Video Game Chat Thread - Pre-Alpha Experimental Version

Are videogames for children?

  • Total voters
    8
  • Poll closed .
Bluewhalechampion said:
fallout 3 has better immersive world
Click to expand...
is being a fallout 3 fan criteria for entering the kingdom of ESL. do true disciples of speaking really shitty english write songs and poems about a king of the third world who will overthrow the tyrannyical new vegas empire and create a kingdom of fallout 3 loving brown people from its ruins.
 
sha k (pronouced shack) said:
is being a fallout 3 fan criteria for entering the kingdom of ESL. do true disciples of speaking really shitty english write songs and poems about a king of the third world who will overthrow the tyrannyical new vegas empire and create a kingdom of fallout 3 loving brown people from its ruins.
Click to expand...
i dont get what your saying but your own english is kinda shit bro.
what i mean to say fallout 3 is better

Darsheel said:
Holy shit how can you say that your a fucking niggerfaggot
Click to expand...
what is with fallout 3 and indians? what does it has to do with pajeets?????????
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Dojima's Dragon
Steam currently has a sale on racing games. Are there any games out there that do car combat like Twisted Metal?
 
0Chance said:
I'm wondering what games out there are worth playing, but theres so many out there. So I'm wondering if you guys can suggest some based on my top 9 1000+ played hour games. I've noticed largely I gravitate to games with replay-ability or no real ending.

View attachment 3297305

View attachment 3297304

View attachment 3297303

View attachment 3297302

View attachment 3297300

View attachment 3297299

View attachment 3297314

View attachment 3297323

View attachment 3297327
Click to expand...
Factorio
 
  • Informative
Reactions: 0Chance
Bluewhalechampion said:
fallout 3 has better immersive world
while fallout nv has an empty world
most of the time i am fighting insects and animals
in fallout 3 you have a serious survival horror
you would shit your pants if you enter the subways
the game also has better then new vegas
which gave justice to hp lovecraft
at the same time new vegas lore is shit!
and new vegas has a lot of oooooh that referench pee pee poo
fuck that and also has lot of lgbt nonsense and sexual themes
while fallout 3 has less of that.
and i hate how fallout nv focused on NCR, and in short made it the most robotic oblivion tier npcs
there is nothing about ncr
there are many factions like Ceaser and Khans and also the fucking enclave!
ENCLAVE! how can it end with old farts! there is no fucking sense!
plus NCR is shown as strong af but get its ass handed to them by a group of fucking junkies!
FUCK THAT!
fallout 3 is simplistic
you can see the carnage how BOS get fucked by super mutants and other grim discoveries
Click to expand...
Getting flashbacks of "do not redeem" spam.

Unrelated: I'm looking at some revamped old-school MMOs, specifically City of Heroes on /coxg/ and Star Wars Galaxies Legends. Anyone know if those are worth it?
 
Rear Admiral Butthole said:
Getting flashbacks of "do not redeem" spam.

Unrelated: I'm looking at some revamped old-school MMOs, specifically City of Heroes on /coxg/ and Star Wars Galaxies Legends. Anyone know if those are worth it?
Click to expand...
they run on private servers, so the first question is if you can handle that drama and admins.
 
Last edited:
Marissa Moira said:
Personally I wouldn't really bother going through an MMO 100% legit, the time investment just isn't worth it when there's single player games that offer similar stuff and are much better.

Like if you want a big expansive world you have Elden Ring.
Click to expand...
Sorry for the late reply.

Wasn't really planning on going through all of them - the Path of Fire expansion is the only one that has anything that looks interesting to me, personally - but even then, it's not like I'm gonna be interacting with the community. It's solely for gameplay with me; I'm just wondering if the PoF expansion would be worth getting, after I've heard so much shit about the Devs and community.
 
Scanline said:
Interested to hear why.
Click to expand...
The narrative that everyone hates Fallout 3 and New Vegas is GOAT didn't really gain traction until the last, like six or seven years or so. You always had hardcore fans that hated Bethesda Fallout but for the most part people loved Fallout 3 when it came out.

As someone who considers it mostly on par with Fallout New Vegas for different reasons I can say that it's pretty good and doesn't deserve the constant shitting on that it gets.
Bluewhalechampion said:
fallout 3 has better immersive world
while fallout nv has an empty world
most of the time i am fighting insects and animals
in fallout 3 you have a serious survival horror
you would shit your pants if you enter the subways
the game also has better then new vegas
which gave justice to hp lovecraft
at the same time new vegas lore is shit!
and new vegas has a lot of oooooh that referench pee pee poo
fuck that and also has lot of lgbt nonsense and sexual themes
while fallout 3 has less of that.
and i hate how fallout nv focused on NCR, and in short made it the most robotic oblivion tier npcs
there is nothing about ncr
there are many factions like Ceaser and Khans and also the fucking enclave!
ENCLAVE! how can it end with old farts! there is no fucking sense!
plus NCR is shown as strong af but get its ass handed to them by a group of fucking junkies!
FUCK THAT!
fallout 3 is simplistic
you can see the carnage how BOS get fucked by super mutants and other grim discoveries
Click to expand...
For some reason it always appeals to retarded ESLs like this monkey though, so that doesn't do the game's rep any favors.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Least Concern and Vault Boy
Mega Black said:
The narrative that everyone hates Fallout 3 and New Vegas is GOAT didn't really gain traction until the last, like six or seven years or so. You always had hardcore fans that hated Bethesda Fallout but for the most part people loved Fallout 3 when it came out.

As someone who considers it mostly on par with Fallout New Vegas for different reasons I can say that it's pretty good and doesn't deserve the constant shitting on that it gets.
Click to expand...
I would argue that Fallout 3's positive reception on its release was because the gaming community was a fucking hellhole in the 7th generation. Game writing was still laughably bad with only a handful of exceptions from the PS3/360 era, and the medium wasn't mature enough for professional criticism to have much of any value beyond recommending what's flashy and fun.

Fallout 3 especially shone when New Vegas launched in a borderline unplayable state on both PC and console, leading most players to not even get to see much of what the game had to offer over its predecessor.

RPGs in general also weren't that popular back then (yeah put down that copy of Skryim, I'll get to it in second). Fallout 3 was, surprising nobody, a sequel to the Fallout series; which were these isometric RPGs that were kind of fucking hard and obtuse and not really easily available unless you happened to live by a pawn shop that carried late 90s PC games. Most people probably didn't even play the original games and still haven't, so they wouldn't have had a frame of reference for the series' historic strengths. Basically what passed for "RPGs" around that time was occupied mostly by Bethesda and BioWare, neither of whose games are even close to what the classic CRPGs of yesteryear provided. There really isn't much in the way of roleplaying in games like Oblivion, Skyrim, or Mass Effect, and it's not like anything in Dragon Age was as profound as what you could find in Planescape: Torment.

Nowadays everyone kind of "gets" RPGs and the classics of the genre are more available than ever. New Vegas got patched and works just fine with a fresh install on the most popular gaming distribution service in the history of mankind, so of course more people are going to be able to appreciate it. Fallout 3's reputation has disintegrated mostly because people have a broader gaming perspective now. It's not impressive to see a guy's head explode into a million different pieces in slow motion anymore, so the game is judged by what it actually brings to the table. And unfortunately, Fallout 3 doesn't bring much.
 
  • Disagree
  • Dumb
Reactions: Wesley Tailpipe the Third and Vault Boy
Scanline said:
And unfortunately, Fallout 3 doesn't bring much.
Click to expand...
That's selling it short. I'm definitely in the camp that both games are good and you should play both, but in terms of comparing the two, NV is pretty much 3 with a new story and environment, some tweaks, and a couple new features - basically a total conversion of 3 rather than a true sequel. Absolutely nothing wrong with that, but without 3's engine and the decisions made about how to make an FPS Fallout game, there would have been no foundation upon which NV could be built.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Wesley Tailpipe the Third, Mega Black and Vault Boy
I have been sinking too many hours then I should have in Assassin's Creed: Valhalla on my week off. The formula is beaten to death at this point, but I cannot sit here and say I am not loving every minute of being a badass Viking chick wielding dual axes.
 
header.jpg

Enhanced PC port of the Switch rhythm game is finally coming on Steam
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back