What are you reading right now?

I've been rereading a 70s Scholastic paperback collection of eight of Poe's stories. Well, rereading the ones I've read and the reading the ones I haven't.
Poe really needed an editor (like his contemporaries). Sure in his case the Victorian prose casts a certain spell on the reader, but that can be done in fewer words. His later prose like in Hop-Frog (one of my favorites) finds a good blend of brown and purple prose.

The House of Usher does little for me, it's a spoopy ghost story, that's it. Poe had the balls to quote Mad Trist in that story and insult it's "prolixity" (purple prose) when those excerpts were easier to understand than the prose surrounding them. He does describe Roderick Usher as having "a nose of a delicate Hebrew model," which made me lol.

But on the whole I enjoy his work, he was talented after all.

The Bees by Laline Paull. Presents bee society as a totalitarian caste system with a dollop of religious fervence (the Queen is referred to as "Our Holy Mother") and while the cold insect discipline is present Paull adds a human layer to the creatures.

The hero of the story is a lowly sanitation worker called Flora 717 who seems to have a lot of unusual genetic benefits despite her lowly status. Thanks to a high death rate brought on by food shortages and other factors like pesticides she's reluctantly moved to different departments in the hive where she excels despite being deemed big and "ugly".
I've heard of that one, seemed interesting for a book released in Current Year. Is it good?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hazel Motes
Simultaneously "American Psycho" and "The Jade Rosary". Both of them taste better for me in smaller chunks. "American Psycho" truly is director's cut of the movie.
 
malazan book of the fallen, i'm currently in the middle of the ninth book (dust of dreams)

overall this series is the most complex work of fiction i have ever seen. it's also very violent and dark - and it's not the fun kind of violent and dark, like warhammer for example. no, this is the sad, tragic, depressing kind of violent and dark that will ruin your day.

in some ways this series feels like a song of ice and fire on steroids. bigger, better, deeper, longer, more extreme, much more difficult to read.
 
I've been rereading a 70s Scholastic paperback collection of eight of Poe's stories. Well, rereading the ones I've read and the reading the ones I haven't.
Poe really needed an editor (like his contemporaries). Sure in his case the Victorian prose casts a certain spell on the reader, but that can be done in fewer words. His later prose like in Hop-Frog (one of my favorites) finds a good blend of brown and purple prose.

The House of Usher does little for me, it's a spoopy ghost story, that's it. Poe had the balls to quote Mad Trist in that story and insult it's "prolixity" (purple prose) when those excerpts were easier to understand than the prose surrounding them. He does describe Roderick Usher as having "a nose of a delicate Hebrew model," which made me lol.

But on the whole I enjoy his work, he was talented after all.


I've heard of that one, seemed interesting for a book released in Current Year. Is it good?
Many years ago, I had to write an essay on Jewish Incest within Usher for a gothic module. I'm sure it was crap- I handed it in on a bender, barely looking at it- and I stretched the point wafer thin, but if I am recalling correctly the claim was about incest from rich families tend be in literature Jewish or 'spiritually' Jew-like in features. Insider ethnic group. Generally unassimilating to host cultures is a valid source of inspiration to write a story about interbreeding.

One of Thomas Mann's early novels was of the same premise, though combined with Wagner's Ring Cycle. It can be quite rare to find in English for some reason... Seems Boris Johnson's grandmother did not want to translate that one.

Lot to say on the matter and I was not the right man for the job at the time.

Not a fan of Poe personally. Melville did it all better in his short stories.
 
Last edited:
Checked out the "Firefly - The Unification War Part One" by the cancelled Josh Whedon.
First impression: Quirky characters.
 
Aren't they both great?
Honestly I really like the old style the wendigo is and how different his interpretation is from what a wendigo means today. I am having a hard time find more cool novellas like it. It is also written in what I could describe old world style. Kind like if there was still a wild out there that has not be explored.
 
I just finished Dune. It was enjoyable for the most part but I much preferred the first half to the latter. The Game of Thrones-esque subterfuge and conniving between the houses entertained me more than the mystical themes of the back half.

That brings me to another point that I felt like it was more of a fantasy book than sci-fi. All of the future visions and powers Paul receive seem to line up far easier with fantasy and the setting of the book could have taken place entirely on Earth with a few small changes to completely remove any sci-fi elements easily.

7/10
 
A few, but Dissolution of the Monasteries: a new history, James G. Clarke, and Miltary History of the Late Roman Empire, Ilkka Syvanne, are the two I'm reading most.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: LurkNoMore
the setting of the book could have taken place entirely on Earth with a few small changes to completely remove any sci-fi elements easily.
Without the Guild and space travel, it removes the necessity of spice entirely. But yeah, it's space fantasy and not really scifi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cave Johnson
Giacomo Leopardi's Zibaldone. This was recently fully translated into English. It is work of musings and thoughts by an Italian philosopher and poet. He read so much he ended up a hunchback. I'm not really reading it (it is over 4000 pages), more dipping into it before bed. If you like Schopenhauer or Nietzsche, this is the type thinker for you. Despite everything, he is very life-affirming.

And....

61uajmHE1eL._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg


Due to circumstance, Christopher Marlowe is one of the few writers I can claim to have read his entire published works. I think he is one of the few figures of his time that if you said you preferred him over Shakespeare, few heads would turn. His tragedies are lot more readable than many of Bill's later work. It is silly to teach Romeo and Juliet in schools because it is far too flowery that the average teen would not be able to grasp in reading, but Marlowe has a great cockney tongue which keeps him on point and sharp. You know where you are with him.

He writes one type of character perfectly: the amoral schemer. He's also remarkably brutish about everything. Violence is like a joke or cheered at. His tragedies feel like something you would have watched with a pint and shouted alongside with.

At university, I was taught by a teacher who tried to make him out like a Foucault style liberal, but Marlowe is so much better than that. There is a bit in Tamburlaine where the main character burns the Quran. Modern adaptations tend to either overlook this or re-interpret it but it is written in such a way that everyone is made to see and cheer it on. The Jew of Malta is also so extreme with discussing Jews that adaptations are rarer. Modern workings of Merchant of Venice tend to make Shylock look sympathetic- such being the genius of Shakespeare that he could make any character multi-faceted- but it is near impossible with Marlowe who revels in how shitty everyone is.

Rating his plays:

1) Doctor Faustus: this is the one you may learn at school and for good reason. A very funny tragedy about selling your soul. I'm not going ramble but yadda yadda Faustian spirit....
2) Edward II: about the gay king you may have seen in Braveheart. He gets a red hot poker up his arse.
3) The Jew of Malta: scheming politics. Less said the better.
4) The Massacre at Paris: about the St. Bartholomew's Day massacre. This is an incomplete work but what you get, especially with The Guise, is great. There is a real moment of beer guzzling patriotism at the end which always sticks out.
5) Tamburlaine: People really like this, but I it found too long to enjoy. Two parts after all and I have yet to see it performed live.
6) Dido, Queen of Carthage: everyone must start somewhere.

If you do not like plays or poems, I'd recommend at least reading a biography on the fellow. He was stabbed in the eye at a pub, presumably for being a spy. He had a very interesting life is what I am getting at.

As for his poem, Hero and Leander is a common story for poets to write on, but Marlowe's unfinished work is my favourite. My edition features George Chapman's continuation which is good but it lacks the intensity of Marlowe's first two sections. There is a lot to say on it but I would like to read a few more times before I commit. I felt the urge to re-read it last night. It really does stick out.
 
Last edited:
Simultaneously "American Psycho" and "The Jade Rosary". Both of them taste better for me in smaller chunks. "American Psycho" truly is director's cut of the movie.
Well, I finished "American Psycho". It was great in simulating existential nighmare of perpetual financial success. Being sorounded by perfect people with nothing behind their eyes. It was mind numbing reading description of what people wear(even dying mother).
I felt sick to my stomach a couple of times, I laughed a couple of times. Beverly Hills Have Eyes 90210.

Trivia: Dexter Morgan character from the show "Dexter" uses fake name of "dr Patrick Bateman" to buy sedative(strictly controlled substance) he uses to knock out his victims.

Now moving to "Hardwired" by Walter Jon Wiliams.
 
Well, I finished "American Psycho". It was great in simulating existential nighmare of perpetual financial success. Being sorounded by perfect people with nothing behind their eyes. It was mind numbing reading description of what people wear(even dying mother).
I felt sick to my stomach a couple of times, I laughed a couple of times. Beverly Hills Have Eyes 90210.

Trivia: Dexter Morgan character from the show "Dexter" uses fake name of "dr Patrick Bateman" to buy sedative(strictly controlled substance) he uses to knock out his victims.

Now moving to "Hardwired" by Walter Jon Wiliams.
The bit with the decapitated head and Bateman's erect cock... It runs on far too long but that is the point. You feel as sick with it as Bateman probably does.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: LurkNoMore
The bit with the decapitated head and Bateman's erect cock... It runs on far too long but that is the point. You feel as sick with it as Bateman probably does.
How many skullfucks were there? Like three? That was nasty, but I have different top pick. Also I'm sure length that sometimes Patrick has to go to kill a victim is an argument pro all things being only in his head.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Hazel Motes
How many skullfucks were there? Like three? That was nasty, but I have different top pick. Also I'm sure length that sometimes Patrick has to go to kill a victim is an argument pro all things being only in his head.
It has been while since I read it but a few moments stick out...

I'd guess it would be the rats or the nail gun. I had to put it down at that point.

My personal theory was the men he killed really happened and the women were purely fantasies hence why they were so much more brutal and drawn out. It seems the comments he says to men are almost responded to realistically, as though Bateman is more comfortable around them with saying how he feels, but what he says to women don't make sense and are fabrications. Except for the discussions with Jean which are the few times Bateman seems engaged, but that is because Jean has a bit more beyond her surface than other characters. Those scenes are my favourite moments. Bateman is sympathetic when acting like a lost child. The mother issue seems to be a minor but integral part of the story. As is Bryce.

This was teenage speculation though and it would fall apart if given a re-read.

It's funny. Bateman talks about how "inside doesn't matter" (he says it in the film, I think) and only the exterior does, but the novel is refutation of that. The inside of Bateman is all we have to go on. So much so, his exterior actions are forever called into question because of his interior thoughts being so questionable. Minor details, the bumping into Tom Cruise on an elevator, the Rasta man, are left to a reader's judgement because his tone is the same throughout the novel. A murder is the same as mistaken identity, and it does not matter if he killed one or 100, he still feels that way. He has passed the point and may as well be telling the truth because it is his truth.

I used to think this novel was an argument against ideas of a self, but the more I think about it, the more I believe it is the opposite. The self is vital to understanding. It is a great work and I don't think similar-minded novels- Fight Club and Irvine Welsh's Filth- come close to it.

I think Bret Easton Ellis has his own view on what really happened, you can gleam that from the writing, but much is left to the reader to decide.

You read Rules of Attraction? Sean Bateman is one of the main characters. I really liked it. No murdering but it is good.

edit:
I have been thinking about the novel's epigraphs. I'm sure one is about manners. Manners are outward actions. Rarely would one speak of manners of mind. Bateman is mannered but a psychopath, but we are the ones reading a novel, ultimately sourced in his mind. He can be beat on in civilisation but what comes of his individuality?

The novel and long form writing are outward expressions of internalised thinking. Literal thinking changes consciousness. It allows abstract and complex thought, outside reality. This is one of the arguments Plato raises against writing: that it divorces itself from the real world without rebuttal (nobody enters Bateman's narration). Conversely, it is why he would not allow poets into his republic for poetry was oral based and formulaic and would be against complex rationality. It spoke too much to the soul. Seneca had issues with the philosophy for the more he knew inside, the less he understood the world outside. Writing and reading isolates. This is a common argument raised by Wordsworth and Yeats against novels. It drives wildly notions divorced from the real world.

Bateman is self-obsessed in this way. His fantasies are reality and the reality is a fantasy. His obsessions may be affected by newspapers or films, but it is his constructions and emotions which drive the why. Maybe the ending is the big joke against the self. He's crafted a world so driven by it that it ceases to matter to anyone outside of it. Except us. We will never share his world, but we do share his thoughts. We are the endpoint. The self only matters because his self is all we get in the novel. I find this is a very horrifying situation and must re-read it at some point.

edit on my edit: It affirms a self by being a novel.

I have other things to say about irony and writing, but I'll have to give it further thought.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Andrew Neiman
I'd guess it would be the rats or the nail gun. I had to put it down at that point.
Yup, those two.
Plus leaving dead rat to be eaten by starved one. And stomping on legs of bum's dog. Fuck that shit.
My personal theory was the men he killed really happened and the women were purely fantasies hence why they were so much more brutal and drawn out. It seems the comments he says to men are almost responded to realistically, as though Bateman is more comfortable around them with saying how he feels, but what he says to women don't make sense and are fabrications. Except for the discussions with Jean which are the few times Bateman seems engaged, but that is because Jean has a bit more beyond her surface than other characters. Those scenes are my favourite moments. Bateman is sympathetic when acting like a lost child. The mother issue seems to be a minor but integral part of the story. As is Bryce.
I doubt in any of it. Him being unable to hurt Luis, Paul "Allen" situation or "Bethany". Violent acts meet only random people. But that cab driver sittuation...
This was teenage speculation though and it would fall apart if given a re-read.

It's funny. Bateman talks about how "inside doesn't matter" (he says it in the film, I think) and only the exterior does, but the novel is refutation of that. The inside of Bateman is all we have to go on. So much so, his exterior actions are forever called into question because of his interior thoughts being so questionable. Minor details, the bumping into Tom Cruise on an elevator, the Rasta man, are left to a reader's judgement because his tone is the same throughout the novel. A murder is the same as mistaken identity, and it does not matter if he killed one or 100, he still feels that way. He has passed the point and may as well be telling the truth because it is his truth.

I used to think this novel was an argument against ideas of a self, but the more I think about it, the more I believe it is the opposite. The self is vital to understanding. It is a great work and I don't think similar-minded novels- Fight Club and Irvine Welsh's Filth- come close to it.

I think Bret Easton Ellis has his own view on what really happened, you can gleam that from the writing, but much is left to the reader to decide.

You read Rules of Attraction? Sean Bateman is one of the main characters. I really liked it. No murdering but it is good.
I've seen the movie. When I was reading I remebered that movie was based on book by the same author. If it really is the same character it would be fitting.
Bateman is self-obsessed in this way. His fantasies are reality and the reality is a fantasy. His obsessions may be affected by newspapers or films, but it is his constructions and emotions which drive the why. Maybe the ending is the big joke against the self. He's crafted a world so driven by it that it ceases to matter to anyone outside of it. Except us. We will never share his world, but we do share his thoughts. We are the endpoint. The self only matters because his self is all we get in the novel. I find this is a very horrifying situation and must re-read it at some point.

We can see such thing in our world. Influence of pornography. It used to be only fantasies. All those scenarios, configurations. positions and toys. An entire generations grew consoomming it and they accepted those fictions as reality. Now they emulate it in real world. No surprise pornos are more and more wierd. They have to push the envelope somehow. Human has only so many holes in his/her body. You can have sex in some amount of places. Pushing trannies, scat, water sports, eating ass. Well, future looks horryfing. Nightmare beyond human comprehension.

PS. I guess cab driver situation was real. Narration was from 3rd person and harrasment and theft form another cab driver left Patrick without teh Rolex. Phone call from the office was addressed... In the other hand why police wasn't on Patrick's trail? :stress:
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Hazel Motes
Back