What are you reading right now?

I also read Planetes and some Asimov last year so I'm just on a big hard-scifi kick now and taking recommendations.
I am a real sci-fi book nerd, so I could give a lot of recommendations. Especially more retro classic stuff.
If you want a big series, Asimov’s Foundation is still one of my favorites. It is straight up about the fall and rise and fall again of a space empire and the people involved in how the course of humanity is changed. If you like Asimov, that and his robot stories are always a good choice.
If you want some batshit sci-fi, most things Micheal Moorcock has done is a good choice in my opinion. He’s a love him or hate him writer, but I would either check out some of his short stories or An Alien Heat for a hell of a ride.
And if you are true acended sci-fi gigachad, L. Ron Hubbard’s Battlefield Earth is just a fucking blast. Not a single chapter goes by without some classic pulp sci-fi shit going down, we got barbarians fighting aliens with rocks, and it’s written by a complete lunatic. I love this book, it’s just so much fun.
 
I am a real sci-fi book nerd, so I could give a lot of recommendations. Especially more retro classic stuff.
If you want a big series, Asimov’s Foundation is still one of my favorites. It is straight up about the fall and rise and fall again of a space empire and the people involved in how the course of humanity is changed. If you like Asimov, that and his robot stories are always a good choice.
If you want some batshit sci-fi, most things Micheal Moorcock has done is a good choice in my opinion. He’s a love him or hate him writer, but I would either check out some of his short stories or An Alien Heat for a hell of a ride.
And if you are true acended sci-fi gigachad, L. Ron Hubbard’s Battlefield Earth is just a fucking blast. Not a single chapter goes by without some classic pulp sci-fi shit going down, we got barbarians fighting aliens with rocks, and it’s written by a complete lunatic. I love this book, it’s just so much fun.
I might go for Battlefield Earth next, I like that pulpy stupid stuff and I read Westerns like that too. The Asimovs I enjoyed were Robot Dreams and I, Robot, which I absolutely loved, but when I tried Foundation, it was so different that I think I got a little shocked and had to put it down until a less busy time in my life. I liked the cleverness and little tricks and twists in his short stories. Well, Foundation will be there when I can sit and focus better on who's speaking at any given time.
 
I finished Consider Phlebas and am halfway into Player of Games.
Banks' world building is incredible, and while it's great entertainment in the first place, I really enjoy all the subtle, smart philosophies and politics going on there.
I'm reading the series in my native language and have already put it on a list of books I'll reread in English. Translation may not be doing them justice.
player of games.jpg
I had a period of easy reads - a lot of Scandi thrillers and horrors - and the Culture so far makes me excited for something a bit more complex again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Duiker
The past few months Ive been waist deep in a pulpy scifi series from the 70s. Dumarest of Terra.

It chronicles the journey of Earl Dumarest struggling to locate and return to his homeworld of Earth in a galaxy full of people who have forgotten humanities homeworld, some even view it as a legend like Atlantis, or Eldorado.

Although 'lost in space' stories are a dime a dozen, its different because he doesnt own his own ship. Most of hsi adventures are him slumming it to earn enough to buy passage to the next planet. And space travel sucks in this setting, and everyone is broke.

Its pulpy goodness.
 

Attachments

  • 91Z7NlGUAHL (1).jpg
    91Z7NlGUAHL (1).jpg
    852.5 KB · Views: 19
I've just finished the Three Body Problem by Liu Cixin. It's a fine book. It's a bit slow but fine. I dig the premise.

Now, I'm going to re-read Dan Simmons' Hyperion-Endymion cantos. The entire series is a banger. In my opinion, the Hyperion cantos are a bit better than Endymion, but both are pretty solid.

After that, I'm gonna read Metro 2023 by Dmitry Glukhovsky. I've listened to the audiobook, but nothing beats actually reading it.

If you could suggest any books like these, I'd very much appreciate it!
 
I've just finished the Three Body Problem by Liu Cixin. It's a fine book. It's a bit slow but fine. I dig the premise.

Now, I'm going to re-read Dan Simmons' Hyperion-Endymion cantos. The entire series is a banger. In my opinion, the Hyperion cantos are a bit better than Endymion, but both are pretty solid.

After that, I'm gonna read Metro 2023 by Dmitry Glukhovsky. I've listened to the audiobook, but nothing beats actually reading it.

If you could suggest any books like these, I'd very much appreciate it!
Look into Canticle for Leibowitz. Its another post apoc book. I haven't read it myself but heard good things.
 
A biography of Lucius Cornelius Sulla, while thinking very hard about America currently needing a restorer of the republic. Closest we ever got was Andrew Jackson.

Look into Canticle for Leibowitz. Its another post apoc book. I haven't read it myself but heard good things.

Great book, haven't read the posthumous sequel.

I might go for Battlefield Earth next, I like that pulpy stupid stuff

It's terribly written, read Final Blackout instead. That's pulpy in a good way.
New year, new books. Starting off with Night Dogs by Kent Anderson. Set in 70's Portland, it follows a former US soldier turned cop as he works the Portland ghetto. Pretty good so far, pretty loose plot, almost more of a series of vignettes.

His vietnam war novel was a banger, too, Sympathy for the Devil, when that same cop was in SF in Vietnam with an ending I genuinely did not see comin. One of the ten best Nam stories ever told, I wonder how autobiographic it was, like his police books certainly were. There's another one where he works in Oakland that's a good read, too. He's a genuinely great novelist.
 
I'm a low attention span having retard so I read a few books at once, a few chapters at a time, about whatever thing I'm interested in. Currently reading Programmed to Kill, A Supernatural History of the Third Reich, The Holocaust Industry and the Anatomy of Evil

Don't know what this list says about me other than "based" but I like to pick and mix books from all kinds of perspectives and I really enjoy reading non-fiction
 
Don't know what this list says about me other than "based"
No.

Reading broadens the mind and increases your intelligence, but what you are ultimately doing is coasting off someone else's hard work.

You want to be based, do your own research, grub around in the mud in the freezing sleet looking for long lost artefacts, learn multiple languages to gather as much original information as you possibly can, and be prepared to fly to the ends of the earth at the drop of a hat to get the final confession from an eye witness on his deathbed.

Someone who describes themselves as based (or whatever variant thereof) very seldom actually are.
 
I’ve been reading Gene Wolfe’s Book of the New Sun series. It’s easily the most impressive work of fiction I’ve come across in years. At times it can be a bit esoteric and Wolfe likes to throw in a bunch of archaic words, but that just adds to the fun & mystery of reading. Even if you’re a very close and attentive reader, there will be things that you miss on your first pass through. I actually went back and reread the entire first book (Shadow of the Torturer) before moving on to the second, and I picked up on a ton of stuff that blew right by me the first time around.

I can’t recommend these books enough. There are four books in the series but you can pick them up in two volumes — Shadow & Claw, Sword & Citadel.
 
I had a great start to the year with The Name of the Rose (which I liked less than expected) and The Bell Jar (which I liked more than expected), and then I ruined my streak with a shitty (award-winning) novella that hasn't been translated into English yet and hopefully never will be. Now I'm reading Kafka's The Trial in German, sort of, awkwardly - I have the German text and a translation open side by side and I'm listening to the German audiobook at the same time. I have to pause and check the translation regularly, but all in all it's going more smoothly than I'd thought.
 
  • Like
Reactions: timewave0
I started reading The Fort: A Novel of the Revolutionary War, but I'm put off of it because right off the bat i'm very unimpressed. It's a book by Bernard Cornwell, the guy who wrote the Sharpe series of novels, and some others. Military fiction in the vein of Aubrey-Maturin, Horatio Hornblower, Flashman, and so on. None of which I've really read, actually. I read Master and Commander, Old Glory, and The Wild Ohio, all of which do or kind of fit in to that genre, but in general it's not stuff I read.

The premise of the book is that it's sit in the Penobscot Expedition. Britain invaded Maine and planned to turn it into a colony called New Ireland under the rule of Massachusetts loyalists. The Americans tried to excise them and it turned into the worst naval disaster of the war and the worst in American history until Pearl Harbor.

So far what I see is what I'd fear with someone like Cornwell: very plain writing by someone who just churns out formula fiction, one book after another. For the most part the characters all feel like they have the same personality, fervently patriotic (for whichever side they're on) with a lot of tally ho type of speech and eagerness. It hews very closely to historical events and it's like someone took a historical book and just fed dialogue into it. The Hornet's Nest by Jimmy Cart
I'm close to finishing The Martian, but I'll have to reread it again later when I'm not so busy and can absorb better. I wish it were a bit longer because I'd like to see more emotions from each character than just sarcasm and steely resolve. I can forgive that to some extent because Mark doesn't want to share anything embarassing in his logs, but as a professional he has no reason to be embarassed by his emotional state and whatever valuable psychological data his introspection could provide. I like Bruce Ng but everyone else on Earth is a little too quippy maybe? I don't like the Hermes crew for the same reason. The back-up plan in case they miss their resupply before heading back is just too dumb. The third-person description of Mark's arrival to the ascent vehicle was really sweet and I'd have liked a bit more of that kind of thing. I think it would be a good book for secondary school reading lists as practical applications of not just math and science but general problem-solving skills.

I also read Planetes and some Asimov last year so I'm just on a big hard-scifi kick now and taking recommendations.

ETA: I do like the pure man-vs-nature angle without much interpersonal conflict. The cooperation is such a nice change of pace from stories about humans fighting each other.
The author said he just wanted to tell shipwrecked/Robinson Crusoe type stories about engineers surviving off their wits. Author is a geek (hence the absolutely awful comedy in the book, ninjapirates lolsorandom) that just liked fantasizing about survival scenarios.

Consider reading Delta-v, novel about a private space race to be the first to mine an asteroid. It DOES have a lot of human vs human conflict, but it's the same kind of thing in terms of being a constant shitshow where people are trying to keep their rocket barely patched up enough to finish their mission before they all die of space cancer.
 
His vietnam war novel was a banger, too, Sympathy for the Devil, when that same cop was in SF in Vietnam with an ending I genuinely did not see comin. One of the ten best Nam stories ever told, I wonder how autobiographic it was, like his police books certainly were. There's another one where he works in Oakland that's a good read, too. He's a genuinely great novelist
Oh absolutely. I read that one a while back and loved it. Night Dogs isn't quite grabbing me the same way but its still a solid read. Liking the multiple POVs instead of just Hanson.
 
Back