[VOTE] Mozilla Dev Wiki is rebranding and the options look ugly

stares at error messages

Readn' Tea Leaves
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Dec 7, 2020
<https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSenAWZJ2_sK9DY3Ppvryx6vfmaQktuhA_-asAbtjMq7Oa4VzQ/viewform>

This is a google forum for changing the logo for <https://developer.mozilla.org>.

Option 1 looks like literally nothing. I couldn't pick it out of crowd or care what it means. It's the premature ejaculation of logos.

Option 2 looks like In Uterine Device. I can't think of it meaning anything other than, "trannies too need IUDs for their fake vaginas." Yuck!

Option 3 is basically what they have now. It's the Mozilla lizard (or close enough) and you should vote for it. It's similar to what is already used; an outline of the lizard. It's the least groce and or confusing option. Please vote for it.

Option 4 maybe makes me think of the company that makes replicates from blade runner, but it's still too abstract and really looks like smoke-stacks. It's plain and nu-imaginative. It has all the same problems as Option 1.

Option 5 looks like that weird gay thing gashas do with umbrellas, but it's crap and too abstract.

Option 6 makes me thing of Target's in-store brand. It's a total faggy abortion of a design.

Option 6 could also use square instead of circles, but the tranny didn't check over all the images they were putting into the google form.

Option 7 looks like nothing, again. Maybe a road tired, if you squint; so much like the movie Rubber I'll be wanting for it to kill me the entire time to alleviate the pain of boardum and bad taste.

Option 8 looks like a blur. Maybe it's meant to be the speed lines form fast and furious, but I can't see what it actually is, if it's trying to be anything. It's ugly, too abstract, and confusing. Vote hell no!

Thank you for you time. And hopefully all the disgusting bitches that Mozilla hires will have abortions instead of children so we won't have to live with multiple generations of this tyranny.

And if they don't will just have wright the laws to make their children illegal.
 
Last edited:
These are all terrible, but #2 deserves an extra dose of scorn for looking like it says { V }. Vozilla?

Also:
Curly braces would flash, animate and dynamically play with copy
Underscore would flash, animate and dynamically play with copy.
Optional dynamic morphing of baseline shapes that would 'ripple'.
For the love of God.
 
As long as they don't ruin the actual content of MDN, it's not a crisis.

Option 6 would be the worst if they pursued the "Optional dynamic morphing of baseline shapes that would 'ripple'" that would just serve to slow down the page. Oh wait they want to do that for 3 of them, huh.
 
Back