WaPO's Uvalde shooting article.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
JIDF Team 6 said:
Didn't Connecticut pass a law after Sandy Hook restricting access to all crime scene information/autopsy reports? But now it's okay to publish photos of dead kids in the newspaper?!
Click to expand...
Only in the state of Connecticut is that law in effect.

All I want is for some Connecticut police officer to go rogue and release the photos just so retarded boomers and schizos can be disproven once and for all. Their arguments have so many holes but they will never ever admit they are wrong until something like that is released.
 
Dire Dire Cocks said:
I think it might be a way to stop schizos from being schizos screeching about "false flags!!"
Click to expand...

Exept schizos will ALWAYS screech about false flags. The fact this is coming so long after, and deals with such a total non-issue about the Uvalde shooting instead of say the inaction and incompetence of the police or the question of how a 18yo got himself a AR-15 with a full kit in straight up unreal time. It like a purposeful Streisand Effect on a made up glownigger honeypot.

It just doesn't work.
 
I thought you guys were a legit paper. Not fucking faces of death or Orozco the Embalmer. JFC.

Not that I had high thoughts about Jeff Bezos' rag of a paper. Democracy dies in darkness. Keep fucking crying cunts.
 
Dire Dire Cocks said:
Only in the state of Connecticut is that law in effect.

All I want is for some Connecticut police officer to go rogue and release the photos just so retarded boomers and schizos can be disproven once and for all. Their arguments have so many holes but they will never ever admit they are wrong until something like that is released.
Click to expand...
Yeah, that law was so retardedly draconian to the point it hurt the cases of other victims. It actually made me at least hear the schizos out.
 
Lets publish dead kids! That'll show those rethuglikkkans with their AK15 full auto combat murder machines!

Die Jeff
 
not to be that guy, but is there any actual proof of this happening besides someone on twitter? she says "as you all know by now" so im assuming she got this info from someone
 
JIDF Team 6 said:
Didn't Connecticut pass a law after Sandy Hook restricting access to all crime scene information/autopsy reports? But now it's okay to publish photos of dead kids in the newspaper?!
Click to expand...
What's up with Sandy Hook anyways? As a non-American I have seen photos of every aspect of the JFK assassination, RFK assassination, ground-zero photos of the WTC rubble, Paddock's sniper nest, the Columbine scene, the Nashville scene, etc. but for some reason that one event is under a total blackout. I think the only other conspiracy-generating place that's equal in secrecy would be the interior of the base at Groom Lake.
 
BulkForceFive said:
What's up with Sandy Hook anyways? As a non-American I have seen photos of every aspect of the JFK assassination, RFK assassination, ground-zero photos of the WTC rubble, Paddock's sniper nest, the Columbine scene, the Nashville scene, etc. but for some reason that one event is under a total blackout. I think the only other conspiracy-generating place that's equal in secrecy would be the interior of the base at Groom Lake.
Click to expand...

The new law puts Connecticut among a minority of states with a statute on the books explicitly restricting public access for pictures taken at crime scenes, according to a survey by the research office.

Under the law passed in June, crime scene photos depicting a homicide victim are not required to be disclosed to the public if they are considered to be an invasion of the victims’ privacy or their family members.

Although the laws vary, California, Florida, Georgia, Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, Pennsylvania, and Texas have comparable statutes, the survey found.

Connecticut’s new law also exempts recorded interactions with emergency services personnel from disclosure. Although 911 call recordings are still subject to disclosure, the statute can prevent the disclosure of portions of audio recordings during which a homicide victim is described. Currently, this portion of the law only applies to recordings made before the end of next year’s legislative session.
 
BulkForceFive said:
What's up with Sandy Hook anyways? As a non-American I have seen photos of every aspect of the JFK assassination, RFK assassination, ground-zero photos of the WTC rubble, Paddock's sniper nest, the Columbine scene, the Nashville scene, etc. but for some reason that one event is under a total blackout. I think the only other conspiracy-generating place that's equal in secrecy would be the interior of the base at Groom Lake.
Click to expand...
Not a total blackout.
We have an entire website about it showcasing every photo and video relating to it (very good website for anyone who is interested in it).
We have pictures of Lanza's corpse (granted, not full photos, but still photos.)
We have audio of Lanza's suicide shot and him hitting the floor after he fires it.
We also have a 800+ page book named The Sheltered Storm written by an extremely well-versed researcher.
We have his old YouTube channel's entire video library where he explains his motive basically (antinatalism).
We have 1000+ pages of his old forum messages on the Shocked Beyond Belief forum.

The media completely dropped the ball on the entire story. They mis-reported his brother, Ryan Lanza, as the shooter initially because he was wearing his ID during the shooting. They made false claims that his mother whom he shot first, Nancy Lanza, worked at the school as a lunch lady. They even said his dad, Peter Lanza, was dead.

Also, every fucking retard on Reddit and other site acts like even talking to the conspiracy theorists was a crime against humanity. No, you fucking idiots, taking millions of dollars from Alex Jones does not make more people believe, as a matter of fact it makes more people not believe it.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the info. This answers a lot of questions I had.

This is why I come here, instead of getting info from the MSM. Now someone needs to compile all that stuff for Portapique, because I have mucho questionas about that incident, too.
 
General Emílio Médici said:
Exept schizos will ALWAYS screech about false flags. The fact this is coming so long after, and deals with such a total non-issue about the Uvalde shooting instead of say the inaction and incompetence of the police or the question of how a 18yo got himself a AR-15 with a full kit in straight up unreal time. It like a purposeful Streisand Effect on a made up glownigger honeypot.

It just doesn't work.
Click to expand...
You're right. The press can create a time machine and send skeptics of the day of JFK Assassination and they will still find a way to find a conspiracy. Posting pictures of dead kids will just mean it would spread on the internet for all to see like all other gore media.
 
Dire Dire Cocks said:
All I want is for some Connecticut police officer to go rogue and release the photos just so retarded boomers and schizos can be disproven once and for all. Their arguments have so many holes but they will never ever admit they are wrong until something like that is released.
Click to expand...
So it truly hasn't crossed your mind that the reason the law was passed was to conceal evidence of government involvement in that mass shooting?

It's obvious that a shooting really did happen. Why use "crisis actors"? Killing is a bonus, not a drawback. They like killing. They like killing. They definitely killed people for real because they like to do that anyway. It's obvious that, like all the others, this shooting was done by the government.
 
Friendly reminder that "false flag" doesn't mean the thing didn't happen, just that it might not have happened the way you're being told it did.
The phrase comes from ships flying another's flag, so those guys would get the blame for whatever fuckery occurred.
 
What are the journalists out to prove with this? Everyone hates the cops involved and the authorities got extreme criticism from both sides. With the context of inept police wouldn't seeing pics of dead kids make you want teachers to be armed or for schools to have some kind of armed on site resource officer? Is this article just Lebowitzstienberg jerking off to dead white children, are they ready to be that mask off?
I'm a mentally unstable conspiracy theorist and I've never understood the false flag narrative when it comes to school shootings. Whenever you look at a proper false flag or planned event there is always something to be gained. Multibillion double insurance claims on the twin towers, hiding the pentagons money laundering and justification of a insanely profitable war to name a few.
 
BulkForceFive said:
What's up with Sandy Hook anyways? As a non-American I have seen photos of every aspect of the JFK assassination, RFK assassination, ground-zero photos of the WTC rubble, Paddock's sniper nest, the Columbine scene, the Nashville scene, etc. but for some reason that one event is under a total blackout. I think the only other conspiracy-generating place that's equal in secrecy would be the interior of the base at Groom Lake.
Click to expand...
There is a video of one of the parents that just seems highly irregular, he is supposed to be speaking to the press but as he approaches the guy starts laughing while talking to some of the camera people. He then blanks his face over the space of 10 seconds before the prepared statement starts. The conspiracy crowd generally focuses on this guy and claims he is a crisis actor, something that is quite real -- during training for fire fighters, national guard, or the police, the government will put ads out for people to sign up and their job is to pretend to be wounded or injured or crazy during a simulated crisis setting so that the trainees can learn to block out bad things and focus on their tasks rather than getting shellshocked by what they see. This guy in the video just seems like he is overacting for some reason to me, some may think otherwise but usually a telltale sign is the lack of tears or runny nose. He just gives off the vibe of someone faking it, Patrick Bateman style fake human shit.

 
Kyle Odom said:
I'm a mentally unstable conspiracy theorist and I've never understood the false flag narrative when it comes to school shootings. Whenever you look at a proper false flag or planned event there is always something to be gained.
Click to expand...
Yes, the "something to be gained" is gun confiscation. They figure that if they kill enough kids and blame the NRA hard enough, they can eventually manufacture consent for gun confiscation. "They" refers to the Deep State operating within the United States Government. So the various glownigger agencies are colluding to do this and most likely operating through their favorite demonic construct, "THE INTERAGENCY."

It worked in New Zealand, after that glownigger shot up those sandniggers. That was just a few years ago.

It's worked in a lot of countries. They think it will work here, too.
 
Kyle Odom said:
What are the journalists out to prove with this? Everyone hates the cops involved and the authorities got extreme criticism from both sides. With the context of inept police wouldn't seeing pics of dead kids make you want teachers to be armed or for schools to have some kind of armed on site resource officer? Is this article just Lebowitzstienberg jerking off to dead white children, are they ready to be that mask off?
I'm a mentally unstable conspiracy theorist and I've never understood the false flag narrative when it comes to school shootings. Whenever you look at a proper false flag or planned event there is always something to be gained. Multibillion double insurance claims on the twin towers, hiding the pentagons money laundering and justification of a insanely profitable war to name a few.
Click to expand...
School shootings are a stronger manipulation tool than regular mass shootings because kids are dying. It worked best at the State level than Federal and the states with the highest population size in the country have the most restrictive gun laws, besides Texas, so the manipulation works.
Uvalde really screwed that up because of the videos of the cops fighting with the parents instead and only beginning to do something when BORTAC decided to do something about it. Now everybody wants more guns (this trend beginning during the Summer of Love) and trained teachers. The issue about the 2A is such a mess we're repeating the 10th amendment kerfuffle of the Civil War era except this time the rebels want more totalitarianism
 
Last edited:
I don’t really have anything to say other than this is just fucked. This kind of thing makes me feel like Hell is real and we’re living there. (:_(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom