Walmart—yes, Walmart—says AI agents are its future - This is your notification to short Walmart

Article / Archive

Could Walmart become a leader in the burgeoning agentic AI race?

After watching the retail company’s technology leaders discuss a host of new agents Wednesday at a New York City event, a yes might not be as farfetched as it might sound to some.

The retail giant unveiled its vision for how AI agents are going to overhaul how customers shop on its digital platforms; how corporate and store employees do their jobs; and how vendors and sellers track their merchandise performance. In some cases, this autonomous technology is doing so already.

“Walmart is all in on agents,” the company’s chief technology officer, Suresh Kumar, told reporters at the event. “Agents can make life simpler for every aspect of what we do at Walmart,” he added.

Despite its roots as a brick-and-mortar retailer, Walmart has more recently been at the forefront of online commerce. In embracing AI agents, however, the company is positioning itself ahead of even many digital companies.

Agents, to many in the tech industry, are the next evolution in the current AI boom, where artificial intelligence not only acts as an assistant, but can autonomously complete complex multistep actions with limited, or even no, human involvement. And for Walmart, the company’s leaders say it’s a natural next step in a technological transformation that has been underway inside the Arkansas-based retailer for the past few years. Kumar said he believes that Walmart holds a key advantage over many competitors in this space, considering the depth and breadth of data the company holds both because of its massive customer base, and when it comes to employee experiences as the world’s largest nongovernment employer.

He and other Walmart tech leaders showed off examples of four “super agents,” which essentially act as managers that rout tasks to each more specialized agent. For consumers, there’s Sparky, currently a generative AI digital assistant that can answer product questions and make suggestions, and which has been live in Walmart’s app for some time. In the future, the assistant will start to take actions. Namely, create an order of weekly essential products based on a customer’s shopping behavior, and place the order with essentially a thumbs-up from the customer. The agent will also eventually possess the capability to curate a multi-item order geared to an upcoming party or event—based on specifics such as theme, attendee size, and a shopper’s budget.

Other leaders showcased internal agent use cases that the company says will more efficiently accomplish mundane and repetitive tasks for store workers, corporate staff, Walmart software engineers, and brands and other companies that sell through Walmart’s physical and digital storefronts.

While some of these agentic use cases are live today, others are coming soon, company execs said. But they were intent on making one point clear.

“It’s not vaporware,” one executive said, accurately reading between the lines of one of this reporter’s questions.

Critically, many questions remain unanswered. What exact impact will this so-called agentic future—if brought to full fruition—have on employee headcount at the world’s largest nongovernment employer?

“We expect jobs to evolve, and we don’t know what that looks like yet,” Walmart exec Dave Glick told Fortune.

Will the revenue and employee productivity gains outweigh the intense costs of using AI at scale, especially for a company known on Wall Street for consistently generating profits?

And at a broader industry level, is Walmart willing to participate in a possible future where consumers trust shopping agents from companies like OpenAI or Perplexity to autonomously make purchase decisions for them? Walmart U.S. CTO Hari Vasudev told Fortune that the company is building the technological capabilities to do so, but that the ultimate decision will lie elsewhere in the company.

“I don’t want to mandate the business model; I want to be able to build it as open as I can,” he said. “Whether the business decides to do it with a particular AI operator or not will depend on the economics and the business model and the relationships.”
 
I am at a bit of a loss at what ai could/would do... self checkout exists and is arguably better. I don't really see anyone not demanding in person customer service for broken or spoiled items.

Is this just another retarded boomer thinking ai makes money just because it exists?

Legit only use I can come up with is making designs for their no name brand mogs and t shirts.
 
Mega corp over-invests in hot new line-go-up tech that they are confident will make them practically a superpower in 4 years..... just like Virtual Reality..... Green Energy..... Diversity and Inclusion..... Gay Pandering....... etc etc etc.


Though I'm still a bit perturbed at the sudden swamping of ads for appliances touting "AI features!" that are just a 90's CD player's "randomize" function..... or encouraging you to not make the simplest of choices so the AI can "do it for you!" Like..... I don't know anyone who needs help deciding what to buy at the grocery based on what they plan to make for dinner...... apparently? All these years? We were just getting lucky in that regard, but now with a personal assistant built into the fridge? The guesswork is over!


Never again will you go out for bread and mistakenly buy a hammer instead!
 
Last edited:
The retail giant unveiled its vision for how AI agents are going to overhaul how customers shop on its digital platforms
the one thing i most often want to use their "digital platforms" for is to check which of their stores have an item in stock. not for "Delivery" or "Pick Up" but just so i can drive over there and get it myself. why do they make the simplest things difficult.
 
Think of the amount they're probably spending on this...and what's the actual profitability? An occasional extra product sold at a 1-3% margin, at the cost of someone not actually looking around (and therefore potentially impulse buying something else while they look).

No way does this glorified recommendation chatbot produce as much revenue as it costs.
 
Can’t wait til all of these retarded corporations lay off massive amounts of their workforce before getting fucked as they finally figure out LLMs aren’t actually “intelligent” and AI agents are a meme.

“It’s not vaporware,” one executive said

It actually is, retard.
 
Watch them lay off 50% of their workforce within a year of implementing all this AI stuff.
It's entirely staffed by Indians.
I had a friend who worked for the Walmart corporate office in Arkansas for a bit and said they had Infinity Indians all crammed into the IT building. When he left he was replaced by more Indians. They all spoke Hindi or whatever to each other so any non Indian was shutout of communicating with the rest of IT basically.
 
Last edited:
Doing unpaid labor in a store sucks and I don't understand why anyone accepts it.

Off topic, sorry.
I agree in principle. In practice I find it superior to dealing with the brain dead monkey at the till triple scanning a single item then needing 10mins for its handler to remove the items because its rightly not trusted.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cactus
I agree in principle. In practice I find it superior to dealing with the brain dead monkey at the till triple scanning a single item then needing 10mins for its handler to remove the items because its rightly not trusted.
I rather the person being paid to be there is the monkey rather than me, but I guess I'm in the minority.
 
Can’t wait til all of these retarded corporations lay off massive amounts of their workforce before getting fucked as they finally figure out LLMs aren’t actually “intelligent” and AI agents are a meme.

When was the last time these AI things actually made a good product or something better, and not some meme shit to clown on? I can't find it but there was some supermarket chain (out of the UK, I think) which had some recipe generator based on what was in your fridge so you got recipes that were "a delicious salad of lettuce and old batteries".
 
I don't know anyone who needs help deciding what to buy at the grocery based on what they plan to make for dinner
I can see a niche for it.
Hellofresh.webp
People are willing to pay a subscription to these meal services like Hello Fresh and Gousto, and while you can pick your menus, a lot of customers will accept the random assortment they're sent. It's partially because a lot of people are bad at home economics, so seemingly think the only options are "I'm going to eat the same meal every day for a week"
mealprepsunday.webp
or "I'm going to have something completely different every day, why are my groceries so expensive?". If you've got some service or little AI helper buddy that can suggest an assortment of meals with a lot of ingredient overlap, customers will flock to it.

If someone like Walmart can roll out something similar, bundling ingredients in "packages", I can imagine people opting into it - and then Walmart has a great way of managing demand. Glut of seasonal produce means costs are lower and margins higher on tomatoes? Recommend the herd loads of tomato based dishes this week. Supply chain issues interfering with your dried pasta shipments? It's rice week! etc
 
Back