Valve unhappy with Epic's copying of user data - Shills unhappy over bounced checks

vertexwindi

That's for employing me for eight years!
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Apr 29, 2014

Yesterday, we learned that the Epic Store client was copying a Steam user data file called localconfig.vdf. According to Epic, the client stores a local, encrypted version of the file and does nothing with it unless you opt to import your Steam friends, at which point it sends only hashed friend IDs to Epic's servers.

Epic CEO Tim Sweeney said that this process was a rush job designed in "the early days of Fortnite," and that it's going to be fixed. He also said that the Epic Store doesn't use the Steam API due to Epic's own user privacy concerns, not regarding Steam's API in particular, but because of a "general concern of APIs collecting more data than expected." He pointed to this article about Facebook data harvesting.

In a statement sent to Bleeping Computer today, Valve's Doug Lombardi said that the company is "looking into what information the Epic launcher collects from Steam." It sounds like Valve isn't too pleased about the whole thing.

"The Steam Client locally saves data such as the list of games you own, your friends list and saved login tokens (similar to information stored in web browser cookies)," wrote Lombardi. "This is private user data, stored on the user's home machine and is not intended to be used by other programs or uploaded to any 3rd party service.

"Interested users can find localconfig.vdf and other Steam configuration files in their Steam Client’s installation directory and open them in a text editor to see what data is contained in these files. They can also view all data related to their Steam account at: https://help.steampowered.com/en/accountdata."

In other words, Valve doesn't think the Epic Store client should be touching localconfig.vdf at all, and presumably would prefer it if Epic used the Steam API to gather friends lists.

Well isn't this interesting. At this rate we might need an all-compassing Epic fuckup thread.
 
I think it's hilarious that the same kind of people who whine about the NSA have no problem literally downloading and installing chink malware just to play the world's shittiest shovelware.
 
Last edited:
Fortnite.
1.) The PVE\Original gamemode has been in development for SIX YEARS, and still was being updated until the cut the support for it after that rushed PVP bullshit, because it took more resources, iirc.
2.) PVP\BR developers were another team, and not just any team, but the fucking UNREAL TOURNAMENT DEVELOPMENT TEAM! Talk about wasted potential.
I mean, they literally could've made Unreal Tournament 2004 but in the UE4 (which is what any UT fan has been asking since 2004), or at least something inspired by it (like the onslaught gamemode, which is team-based, and it fits in a game with a survival theme like fortnite.)

article said:
[...] we learned that the Epic Store client was copying a Steam user data file called localconfig.vdf [...]
First the fucked up some games with their exclusivity bullshit, then this.
Well, the only good news is that the Halo's masterchief collection is also coming to steam.
ALSO: TFW even Origin and Battle.net are better than the epic launcher.
 
Last edited:
I played Fortnite when it was just PvE. It seemed fun and interesting, though a bit lacking.

Then they saw the popularity of BR and the rest is history. It took off because PUBG's developers got fucking cocky and felt like they didn't need to improve their game or its dogshit performance and lag issues.

So you have people coming for a better supported Battle Royale and the autism of minecraft.

Honestly, Fortnite had the timing. I think if any better developed BR came out instead of Fortnite, we'd be talking about that instead. People were hungry for a better supported and BR type game, and were tired of PUBG's shit. Fortnite was just the one that fit the niche at the right time.
 
That fat re.tard Jim Sterling made a video saying Steam was still worse because it wouldn't protect him from bad games and offensive games.

It's such an awful fucking argument he definitely did it for clicks.

Games media shilled Epic at about the same time.

I suspect there was alot of under the table payouts. Even Resetera was incredulous towards Jim's argument.
 
Games media shilled Epic at about the same time.

I suspect there was alot of under the table payouts. Even Resetera was incredulous towards Jim's argument.

We already know they're corrupt whores who are easily paid off with blowjobs so cash money would be almost a step up for these bottom feeders.

Most of Gamergate was just reactions to the slimeball shit these crooked little pissants did trying to distract from their bullshit and lies.
 
Back