US Washington State Gov. Ferguson’s new approval policy stalling public information - Control of Information: its (D)ifferent when we do it


A new requirement that Gov. Bob Ferguson's office approve most state agency press releases and media responses is delaying information from reaching the public, drawing repeated concerns from state officials, records obtained by Axios show.

Why it matters: The policy has held up multiple agency communications — from updates on bridge repair plans to public health guidance on vaccines to explanations of how a federal shutdown would affect Washington state.
  • Staffers for three former governors say no such policies were in effect during their administrations.
Ferguson's communications director Brionna Aho defended the policy in an email to Axios Tuesday, saying it aims to increase collaboration across state government.
  • "A new administration has different ways of doing things," Aho said. "People are used to doing things a certain way, and change can be hard."
  • She said the state has dozens of agencies, and they "need to be communicating with each other and with the governor's office."
Axios obtained the records cited in this report through public records requests filed with the governor's office and five state agencies.
  • They reveal state staffers frustrated by the glacial pace by which communications move through Ferguson's office, and concerns about how it affects their ability to relay important information.
"We've missed opportunities to share key information with the public," wrote Rachelle Alongi, a former communications manager with the Washington State Health Care Authority, in an email to agency staff in September.
  • Alongi described the approval process as "grueling," "painful," and a "continual barrier" — one that "creates a tremendous bottleneck, where we are waiting days or weeks for a response."
At times, agency staff said the policy was used to avoid answering tough questions — such as about funding for the Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) food aid program, which was affected by last year's federal government shutdown.
  • "Last week, we were instructed by the Governor's office to decline all interview requests related to WIC to avoid questions related to the State's budget shortfalls and why there was no backup funding for the program," Raechel Sims, a spokesperson for the state Department of Health, wrote in an email to colleagues in October.
Slide titled Challenges/barriers notes media-relations delays: government approval needed for responses and interviews; highlights the quote This is a painful and arduous process.
Excerpt of an email from Rachelle Alongi, a former communications manager at the state Health Care Authority, obtained through a public records request. Screenshot: Health Care Authority records
Zoom in: Even some public health alerts have been subject to the review requirement — such as an October news release that included notice of a confirmed measles case at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.
  • That release, titled "DOH launches measles exposure map to help keep Washingtonians safe," ultimately went out about an hour later than public health officials had aimed for, after the governor's office asked for changes.
Some delays have lasted more than a month. On Aug. 5, 2025, for instance, KOMO-TV asked the state Health Care Authority to participate in a segment about a federal spending bill, Alongi wrote.
  • As of Sept. 19 — six weeks later — Alongi said the agency was still waiting for direction from the governor's office on how to respond.
How it works: In addition to press releases, the policy requires the governor's office to approve most interview requests, talking points and agency responses to reporter inquiries — including replies to follow-up questions, email records show.
  • The new rules took effect last July.
What they're saying: Agency officials repeatedly raised concerns about the system's inefficiency, per the records.
  • "...It is increasingly difficult to get any actual work done because all our time is spent on sending things in for reviews, tracking reviews and reminding their comms shops of our deadlines," Barbara LaBoe, a communications official at the Washington State Department of Transportation, wrote in an email in October.
  • Short-staffed agencies often spend time preparing responses for reporters, only for the governor's office to miss those reporters' deadlines, Sims wrote.
"I'm not exaggerating when I say we cannot effectively manage agency communications to our high standards with this system in place in the long run," wrote Stefanie Randolph, WSDOT's former acting communications director, in an October email.

Agencies have been instructed not to tell members of the media about the new approval policy, emails show.
  • "Going forward, we should not reference the governor's office in any procedural context — including processes, deadlines, or timelines when communicating with reporters on inquiries," former DOH communications director Maranatha Hay wrote to colleagues in October. "They've requested that their office not be mentioned at all."
White document page on teal background, with large black text and several yellow highlights. Text cites not mentioning the governor's office and a new response deadline language.
Excerpt from an October email from Maranatha Hay, former Department of Health communications director, telling staff that the governor's office doesn't want them to discuss the media policy. Screenshot: Department of Health records

Context: Washington's last three governors didn't impose similar rules, according to three staffers who worked for them. Two requested anonymity to avoid repercussions at their current jobs.
  • Marty Brown, who served in several roles under former governors Gary Locke and Chris Gregoire, said agencies might have given them a heads up about possible controversies, but advance approval of press releases and interviews wasn't required.
  • Typically, "we'd read about it in the paper at the same time as the public," Brown told Axios.
  • Asked about approving individual responses to reporters, Brown added: "That would be a lot … there's only 24 hours in a day."
Behind the scenes: Ferguson has been directly involved in reviewing and editing some agency news releases and talking points, contributing to delays, according to email records.
  • Discussing a WSDOT news release about I-5 construction last November, Aho, Ferguson's communications director, wrote that a second draft was "closer to what the governor was looking for, but I think missing some details he said he felt strongly about."
  • That was nine days after the second draft had been sent over for approval.
  • Ferguson also personally reviewed interview talking points before state epidemiologist Scott Lindquist was cleared to speak with Politico about bird flu last July, according to an email from a Ferguson staffer. The staffer apologized to DOH officials for the delay.
The other side: Aho said the governor "has only personally reviewed a small fraction of agency materials."
  • She added that the governor's office has made "numerous customizations" to the policy over time.
The agency communications officials whose work emails are quoted in this story either declined to be interviewed by Axios or didn't respond to requests for comment.
  • Three of them — Hay, Alongi and Randolph — have since moved on to other agencies that aren't subject to the same oversight by the governor's office.
END OF ARTICLE


Washington Gov. Ferguson limits press access, breaking precedent​


Since taking office, Washington Gov. Bob Ferguson has held more Seahawks flag-raising ceremonies than press conferences dedicated to taking wide-ranging questions from reporters.

Why it matters: Ferguson has departed from his predecessors' practice of holding regular, open-ended press availabilities — limiting public scrutiny of his administration.
  • His office also imposed new media approval rules that have slowed agency responses to the press and frustrated state workers, as Axios first reported last week.
Zoom in: Ferguson has taken questions at events tied to legislative milestones and at topic-specific press conferences. But he has held no standing, unscripted availabilities of the kind his predecessors conducted.
  • Jay Inslee, Ferguson's immediate predecessor, held a freewheeling press conference the day after his inauguration, and continued holding regular open Q&As with the press corps throughout his tenure, according to TVW archives.
  • Ferguson has yet to hold a single one in 16 months.
What they're saying: "He seems reluctant to cede control of the situation in the way that kind of open-ended news conference does," said Paul Queary, a former Associated Press correspondent in Olympia who now publishes the Washington Observer.
  • Queary said former governors Gary Locke and Chris Gregoire also had regular open press availabilities — a free-form format that he said makes it harder to evade pointed or confrontational questions.
  • "I don't remember any previous governors having this bizarre combination — what appears to be an obsession with media coverage, and a real disinclination to interact with the press," Queary said of Ferguson.
State of play: Ferguson instead holds frequent media events on specific topics — including one last week about state health inspectors' inability to access an immigration detention center in Tacoma.
  • These events typically feature multiple speakers and center on announcements from the governor or other officials.
  • Reporters can ask broader questions, but time is limited and the focus generally stays on the news at hand.
The big picture: The governor's lack of regular sit-downs with the media reflects a broader pattern, said Bill Lucia, editor of the Washington State Standard.
  • "There's been a lack of access and transparency in making him available and letting people know what he's up to," Lucia told Axios.
  • Lucia started a weekly "Where's the governor?" column last year to track the governor's whereabouts, after months of Ferguson's office not sharing the governor's schedule of public appearances in a timely manner.

The other side: Brionna Aho, Ferguson's spokesperson, did not answer Axios' questions about why Ferguson has dispensed with the media practices of past governors.

  • "The governor takes questions on other topics at most press conferences, and almost always takes extra time after the formal event to talk with reporters who attend," Aho wrote in an email to Axios.
  • She added that the governor "speaks at many public events where he is almost always available for questions."

What we're watching: Whether Ferguson will open himself up to more regular, unscripted interactions with the press — or continue to limit media access through his term.
 
"If we make getting the information a miserable process that takes weeks, if not months, nobody will ever ask questions!" has not really proven to be a winning strategy overall in the past. It just opens avenues for leakers and informants that can spread bad info at will.
 
"If we make getting the information a miserable process that takes weeks, if not months, nobody will ever ask questions!" has not really proven to be a winning strategy overall in the past. It just opens avenues for leakers and informants that can spread bad info at will.
It also lowers people's trust in anything the government finally says. It's an authoritarian approach that eats itself at both ends.
 
I've stated in the past that I pulled out all of my investments out of Washington state and Oregon. The fucking writing was on the wall 16 years ago and it has only gotten worse.

Communism at its finest.
 
Back
Top Bottom