Warhammer 40k

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Got to play as Techmarine in SM2 as finally people finished prestiging it so I can actually enter in matches.

In general, it is a fine class, but I still think a deployable Turret would be better than depending on RNG (I do enjoy the default skill), and I find the Omnisiah Axe quite weird to use, but I think thats to be expected from a proper halberd weapon.
 
Is this guy a confirmed tourist? Like he hasnt painted anything? How tf does he do his channel with so little skin in the game?
He's a tourist that got fixated on the lore for TW warhammer a decade ago, then proceeded to look into more lore, give his own interpretations of lore, and so on. But even the lore he did look at and make videos about was old shit back when he was actually doing that a decade ago.

No models, no painting, no games, doesn't read the books, maybe plays some of the videogames rarely. His entire thing is a grift that he was successful at for a few years before other channels started doing lore shit as well, but he no longer actually gives a shit about anything GW does(and didn't really even when it was the focus of his main channel), hence being a grifting faggot who can't get a real job elsewhere so instead he does the culture war bullshit with a halfassed focus on GW.

Meanwhile Sargon of Applebees has shown painted models, and managed to irritate a black library author simply by existing, to the point of becoming canon in 40k as a necromunda character.

Fuck Arch.
 
They still use resin. Most of the auxiliary units in Necromunda are resin and there's oddball minis in The Old World that are still resin that are mostly old stuff. For some reason, the one named Beastmen character that was released last year that's resin. Have a personal theory it was gonna be used for Slugtongue or they were gonna make a new character for a new codex before they went the End Times route instead.
From my observation, everything that's resin is packaged in either generic boxes or in blisters with product graphics that do not include model count. I have very recent examples to check. Resin models are also sold almost exclusively via GW's online store, not physical retail, which is why their packaging is less detailed.

His argument seems to be that they're dumbing shit down as part of an attempt to turn GW products into "The Warhammer Brand" like how Marvel turned their shit from a line of comics and associated products to "The Marvel Brand." More people than ever wearing a t-shirt with the Captain America shield on it while the actual Captain America comics are abysmal dogshit -- but who cares about what a bunch of nerds obsessed with comic books care about?

Yeah the Warhammer paint pots still suck dick and you get less than a teaspoon of paint in them for $7-9 each but who cares, we have licensed Purity Seal Air Fresheners to sell. Subscribe to Warhammer+.
Okay, I gave in and watched the video. Ripped it so that it can be discussed without adding to his metrics:

Pretty much the diatribe I imagined it was going to be, but here are a few further thoughts over the video's duration:

1772920306428.png1772921075735.png
  • Arch has this whole side rant about the 40k logo, idolizing the third one (since 3rd Edition) while decrying the latest one (since 9th Edition). He dismisses the first two as "products of their time", but after having time to settle and seeing them all at once, I think the same can be said of the third one as well. The current logo also has the clearest aquila shape, especially from a distance. Though I've always felt indifferent about the logo change even at the time, I have a hard time even understanding what Arch means to claim that the third logo sells "the product" while the current logo criminally sells "the brand". The current logo is still clearly taking cues from previous designs to form a continuing lineage representing 40k specifically. If it was intended to forsake "the product" for "the brand", I would think that it would radically shift to bear more resemblance to the broad Warhammer brand logo that debut the year prior (and doesn't get mentioned by Arch at all in this video).
  • Proving my previous conclusion of Arch's business sense to still be true, it appears that he is unable to comprehend that GW has always aimed to attract new customers who are unfamiliar with their ecosystem, especially children. In fact, I think they might proportionally put more effort and investment into specifically introductory marketing material than any other IP, be it Magic The Gathering or Star Wars or Pokemon. I was first drawn into 40k by participating in an employee-guided demo game at a Games Workshop mall store more than 25 years ago, and I still have introductory booklets from back then.
  • Arch is making a big error in assuming that GW just pushes products through their own retail stores when annual reports show that GW pulls more revenue from third-party retailers. As I just said in a previous post, GW is put against competing paint brands within the same stores. I've inspected many third-party retailers in my area, and I don't think any of them sells only paint from GW.
  • It's very bizarre that Arch is coming with this big complaint about "the product" being sacrificed for "the brand" when this brand change is to sell paint to more people. You know, paint, a central component to the tabletop game and hobby that is GW's core business. This is pretty much as far as you can get from GW's miscellaneous merchandizing that Arch's ranting here is more suited for.
  • "Our products are falling in quality continuously. Our rules are garbage." The fact that Arch puts rules and product quality in separate statement indicates to me that he believes the models themselves have become worse. I don't think I've ever heard such a complaint from anyone, even among the many who criticize GW's game designs, promotional painting style, and the conception of Primaris Space Marines. With only a few outliers (like Inquisitor Corteaz and Desolation Squad), it has been my observation of GW's models as well as public feedback that quality has only gone up and continues to be the best in the realm of plastic miniatures.
  • As Arch mocks the red label on the red paint, he gives away that he's a tourist who doesn't paint when it appears he doesn't understanding the purposeful color coding on the pots to indicate the type of paint. GW has been using such color coding since 2007.
  • Though it is difficult to objectively gauge the trajectory of comparable IPs Star Wars, Star Trek, Marvel, and DC when they're under the umbrellas of giant media corporations, Warhammer is much easier to assess in GW's annual reports since GW itself is so much smaller and focused. We can see that revenue has greatly been on the rise since the onset of 40k 8th Edition (and Primaris Space Marines) since 2017. Furthermore, we can see that through all of the reports going back to 2014 that profit from licensing/royalties has been wavering between 10% and 20% of total profit. So even as Warhammer licensing and BRAND recognition has been on the rise as we can all tell, the core tabletop game and hobby PRODUCT has also been rising such that the proportion in GW's business has remained the same.
Finally, it's also very ironic that Arch is having such a fit over GW dropping the Citadel Colour brand and broadly promoting Warhammer as an IP when he is not known to have ever painted or engaged in the tabletop wargame and hobby proper, even before he vocally renounced Warhammer almost a decade ago because of Primaris Space Marines. Indeed, Arch himself has always been the tourist he decries.

Is this guy a confirmed tourist? Like he hasnt painted anything? How tf does he do his channel with so little skin in the game?
The most I've ever heard is that Arch painted some Skaven a very, very long time ago, but even that might not be true. The name "Arch" does not lend well too search queries, and it just occurred to me that his real name appears to be unknown. Because ultimately nobody cares about him.
 
I feel a bit sentimental about the Citadel brand because that was Bryan Ansell's company and he was the One True God of Wargaming but at the end of it's just obscure corporate trade dress and really not something worth getting upset about either way.
Bryan-Ansell-Nachruf-3610622992.jpg
 
autistic people do not like when things change. The whole thing about citadel being the brand name of GW's paints was never something that needed much explanation and its not like theres some leftist ulterior motive in renaming a brand of paint.

(MY WARHAMMER PAINT IS UNDER ATTACK!!!!!)

Meanwhile, apparently citadel does wierd shit like change the mix on nuln oil and make it worse? I can't verify because apparently I have the 'old version'.
 
Proving my previous conclusion of Arch's business sense to still be true, it appears that he is unable to comprehend that GW has always aimed to attract new customers who are unfamiliar with their ecosystem, especially children. In fact, I think they might proportionally put more effort and investment into specifically introductory marketing material than any other IP, be it Magic The Gathering or Star Wars or Pokemon. I was first drawn into 40k by participating in an employee-guided demo game at a Games Workshop mall store more than 25 years ago, and I still have introductory booklets from back then.
To further this point about Arch's lack of business sense, every IP is basically a leaky bathtub/bucket/whatever. People will age out of it, get old and die, get too busy with other things in life. If you're a business that heavily revolves around selling that IP as a brand to customers, you absolutely at the bare minimum need to replace those customers that will be lost over time, just to maintain your status before any kind of growth.

Arch is making a big error in assuming that GW just pushes products through their own retail stores when annual reports show that GW pulls more revenue from third-party retailers. As I just said in a previous post, GW is put against competing paint brands within the same stores. I've inspected many third-party retailers in my area, and I don't think any of them sells only paint from GW.
He's failed to simply look at GW's publicly available annual and semi-annual reports while commenting on shit and looking like an idiot many times. Because GW's focus as a company is so narrow, their reports are actually pretty clear for anyone to read. But he can't be bothered before cranking out videos.
"Our products are falling in quality continuously. Our rules are garbage." The fact that Arch puts rules and product quality in separate statement indicates to me that he believes the models themselves have become worse. I don't think I've ever heard such a complaint from anyone, even among the many who criticize GW's game designs, promotional painting style, and the conception of Primaris Space Marines. With only a few outliers (like Inquisitor Corteaz and Desolation Squad), it has been my observation of GW's models as well as public feedback that quality has only gone up and continues to be the best in the realm of plastic miniatures.
I'd say there's a difference between quality and design. Coteaz 2.0 is fucking ugly, the desolation marines with their giant nerf guns are fucking ugly. But is the quality an issue? No. The recent Deathwatch Kill Team actually had some shitty mold lines that actually are pretty bad.
1772931084010.png1772931151514.png

But Arch likely isn't complaining about that.

As Arch mocks the red label on the red paint, he gives away that he's a tourist who doesn't paint when it appears he doesn't understanding the purposeful color coding on the pots to indicate the type of paint. GW has been using such color coding since 2007.
Because he's a grifting faggot. Base is red, air is grey, wash is green, dry is gold, layer is blue, etc. within the current line(and has been for years)
1772931265895.png

Meanwhile, apparently citadel does wierd shit like change the mix on nuln oil and make it worse? I can't verify because apparently I have the 'old version'.
Yep, this definitely a thing. It's quite a few paints too, not just nuln oil.
 
I live by the belief that if your voice triggers the butchers nails and I wanna beat you to death, then your personality will do the same, your face will too, your lifestyle, your family, just everything. If the very first instance of life-interference evokes a desire to revert to monke then you are trash.
IMG_7996.jpeg
Arch proves my theory. That nigger is like psykers to nail-enlightened individuals, everything about him makes me wanna graduate from homicide to genocide.

Ian too, honestly the whole of Warhammer YouTubers pretty much proves you can and should judge a book by their cover.
 
see this is actually worth talking about to a massive audience of warhammer fans who already think GW is screwing them. I guess you'd have to actually be a hobbyist to care *sigh*
Indeed. That's yet another reason I think a bunch of the hobby channels are actually alright. No one is watching hobby channels unless they're actually interested in the hobby. The lore channels are all run by faggots who want to leech money off of GW via youtube with as little effort as possible but at least some of them actually do paint and play. I don't believe you need to have thousands of points of multiple armies, be painting 6 hours a day, and go through at least 4 chapters of whatever the latest black library book of the week is. However, most people actually involved in the hobby in one way or another I will always hold in higher regard than people just involved in lore channel faggotry(viewing or creating). But even among lore channels,

Arch is one of the worst with regard to being a fucking tourist.
The most I've ever heard is that Arch painted some Skaven a very, very long time ago, but even that might not be true. The name "Arch" does not lend well too search queries, and it just occurred to me that his real name appears to be unknown. Because ultimately nobody cares about him.
I've also heard this but never seen anything to confirm it. Allegedly he was being a smug retard doing a bare minimum paintjob for some local single day tournament thinking he was getting one over on the judges by having a basecoat, a metallic, a spot color, and then a wash or whatever.... which literally is just the bare minimum at a large event and for a single day no one would give much of a shit anyway.
 
Meanwhile, apparently citadel does wierd shit like change the mix on nuln oil and make it worse? I can't verify because apparently I have the 'old version'.
Nobody should be buying citadel/warhammer paints anyway, these are for newcomers, for people looking to give little Timmy a cool holiday gift, that's it. Between AK, vallejo, tamiya, pro acryl, armypainter, you are well taken care of.
 
Nobody should be buying citadel/warhammer paints anyway, these are for newcomers, for people looking to give little Timmy a cool holiday gift, that's it. Between AK, vallejo, tamiya, pro acryl, armypainter, you are well taken care of.
Whilst I swear by Pro Acryl as the best range, Citadel paints arent really bad, just certain colours are. Whites and off whites mostly.

Also their Contrasts are pretty solid. Black Legion is one of my favourite blacks and if anyone has a contrast to recommend, let me know, theyre pretty good to work with.
 
What are some books that show the creepy sinister side of the Tau?
Anything by Peter Fehevari containing the tau is good. They're not cartoonishly evil but they're conniving, sinister. The Farsight quadrilogy by Phil Kelly is also pretty good, particularly the last 3 for the purposes you asked.

The whole race are literally deprived of free will by the ethereals, they're not coerced or forced into it but it's also not a choice they're free to make. And there are implications it's not entirely natural.
 
Back
Top Bottom