Was Bush really bad at all?

As a kid I didn't care about politics, so when he won I barely noticed, I can't comment on much of his presidency but he was certainly a terrible president just based on Iraq and the Patriot Act alone, not to mention him openly becoming a supporter of liberalism in recent years.

He deserves to be legally prosecuted for treason and to receive whatever the maximum punishment for that is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alex Hogendorp
In my estimation, 90% of the criticism came from the 2003 Iraq War. Prior to that he had impeccable approval and afterwards it took a huge hit and never recovered. It really did color his entire presidency.
 
George W Bush was pretty bad, considering his wrongdoings have gotten Vladimir Putin to shift further away from reasoning with the west and the succeeding presidents (with the exception of Donald Trump) only exacerbated the issue. Not saying that I am a supporter of Vladimir Putin or Donald Trump. I just don't like the fact politicians have to power to fuck up so many different lives by shifting humanity to a paleolithic civilization where it's hospitality is comparable to that of the Permian Mass Extinction. All just for potentially one small action alone.

Needless to say. American Intervention was widely unpopular even during that days of the Vietnam War.
 
So, for all of the bitching about the military-industrial complex, and the surveillance state, you can thank Dubya and pals for that as he was the one that flung the doors wide open on all of this, with everybody else riding in on his authoritarian coattails. Obama, Trump, and Biden are mere amateurs compared to what his administration pulled.
Lyndon B. Johnson would like to speak with you. Nobody likes having their life's work stolen by somebody else later on.

Now back to whether George W. Bush was a terrible president. Eh, in my opinion, he's radically substandard, however, he's not egregiously terrible. It'll be hard to get a 100% accurate evaluation of the guy's presidency until at least the 2040s once an entirely new generation removed from anything related to the early 2000s becomes conscious. All the millennials and older Zoomers are still heavily influenced by the era's political culture so their biases will show up no matter how impartial they may try to be. Think about the boomers' instilled hatred of Nixon and love of LBJ that took until quite recently to be reevaluated showing that they were both run-of-the-mill politicians of their time who did non-uniquely crappy things for their parties at the expense of others.

The big "shift" in "their" America will be forever linked to those figures no matter how much new information or dissertations point out the seedlings of the problems that bloomed during the '60s and '70s were probably planted decades ago. They're just the new guys tasked with holding the water can over the spot it was buried in. Same with Bush and Obama.

Iraq, the Patriot Act, and No Child Left Behind are all horrible things that will forever be a blight on Bush Jr.'s 12-year run, but they were all things that were most likely gonna happen either way regardless of whether Dubya entered politics.

Al Gore or whatever Rhino takes Bush's place would have invaded Afghanistan and most likely another bordering country still based on the fear of general terrorism which was the big boogie man in D.C. for years. People forget how fearful America was of any Islamic group being allowed to operate and potentially plan strikes on the homeland. If it wasn't Iraqi WMDs, a new group in Yemen, or Pakistan for harboring Bin Laden. Any number of things could have set the twitchy military people off who were itching to continue the fight against the Jihad. The "Nation Rebuilding" aim was a goal in almost every foreign campaign after WWI so we would still stay to try and make a functioning government only to later find out this isn't like a European or Asian nation. The goat herders obey nobody besides their clans. I guess if things went perfectly we could have been out of there in 2012, still a decades-long quagmire though. Puppet government left behind 100% collapses after withdrawal.

The CIA as we all know, has been spying on people daily as far back as the 50s and the monolith that is their department only grew tenfold in the following years. The Patriot Act is not new, just the result of a tragedy not being put to waste. Project ECHELON was already able to intercept satellite transmissions and most internet traffic since the 90s. A new politician in the 2000s likely signs the same measures we saw in 2001 just spaced out in smaller portions. Snowden still has a bunch of shit to leak. The Feds grow bigger and more advanced as they adopt emerging technology. The reasons for clamping down so hard may be due to different contrived reasons like online radicals or mass shooters. Misinformation might also be put into play far earlier if the "Terrorism" alarm isn't there to be exhausted.

Finally, we have the schooling system that already had the focus on funding and learning based on standardized testing scores since 1983 with the "A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational Reform" report. That shit was so entrenched along with despised by most educators that the newly released Simpsons parodied it during a 1992 episode, seeing it as the thing which decided a person's life. Since bureaucratic policies are based on contextless statistics, this number-crunching obsession still sees schools all over the country sacrifice real learning for knowledge parroting so that they get large enough grants to keep funding the damn overcrowded buildings. Reforms against it will take a snail's pace to gain enough momentum to be enacted.

TL;DR:
Bush was a middling President whose cabinet made retarded decisions and policies which were not all that surprising in hindsight given the general trends at the time. He could have done better, but that would only make a 5% better reality that could easily still slip into the same societal bog we find ourselves in today. He'd have to kill off 99.9% of the Senate and politicians in 2000 to make a real change in the direction the United States took.
 
Yes. He was possibly the worst president in American history in terms of the sheer evil he did to this country without doing much good. No Child Left Behind, Patriot Act, wars in the sandbox on nonsensical ("installing democracy") or blatantly false ("finding WMDs") premises. Trillions and trillions of dollars spent, thousands of Americans dead, tens of millions of American lives destroyed, all to make this country and other countries far worse places than they were. He was the neocon puppet for evil scumbags like Dick Cheney, a tool for the Trotskyist commie ideologues of neocon ideology. Bush continued and ignored bad policies under Clinton, which ensured that Americans suffered the derision of the world, record high gas prices, decaying infrastructure and health, and eventually the Great Recession thanks to the failure after failure of Bush's criminal administration. Bush failed to secure the border and even broke promises related to restricting immigration.

About the only thing he didn't fuck up was domestic crime, since he kept the Clinton crime policies around and let Rudy Giuliani keep NYC safe. He also had the decency to not seek promote war against Russia unlike today's neocons, even if he did promote color revolutions in Eastern Europe, even if it was just because pissing off Russia too much would hurt the wars in the sandbox.

Bush was basically the right hand of the globalist machine. Obama was the left hand, and the only reason I don't think Obama was as bad (and make no mistake, he was BAD) is because he didn't have the chance to fuck up and mostly stuck around placing millstone after millstone around the country's neck. Plus Obama is slightly more authentic of a person. He comes across as a closeted snobby black guy, because that's exactly what he is. Bush pretended to be a Texas cowboy good ol' boy when he's a goddamn Connecticut coastal elite WASP. Absolutely disgusting.

Was it all Bush's fault? Only some of it. This shit was 25 years in the making when Bush took office, the result of the Uniparty taking advantage of crises in the 70s to sell our economy to China and turn the US into the slave of corporations. Bush's daddy was one of those evil bastards and a certified glownigger. Dubya Bush was the moment the system failed and gave us someone who wasn't just evil, but incompetent at their evil (go read about Paul Bremer, Bush-appointed dictator of Iraq to see what I mean).

I could go on for pages and pages about how bad Bush was, but to sum it up, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, and his entire administration should be executed for the crimes they committed against the American people, starting with letting terrorists kill 3,000 Americans on 9/11 just to start wars for personal gain.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Willie B. Hardigan
He's a relic from a time when choices in American politics were at their worst, which was coincidentally at the height of Boomer's voting power. I hope we never go back to the neocon "vs" neolib era ever again. Seeing the modern Democrats suck him off along with Dick Cheney is disturbing.

I'm an elder zoomer who was in grade school when Bush was president and supporting the Iraq war was "patriotic" in my town.
 
He wasn't good, but wasn't the worst president in history nor did his antics call for the level of asshurt people had at the time.
It was basically proto-trump derangement syndrome when you really think about it. Most didn't notice since there were actual problems, but all the hallmarks were there.
All of his worst policies were continued and expanded upon by Obama, who was far worse president all things considered.
 
Back