What are you reading right now?

“The shallows: How the internet is changing the way we think, read, and remember”
Just started reading again after finishing ISAIF.
I’m enjoying it so far, it’s going over how technology shapes our thoughts even if we don’t realize it at at the moment. After I’m finished with this I might check out “entertaining ourselves to death”, and other neo-Luddite/anti-tech
 
“The shallows: How the internet is changing the way we think, read, and remember”
I picked that up in the library. Can't second your recommendation enough. It made me buy a dumb phone. Back now to a smart phone but the year or so without it has made me more careful.

There has been a great change in literature. It can't be the internet's fault totally. Dr Johnson predicted in the late 1700s:

"I fancy mankind may come, in time, to write all aphoristically, except in narrative; grow weary of preparation, and connection, and illustration, and all those arts by which a big book is made".

You can see this in David Markson's novels or Pessoa's The Book of Disquiet where the 'chapters' are fragments of a larger whole. They can be read individually, flicked through. They are awashed with knowledge as though the authors live in a library. People live in the biggest library of all now. Vast as the sea, there is no end or beginning to it. It is hard to plan in that state, to read the first line or to know where to stand.

Cinema has played a role. Most novels are not worth reading and are better off watched as films. The few novels that do matter, however, go unread. Some emotions and views cannot be expressed in film without the medium suffering. Most 'though provoking' films tend to only scratch the surface. It is a medium that must by necessity generalise. It is perfect for archetypal and tragic characters. Something like The Godfather is elevated as film when it is a meh novel.

Really, as much as television and cinema have tried, you can't replicate the experience of reading War & Peace, Moby Dick, Ulysses or Paradise Lost. Something is lost in translation.

If you like The Shallows, read Walter J. Ong's Orality and Literacy, which goes over the differences between oral and literary consciousness. That to me by far one of the most important developments in modern history. We have reverted to visual people and our intellectual culture has suffered. Our view of the world has shallowed. Our perception is not as clear and poetic as Homer's but just as simple. Abstract thinking, removing yourself from the world, the kind you can only find in big books, has its own inverse problem (men living by words), but we require a balance.
 
The Imago Sequence and Other Stories by Laird Barron. I thought for sure that was a pen name but apparently not. Very nice supernatural/occult horror that's reminiscent of Lovecraft or CAS but not too much. Reminded me of season 1 of True Detective. Broken down, alcoholic protagonists, backwoods cults worshipping primordial horrors, bored millionaires dabbling in the occult, epiphanies that might be cosmic truths or just a bad trip. Strong themes of mutation and metamorphosis in response to human exposure to whatever is dreaming out in the dark.
 
Ubik by Philip K. Dick. It took me awhile to appreciate his style of writing when I read A Scanner Darkly for the first time and it's now one of my favorite books. Something PKD is incredibly good at is being able to write really intelligently put together world building and sci-fi concepts, without the scale of those more abstract story elements replacing the development or writing quality of individual characters, which he is able to give enough of a focus to in the story that his books are basically complex character studies alongside some the most consistently unique and creative Sci-fi ideas.
 
Currently making my way through Moby-Dick at the moment, about a third of the way through just after the book discusses Ahab’s conviction in his hunt.

My god has this book been an absolute treat so far! I wasn’t so sure of it before Ishmael finds the Pequod but from that point it has been a delight!

Very much savouring this one.
 
Been reading author and pulp fiction expert Will Murray's novels from Steeger Books (formerly Altus Press) where he takes on Popular Publications' long-running pulp vigilante The Spider. As he explains in the afterwords to these, he and the late gentleman who owned the rights to various Popular Publications pulp heroes were deciding which character to bring back in novels, strongly considering Operator No. 5, but decided upon The Spider. The first novel Legion of Doom has a meteor with strange and deadly properties crash in Central Park, attracting the attention of wealthy playboy and criminologist Richard Wentworth (The Spider) and Jimmie Christopher, Operator No. 5 of America's most top secret intelligence outfit, and another man Wentworth, a veteran of the Great War, figures must be the notorious Allied operative G-8, ace pilot and spy. It also attracts the attention of an old enemy of The Spider's and other old foe of one of the other heroes.

The second novel, Fury in Steel, is set in 1941 and Wentworth fears German operatives are planning to stir up trouble, and once again the Spider's NYC and other parts of America another apocalypse, a crazed scheme by another villain to wreak havoc, panic the nation, and cause the deaths of thousands. Killer robots are on the loose, killer robots that can bite men's' heads off with their powerful jaws, tear men from limb to limb, ignore bullets and tear into the foundations of skyscrapers with their jaws and hands like steel termites and bring buildings down. To complicate matters for Wentworth and his people, the FBI has sent in the three man team known as The Suicide Squad, and Agents Kerrigan, Murdoch and Klaw would also be more than happy to bring in The Spider, or put him down.

The third novel, Scourge of the Scorpion, brings in obscure pulp hero The Skull Killer. The Skull Killer is obscure for two reasons: he was never the star of his own pulp but rather functioned as the hero in a couple of pulps that spotlighted the villains, The Octopus and The Scorpion, and there was only one issue of each, and it’s a common belief in pulp fandom that the lead novel in The Scorpion was a rewritten story that had been intended for the never published second issue of The Octopus, since that magazine sold poorly. Murray comes up with a way to tie together the mystery of The Octopus and The Scorpion that's actually kind of clever, and brings in the Cult of the Purple Eyes, the brainwashed minions of both The Octopus and The Scorpion, still under the mysterious Scorpion's command. The Scorpion's mad plans include leaving hundreds and hundreds of various booby-trapped everyday items around New York City that infect hundreds, if not thousands of people with a deadly combination of scorpion venom and tetanus.


Hangman From Hell.jpg

Most recently there was The Hangman from Hell, where one of Wentworth's European contacts is bringing him some important information but the man's been murdered, and Wentworth's loyal Sikh assistant Ram Singh is attacked by a masked giant wielding a hangman’s noose attached to a razor-sharp sickle. Wentworth’s investigation reveals that this attacker, a deadly assassin known as The Hangman, is an operative for the Purple Shirts, a burgeoning Central European fascist movement with allies in the States and he’s come to the United States for the specific purpose of killing Operator No. 5, Jimmie Christopher, America's ace secret agent. Wentworth/The Spider and Christopher have an uneasy relationship as Christopher considers himself a legitimate operative of the US government and cannot condone a vigilante like the Spider, but they must work together as the Purple Shirts have a plan involving a big rally at Central Park, involving a weapon with gruesome effects.
 
I picked that up in the library. Can't second your recommendation enough. It made me buy a dumb phone. Back now to a smart phone but the year or so without it has made me more careful.
"Carr cites a bit of psychology and neuroscience, but he doesn't seem to notice that the study he unveils most triumphantly actually refutes half of his own argument. An experiment showed web novices' brains changing in response to internet use, but it also showed "no significant difference in brain activity" between the novices and a web-savvy control group when both were engaged in "a simulation of book reading". In other words, people who used the internet regularly had not lost the ability to read books after all. (...) John Palfrey and Urs Gasser have actually bothered to find out what young people do online, rather than just assuming them to be glazed, distracted skimmers. Here is a far more nuanced story of a teenage girl's "newsgathering process", which alternates between "grazing" and a "deep dive", when she wants to know more about a particular topic and will indeed read in-depth."

I never read, period. I do now, and I love it to the point I'm more interested in reading the books behind the movies I considered a 6, hoping they're actually an 8. Even the most boring Dune Messiah was a journey I look back on fondly, "a whole lot of nothing, but still, more Dune". Yet, I constantly bang myself over the head when I read. I re-read lines and read without absorbing, and I find myself going "must be that internet brain". I don't doomscroll, I uninstalled all apps I don't use, and I can leave my phone in the locker at work and be better off. It seems like such a novice issue, finding myself "not reading properly", but I also never end up watching videos discussing a book I read or anything. I read it, reflect, and move on. For some reason the notion of "oh let's go through what I just read with other people" just doesn't fit me.

Anyways: I'm reading The Tartar Steppes as per /lit/ suggestion. Really good, simple and confined. Only just 90 pages in but already gone through the semi-dream sequence describing life as a journey from A to B; childhood seemingly pushing you along only by interest and 'why not'ness, whereas suddenly you hit adulthood, look back over your shoulder and realize the gate is locked. The sun moves faster and the trees and people around you become fewer until you're at the coast of your demise with no one left beside you. Almost feels as if I've adopted Drogo's struggle of "oh fuck I'm up here, fairly content with life, knowing there's a city 2 days travel away in which I could be happy, married and experience life', and yet that confined prison in the mountains seems like a bitter pride.

I myself am stuck on that point of "If just I get this next job change" or "this next game release will give me a new deeply-rooted hobby and urge to practice and get good like competitive TF2 in my youth", knowing neither case will do it. I need a new outlook on life and to 'leave the fortress' instead of just settling for what's familiar. Curious how the rest of the book will go.
 
On the recommendation of @Flexo , I'm reading Mistborn on my work breaks. I've never read Brandon Sanderson in my life. This guy likes set up and detail. I really like it so far. The world is pretty interesting, makes me think of Morrowind
The Mistborn Trilogy is some of his best work. Goes hard.
 
The Illustrated Eric

Faust Eric by Terry Pratchett, illustrated by Josh Kidby. This is a rare Discworld book that I've only read a few times, and then not since high school. I've never read the illustrated edition before, either. I was never a fan of Josh Kidby, even back in the day, much preferring his son/successor Paul Kidby, but this feels very nostalgic and comfortable to me. It's nice.

I'm also working my way through a couple different porn for women paranormal romance series. Very samey and definitely not cerebral, but it doesn't seem like my stress levels are going to drop any time soon, so I'm trying to subdue my brain with popcorn books and other comfy lit.

After this, more Pratchett. The Colour of Magic and The Light Fantastic are waiting for me after this. It's been a couple of decades since I last did a complete reread of his books. I hope that I enjoy them as much as I used to.

My tbr pile is extremely delinquent. However, I firmly believe that recreational reading should always be enjoyable- with the caveat that what's enjoyable is very much in the eye of the beholder- and I can't see myself as being in the mood for anything requiring more than a couple of braincells for a ways.
 
Currently making my way through Moby-Dick at the moment, about a third of the way through just after the book discusses Ahab’s conviction in his hunt.

My god has this book been an absolute treat so far! I wasn’t so sure of it before Ishmael finds the Pequod but from that point it has been a delight!

Very much savouring this one.
I want to give Moby Dick another shot. I read it back in high school and thought it was pretty boring, but several of my favorite teachers were very excited to see I was reading it and said it was one of their favorites. I picked it up back then because several themes and quotes are used in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan and I'm a big nerd.
But I just finished reading Buccaneers and Pirates of our Coast by Frank R. Stockton, which I scored in a Little Free Library, so chasing that with another seafaring book would be fun.
 
I finished Lolita and reading Philosophy in the Bedroom by Marquis De Sade.

Marquis De Sade strikes me as a Redditor Atheist. In his book he literally mentions "If god is so omnipresent, why is there evil and why hasn't he stop it" that I see atheists keep dropping. Which screams "fuck you mom and dad for dragging me to sunday service". After realizing this, the rest of his book comes off as him writing about his anal sex fetish, him corrupting, and fucking, young girls and boys. Which means this book comes across as disgusting and reading fan-fiction about himself which means he's a boring faggot.

And I'm pretty sure this is where Games Workshop got their inspiration for Slaanesh with his book mentioning excess.

So this literal fucker is nothing more than a baby-tier boomer hippy. Fat. Bisexual. And I would literally not have sex with him

Also Lolita check marks the characteristic traits of pedophiles archived in this site. Technical terminologies that pedophiles use like "no its not pedophile, its ebinophile" or "cunny" or whatever terminologies these things use. Humphret using "Lolita" "Pubescent" "Nymphet" justifying his sex with Dolly like how something about purity, how she is the one attracting him not the other way around because of these technical characteristics. Something I imagine pedophiles also do, like that convicted murderer Steven Sandison who killed this pedophile he was with cellmate with. Said Pedophile wouldn't stop justifying what he did to his step daughter, i think, so Steven killed him with some shoelace.
 
Last edited:
On the recommendation of @Flexo , I'm reading Mistborn on my work breaks. I've never read Brandon Sanderson in my life. This guy likes set up and detail. I really like it so far. The world is pretty interesting, makes me think of Morrowind
One of the best trilogies I have ever read. You might notice some Mormon theology undertones in it.
 
One of the best trilogies I have ever read. You might notice some Mormon theology undertones in it.
I'm not too deep in yet, but I'll see if I notice anything. It's certainly well written in any case. I like the world and imagery from it. Ash just raining from the sky 24/7. Honestly kino.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vecr and ScurvyRat
Back