WaPO's Uvalde shooting article.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Last edited:
I gave the Editor-in-Chief a piece of my mind. Will probably go right to her spam folder, but it felt good to call them pieces of shit.
 
Haloperidol IM said:
Man, I think somebody in the WaPo newsroom got a visit from the Good Idea Fairy after Crowder released the manifesto.

This strikes me as a more sensational kind of journalism over operating in the public interest; that said, I guess the latter has been dead and buried since before the new millennium.
Click to expand...
The difference is Crowder released material related to the person committing the crime that everyone should rightfully see but troonguards don't want us to have access to. This is just an invasion of privacy and there's no way you can argue otherwise.

Again, journos are like all other cloutchasers: subhuman sociopathic pieces of shit.
 
The gun is the tool, the mind is the weapon.

(Sorry)
 
Kimberly Garcia, the mother of a Robb Elementary School shooting victim whose tweets are featured in the OP of this thread has made some statements about the article.

garcia 1.png
garcia 2.png
 
Statement from a (anti-gun activist) father of a Uvalde shooting victim about the article, he thinks it's a good idea and should be seen to show the horrific nature of shootings.
1700173498868.png1700173519740.png1700173560815.png
 
Wah wah, more emotionally driven propaganda to abridge on the 2nd amendment. Sure the blood splatter pics in uvalade is pretty shocking but I imagine The Washington post would never give the same article for kids killed in Syria calling it "A rare look at the devastation caused by US Air force drones", because it's not as important as the fact that some nut used a certain type of gun.
 
Dire Dire Cocks said:
Statement from a (anti-gun activist) father of a Uvalde shooting victim about the article, he thinks it's a good idea and should be seen to show the horrific nature of shootings.
View attachment 5499364View attachment 5499367View attachment 5499368
Click to expand...
No, that's what the government will do if there's a gun ban.

In incidents where guns saved lives - Jack Wilson, Eli Dicken, the SRO at Olathe East - the gun control lobby wasn't happy that lives were saved. They coped and seethed that they didn't have dead bodies to grift off of.

The only reason anyone wants you disarmed is because they want to do something you would kill them for. These ambulance-chasing sons of whores make me sick.
 
Dire Dire Cocks said:
Statement from a (anti-gun activist) father of a Uvalde shooting victim about the article, he thinks it's a good idea and should be seen to show the horrific nature of shootings.
View attachment 5499364View attachment 5499367View attachment 5499368
Click to expand...
"One single bullet struck uziyahs spine and blew out his stomach"

Surely it'd be on the ground in the photos no? I want to feel bad for the guy, but when he uses his child's death in this capacity I cannot. Especially with his "warning" of its GOING to happen to your kids, yet I understand his doomer view. Sad is all I can say really, I do not think they will ever show the dead bodies of the children because I genuinely think the real mangled ones were shot multiple times. I do not believe this single bullet entrails removal. I want to think it's been said to them so they think their child wasn't shot more than once.
 
attractive_pneumonia said:
New reg, every single one of your 5 posts is shilling for Israel or trying to tamp down "conspiracy thinking." How about you go fuck yourself, I'm allowed to have my suspicions and I'm not even a Sandy Hook conspiracy theorist, I just find that guys antics weird.
Click to expand...
He's just a faggot kike, ignore the fuckign clown like all the rest.
 
Do they mention the fact Uvaldale was only as bad as it was because the cops did fuck all? Bit of a issue with wanting to ban guns and leave the only guns in the hands of incompetent doughnut munchers no?
 
Meat Target said:
Emotional blackmail.
Click to expand...
Absolute Journoscum. TJD. Whenever one of these rags pushes out a propaganda piece to radicalize coastal libs, never a single mention of lives saved, or Home invasions or robberies thwarted, geo political implications of other countries literally being afraid to go to war with the United States because of how harmed the populace is.

“Omg 100 people hurt their hands with drills. Let’s constantly publish about how dangerous drills are.”

Meat Target said:
I gave the Editor-in-Chief a piece of my mind. Will probably go right to her spam folder, but it felt good to call them pieces of shit.
Click to expand...

that is actually excellent. Never miss an opportunity to complain. Don’t let these bastards think that they’re unanimous in any sense. Complain at every opportunity kiwi friends.

Every time you see faggot rainbow corporate trash, find the send feedback button, and give them a screenshot, and tear them a new one for being the problem
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom