🐱 Website lists trigger warnings for over 6,000 classic novels

CatParty


This starts a whole new chapter on what it means to be woke.

A Wikipedia-style website has published trigger warnings for thousands of the world’s most iconic novels ranging from the works of Charles Dickens to Harper Lee and even J.R.R. Tolkien.

The site, aptly named BookTriggerWarnings.com, points out content across classic literature such as fatphobia, age-gap romances, discrimination against gypsies, and even diarrhea as some of the red flags for readers.

However, the minds behind the site are quick to admit that the team of peer-based trigger spotters are not all that qualified.

“We are not medical/psychological professionals and do not claim that our pages are complete or accurate,” a homepage message reads, also warning “just because a book ‘looks safe’ for you on our site does not guarantee that it is.”

There’s been a total of 6,701 books to have trigger warnings on the site, the Daily Mail reported.

They range from high school required readings such as Mark Twain’s reconstruction era book “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,” which was listed for “parental neglect,” along with themes of racism and slavery, to a laundry list of apparently inappropriate subject matter in J.D. Salinger’s New York coming-of-age tale “The Catcher in the Rye.”

That novel is marked for ableism (the discrimination against a non-able-bodied individual), vomiting, diarrhea and violent fantasies, in addition to other heavier subject matters such as suicide, sexual harassment, racism, homophobia and “implied” pedophilia.

F. Scott Fitzgerald’s “The Great Gatsby” — a glamorous depiction of Long Island’s elite gold coast in the 1920s — made it onto the site for containing themes of wealth hoarding, class discrimination, misogynistic violence and — spoiler alert — character death.

Harper Lee’s iconic “To Kill a Mockingbird,” depicting the Jim Crow-era South, was also cited for murder, mentioning “rape,” use of the “N-word” and racism. A school district near Seattle also removed it from its curriculum earlier this year.

Classic reads from Arthur Conan Doyle’s “Sherlock Holmes” mystery series were also found to contain triggers relating to the persecution of Mormons, use of poison, ableism again, and the novels’ often main theme: murder.

Jane Austen’s classic British romance “Emma” is apparently problematic for referencing period-typical age gap romances and anti-gypsy sentiment, whereas Helen Fielding’s “Bridget Jones” series is considered to be triggering for including cheating along with body image issues, weight obsession and calorie counting.

Mythical adventures such as J.K. Rowling’s “Harry Potter” books were put on the muggle website for containing elements of fatphobia, child abuse, invasion of privacy, “eliminationist language” in addition to spiders (OK, I can agree with this one), snakes and broken bones.

The University of Chester in England also put content warnings on “Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone” in January.

Dickens’ “Oliver Twist,” the story of an orphan’s plight through poverty in old England also gets dinged for anti-Semitism, “traumatic childbirth,” inhuman treatment, vulgar swearing and bullying.

Meanwhile, Victor Hugo’s French Revolution novel turned musical, “Les Misérables,” was put on the site for references to prostitution, illness and gun violence.

It was also found to be true that the hearts of men are weak in Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings” series, as fascism, sexism and slavery were all noted to be among its pages by the site.
 
“We are not medical/psychological professionals and do not claim that our pages are complete or accurate,” a homepage message reads, also warning “just because a book ‘looks safe’ for you on our site does not guarantee that it is.”
Glad they included this disclaimer, I almost read a book.
 
The Return of the King:
Sexism (??????)
Fascism (???????????????????????????)

Is it sexist because there are only a few women in it, and they all have supporting roles? That's it?
Fascism mystifies me. No idea what could be referenced there.
Maybe the Scouring of the Shire towards the end? That's the only thing I can think of.
 
Nigger the fuck are you talking about? Nancy Reagan was such a retarded fucko with insane reach that she managed to get "WINNERS DON'T DO DRUGS" plastered on every video game screen in the fucking country by law. Remember DARE? What about abstinence-only sex ed? What about adding "under God" to the pledge of allegiance? What about the dry counties that still exist across the country or weird morality laws like strippers not being allowed to go naked in some states? To pretend that the Christian moralizing right haven't had their run of the show for the last century is patently absurd. When I boot up the next COD and there is a government mandated splash screen that says "THE FBI SAYS THIS GAME MAY TRIGGER YOU! PLAY AT YOUR OWN RISK" Then I'll start to take it a little more seriously.
All that stuff is good though. Only faggots do drugs, One nation under God is this nation's glorious catch phrase, dry counties are good because alcohol causes fat people to fuck and have fat children, and nobody want's to see stripper cunt.
 
They ruin everything...

Screenshot_20220312-113541_Chrome.jpg
 
Maybe the Scouring of the Shire towards the end? That's the only thing I can think of.
The way trigger warnings work is if something is presented at all, regardless of the value judgement, it gets a warning. If Sauron is considered fascist, even if the story is about him being evil and getting defeated, the book still shows "fascism" which may trigger someone into having a mental breakdown because seeing it in any context is traumatic.

So for example, The Diary of Anne Frank could conceivably have a "fascism" trigger warning because it depicts fascism, even if it depicts it as evil.

A child's book about bullying being wrong would in fact get a bullying trigger warning, because supposedly for some people, seeing it in any context is harmful. Best not to depict it at all. Because of course, if we never allow fascism or bullying to be depicted, nobody will develop the ideas to do those things IRL. Turns out all those classical fables and morality tales just caused the problems they were supposed to fix, donchaknow?
 
Last edited:
Back