YourFriendlyLurker 2.0
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
I have completed Blindsight and Echopraxia by Peter Watts and holly molly I have so much to say and will have even more once the dust in my brain settles. Those are quite hard books to chew and the language Watts uses doesn't make it easier. If the things like “Chinese Room” or “Philosophical Zombie” do not ring any bells for you, my honest advice is to put those books away. If they do though, you are in for a ride.
Somehow it reminds me of The Passenger of McCarthy which I loved. However, if The Passenger (not Stella Maris) theoretically can be read just as psychological drama without the deep dive into the math, physics, philosophy, etc, or just be enjoyed for McCarthy's language, with Watts it’s not gonna work. You either get it or you close the book, especially, the Blindsight.
What I loved: General idea, characters, the horror side of the story, aliens (fucking good ones, fully justifying the word “alien”), and the fact that Watts put a “sources” clause at the end of the book referencing the concepts he used. Thanks to that, I have found there are a couple of things to read on concepts that got me interested.
What I didn’t love: sometimes the flow of events becomes obscure, bordering on a total loss. Language – the amount of terms makes the book hard to read. Not impossible of course, just hard.
PS: if you by any chance will read it, look HERE. Maybe those books will be adapted one day, but that alone is freaking piece of work.
Somehow it reminds me of The Passenger of McCarthy which I loved. However, if The Passenger (not Stella Maris) theoretically can be read just as psychological drama without the deep dive into the math, physics, philosophy, etc, or just be enjoyed for McCarthy's language, with Watts it’s not gonna work. You either get it or you close the book, especially, the Blindsight.
What I loved: General idea, characters, the horror side of the story, aliens (fucking good ones, fully justifying the word “alien”), and the fact that Watts put a “sources” clause at the end of the book referencing the concepts he used. Thanks to that, I have found there are a couple of things to read on concepts that got me interested.
What I didn’t love: sometimes the flow of events becomes obscure, bordering on a total loss. Language – the amount of terms makes the book hard to read. Not impossible of course, just hard.
PS: if you by any chance will read it, look HERE. Maybe those books will be adapted one day, but that alone is freaking piece of work.