- Joined
- Feb 3, 2021
I think people are failing to see the forest from the trees. It shouldn't be some grand argument about the ethics of watermarking or the quality of archived material. Its simply a dumb way to piss off youtubers using the content, and how best to do that.
For example, I made my pfp in photoshop because I thought it was cute and I like putting please be patient hats on things. Now if you search tenor for "Please be patient", that image is the second fucking result. They stole it and put it on their platform. Do I care? Not really, but if it had a niggermark maybe the faggy gif website wouldn't have stolen my autistic picture without attribute.
As we on KF all know, if you post something online, it's gonna get posted elsewhere. A cheeky little watermark wont stop that, but it will make certain people seethe. And if you're super worried about the integrity of the quality, just keep the local copy or keep it on a storage website lol.
For example, I made my pfp in photoshop because I thought it was cute and I like putting please be patient hats on things. Now if you search tenor for "Please be patient", that image is the second fucking result. They stole it and put it on their platform. Do I care? Not really, but if it had a niggermark maybe the faggy gif website wouldn't have stolen my autistic picture without attribute.
As we on KF all know, if you post something online, it's gonna get posted elsewhere. A cheeky little watermark wont stop that, but it will make certain people seethe. And if you're super worried about the integrity of the quality, just keep the local copy or keep it on a storage website lol.