In minor, recent news, a minor Powerpuff Girls villain has become the new bassist for Gorillaz.
Yeah, I'm glad they addressed the whole "IT'S NOT RALPH WRECKS THE INTERNET?!" thing. But this isn't giving me any hopes. Especially since the only plot information we got to go on is that Sugar Rush needs fixing. No word on villains or anything.
Well, the villain is almost certainly going to be the blue dyke if this movie is as dumb and predictable as it looks.
Realistically, it'd be predictable even if she was their ally throughout the entire time.
Their new music video has some pretty sick animation:
In minor, recent news, a minor Powerpuff Girls villain has become the new bassist for Gorillaz.
Eh... maybe I'm not right person to judge, because I'm not a fan of self-referentional self-aware ironic humor this trailer is packed with, but so far I don't like this movie. And Princesses are actually presented in very stereotypical way, how people see them as "Disney Princesses" mass instead of individul characters. And of course they had to refer to "being rescued by a man".
I'm tempted to say the portrayal of the Princesses being a cluster mind instead of individuals might be another bit of "self-depreciation" against the audience. And from what I've read, so is the idea of them in modern clothes.Eh... maybe I'm not right person to judge, because I'm not a fan of self-referentional self-aware ironic humor this trailer is packed with, but so far I don't like this movie. And Princesses are actually presented in very stereotypical way, how people see them as "Disney Princesses" mass instead of individul characters. And of course they had to refer to "being rescued by a man".
Shrek made fun of it all almost 20 years ago and way better.
For me it feels like Disney's Emoji Movie. But a little less trashy.
It's a pity, I really liked the first movie.
True. I suppose someone simply wanted a real world approach to this (like they way they did in 1988's Oliver & Company).
Eh... maybe I'm not right person to judge, because I'm not a fan of self-referentional self-aware ironic humor this trailer is packed with, but so far I don't like this movie. And Princesses are actually presented in very stereotypical way, how people see them as "Disney Princesses" mass instead of individul characters. And of course they had to refer to "being rescued by a man".
Shrek made fun of it all almost 20 years ago and way better.
For me it feels like Disney's Emoji Movie. But a little less trashy.
It's a pity, I really liked the first movie.
I see you agree with me on this matter (and I'm sure, just like with the Thundercats reboot, we really don't have a say in this anyway since it's a kids show and forget it), this doesn't really feel like the same Dot to me (unless they retained her obsessiveness for dots in the show, which I'm sorta doubting given the type of personality they want to saddle her with).Li'l Dot looks a little different than what I remember, though I can't quite place my finger on how exactly.
Oh yeah, that's right, she's not wearing her trademark red-with-black-polka-dot dress.
Li'l Dot without her red dress is almost as much of a travesty as Hanna-Barbera giving Richie Rich a red sweater with an R on it because Richie's tuxedo was too hard for them to draw!
Redesigns for Audrey, Dot, Lotta, et al. look so uninspired. Bet you $100 that the show will whitewash Lotta's gluttony because muh fat acceptance and political correctness.
I'm sure they will. Nothing that made these girls work before is being done here (assume this version of Dot still has that dot obsession that knows no end).
That's all this reminds me of, it's shows like EE&E, perhaps Phineas and Ferb and any other similar show thrown in a blender and this is the result. It's not very original.