Zoosadist Valerie / Connor Roundy / Hypnotist Sappho / Succubus Sappho / Vin R. Wolf / f1r3fr0st / V3xArray / r00tlulz - Chair Force "mommy dom" pedophile zoophile furry troon, cult leader who grooms children into zoophilia, wannabe hypnotherapist fetishist who exploits his clients, chairman of a fraudulent bestiality non-profit

[Galeocerdo]

I really didn't want to come back to this thread, I only did because this rando new account was watching mine, I checked his post history and it's clear a sappho alt talking in psuedo-intellectual speak and sucking the shaft as hard as possible. Since I'm now being fucking tagged by this I guess I'll smack back a bit. For the record I reckon this is an alt by Sappho, an orbiter trying to get in good with Sappho or just someone close to them talking up.

@Galeocerdo Disliking a statement doesn't alter its truth. Just because someone disagrees or dislikes a certain fact doesn't erase its validity or impact. Reality is not subject to personal preference; it is simply what is, and no amount of disapproval can change that. The truth remains steadfast, whether we embrace it or reject it, and our emotional responses to it do not affect ts existence. Ultimately, we must face the truth as it is, regardless of how we feel about it

I said the statement was dumb because it is. You were (and are) continuing to use psuedo-intellectual speech which sounds like you're throwing everything through chatGPT to make yourself sound poetic and intelligent, when ultimately you're saying "Sappho's gone and will never return, such sad, very wow" in the most homo-erotic way imaginable. We all know Sappho will return because they constantly do so, they go "I'm leaving QQ", leave for maybe 6 months whilst maintaining alts the entire time, do some "I've changed" bit then return only to do the same shit again then get chased off the internet. This is called a "Lolcow Loop" and it's what she's doing.

And @Galeocerdo exposing someone's flaws, mistakes, or secrets doesn't make you morally superior, especially if you were once close to them. If you were friends with the person you're exposing, it means at some point, you accepted them despite their imperfections. Turning around and broadcasting their faults doesn't erase your own involvement or association with them. In fact, it often says more about your character than theirs, showing that you were willing to keep their confidence until it no longer served you.

Jesus what saturday morning's kid show did you pull this heap of shit from? Let's run down the fact I wasn't "close" to Sappho, I knew them for roughly a month, I documented here and constantly said to them that I didn't trust them, I didn't agree with what they had done and the worst I could be painted with is being retarded a naive believing a horrorcow of this magnitude could be helped into leading a normal life. I dropped them the second they were found to be talking to Pedos and Zoos again. I didn't "Expose" anything as everyone already knew all this, I didn't "Broadcast their faults" because again, they were already known and I was immediately ridiculed by this thread and those around me for entering into the endeavour whilst everyone told me not to. I have not tried to "Erase" or hide my involvement in this case, I will also say Sappho was the same way back. If she in anyway "Trusted me" or had "Confidence in me" that would show they're beyond fucking retarded wouldn't it? They would within a month trust some dude who is/was a very vocal detractor of theirs who was an active contributor to a page discussing them in a negative light. It's also known I was being lied to the entire time by Sappho on a myriad of things which is why I dropped them. Actually pay attention to things.

or held them accountable instead of maintaining your relationship with them. By choosing to stay, whether out of loyalty, convenience or fear, you became part of the problem. At some point, inaction becomes just as damaging as the wrongdong itself. You only made moves once you had been wronged, you're doings were nothing much of revenge.

I would struggle to call speaking to them on discord for a month "Maintaining a relationship" with them, one could argue it is to a very small degree but I would say that implies we had struggles and arguments which required attention and ratification. The moment we had an issue I dropped them and before that we were small talking at best, I had two discord calls with them where they just vented about KiwiFarms and I told them if "The farms are full of lies and I've changed" then they should fucking prove it, which they ultimately didn't. I didn't "Chose to stay" because the moment I was offered the choice I left. This is an extremely retarded logic of thought because by this anyone and everyone who's ever interacted with Sappho is therefore complicit in every and any action they did.

 

[bezibank]

@Galeocerdo Maintaining a friendship with Sappho, even if you later exposed them, still reflects a level of complicity and tolerance for their actions. By choosing to associate with them, you provided them with social validation, potentially enabling their harmful behaviour for an extended period. Even if you spoke out, it raises the question of why you continued the relationship despite knowing their character. Exposing them later does not erase the harm that was allowed to persist while the friendship remained intact.

Cutting off a bad person immediately isn't always simple,m. People may stay connected to harmful individuals for a variety of reasons - gathering evidence, hoping for change, or even fearing retaliation. Additionally, morality isn't always black or white; individuals grow, change, and sometimes take time to recognise the full extent of someone's wrongdoing. What truly matters is the choice to eventually take a stand. Exposing a bad person such as Sappho requires courage, and the act of doing so should not be dismissed simply because of passed association. But fear or uncertainty doesn't erase responsibility, and waiting to take action, no matter the reason, means that harm was allowed to persist longer than necessary. While exposing Sappho is commendable, it doesn't undo the fact that a moral compromise was made along the way. Doing the right thing eventually doesn't mean the wrong choices beforehand were justified.

 

[Spoonomancer]

@Galeocerdo Maintaining a friendship with Sappho, even if you later exposed them, still reflects a level of complicity and tolerance for their actions. By choosing to associate with them, you provided them with social validation, potentially enabling their harmful behaviour for an extended period. Even if you spoke out, it raises the question of why you continued the relationship despite knowing their character. Exposing them later does not erase the harm that was allowed to persist while the friendship remained intact.

Cutting off a bad person immediately isn't always simple,m. People may stay connected to harmful individuals for a variety of reasons - gathering evidence, hoping for change, or even fearing retaliation. Additionally, morality isn't always black or white; individuals grow, change, and sometimes take time to recognise the full extent of someone's wrongdoing. What truly matters is the choice to eventually take a stand. Exposing a bad person such as Sappho requires courage, and the act of doing so should not be dismissed simply because of passed association. But fear or uncertainty doesn't erase responsibility, and waiting to take action, no matter the reason, means that harm was allowed to persist longer than necessary. While exposing Sappho is commendable, it doesn't undo the fact that a moral compromise was made along the way. Doing the right thing eventually doesn't mean the wrong choices beforehand were justified.

And you coming to the defense of Pedozoo Connor Roundy pulling multiple Roundyism's like saying Pedozoo Connor Roundy quit the internet and going after tranny shark chaser Galeocerdo isn't defending Pedozoo Connor Roundy?

 

[Squire Trelane]

I use a fresh account to post on the thread because I don't want to have any affiliation or lasting connection to it.

"Fresh account," like you actually have another. You're clearly a tourist. I don't think I've ever seen anybody on this website @ other users like some twitlongering faggot. Lurk more, Sappho.

 

[twisted cycle path]

@bezibank Do you do this spergbabble WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS faggotry on your main? Who am I kidding there is no main.

I see this fattass faggot's name show up and I get excited because he might have done something funny or killed himself but its just you running interference, what a shame

 

[Cronkle]

It’s Connor, a troll, or one of the fat fuck’s cock polishers. They’re definitely using chatGPT or something. Here is their only post that’s outside of this thread. I wouldn’t even respond to them. Might as well give this nigger their pink triangle already

Tesla is geniunely an impressive company, revolutionizing both the automotive and energy sectors in ways few others have, Their electric vehicles (EVs) are a major leap forward in sustainability, offering high performance, long-range capabilities, and an rvo-friendly alternative to traditional gas-powered cars.

 

[Galeocerdo]

Maintaining a friendship with Sappho, even if you later exposed them, still reflects a level of complicity and tolerance for their actions. By choosing to associate with them, you provided them with social validation, potentially enabling their harmful behaviour for an extended period. Even if you spoke out, it raises the question of why you continued the relationship despite knowing their character. Exposing them later does not erase the harm that was allowed to persist while the friendship remained intact.

Cutting off a bad person immediately isn't always simple,m. People may stay connected to harmful individuals for a variety of reasons - gathering evidence, hoping for change, or even fearing retaliation. Additionally, morality isn't always black or white; individuals grow, change, and sometimes take time to recognise the full extent of someone's wrongdoing. What truly matters is the choice to eventually take a stand. Exposing a bad person such as Sappho requires courage, and the act of doing so should not be dismissed simply because of passed association. But fear or uncertainty doesn't erase responsibility, and waiting to take action, no matter the reason, means that harm was allowed to persist longer than necessary. While exposing Sappho is commendable, it doesn't undo the fact that a moral compromise was made along the way. Doing the right thing eventually doesn't mean the wrong choices beforehand were justified.

I had a "Friendship" for a month, this is known and been shown many times. Why you're trying to moralfag deflect blame onto me like I was some buddy-buddy friend for a long period of time is beyond retarded. Where the fuck do you think I got some huge round of applause and a suckjob for "EXPOSING" (which again you fuck up, I didn't expose anything, everyone knew what I said already and I just served to make myself look retarded) Sappho?
Take your moralfag tourist bullshit elsewhere and stop deflecting onto me, noone is under the illusion that I'm some great and grand person because of my actions, we're all acutely aware I was retarded, I FAFO'd hard and everyone has held me to account for it.

tranny shark chaser Galeocerdo

^I mean this is now what I'm known as for my actions in the "Sappho Saga" and I'm not even worth of a footnote past that.
Christ I must've put a dent into Sappho's ego if I now have to deal with this kind of shit.

 

[Spoonomancer]

Christ I must've put a dent into Sappho's ego if I now have to deal with this kind of shit.

I put it down because Pedozoo Connor Roundy has a very funny hateboner towards you and will not hesitate to break any character he was trying to build up just to get at you and it's legitimately funny how he tried to say that your adult character with a lot of porn was even a fraction of as bad his relationship attempts with actual minors.

 

[Galeocerdo]

I put it down because Pedozoo Connor Roundy has a very funny hateboner towards you and will not hesitate to break any character he was trying to build up just to get at you and it's legitimately funny how he tried to say that your adult character with a lot of porn was even a fraction of as bad his relationship attempts with actual minors.

There is a whole lot of powerlevelling self-soothing I could do over "Muh degeneracy", it's also the only thing they had to try and attack me with, they thought it was all they needed to completely turn the thread against me and have you guys fuck with me instead of them. Deflection 101.

As for why they have the enormous hate boner? I would say it's because I was nothing more than a huge ego boost for them, I have said before I think they saw me "befriending" them as "I won against the KiwiFarms! I can even indoctrinate my enemies into being around me!" and because, very quickly, that was proven wrong, it's been a thorn in their side if they're still willing to make accounts just to snag my attention, or send Lazzy to add me on discord when shit goes down with the intention of likely trying to win me on side or mock me (Who tf knows, I literally saw the add and blocked the faggot).
I imagine they'll leave me alone eventually when they inevitably have someone a-log them who they have way more success fucking with.

 

[Your Mother Should Know]

Hypnotist Stupido

 

[Aquinas 2]

Hypnotist Stupido

Hypnautist*

 

[Cronkle]

After very publicly getting away with pedophilia and zoophilia, you’d think this fat, retarded, failure of a man would tuck his tail (it’s a figure of speech, Connor, don’t get excited you sick fuck) and just disappear his own sake. Not come back to his own thread with alts and chatGPT trolling. This is the way of the lolcow though I suppose. His fat ass can’t help himself, similar to how he can’t help himself by just staying away from kids and animals. And cake apparently

 

[t28ai875]

"Sappho won't return" ~likely Connor Roundy the pedozoo

If it isn't Connor Pedozoo Roundy, it's likely one of the minors in his "Sappho's Drug Chat" adding to the tally of people who come to Connor's defense and if it somehow a Connor Roundy the Pedozoo defender, please leave Connor's sight, he is likely grooming you or trying to groom you by love bombing you.

that account is a sock of a Sappho supporter, the forensic linguistics do not match Connors speech patterns, I made a doxbin on a Sappho supporter which I will post in a couple minutes. I will expand my doxxes of these fucks to help you guys root out impersonators and get to the root of this problem: Connor Roundy who recently changed their name in the last year or so if my sources are reliable and legit. Also if I may add, and I cannot stress this enough, Connor has not left. They have rebranded and moved on to traumatize other groups they have formed. The hunt will NEVER end. Fuck you Connor. You should have blown your brains out with that pathetic airsoft gun years ago you sick fuck. also shut the fuck up whoever is running that sock, before I expose you, cause your linguistics match an ex-lover of Connor, so shut it before you dig your own grave bitch. or don't, i'll happily dig it for you if your schizo paranoia will let you push your luck.

 

[t28ai875]

as promised, here is the aforementioned dox: https://doxbin.org/upload/PedoZooEliKostakis
this sick fuck was trying to date sappho and pined after them when they "died"

 

[t28ai875]

@Galeocerdo Maintaining a friendship with Sappho, even if you later exposed them, still reflects a level of complicity and tolerance for their actions. By choosing to associate with them, you provided them with social validation, potentially enabling their harmful behaviour for an extended period. Even if you spoke out, it raises the question of why you continued the relationship despite knowing their character. Exposing them later does not erase the harm that was allowed to persist while the friendship remained intact.

Cutting off a bad person immediately isn't always simple,m. People may stay connected to harmful individuals for a variety of reasons - gathering evidence, hoping for change, or even fearing retaliation. Additionally, morality isn't always black or white; individuals grow, change, and sometimes take time to recognise the full extent of someone's wrongdoing. What truly matters is the choice to eventually take a stand. Exposing a bad person such as Sappho requires courage, and the act of doing so should not be dismissed simply because of passed association. But fear or uncertainty doesn't erase responsibility, and waiting to take action, no matter the reason, means that harm was allowed to persist longer than necessary. While exposing Sappho is commendable, it doesn't undo the fact that a moral compromise was made along the way. Doing the right thing eventually doesn't mean the wrong choices beforehand were justified.

shut.
the.
FUCK.
up.

nobody asked for your two cents, and at that its not even worth that much, broke bitch. stupid cunts don't know when to stop yapping and go find a god damn taco to make in the kitchen. fucking fatass beaners. this thread's for the big boys, stay in your lane kiddo, go yap about tesla or some other shit but shut it in this thread, attention whore.

 

[crackers breakfast]

kiwi farms official furry slapfighting thread

 

[0 0]

Sappho In question, though once a prominent figure on the internet, will not be making a return. Their presence, which once shaped communities, has come to an end, and it's clear that no amount of nostalgia or longing will bring them back. Yet, some individuals online choose to impersonate them, not out of genuine intent but as a way to relive and reminsce on old memories of a time when that person's voice and personality brought something special to the online world. These impersonators are not truly reviving the individual but are simply clinging to the past, unable to accept that Sappho's era has passed. In doing so, they can only reinforce how much that figure impacted them, while simultaneously highlighting that no one can truly recreate what was unique to that person's presence.

Connor has a DMT lab if anyone is looking for a legit way to bust them for something illegal...

You two make compelling points. However,

 

[Bigideas McTucker]

shut.
the.
FUCK.
up.

nobody asked for your two cents, and at that its not even worth that much, broke bitch. stupid cunts don't know when to stop yapping and go find a god damn taco to make in the kitchen. fucking fatass beaners. this thread's for the big boys, stay in your lane kiddo, go yap about tesla or some other shit but shut it in this thread, attention whore.

Newest fag I've seen. Pink triangle. Triple posting absolute fucking nonsense.

 

[MisterNeurotic]

shut.
the.
FUCK.
up.

nobody asked for your two cents, and at that its not even worth that much, broke bitch. stupid cunts don't know when to stop yapping and go find a god damn taco to make in the kitchen. fucking fatass beaners. this thread's for the big boys, stay in your lane kiddo, go yap about tesla or some other shit but shut it in this thread, attention whore.

Could this be sappho?

 

[Galeocerdo]

Could this be sappho?

Potentially, it's not unlike Sappho to act much like the leader of a cult and completely throw people under the bus the second that person does something they don't like, which it would stand to reason they'd dox people within their clique (Minors included) just for going against them. Again, look at how quickly they tried to pathetically "attack" me with wild accusations and some furry porn because I didn't fall into line with what they wanted.
Also the ban would suggest it's likely an alt of Sapphos (as alts are not allowed).