🐱 Website lists trigger warnings for over 6,000 classic novels

CatParty


This starts a whole new chapter on what it means to be woke.

A Wikipedia-style website has published trigger warnings for thousands of the world’s most iconic novels ranging from the works of Charles Dickens to Harper Lee and even J.R.R. Tolkien.

The site, aptly named BookTriggerWarnings.com, points out content across classic literature such as fatphobia, age-gap romances, discrimination against gypsies, and even diarrhea as some of the red flags for readers.

However, the minds behind the site are quick to admit that the team of peer-based trigger spotters are not all that qualified.

“We are not medical/psychological professionals and do not claim that our pages are complete or accurate,” a homepage message reads, also warning “just because a book ‘looks safe’ for you on our site does not guarantee that it is.”

There’s been a total of 6,701 books to have trigger warnings on the site, the Daily Mail reported.

They range from high school required readings such as Mark Twain’s reconstruction era book “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,” which was listed for “parental neglect,” along with themes of racism and slavery, to a laundry list of apparently inappropriate subject matter in J.D. Salinger’s New York coming-of-age tale “The Catcher in the Rye.”

That novel is marked for ableism (the discrimination against a non-able-bodied individual), vomiting, diarrhea and violent fantasies, in addition to other heavier subject matters such as suicide, sexual harassment, racism, homophobia and “implied” pedophilia.

F. Scott Fitzgerald’s “The Great Gatsby” — a glamorous depiction of Long Island’s elite gold coast in the 1920s — made it onto the site for containing themes of wealth hoarding, class discrimination, misogynistic violence and — spoiler alert — character death.

Harper Lee’s iconic “To Kill a Mockingbird,” depicting the Jim Crow-era South, was also cited for murder, mentioning “rape,” use of the “N-word” and racism. A school district near Seattle also removed it from its curriculum earlier this year.

Classic reads from Arthur Conan Doyle’s “Sherlock Holmes” mystery series were also found to contain triggers relating to the persecution of Mormons, use of poison, ableism again, and the novels’ often main theme: murder.

Jane Austen’s classic British romance “Emma” is apparently problematic for referencing period-typical age gap romances and anti-gypsy sentiment, whereas Helen Fielding’s “Bridget Jones” series is considered to be triggering for including cheating along with body image issues, weight obsession and calorie counting.

Mythical adventures such as J.K. Rowling’s “Harry Potter” books were put on the muggle website for containing elements of fatphobia, child abuse, invasion of privacy, “eliminationist language” in addition to spiders (OK, I can agree with this one), snakes and broken bones.

The University of Chester in England also put content warnings on “Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone” in January.

Dickens’ “Oliver Twist,” the story of an orphan’s plight through poverty in old England also gets dinged for anti-Semitism, “traumatic childbirth,” inhuman treatment, vulgar swearing and bullying.

Meanwhile, Victor Hugo’s French Revolution novel turned musical, “Les Misérables,” was put on the site for references to prostitution, illness and gun violence.

It was also found to be true that the hearts of men are weak in Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings” series, as fascism, sexism and slavery were all noted to be among its pages by the site.
 
Trigger warnings are retarded, but let's be real. This is a site called "book trigger warnings dot com". If you're voluntarily going there, I don't know what to tell you. It's like diving into a sewer and then being surprised by the amount of shit you come into contact with.

I think a fun activity would be to find the silliest warnings
I started making a list, but then I realized I was just copy-pasting the entire website.
 
Bruh so this just TvTropes and Tumblr/Twitter having a lovechild. (God, even thinking about that makes me want to wonder why the fuck am doing on the internet).
 
Fuck Everything.gif


Why do they keep doing this shit? I don't want the world to be one big hugbox!
 
When I was in school I knew not to read a book if it had a gold foil seal on the front of it. Those embossed metallic labels were a warning that whatever that book was about, it was going to be shit and I was better off picking anything else. Except Mrs Basil E Frankweiler and that was a total fluke.
 
This reminds me of this old fundie website called Capalert where some internet preacher would list every "offensive" element of movies based on the Bible, and the more offensive things it had (like a woman showing any cleavage or a character saying "goshdarnit") he'd dock points. I am so glad we're moving to the point a far-left version of Capalert has become reality, and I just want to know what will be its equivalent of Toy Story 2 (which Capalert suggests is on par with average PG-13 movie in terms of offensiveness).
 
Everybody acts like they have some profound trauma, as if they were in the trenches if WWI and saw their buddy get his leg blown off by a landmine. No Melissa, you don’t have PTSD because someone called you a fivehead, you’re just sensitive.

Even if we nerf the world on every possible level, there is no way to avoid the pain of living. Strife and death are the only things guaranteed to us by nature. The only thing we can control is how we react to that pain — learn to be resilient or get swallowed up, there is no alternative. Maybe one day these brainlets will get it but I’m not optimistic
 
The article is pure outrage-bait, of course, but the site itself is kind of interesting. It doesn’t seem to list “triggers” so much as objectionable/“adult” content in books. For instance, it points out that “The Catcher in the Rye” includes underage smoking. Rape/murder is one thing, but I can’t imagine who would consider underage smoking a PTSD trigger. It really seems more like a parental guide than a list of triggers.

The site also doesn’t have a very complete database. For instance, there are no entries for any works by Burroughs, Carver, Cheever, Nabokov, Hubert Selby, etc.
”Harry Potter references" is a trigger warning?, lol
It is for me!
 
Back