- Joined
- Oct 3, 2022
but I don't recall changes to his mom?The new changes are made by Chris Savino.
Not tell me why.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
but I don't recall changes to his mom?The new changes are made by Chris Savino.
Not tell me why.
The same thing sort of happened with the OG Powerpuff Girls.Ever see Dexter's Lab around the year 2000? Show was alright, with pretty funny moments (like "omelette du fromage"). Then sometime around the early '00s, there was a sudden change in the background art to make it flat and ugly. Characters' voices changed a little. Also the plots became unfunny and a chore to get through. Like that very first of the new episodes was about some robots from the lab who went on a long journey to find freedom or something like that. Not long after the new changes, I stopped watching it.
What is it with Western animation studios thinking it is a great idea to change what viewers are used to, to an almost different show?The same thing sort of happened with the OG Powerpuff Girls.

It was the early 2000s, animation went through a transition period of going from hand drawn to digital. Even shows that maintained staff would make the jump.What is it with Western animation studios thinking it is a great idea to change what viewers are used to, to an almost different show?
![]()
It was the early 2000s, animation went through a transition period of going from hand drawn to digital. Even shows that maintained staff would make the jump.
Otherwise, they are just shows that ran their course but were too valuable to axe - high viewership or merchandise sales. Sadly most shows were episodic, so it isn’t like there could be a natural progression into new storylines and characterizations. I think this detail really set the best of long running series apart.
The DCAU technically ran for a decade, but kept heightening the scope for more stories. Even smaller scale series like King of The Hill had minor progressions to buck the status quo and keep things interesting.
Doug was an early example of a show changing direction. Early '90s Doug was one show, and Di$ney Doug starting in 1996 was an almost different one. Before digital went huge.It was the early 2000s, animation went through a transition period of going from hand drawn to digital.
Being fair, that is an extremely unique case given it switched ownership, so who knows what the behind the scenes changes or restrictions were put in place. Apparently the staff really hated the change in environment from Nick to Disney and they lost some big names due to payment disputes.Doug was an early example of a show changing direction. Early '90s Doug was one show, and Di$ney Doug starting in 1996 was an almost different one. And this was before '00s.
It is often understated, but Nickelodeon was really great at this in the 00s. Fairly Odd Parents, Jimmy Neutron and Danny Phantom were extremely ahead of the game in being episodic comedies that would have progression and reoccurring elements that would reference previous episodes.I also remember that 6teen, even though it's sort of technically an episodic show, also had some progression and storylines to it, and actually had an ending, not counting the Election one-off special of course.
How did the ratings go after the change?Doug’s creator decided to make many of the changes, likely due to the switch and different conditions presented, with Disney just hoping to capitalize on Nick’s former success.
Not super familiar with Doug TBH, was kind of just browsing Reddit, but looking it up this article may answer your question. Looks like it was a massive success. As for the changes, the article highlighted how Disney basically removed all unsavory elements from Doug to cleanse it for the new block.How did the ratings go after the change?
The new Doug was so successful that Disney went on to make a Doug movie in 1999 and sold tons of Doug-related merchandise. Right before the movie's release, The Los Angeles Timesestimated that the Doug franchise could be worth as much as $100 million for Disney.
I can tell you from experience as someone who was there in those days that any popularity the Disney Doug had was leftover from kids/fans who were just glad to see more Doug. Especially when you're barley sentient as a child and don't know how companies, intellectual property, or copyright works. Doug was Doug. You recognized him in nickelodeon, then saw he had a movie and tons of happy meal toys and you just wanted it, and disney knew this, they've always known this.Not super familiar with Doug TBH, was kind of just browsing Reddit, but looking it up this article may answer your question. Looks like it was a massive success. As for the changes, the article highlighted how Disney basically removed all unsavory elements from Doug to cleanse it for the new block.
Was sort of spitballing based on the thread I’ll attach below, but yeah, it seems like there was a mass culture shift between studios, explaining what happened.
https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2016/08/119240/doug-cartoon-disney-channel-review?callback=in&error=server_error&error_description=timeout exceeded
Once Millennials got their hands on the world of cartoons, they completely killed it.Elizabeth Ito of Netflix's City of Ghosts is losing it on Twitter, detailing failures of the animation industry to not capitalize on the younger generation having a higher amount of people looking for animated content. She is also begging for a job. [Screenshots taken from /co/]
View attachment 8069127
View attachment 8069130
View attachment 8069143
Am I going in retarded, or was there a talking dog character at one point?I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who thinks The Fairly OddParents "jumped the shark" when they introduced Poof.
I dunno, I stopped watching not long after Poof was introduced. I also think Rugrats jumped when Dil was in.was there a talking dog character at one point?
Unpopular opinion, I actually like Poof. I never thought he was a bad addition, and I like how Timmy had to take up a big brother role with him.I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one who thinks The Fairly OddParents "jumped the shark" when they introduced Poof.
Funny, Dil also went from hated to favorite with the sequel series, All Grown Up.I also think Rugrats jumped when Dil was in.
The later seasons broke all rules and had Timmy share his god parents with a new girl named Chloe, who didn’t even need them. The also added the dog Sparky. I think it is funny that New Wish kept Poof, but completely ignores the other two.dog. baby, girl? was the the order of dumb shit they added before they settled for a black girl to save the series?
To me it changed the show and made it feel overdone. And they added some other character and a magical dog? Sounds very overdone then.Unpopular opinion, I actually like Poof. I never thought he was a bad addition, and I like how Timmy had to take up a big brother role with him.
I tried to watch some of All Grown Up, but I didn't really like it that much. I guess I liked Rugrats best back when it was just the original main cast in the original show.Funny, Dil also went from hated to favorite with the sequel series, All Grown Up.
Yeah, Sparky the fairy dog was annoying from the start, and hated enough to where he was quietly removed not long after iirc.To me it changed the show and made it feel overdone. And they added some other character and a magical dog? Sounds very overdone then

I checked out on that series when it stopped being random adventures of a boy chasing puppy love with different swords and his magic dog and started getting into goofy cosmic lore shit, relationship drama and big overarching plotlines about ancient eldritch deities causing the interdimensional apocalypse.The Adventure Time threads continue to be 90% incel posting by volume. It's sapping my will to watch anime.
Bruh that's just Susie from Deltarune if she was human