We Should Get To Destroy Shrines In Assassin's Creed Shadows, Actually - The people speaking out about historical accuracy and respect of cultures now are acting in bad faith, and studios are giving them legitimacy.

1.png

Ubisoft has patched out the ability for players to destroy shrines and temples in Assassin’s Creed Shadows. The day one patch was released after a Japanese politician raised concerns that people might hypothetically try to reenact clips of shrines being defiled, and the Prime Minister of Japan said that these acts wouldn’t be tolerated.

I’ve already explained the Prime Minister’s reaction and how the entire conversation was largely in the context of an existing problem of tourists disrespecting sacred sites – just this week, a site featured in Ghost of Tsushima was closed for the same reason, despite that game not allowing you to destroy them anyway. I was very annoyed at the fact that this was framed as an issue of gamers potentially wanting to intentionally deface these monuments. As we all know, the vast majority of people are able to understand that you’re not supposed to slash up shrines with a katana, and that doing something in a video game isn’t actually going to instigate that in reality.

It’s All Manufactured Outrage​

2.png

But what annoyed me more is that this hypothetical was essentially prompted by Assassin’s Creed detractors (which is perhaps too kind a word) who wanted to have a legitimate reason to heap backlash on Shadows. A lot of the noise thus far has been based around Yasuke, one of its protagonists, ‘not really being a samurai’, which is disrespectful to the Japanese people who wanted to be properly represented.

Note:
Never mind that Yasuke is the only protagonist of an Assassin’s Creed game who actually has any basis in historical reality at all. Also, forget that Naoe, a Japanese woman, is a playable protagonist too.

Since that angle has failed to take – it doesn’t look great when your entire movement is based around ‘I don’t like the Black protagonist’ – the same bad actors are now once again trying to manufacture outrage on behalf of an entire nation by claiming that the destruction of shrines in a video game is disrespectful. Both angles are similar in that they claim it’s about respect for the Japanese people.

When Has Assassin’s Creed Ever Respected Anything?​

3.png

It’s truly ridiculous to ask that from a series like Assassin’s Creed, a game that simply does not respect anything. This is the series that portrayed Cardinal Rodrigo Borgia, who became Pope and therefore the most deified man in the world’s biggest religion, as a Grand Master of the Templar Order. It gave us a game where we beat the snot out of the Pope. Assassin’s Creed Valhalla made an entire mechanic out of burning down monasteries, pillaging them, and using the stolen materials to upgrade your own settlement. If we’re talking about respecting religion, where’s the backlash to that?

Why does Japanese culture get special treatment? Is it not absurd to assume that the Japanese people are so sensitive that they can’t deal with a couple virtual broken tables in imaginary shrines in a series long known for letting you stab historical figures and parkour all over sacred places? Every religion is sacred to someone. If Ubisoft didn’t care then, then it shouldn’t care now.

To patch this out is, put simply, self-censorship. Worse, it has been triggered not by a government that actually cares about historical accuracy and respect for the sacred in video games, but by those who wanted a reason to force Ubisoft to capitulate. And capitulate it has.

It’s a small and probably unnoticeable change. I personally don’t care to destroy shrines in games or kill random bystanders, and I was never going to, because you control the buttons you press. Shadows doesn’t even incentivise the destruction of these shrines like in Valhalla; it’s an entirely incidental thing you can do if you’re mucking around. It doesn’t tell you that you should, and not even that you can – in fact it previously asked players to show respect before patching it out entirely – it’s just an application of video game physics that spans the whole game.

In Assassin’s Creed, we’ve scrambled up historical monuments. We’ve murdered historical figures in cold blood. We’ve allowed the series to present alternate histories and ourselves perpetuated them again and again. The people speaking out about historical accuracy and respect of cultures now are acting in bad faith, and studios are giving them legitimacy.

Article Link

Archive
 
Why does Japanese culture get special treatment?
Because they won a cultural victory against westoids and their opinion counts. Not only Ubishit must rely on Japanese consoomers to make profit, Japan can also command westoid attitudes. Western culture went to shit, and now westoids use Japan (or Israel) as a patriotism surrogate and are pissed about blacked m'lady more than about good muzzies and evil Templars.
 
ARTICLE: This is the series that portrayed Cardinal Rodrigo Borgia, who became Pope and therefore the most deified man in the world’s biggest religion, as a Grand Master of the Templar Order. It gave us a game where we beat the snot out of the Pope.
Because the real Rodrigo Borgia didn't have a freaking magic laser staff.
It's far from emulatable, unlike smashing a shrine.
 
Given the amount of disrespect Ubisoft gave to Japanese audiences/culture with Assassin Creed's Shadows, whoever wrote this is just proving that point of their contempt for Japan.

So, they want Yasuke, a manufactured Black samurai through revisionism, to have free reign to destroy replica Japanese shrines for muh immersion? That's pretty racist if you think of it.
 
Broken clock, the Journos are actually correct, the whole shrine outrage is 100% fake outrage by the same people who were mad you cannot smash the Synagogues in The Last of Us 2 and Kingdom Come 2.

However, fuck Journoscum, as hypocrites aren't allowed to cry hypocrisy and everything they say is bad faith.
If this was a Synagogue or a Mosque they would be screaming bloody murder if it was destructible.
 
Assassin's Creed isn't popular in Japan at all, so literally the Japanese do not care, the Japanese market is dominated by Nintendo.

There's nothing else to be said about this game other than a bunch of Western and Indian game developers having their wet dream about Japan.
 
Last edited:
The synagogue in Last of Us 2 was undamageable, and even featured an indestructible Torah that could withstand molotov cocktails. I'm sure this journoscum will be Tweeting and Neil Druckmann to patch that shit in any second.

Eta:

Damn, late and gay.
 
Last edited:
most japs dont care because its a non jap video fame. they do care that the shrine shit will bring more nusiance streamers to japan
This is the biggest reason. The Johnny Somalis of the world will go to Japan and seek to emulate the destruction in the game for TikTok views. You can't fault the Japanese for wanting to make sure that doesn't happen.
 
Back