Vaush / @VaushV / VaushVidya / IrishLaddie / Ian Anthony Kochinski - Horse Cock Enthusiast, Larpy Violent Revolutionary, Sex Pest, in his 100th pedo scandal

[Mr E. Grifter]

I know you guys aren't super into vaush but earlier today he debated a lesser known leftuber named Mexie. They had this passive aggressive conversation about whether he and his followers were too toxxxxxxxxic and aggressive and it eventually boiled down to Vaush cornering Mexie on her not wanting confrontation at all and being a cuck who refuses to correct minority voices since she's a white bitch (granted they didn't use this sort of language, but that's the key takeaway). He made a pretty salient point about how the left's performative acceptance and deference is why they have been/are losers, since they do not have the strength to debate each other and get better at justifying their positions.

I liked the exchange and when he uploads it as a discreet video I'll post it here.

The far-left is famous for its infighting and autistic purity spiralling - what is he even talking about. Vaush bans and threatens to ban people who don't agree with him too.

The only reason his "tahxic" fans are relevant, is that he takes the position that your comment section, your fans and followers are your responsibility - it's implicit, if not an explicit position he holds - so when they're running around purity spiralling, and acting like him his own position is that it's his responsibility.

The biggest irony being his fans are so uncritical of him - and he laps that shit up. He's started to believe those over the top video titles that I'm pretty sure Destiny adopted ironically to mock Ben Shapiro videos, but kept because they bring in views.

 

[Brutalist]

View attachment 1307128
I guess there's gonna be a debate with Count Dankula tomorrow.
Not gonna lie, I've only really watched his Mad Lads videos and the one he did on bad anti-free speech arguments so I barely know shit about his political views or debating skills.
Anybody here got any predictions on how it's gonna go down?

I dare anyone to look at the subject of this "debate" and tell me it won't be three hours of screeching and ad hominems.

Being mislabeled and unlawfully charged as a nazi is the crux of Dank's rise to fame. He's been having this discussion for a long, long time with people ranging from politicians to prosecutors, and yet there still isn't a shred of evidence outing his supposedly supremacist ways. Does anyone seriously believe Vaush will have found something the BBC and the Crown both missed?
Dank isn't the sharpest tool in the shed by any means, but it doesn't take much to push your opposition on their complete lack of proof beyond warped conjectures.

Honestly this feels like a flimsy justification to have a go at one of the last 'right wing' youtubers that isn't a complete cow.

 

[Goku 1000000 O]

View attachment 1307128
I guess there's gonna be a debate with Count Dankula tomorrow.
Not gonna lie, I've only really watched his Mad Lads videos and the one he did on bad anti-free speech arguments so I barely know shit about his political views or debating skills.
Anybody here got any predictions on how it's gonna go down?

Dank is a mouthbreathing moron who was also part of UKIP’s nuking, much less than Carl but still.

His debate with Destiny was fucking embarrassing and he has a tendency to make himself look worse because he doesn’t understand what he’s saying. For example, he said he’d be ok with having a holocaust denier on his campaign staff during a stream with Kevin Logan because free speech. This was during the fucking campaign too.

Very good chance Dank does something really stupid and Vaush will try to capitalize on it like a motherfucker.

 

[Johan Schmidt]

I love how that's a 'debate'.
"You're a white supremacist."
'No I am not.'
Done, there's literally nothing you can do with that shit. It'd be like calling Vaush a Confucian and he just disagrees.

Dank is a mouthbreathing moron who was also part of UKIP’s nuking, much less than Carl but still.

His debate with Destiny was fucking embarrassing and he has a tendency to make himself look worse because he doesn’t understand what he’s saying. For example, he said he’d be ok with having a holocaust denier on his campaign staff during a stream with Kevin Logan because free speech. This was during the fucking campaign too.

Very good chance Dank does something really stupid and Vaush will try to capitalize on it like a motherfucker.

I don't think that they're stupid, I just think that they don't really give a fuck all that much. Their one and only overriding desire (Sargon and his ilk) seems to be 'leave me alone REEEEEE'. Beyond that they don't care about anything else; it's not stupidity, it's just some sort of weird hyper liberalism where so long as you leave them alone you can do and say whatever the hell you want. It's an infantile worldview and one that even Sargon seems to be edging away from now that he's popped out a kid and seems to be realising how fucked the UK is.

 

[SpergWatcher]

I know you guys aren't super into vaush but earlier today he debated a lesser known leftuber named Mexie. They had this passive aggressive conversation about whether he and his followers were too toxxxxxxxxic and aggressive and it eventually boiled down to Vaush cornering Mexie on her not wanting confrontation at all and being a cuck who refuses to correct minority voices since she's a white bitch (granted they didn't use this sort of language, but that's the key takeaway). He made a pretty salient point about how the left's performative acceptance and deference is why they have been/are losers, since they do not have the strength to debate each other and get better at justifying their positions.

I liked the exchange and when he uploads it as a discreet video I'll post it here.

I wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't upload the debate. He doesn't seem to upload debates that a) make him look bad or b) might make people he deem useful seem bad. He recently had a spat with black nationalists and debated on a live with someone that make an argument for protecting black culture (whatever the fuck they mean by that), and he received a short but quite significant backlash from his community and black nationalists because he said that any protection of culture was useless and wrong and he didn't wanted no culture to be protected. He never uploaded that debate and that was last week.

 

[Marco Fucko]

I wouldn't be surprised if he doesn't upload the debate. He doesn't seem to upload debates that a) make him look bad or b) might make people he deem useful seem bad. He recently had a spat with black nationalists and debated on a live with someone that make an argument for protecting black culture (whatever the fuck they mean by that), and he received a short but quite significant backlash from his community and black nationalists because he said that any protection of culture was useless and wrong and he didn't wanted no culture to be protected. He never uploaded that debate and that was last week.

Honestly yeah. I saw he mentioned posting a meme on his twitter that mocked Mexie but I can't seem to find it. Kind of a shame Vaush is cucking on this, I would have loved a bigger shitstorm.

 

[Rekkington]

View attachment 1307194

I dare anyone to look at the subject of this "debate" and tell me it won't be three hours of screeching and ad hominems.

Being mislabeled and unlawfully charged as a nazi is the crux of Dank's rise to fame. He's been having this discussion for a long, long time with people ranging from politicians to prosecutors, and yet there still isn't a shred of evidence outing his supposedly supremacist ways. Does anyone seriously believe Vaush will have found something the BBC and the Crown both missed?
Dank isn't the sharpest tool in the shed by any means, but it doesn't take much to push your opposition on their complete lack of proof beyond warped conjectures.

Honestly this feels like a flimsy justification to have a go at one of the last 'right wing' youtubers that isn't a complete cow.

Yes Vaush, a man named Count Dankula who did a meme where he made a fat pug raise its leg is the Nazi you have been looking for.
If Dankula doesn't just troll Vaush the entire time then there's no reason for him to be on the internet.

 

[Johan Schmidt]

Yes Vaush, a man named Count Dankula who did a meme where he made a fat pug raise its leg is the Nazi you have been looking for.
If Dankula doesn't just troll Vaush the entire time then there's no reason for him to be on the internet.

Best part about the whole dankula thing was that the whole punchline of the joke was that Nazis were bad. His dog was cute, he made it the 'worst thing ever' and it became a Nazi. That was the fucking joke; I have no idea how people can take 'I like the Nazi's' from the statement 'The Nazis were bad'.

 

[Corgo]

 

[Goku 1000000 O]

I don't think that they're stupid, I just think that they don't really give a fuck all that much. Their one and only overriding desire (Sargon and his ilk) seems to be 'leave me alone REEEEEE'. Beyond that they don't care about anything else; it's not stupidity, it's just some sort of weird hyper liberalism where so long as you leave them alone you can do and say whatever the hell you want. It's an infantile worldview and one that even Sargon seems to be edging away from now that he's popped out a kid and seems to be realising how fucked the UK is.

Skeptics are genuinely stupid people, their genuine density and inability to adapt their arguments shows a lack of mental capacity on their part. Ask any of them and they’ll still call themselves classical liberals, while gaining some fashy tendencies.

Carl may be (in my view) getting more fash, but his constant attempts at trying to cram it into a liberal framework is incoherent (see Starship Troopers).

If Dankula doesn't just troll Vaush the entire time then there's no reason for him to be on the internet.

I think this would be Dank’s best approach, can’t really embarass yourself if you just meme the entire time. But he really has to take no effort at taking it seriously, which wont happen.

Also if he does fuck with him the whole time that might make Vaush mad as fuck and that’d be very entertaining.

 

[Rekkington]

View attachment 1307661

You hear that gang?
We live in a regime where we deny trans existence. While we are force-fed insane tranny propaganda constantly.
Wow it turns out that when you subject everyone to trannies and expose their existence, normal people still don't like them and they still kill themselves.
Communism is the worst sort of gay.

 

[K-7]

I haven't watched the debate yet, just saw this pop on my Twitter feed

https://twitter.com/CountDankulaTV/status/1263218539856527361

 

[Namekian George Floyd]

Carl may be (in my view) getting more fash, but his constant attempts at trying to cram it into a liberal framework is incoherent (see Starship Troopers).

I stopped watching Sargoon years ago, in what way is he growing to be fashy?

 

[HonestJohn2376]

I haven't watched the debate yet, just saw this pop on my Twitter feed

https://twitter.com/CountDankulaTV/status/1263218539856527361

View attachment 1308307

Is Danka trolling or being serious? Either way, it's stupid.

 

[Slimy Time]

I haven't watched the debate yet, just saw this pop on my Twitter feed

https://twitter.com/CountDankulaTV/status/1263218539856527361

View attachment 1308307

Full debate here

Never heard of Vaush before that tweet popped into my feed, watched about 10 minutes. He is such a pseudo-intellectual faggot. Utterly insufferable.

V - "I expect a good faith argument for 15 minutes before it devolves into pointless bickering. I expect you deflect with "it's just a joke mate" and laugh a lot to duck questions".

D - "So are you saying that "it's a joke mate" is an invalid argument".

V - "No, it can be legitimate, but now I know you are going to use that because you are pre-empting it".

At this point I checked out. I know this type of debater all too well. Smugfag Nostradamus here with no self awareness/knows what he's doing, but one rule for me and not for thee. Best thing to do with these people is call them a negro, drag them off their high horse and beat them with shit flinging experience.

 

[Nolan Crush]

Full debate here

Never heard of Vaush before that tweet popped into my feed, watched about 10 minutes. He is such a pseudo-intellectual faggot. Utterly insufferable.

At this point I checked out. I know this type of debater all too well. Smugfag Nostradamus here with no self awareness/knows what he's doing, but one rule for me and not for thee. Best thing to do with these people is call them a negro, drag them off their high horse and beat them with shit flinging experience.

yeah, he's a huge retarded hypocrite; I watched almost the entire thing, only missing a few minutes. What kept me there was Dankula showing just how stupid and pathetic Vaush is. He also complains about hypocrisy, why do so many hypocrites complain about hypocrisy? "White supremacists are dishonest"
Vaush cut context to make a point. He was being dishonest at 1 hr, 18 min, and 14 sec
In this debate Vaush takes out context in regards to Tommy Robinson. His wiki mentions him being a neo-fascist however the full context is "Robinson has been active in far-right politics for many years. He was a member of the neo-fascist and white nationalist British National Party (BNP) from 2004 to 2005." It's also the only mention of "neo-fascist" so it's the only part he could be talking about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Robinson_(activist) Vaush never mentioned the 2004-05 part. Which is VERY important because it means that people would understand that Tommy might've changed since it was 15 years ago.
I also love how he treats everything he says as a fact despite him having no idea what he's talking about, fucking egotist. He acts like he knows Tommy more than Dank (his literal friend) does. Vaush isn't "pro-free speech" he said in a livestream that he'd ban Sargon from YouTube if he could, despite Sargon having kids. That's not being "pro-free speech".

 

[Flamenco]

Is Danka trolling or being serious? Either way, it's stupid.

Nah, I think that Dankula simply gave Ian all the respect and seriousness that he deserves.

 

[Goku 1000000 O]

I have to say, although I still think Dank is not very bright he did well against Vaush. I’m actually surprised Vaush absolutely failed to prosecute the case against Dank as badly as he had.

Dank honestly managed to control the conversation far more than I’d expect him to usually.

I stopped watching Sargoon years ago, in what way is he growing to be fashy?

More to do with his rhetoric, like leaning into the nationalism and traditionalism angle more and more.

 

[HonestJohn2376]

In this debate Vaush takes out context in regards to Tommy Robinson. His wiki mentions him being a neo-fascist however the full context is "Robinson has been active in far-right politics for many years. He was a member of the neo-fascist and white nationalist British National Party (BNP) from 2004 to 2005." It's also the only mention of "neo-fascist" so it's the only part he could be talking about. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tommy_Robinson_(activist) Vaush never mentioned the 2004-05 part. Which is VERY important because it means that people would understand that Tommy might've changed since it was 15 years ago.

Tommy u-turned from being a white nationalist to a Zionist. He's still far-right, but he went from simping for Anglos to simping for Jews. While you can argue Zionism has fascistic tendencies, it is obviously a different disease from white nationalism. I personally find both positions idiotic. Might as well ditch meth for crack.

https://www.thejc.com/lifestyle/features/what-makes-the-edl-s-former-leader-who-says-he-is-a-friend-of-the-jews-tick-1.65493

I also love how he treats everything he says as a fact despite him having no idea what he's talking about, fucking egotist. He acts like he knows Tommy more than Dank (his literal friend) does. Vaush isn't "pro-free speech" he said in a livestream that he'd ban Sargon from YouTube if he could, despite Sargon having kids. That's not being "pro-free speech".

I despise the chubby limey, but even he has a God-given right to grift.

Nah, I think that Dankula simply gave Ian all the respect and seriousness that he deserves.

So trolling it is.

More to do with his rhetoric, like leaning into the nationalism and traditionalism angle more and more.

The political climate is splitting the rationalist skeptics™, most of whom were formally milktoast liberals, to either become nationalists or socialists. It's a gradual process but there is a visible trend. Hard to be an "enlightened centrist" these days.

 

[Namekian George Floyd]

I just watched the debate, both of them did really poorly but Vaush explaining how you could accuse someone of being a white supremacist without having any evidence by pure conjecture that supports your conclusion was worse than Dankula constantly telling Vaush to just ask him questions despite it obviously not working.

Btw, who is actually a white supremacist? Is that actually a thing anymore? Who wants whites to reign supreme over all other races? I only ever see people that want to remain completely seperate from other races.