🐱 Website lists trigger warnings for over 6,000 classic novels

CatParty


This starts a whole new chapter on what it means to be woke.

A Wikipedia-style website has published trigger warnings for thousands of the world’s most iconic novels ranging from the works of Charles Dickens to Harper Lee and even J.R.R. Tolkien.

The site, aptly named BookTriggerWarnings.com, points out content across classic literature such as fatphobia, age-gap romances, discrimination against gypsies, and even diarrhea as some of the red flags for readers.

However, the minds behind the site are quick to admit that the team of peer-based trigger spotters are not all that qualified.

“We are not medical/psychological professionals and do not claim that our pages are complete or accurate,” a homepage message reads, also warning “just because a book ‘looks safe’ for you on our site does not guarantee that it is.”

There’s been a total of 6,701 books to have trigger warnings on the site, the Daily Mail reported.

They range from high school required readings such as Mark Twain’s reconstruction era book “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,” which was listed for “parental neglect,” along with themes of racism and slavery, to a laundry list of apparently inappropriate subject matter in J.D. Salinger’s New York coming-of-age tale “The Catcher in the Rye.”

That novel is marked for ableism (the discrimination against a non-able-bodied individual), vomiting, diarrhea and violent fantasies, in addition to other heavier subject matters such as suicide, sexual harassment, racism, homophobia and “implied” pedophilia.

F. Scott Fitzgerald’s “The Great Gatsby” — a glamorous depiction of Long Island’s elite gold coast in the 1920s — made it onto the site for containing themes of wealth hoarding, class discrimination, misogynistic violence and — spoiler alert — character death.

Harper Lee’s iconic “To Kill a Mockingbird,” depicting the Jim Crow-era South, was also cited for murder, mentioning “rape,” use of the “N-word” and racism. A school district near Seattle also removed it from its curriculum earlier this year.

Classic reads from Arthur Conan Doyle’s “Sherlock Holmes” mystery series were also found to contain triggers relating to the persecution of Mormons, use of poison, ableism again, and the novels’ often main theme: murder.

Jane Austen’s classic British romance “Emma” is apparently problematic for referencing period-typical age gap romances and anti-gypsy sentiment, whereas Helen Fielding’s “Bridget Jones” series is considered to be triggering for including cheating along with body image issues, weight obsession and calorie counting.

Mythical adventures such as J.K. Rowling’s “Harry Potter” books were put on the muggle website for containing elements of fatphobia, child abuse, invasion of privacy, “eliminationist language” in addition to spiders (OK, I can agree with this one), snakes and broken bones.

The University of Chester in England also put content warnings on “Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone” in January.

Dickens’ “Oliver Twist,” the story of an orphan’s plight through poverty in old England also gets dinged for anti-Semitism, “traumatic childbirth,” inhuman treatment, vulgar swearing and bullying.

Meanwhile, Victor Hugo’s French Revolution novel turned musical, “Les Misérables,” was put on the site for references to prostitution, illness and gun violence.

It was also found to be true that the hearts of men are weak in Tolkien’s “The Lord of the Rings” series, as fascism, sexism and slavery were all noted to be among its pages by the site.
 
This reminds me of this old fundie website called Capalert where some internet preacher would list every "offensive" element of movies based on the Bible, and the more offensive things it had (like a woman showing any cleavage or a character saying "goshdarnit") he'd dock points. I am so glad we're moving to the point a far-left version of Capalert has become reality, and I just want to know what will be its equivalent of Toy Story 2 (which Capalert suggests is on par with average PG-13 movie in terms of offensiveness).
Capalert was one of my first introductions to fundie Christianity. Tom "No Fun" Carder crowdfunded for it and everything in the hopes of sitting on his ass and fuming at the big screen full-time in the name of Jaysus, but true to the game never seemed to meet goals. (I remember at one point huge donations were promised a shiny Capalert ballpoint pen in return!) Last I checked the site was still up, but hadn't posted a review in 5-10 years.
 
All that stuff is good though. Only faggots do drugs, One nation under God is this nation's glorious catch phrase, dry counties are good because alcohol causes fat people to fuck and have fat children, and nobody want's to see stripper cunt.
Cringe. Theocrats are faggot retards.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Syaoran Li
I think a fun activity would be to find the silliest warnings
More fun would be earnestly contributing to about 10 books to build a history, then going in and adding "zoophilia" and "pederasty" to books that don't deserve it, just to pollute the waters. Alas, I am not yet bored enough, but someday...
 
This is the world Stephen King wants. Hope he's enjoying it. Or IT.

Lol, and it doesn’t even include the very explicit homophobia in the book, so it‘s not even an exhaustive list.

I’m somewhat torn - if this was presented as a list for parents, I’d be 100% on board with it, because it makes it easier for them to judge if a book is ok for their kid. But the fact it’s called “trigger warnings” immediately causes me revulsion.

I think it’s because it’s a further example of the infantilizing of adults.
Mein Kampf isn't listed on there, so it must not have anything triggering.
The Gor series, also not present. Neither is the Sword of Truth books, most of Robert Heinlein, Lolita, anything by Anne Rice…. I’m starting to get the impression most of these are aimed at basic bitch books for basic bitches.
 
Last edited:
I’ve read LotR many times and I can’t think of what they’re referencing here. Maybe I’m missing something, but I can’t think of any child characters in the books at all.
Well, there's Bergil, the kid who gives Pippin a tour of Minas Tirith shortly after his arrival. Plenty of characters are mentioned as having children (Sam had 13!) though those children never really drive the action.

The database doesn't seem well kept up; I think that's the real explanation, tbh.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: timewave0
When I boot up the next COD and there is a government mandated splash screen that says "THE FBI SAYS THIS GAME MAY TRIGGER YOU! PLAY AT YOUR OWN RISK" Then I'll start to take it a little more seriously.
the only difference between that and what we have now, is that current media is less obvious about their propaganda. Normies don't see it because they're normies, but the trained eye can see it well. You don't have a splash screen saying "SEXISM IS WRONG!", but you have this:

1647182974051.png1647183049153.png

The FBI is also infested, even more infested than ever was.
 
This public can't comprehend a novel, because it requires attention for longer than five minutes, so they actually don't need any "triggers". Somebody just wasted a lot of time and effort for nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dysnomia
the only difference between that and what we have now, is that current media is less obvious about their propaganda. Normies don't see it because they're normies, but the trained eye can see it well. You don't have a splash screen saying "SEXISM IS WRONG!", but you have this:

View attachment 3068831View attachment 3068832

The FBI is also infested, even more infested than ever was.

It always amazes me that Abby resembles a teen Eddie Furlong enough that if I only glance at the pic while scrolling I won't know the difference.

As long as men can't fap to that all is right with the world.

Found this gem on a random page:

loveme1.png

I thought it was just your standard trap manga. But looking through the pages it's full of wokisms. I don't know if that's the translators or it was intended that way by the author. But it's trying very hard to be woke as fuck and I found it pretty funny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CatParty
My trigger warning

"if you have a problem with these certain things, thats more than ok. All you gotta do is put down the book, find some rope, tie it tightly around your neck, put tie the other end on a high spot while you are standing on chair. Get that? Noooow...jump. To the rest of you that dont care about that shit, go right ahead and enjoy yourselves."

Yeah, this shit is undoubtedly worse than the evangelical crazies from the Reagan era protesting about Satanism and the like at this point. At least most people knew to laugh those people away, whereas this is being broadly embraced as acceptable behaviour within society.

Thats why I hate when they compare both. They SOUND similar but in practice what we have now is much much worse.

Evangelical crazies will at worst make a book burning and go home satisfied.

These insane liberals will legit use the law to ban it just because they dont like it. And they never get satisfied so they will just go after more and more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CatParty
Back