We need to change the rating scoring system

Status
Not open for further replies.

kittyfucker

bind N explode
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jan 1, 2020
I was looking at the Featured Content and I noticed something a little sad.

1632671764340.png


As of right now, this post has:
Islamic Content (166), Horrifying (82), Winner (49), Informative (20) ... and some other small ones

We have people posting nasty wonderful content with a general positive reaction to the post, yet @Advice only has a reaction score of 54 because Islamic Content and Horrifying are negative ratings. Islamic Content, Horrifying and Lunacy all give -1, but I have never personally seen any of them used to display true disgust or negative emotion. I don't know if the solution is to make these ratings neutral or to make them positive, but I just feel like someone should point this out. Maybe we could turn these positive but make negative ratings harsher? Maybe add a new positive rating that conveys the same emotion?

I get that they are just little internet stickers but looking at accounts with a very high or very low reaction score can help you gauge if the person is actually a good poster or just a random faggot. People who post amazing content in horrifying threads are going to have lower ratings than people who put in less effort, but the post is not islamic, horrifying or lunacy. Something something reward systems, guys!
 
The truth is, there's a lot of fuckery and cheating going on the the world of competitive ratings. All the guys on the top didn't get there by hard work and high quality effortposting, they got there by gaming the system with artificial score inflation and covert agreements. I don't want to encourage anyone to get into the high level competitive ratings scene because it's not something you want to get involved in. Keep it as a hobby and nothing more.
 
Last edited:
I just negrated your post.

FAQ;

What does this mean?
The amount of karma (reaction score) on your post and Kiwi Farms account has decreased by one.

Why did you do this?
There are several reasons I may deem a post to be unworthy of positive or neutral karma. These include, but are not limited to:

Rudeness towards other Farmers,

Spreading incorrect information,

Sarcasm not correctly flagged with a /sneed.

Being a faggot.

Am I banned from the Farms?
No - not yet. But you should refrain from making threads like this in the future. Otherwise I will be forced to issue an additional negrate, which may put your posting privileges in jeopardy.

I don't believe my post deserved a negrate. Can you un-negrate it?
Sure, mistakes happen. But only in exceedingly rare circumstances will I undo a negrate. If you would like to issue an appeal, shoot me a private message explaining what I got wrong. I tend to respond to PMs within several minutes. Do note, however, that over 99.9% of negrate appeals are rejected, and yours is likely no exception.

How can I prevent this from happening in the future?
Accept the negrate and move on. But learn from this mistake: your behavior will not be tolerated on Kiwifarms.net. I will continue to issue negrates until you improve your conduct. Remember: Kiwi Farms is privilege, not a right.
 
The truth is, there's a lot of fuckery and cheating going on the the world of competitive ratings. All the guys on the top didn't get there by hard work and high quality effortposting, they got there by gaming the system with artificial score inflation and covert agreements. I don't want to encourage anyone to get into the high level competitive ratings scene because it's not something you want to get involved in. Keep it as a hobby and nothing more.
I need to put on my resumé that I have little internet stickies that strangers on the internet gave me for morale! It shows I'm a hard worker and care about my community!!!

Posting axewounds etc should qualify us all for The Presidential Medal of Freedom
 
Y'know I thought this person was going to cry about their own reaction score, but I think worrying about someone else's is a lot gayer than that.
It's a choice between being a selfless fag and being a selfish fag, the amount of faggotry is the same in both cases.

I agree, Judaic Content should be the negative rating.
You want another lawsuit from Melinda?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: kittyfucker
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back