Watching This Humanoid Robot Sort Packages Is Quite Something - Yep, they're definitely coming for our jobs.

Article / Archive

Earlier this year, humanoid robotics company Figure showed off its Figure 02 robot using a sophisticated visual language system called Helix to sort packages at a logistics warehouse.
https://playwire.com/?utm_source=pw_ad_container
Footage showed a small army of the humanoid robots deftly picking up packages of various sizes, shapes, and hardnesses, and manipulating their orientation.

Just three months later, the company has published an update about its Helix learning-based approach to robotics on its website, showing off the same robot sorting an even wider variety of package styles, including deformed poly bags and flat envelopes.

It's a remarkable feat of robotics that highlights how close the tech is to completing human-level tasks in a warehouse environment, at least at specific tasks. Companies including Tesla and Agility Robotics are spearheading a concerted effort to automate repetitive human jobs — and judging by the latest results, we've never been closer to a future filled with bipedal robots crewing stations in commercial environments.

Figure claims its Helix system has steadily progressed in a matter of just months. Its robot is now spending just over four seconds per package, a second faster than before, while still maintaining accuracy. The company also says shipping labels are also correctly oriented for scanning 95 percent of the time, an improvement of 25 percent compared to earlier this year.

The robot can dynamically adjust to the unique shape of packages by "adjusting its grasp strategy on the fly — for example, flicking away a soft bag to flip it dynamically, or using pinch grips for flat mailers."

Figure 02 even pats down plastic packaging, a movement it's picked up through learning.

"This subtle 'flattening' action, learned from demonstrations, ensures the barcode is fully visible to the scanner," the company's update reads. "Such adaptive behavior highlights the advantage of end-to-end learning — the robot learns from demonstration strategies that were never explicitly hard-coded, directly from the data, to overcome real-world imperfections in packaging."

The race to fill warehouses with humanoid robots is on, and several companies are clamoring to become the de facto leader in the burgeoning industry. The basic idea is to have one model of robots fulfil a number of different tasks, as opposed to a range of highly specific, purpose-built robots.

However, making them cost-efficient and reliable enough to actually replace human labor on a significant scale will likely still pose a significant challenge.
 
Wouldn't want to be working alongside them, I don't mind the transport bots but pass on robots that could probably punch through concrete, like its one neutron interaction away from thinking I'm a small box or decides the racking needs moving and pulls it all down.

Though I can't wait for the chinese liveleak clips.
 
this smells fake and gay. why the fuck would you need a fully humanoid robot to sort packages and not just a camera that controls a switch or something? I'm sure the dream is being able to integrate it into existing human-operated facilities without reconfiguring them, but that's retarded. robots are not humans. humans do not perform well in robot-optimized jobs, and robots do not perform well in human-optimized jobs. this is just another one of those gay startups whose goal is to get a bunch of shareholders excited and then cash out before its inevitable nosedive. from their "Master Plan" page:

tech startup faggot said:
Background: I’m 20 years into building technology companies, previously the Founder of Archer ($2.7B IPO) and Vettery ($100M exit). My sole focus is Figure. My ambition is to build this company with a 30-year view, spending my time and resources on maximizing my utility impact to humanity.

it's very telling to me that his mission statement uses a bunch of gay business jargon as its main thrust and then half-heartedly tacks on a boilerplate "advancing humanity" thing at the very end. this guy isn't revolutionizing shit, he's selling a bunch of dopes a shitty product that's tailor-made to get him a nice big IPO he can add to the mission statement of his next big scam project.

this job replacement scaremongering is tiresome. first off, these little coastie culture warriors absolutely love this automation shit. you think a fucking culture columnist in New York City or Los Angeles or San Francisco is genuinely upset about robots replacing human jobs? if a guy like Elon came along and sold them a $50,000 robo-hand on wheels that brought them Starbucks and jacked them off every morning, they would squeal with delight and write a dozen columns fellating him as the new Edison. to them, the poors who work in manufacturing and construction and trucking and shit are all disgusting transphobic Trump voters who are spreading evil Russian dezinformatsiya (that means disinformation for you uneducated fucking leptons) and Destroying Democracy with their hateful ignorance. wringing their hands over mUh LoSt JoBz is just more empty virtual signaling.

second, these awful helljobs at Amazon warehouses and shit are literally not made for humans. they look like "jobs" if you squint your eyes and block out the horrifying stress and dehumanization they subject people to for a paycheck. but the humans doing those jobs have been vestigial since day one, hanging on by a thread of skin, just waiting for the technology to grow in enough for the industry to slough them off and leave them rotting in the dirt. is your imagination so limited that you're fighting for that status quo? humans should not be doing those jobs to begin with. most of it has long since been exported to China anyway, where line workers are jumping off the factories like depressed lemmings.

third, this is the inevitable march of technology. it's not good or bad, it just is. humans will always make machines to complete tasks more efficiently. it's endemic to the species. yes, it will bring pain and conflict as society struggles to reorganize around this change. welcome to history. we like to meme here about Uncle Ted's Industrial Revolution quote, but there's no timeline where industrialization didn't happen. better ideas are needed beyond "technology bad", and no, UBI is not one of them.
 
oh wow, these things are slow as shit. you'd need a lot of these things to be able to keep up with a singular person definitely not speaking from experience or anything

we're not quite there yet imo

I'm sure the dream is being able to integrate it into existing human-operated facilities without reconfiguring them, but that's retarded. robots are not humans. humans do not perform well in robot-optimized jobs, and robots do not perform well in human-optimized jobs.
this, absolutely. if they think they can integrate these robots into human-operated facilities, lolno. just no. imagine one of these things having to sort to conveyer belts that are either on the floor or above their heads. not only that, but they'd need to be able to move back and forth in order to be able to grab packages on a very large slide. and i won't even go into all the shit that can happen if packages start jamming up and you need someone, like an actual person, to break it.
 
Last edited:
oh wow, these things are slow as shit. you'd need a lot of these things to be able to keep up with a singular person definitely not speaking from experience or anything

we're not quite there yet imo
its only sorting by package shape and color? shit's not reading the labels. the USPS couldn't use this pos as it is today.
 
its only sorting by package shape and color? shit's not reading the labels. the USPS couldn't use this pos as it is today.
it's cute how they try to give it the most ideal situation for sorting. just small bags with the label on either the front or back, not like boxes that have 6 flat surfaces that a label could potentially be on. also i like the way it gently places the little bags on the belt, making them all nice and neat so they can be scanned. nigger, nobody got time for that, just yeet that shit down the belt and a person will scan it downline

this shit relies on speed, and i just don't think they're going to be able to replicate that with robots.
 
That's the dumbest thing I've seen in over a week and that's saying something given the riots and "protests' that have gone on this week. Is this company Chinese? These robots are awfully reminiscent of the kind of thing the Chinese try to pass off as advanced robotics.

As for sorting, besides the fact that the example of the tech they showed moves like a geriatric on an opioid, sorting is already a solved issue. Just search for 'sorting conveyers' and you'll see examples of several different types. All of which can trivially scan and/or inspect the payload.

If this was meant to be an expedition of tech then it's quite pathetic and the saddest thing is that people are ignorant/stupid enough to think something like this is 'advanced' and that this is what they should be worried about and not the actually advanced tech that is coming for your lif-- job...
 
it's cute how they try to give it the most ideal situation for sorting. just small bags with the label on either the front or back, not like boxes that have 6 flat surfaces that a label could potentially be on. also i like the way it gently places the little bags on the belt, making them all nice and neat so they can be scanned. nigger, nobody got time for that, just yeet that shit down the belt and a person will scan it downline

this shit relies on speed, and i just don't think they're going to be able to replicate that with robots.
it wont be a humanoid robot. itll have many arms and rollers to quickly find the label and shoot it down the right chute.
 
I guess the idea is to pitch this to the smaller distribution centers that are still fully manual and don't have any of the existing automation solutions - Buy one, it fits right into the existing human labor spot and what it lacks in speed it makes up in consistency. Given time, you can scale up the robotic presence, spread out that cost, and never have to deal with ripping out and replacing the actual mechanical part of the system. Humanoid automation also has one major advantage over other systems, which is that if and when there's an issue, you can just as readily swap the robot back out with a person. I'm sure the chinks are also selling it to investors as "we only have to manufacture one main product, and software lets it fill all these spaces" rather than becoming a specialist manufacturer of a specific solution.

Still doesn't seem to be ready for primetime, doubly so if its a chink company, triply so if its supposed to be neural net reinforcement learning (Which is always prone to retarded shit because it learns to game the scoring algorithm, not solve the problem), but don't dismiss humanoid automation so readily.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: kittyhou
This is a bullshit demo. It isn't actually sorting anything, simply moving parcels from a hopper onto a single belt. I'd be shocked to learn it's actually reading anything off the label. It's simply orienting them label-up, an entirely pointless task. UPS/Fedex/USPS, and I imagine every parcel carrier on the planet, has already employed scanners that read from any side. More advanced systems need one scan like this and the machine applies an RFID in-transit sticker (this is the mini label you see on every package). Then you've got a system of belts, chutes, and switches to sort packages automatically. It is >99.9% hands-off between being offloaded on one truck and loaded onto another. Both of those activities require actually being ambulatory and not simply standing at a station. Even with the extra work handlers would get yelled at for sandbagging if they were even as slow as 3x the speed of this bot.
 
Back