was wwe2 necessary?

KemChy

KemChy

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jul 16, 2018
think about it...no seriously THINK ABOUT IT...over 3 million people dyed and even more surely more..people got sick in winter got killed for no reason...the good outcome is that the soviets expanded to berlin...but then again so much people ripped for nothing...maybe they should have let hitler take danzig and not many things would change not so many people would die.and really was hitler even THAT bad?yeah sure he killed people.but john mccain also killed people or bill clinton...why do they get a free pass?and it's not like hitler directly killed somebody.hitler was bad but i think churchill and roosevelt were much worse.the best outcome would be hitler and stalin joining together and destroying uk usa...but this wasn't the best result possible.what is your opinion on this issue/topic?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Dumb
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Mrs Paul, Crisseh, Domo Kitties and 12 others
WWF was completely necessary, now Smackdown on the other hand..
 
KemChy said:
just like any other person. but the thing is i don't have an address so i can't really order anything. i have the same address as 30 000 other people. i had to pick up all the peripherals to install the internet myself and install them home. nobody came to do it for me.
Click to expand...
what are your thoughts on monoliths and zones?
 
  • Like
Reactions: KemChy and Dial M for Misgender
KemChy said:
no i meant the great war 2 from 1941-1945
Click to expand...
You list the war years incorrectly.

As an American we were active in those years only, but the war started before that. American schools teach 41 because we kinda showed up and won the war for the entire world again.
Russians schools teach 41 because the commissars shot people that taught history that had nothing to do with USSR.

WW2 happened because retards like Woodrow Wilson allowing Germans to be shit on after the war to a point a collapse was going to happen, not if when and then being shocked nations that fell apart extreme leaders popped up. The LON was a Chris Chan level fail.

There's a ton of reasons WW2 was going to happen and the easiest way to sum it up because WW1 happened. It's often said, in jest there was no second world war, just a decade long break before we went back at it and this time brought more countries along.
 
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Mrs Paul, Nekromantik and Prussian Blue
Warsmith Kroeger said:
[redacted]
Click to expand...

No, it is not. War is for political systems that wish to profit off of a war-tax. This is called khums in the musloid political system, and it was called the Treaty of Versailles in WWI. But here is the deal. The profit margin for engaging in war is exponentially smaller than if you are to collaborate with the country that you wish to declare war upon. Instead of killing millions of people that could produce labor for you, you should instead cooperate with the country and reach an agreement so that you can compound the wealth of both countries. Sometimes war even results in a net deficit! And the risk-reward of war is an illusion that only causes people to invest in a power-mongering entity rather than an entity that produces actual goods!

War is one of the dumbest things mankind has ever engaged in. War is not important at all, and its illusory economic benefit versus just simple collaboration with other countries is why it is not important. War is for sex perverts that want to get their dicks hard by thinking about how many people they are killing. Economic collaboration is for psychologically normal human beings that realize that they do not want to economically strip and cripple both their own country and another country just for the sake of saying, "We won!"
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Dumb
Reactions: Dial M for Misgender and (deleted member)
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back