- Joined
- Jul 12, 2024
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There's a LOT of classic authors. But I'm just gonna presume we're talking about the classic Hugo and Nebula winners from back in the day. If they've appeared as a winner, I won't note them.Can anyone recommend some good scifi stories? My dad is looking for something to read and is really big into scifi. He's read a lot of the "classic" authors that I know about at least so I figured I'd ask here.
is there anything in particular he's interested in about scifi? scifi has a lot of subgenres, such as mystery or psychology or marine tactics or romance or revenge or strategy or horror and so on, anything in particular?Can anyone recommend some good scifi stories? My dad is looking for something to read and is really big into scifi. He's read a lot of the "classic" authors that I know about at least so I figured I'd ask here.
He likes space stories (space operas I guess?). He's a big trekkie if that helps.is there anything in particular he's interested in about scifi? scifi has a lot of subgenres, such as mystery or psychology or marine tactics or romance or revenge or strategy or horror and so on, anything in particular?
I keep meaning to read Solaris after watching the movie. Maybe I'll get it and loan it to him.Stanislaw Lem- famous eastern european writer during the late 50s-early 60s that's become honored as one of the greats. Wrote Solaris and The Invincibl.
He should take a look at the rest of Andy Weir's works then. Artemis is a similar hard sci-fi story about a smuggler on a moon base, basically a heist story with a surprisingly large amount of plot-critical welding, while Project Hail Mary is a bit softer and focuses on a first contact situation and the invention of humanity's first interstellar vessel. Neither one was as well-received as the Martian, but I think they're both quite good. Artemis in particular was clearly written with the idea that it might be adopted for a screenplay one day (which was announced a couple years ago, but nothing came of it).Last book he read was The Martian and really enjoyed it.
take a look through the list I posted.He likes space stories (space operas I guess?). He's a big trekkie if that helps.
Last book he read was The Martian and really enjoyed it.
I keep meaning to read Solaris after watching the movie. Maybe I'll get it and loan it to him.
I'd say St. Augustine. Also Kierkegaard, although I'm not sure I'd call what he wrote apologetics. He has a very eccentric view of religion.C.S Lewis is one of the only Christian apologetic writers I have found worthwhile (aside from Theophilus of Antioch). If there are others in the same calibre, I would be up for some recommendations.
He also used "Lewis Padgett" as a pseudonym for his works with Moore so if you like him you should also look for that. He's partly not well remembered for having died young, but also for using a LOT of pseudonyms, many in one-off works, so we probably don't know all the pseudonyms he used.
- C. L. Moore & Henry Kuttner- A husband and wife duo that wrote together. Moore's debut work, Shambleau, was praised by Lovecraft. She's also known for Northwest Smith and Jirel of Joiry. The former's a proto-Han Solo and the latter's a female sword and sorcery heroine. Kuttner's died early but he had plenty of decent works like Fury, Mutant, and Mimsy were the Borogroves. You can get "the best of" volumes of their works easily on ebay or kindle. Moore also wrote a bunch of novels in the '50s that dealt with the more apocalyptic. Kuttner had some variety to him.
Kuttner, for some reason, is being "rediscovered" by some of the circles of SF/F fans I'm in and it's pretty interesting seeing Kuttner-Kornbluth-Cordwainer Smith get "rediscovered" and now people are telling me to read Kuttner's horror works, Kornbluth's Syndic, and just get Smith's works.He also used "Lewis Padgett" as a pseudonym for his works with Moore so if you like him you should also look for that. He's partly not well remembered for having died young, but also for using a LOT of pseudonyms, many in one-off works, so we probably don't know all the pseudonyms he used.
Kuttner himself also did a couple Lovecraft pastiches and both of them were in the "Lovecraft circle."
Ronald Knox is bang on if you like CS Lewis. They are both from the same era, were friends, and share perennial concerns.C.S Lewis is one of the only Christian apologetic writers I have found worthwhile (aside from Theophilus of Antioch). If there are others in the same calibre, I would be up for some recommendations.
What we mean, in the last resort, by 'an answer to prayer', is that from the beginning of time, before he set about the building of the worlds, God foreknew every prayer that human lips would breathe, and took it into account. That, and nothing less, is the staggering claim which we make every time we say the 'Our Father'.
If I could have collected all the symposiasts in a room, this is the issue I would have put to them, to 'try their spirits'. By all means (I would have said) let us leave dogma on one side, let us take no notice of all the secular disputes which divide the sympathies of Christian people, let us refrain as far as possible from prying into the mysterious secrets, too high for our ken. But- do you believe that God runs the world, and cares what happens in the world? For, if so, you will have to find something better than a pale, pantheist abstraction to satisfy your notion of God. And if not, you may spare your inkstands; nothing you can tell us about your religion will ever strengthen an infirm purpose or heal a broken heart.
I may be a bigot, I may be a pedant' but I believe I have the ordinary Englishman with me here. He does not want 'religion'; he wants God.
And if you tell him that he knows God by an intuitive perception, you will only make him unhappy. He is fully conscious that the word came into his vocabulary when he was a child, when he was accustomed to accept from his elders a multitude of traditions, some of which his riper mind has discarded; that he has lived with the idea and grown accustomed to it, that it has formed part of a fairyland which he would like to find true. Precisely for that reason, he distrusts the sentiment; he suspects himself of fostering a grateful illusion, suspects that the wish was father to the thought. The notion of God fits in with his higher ideals, with his dearer hopes; all the more reason to surmise that it has been coined, by successive ages of mythology, for that purpose. The very reason why you ask him to believe in God, namely, that he wants to believe in God, is his main reason for doubting. The elders, when they heard Helen plead, made allowances for the beauty of her voice, lest they should be spellbound by its influence; what if this hope, too, should be an illusion of the Sirens?
The Englishman wants truth of fact; you will not get him to replace it by artistic values. The pressure of fact is all around him, reflected in the daily urgency of living; you must give him a metaphysic of fact, for the alternative is despair.
As you can already tell there is something annoyingly affected about the tone. Two of the endings are surprising but only because they’re so dumb. Around ten pages from the end something is revealed about one of the characters that is so ill-judged I lost whatever faith I had left in the author. And to top it all off, there’s some worldbuilding and an overarching story across all three parts but the book ends at what would be the end of the first act in a normal narrative so you get zero pay-off to all that. I’ve read books less enjoyable in the moment than this one this year, but this is the one that pissed me off the most upon finishing.One of these mysteries is a prison story. One is a regular whodunit. One is a locked-room mystery. I can’t promise that they’re necessarily presented to you in that order; but it should be easy for you work out which is which, and to sort them out accordingly. Unless you find that each of them is all three at once, in which case I’m not sure I can help you.
In each case the murderer is the same individual – of course, Jack Glass himself. How could it be otherwise? Has there ever been a more celebrated murderer?
That’s fair, I hope?
Your task is to read these accounts, and solve the mysteries and identify the murderer. Even though I have already told you the solution, the solution will surprise you. If the revelation in each case is anything less than a surprise, then I will have failed.
I do not like to fail.
There were a few niggles I had. Apart from the first chapter (on language) it didn’t flow very elegantly and had quite a bit of repetition. Maybe because it was adapted from a paper. A few tangential points he made annoyed me, like talking about ‘the welfare of transgender and queer Africans’ in the same paragraph where he discusses how in most African countries homosexuality is still a criminal offence, or describing what happened with George Floyd as a ‘wanton killing’ by police officers. There’s even a minor outbreak of TDS with “as in other societies, liberal representative democracy in Africa is a self-correcting mechanism, as long as no-one takes power and uses it to make it impossible for them to be removed, as did the Nazis in 1930s Germany and as Trump attempted in the United States in January 2021.”Here is the deal: the world, the so-called West or Global North, does not owe Africa. And I fail to see—unless we grant that white supremacists are right and we are permanent children whose will is forever at the mercy of our erstwhile colonisers—why after 60 plus years of independence, Africans are willing to accept that we are still colonised and that we have no will or strength to defeat our oppressors and, therefore, do not have the wherewithal to expunge modern institutions and practices inspired by the so-called West from our lives.
Books by Ian M. Banks, Peter Hamilton, Neal Asher, Charles Stross, Robert Reed, and Alistair Reynolds might fit the bill. If you know any other books he really likes that would help narrow it down.He likes space stories (space operas I guess?). He's a big trekkie if that helps.
Last book he read was The Martian and really enjoyed it.
I keep meaning to read Solaris after watching the movie. Maybe I'll get it and loan it to him.
From what I understand, Moore's second husband was the literary executor for Kuttner and Moore's work and wasn't authorizing reprints for whatever reason, so they were out of print for years. Moore's stepdaughter ended up with the rights after her father died, and she allowed reprints to go forward. Also, some of Kuttner's material has fallen into the public domain, which has increased his visibility a lot. It's great that people are find out about them again, because they were very popular authors in the science fiction during their lifetimes.Kuttner, for some reason, is being "rediscovered" by some of the circles of SF/F fans I'm in and it's pretty interesting seeing Kuttner-Kornbluth-Cordwainer Smith get "rediscovered" and now people are telling me to read Kuttner's horror works, Kornbluth's Syndic, and just get Smith's works.
anyways, does anyone have thoughts on Edmond Hamilton, the old SF writer?
I'm surprised at how much decent science fiction (and, some fantasy) there was in the 30s-60s that slips under the radar of the dozen or so "greats".Books by Ian M. Banks, Peter Hamilton, Neal Asher, Charles Stross, Robert Reed, and Alistair Reynolds might fit the bill. If you know any other books he really likes that would help narrow it down.
From what I understand, Moore's second husband was the literary executor for Kuttner and Moore's work and wasn't authorizing reprints for whatever reason, so they were out of print for years. Moore's stepdaughter ended up with the rights after her father died, and she allowed reprints to go forward. Also, some of Kuttner's material has fallen into the public domain, which has increased his visibility a lot. It's great that people are find out about them again, because they were very popular authors in the science fiction during their lifetimes.
If you're reading Kornbluth, check out his novel Not this August. He's another great author who died too young.
I haven't read a lot of Edward Hamilton, but I did enjoy his books A Yank in Valhalla and The Haunted Stars. He also wrote a great short story called "What's it Like out There".
Even total pulp from the "Golden Era" is top tier compared to the absolute crap that literally wins Hugos now.Honestly, with how crap modern media feels, I keep finding older stuff I like that seems to have been almost forgotten.
I mean given that the SFWA is melting down and the Hugos have been rigged for a while, I'd honestly consider Tom Swift and His Electric Rifle to be better than BIPOC power fantasy #329.Even total pulp from the "Golden Era" is top tier compared to the absolute crap that literally wins Hugos now.