beautiful and well designed. Just abused. We should defund a lot of the big government bullshit but we can still use our DC infrastructure for things.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cactus
They should consolidate several fed agencies in that building and then dump inferior office buildings. Kick out useless bureaucrats while still saving amazing buildings.
Nah, don't dump them, make them into congressional dorms. Mandatory. No more need for them to bitch about having to keep two residences. You can even run a bus back and fourth for them so they don't have to worry about transportation.
 
National Park Service
Imagine having a National Park Service in a country that has some of the most dramatic landscapes in the world...and the headquarters is in Washington DC.

I'd hate to see the pussies that work there. I bet most of the employees would cry if they went without a soy latte for a day. It's probably 30 percent gay vegans.

They should be fed to the 1000 lb brown bears in Katmai National Park. Alaska 🐻
 
Back