Opinion What I Want My Kids to Learn About American Racism

1652217136178.png

I first heard the phrase “white supremacy” in my introductory sociology course at the University of Illinois in 1993. The image of men wearing white sheets and burning crosses came to mind, and I figured my professor was referring to ancient history. But I remember her continuing: “White supremacy is the assumption that the cultural patterns associated with white people — from clothes to language to aesthetic preferences to family structure — are normal, and the patterns associated with people of color are inferior.”

Wait, didn’t that basically describe my entire life? Feeling strange about my Indian grandmother’s clothes, about my grandmother’s cooking, about the fact that my grandmother even lived with us.

I learned that there was a whole language for this, with concepts like “institutionalized racism” and “structures of oppression.” There were influential theories, indeed entire academic fields, built on those ideas. And however bad it was for South Asian immigrants like me, white supremacy and institutionalized racism operated in the lives of other groups, including Black people, Native Americans and Latinos, in specific and often more challenging ways.

I could not get enough. I read bell hooks, Audre Lorde, Paulo Freire. Understanding white supremacy helped me see my life in a different light.

I remembered the presentation my dad had given at a conference of South Asian businesspeople in Chicago. Someone asked him why he had decided to buy a Subway sandwich store instead of starting an independent shop. “Which white people do you know are going to buy sandwiches from a brown guy born in India named Sadruddin?” I recall him responding. “A recognizable franchise covers your dark skin and ethnic name. It helps you hide.”

At the time the comment had struck me as perfectly logical and entirely unremarkable. My dad had simply spoken a basic truth of life as a brown-skinned immigrant in the United States, the equivalent of noting that gravity pulls you down. I remember most of the audience nodding along. But later, based on what I learned in my classes, I interpreted the moment differently: It was a wound from a bullet fired from the gun of American racism.

The deeper I read, the more I saw the entire world through that lens. I soon couldn’t see much else. Racism permeated everything. My principal identity was as a victim of racism. My singular purpose was to call racism out, beat it down and give it a violent death in front of a crowd.

I lost sight of many things, like how fortunate I was to be a middle-class college student spending my days reading and the role I had in building something better. I was in a conspiracy against my own agency. I sense a similar tendency in the way race and racism are taught in some schools today. Calling out racism is part of the work, not all of it. After you get rid of the things you don’t like, you need to build the things you do.

My kids have learned about “privilege” and “oppression” much earlier than I did — they were using these words in everyday conversations by the time they were 10 years old.

They didn’t learn this from me or their teachers at school. In fact, I find myself bemused by all the controversy over learning about race in elementary schools — as if the classroom is where most kids are first hearing about race.

The ways racism plays a role in American life are obvious to kids from a very young age. Before some kids can ride a bike, they are watching videos of police officers killing Black men. They see Colin Kaepernick kneel during the national anthem, hear the political statements of LeBron James and Naomi Osaka, listen to songs like “This Is America” by Childish Gambino, read books like “The Hate U Give,” watch television shows like “All American” and, above all, experience racism themselves.

It would be a tragedy if teachers pretended none of this was happening and left kids to their own devices to figure it out. The job of the school is to provide broader context for the facts of the world and to pass along the knowledge and skills so that students can navigate it. That means that a full history of America’s past and present, our ugliness and our beauty, needs to be taught.

And I would be remiss in my duties if I allowed my kids to fall into the same victim mind-set that I succumbed to as a college student. We are South Asian American Muslims, and my kids have experienced their fair share of anti-Muslim taunts, which, these days, are just as much about racial bigotry as religious bias. We work with the school so that it is better equipped to deal with the problem of prejudice, and then I remind my kids what a privilege it is to be Muslim. I want them to derive their identity from loving Islam, not hating Islamophobia.

My kids are now 12 and 15. As they progress through adolescence and become even more attuned to the politics and culture of their nation, I want their schools to play the appropriate role in shaping them to be participating citizens of a diverse democracy. That means teaching an expansive version of American history and instilling in them a sense of responsibility to help make the next chapter more just and inclusive. Citizenship is not a spectator sport.

That was a lesson it took me until the end of college to learn.

In my final semester at the University of Illinois, I did an independent study with an African American female professor of theater and education. Toward the end of the semester she invited me to attend a dress rehearsal of a play she had written with her graduate students. “Children are one of the most oppressed groups in our society,” she told me. The play was an experiment at a type of theater that put kids at the center.

I was eager to demonstrate how much I had learned in our independent study and was the first person to stand during the talk-back session after the performance. My professor smiled broadly when she saw me. I used a tone dripping with scorn. I targeted a scene in the play where a child retreats to his own room after a fight with a parent. In front of the entire audience, I declared my professor and her graduate students guilty of racism and classism for writing a character who had his own room. “What about all the families where kids don’t have their own rooms? Or the Black and brown families that don’t have houses? Don’t you realize that your play is only further oppressing them?”

The cast stared at me in disbelief. There were no more questions or comments from the audience. My critique effectively shut everything else down.

I had hoped my professor would be proud of me. So the email she sent came as a total surprise. I remember the contents as if I read them yesterday.

Her students, she wrote, had worked so hard on the play and were deeply hurt by my comments. She was hurt, too. Why hadn’t I offered constructive suggestions, she wondered.

She closed with this: Since you were disappointed with the play that these students wrote, you should try your hand at creating something better. It is always harder to create than it is to criticize.

I sat with that email for a long time. My professor was teaching me that devoting yourself to seeing the bad in everything means that you ignore the good and you absolve yourself of responsibility for building things that are better.

I know that there is a role for people who sit in the audience and criticize the show, but it was starting to dawn on me that that’s not who I wanted to be. I wanted to be the person putting something on the stage.

Parenting is in no small part the process of praying your kids get right the things that you got wrong. I hope my kids’ schools teach them that considering the role of race is a question that should frequently be asked, not a conclusion that is already reached.

Because of the way I interpreted the ideas of white supremacy and structural racism in college, the only comment I remembered of my father’s during that conference of South Asian businesspeople was the one he made about race. But my father said many other things too. He pointed out that the Subway sandwich stores we owned had given us a comfortable life, including filling the savings accounts that put my brother and me through college. Several of his managers, recent immigrants from South Asia, went on to have their own Subway sandwich stores and earned enough to put their kids through college too. My dad was proud of what he built, and the difference it had made for his family and broader community.

I don’t want my kids to shy away from confronting racism, but I don’t want whatever racism they might experience to make them lose sight of all of their other identities and privileges. Above all, I want my two sons to understand that responsible citizenship in a diverse democracy is not principally about noticing what’s bad; it’s about constructing what’s good. You need to defeat the things you do not love by building the things you do.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/10/opinion/race-teaching-school.html (A)
 
theater that put kids at the center.
I was eager to demonstrate how much I had learned in our independent study and was the first person to stand during the talk-back session after the performance. My professor smiled broadly when she saw me. I used a tone dripping with scorn. I targeted a scene in the play where a child retreats to his own room after a fight with a parent. In front of the entire audience, I declared my professor and her graduate students guilty of racism and classism for writing a character who had his own room. “What about all the families where kids don’t have their own rooms? Or the Black and brown families that don’t have houses? Don’t you realize that your play is only further oppressing them?”
Nice work growing from this experience. Very impressive considering most would have only felt superior. That said, maybe this bit has some truth to it considering most white people can reach that conclusion without attacking a literal children's performance:
“White supremacy is the assumption that the cultural patterns associated with white people — from clothes to language to aesthetic preferences to family structure — are normal, and the patterns associated with people of color are inferior.”
What did you say in response to the professor? Did you write an apology to her students? The performers? This might be White bias on my part but if I had acted like that as a child I would be compelled to do something like that out of shame. It's just the normal thing to do in polite society. You were an adult and you're now using your experience portrayed as an unrepentant ass as work product. Surely it would be a better article to explain how you made amends? Because leaving it out leads one to infer your shitstained ass didn't do the right and normal thing after behaving like that.

People like Pajeet here are why supremacy is a logical conclusion to reach. The monkey found a cudgel and their aberrant behavior was incongruent with polite society's expectation. While it was able to suss out that yes, it was bad, and even understands some of why it is bad, it completely misses the bigger picture or what a normal, actual human being does in that situation. It's the charitable perspective to view such creatures as inherently inferior. If they considered the 'jeets as equals then that would mean behavior like this must have some actual malice behind it. Fucking benchods.
 
"White Supremacy is white people thinking that immigrants to their white nations should be held to white standards and have to follow white rules."

Fuck this retarded bitch, I hope she gets sent back to India.
"White rules" like rape is wrong, bestiality is wrong, fucking children is wrong, and setting little girls on fire is abhorrent.
If you're opposed to "white rules", you're a fucking savage.
 
"White rules" like rape is wrong, bestiality is wrong, fucking children is wrong, and setting little girls on fire is abhorrent.
If you're opposed to "white rules", you're a fucking savage.
"You say burning widows is your custom. Well, we say hanging people who burn women is our custom. So, build your pyres and we will build our gallows, and we shall let custom have the day." - Some English dude in India.
 
>White supremacy is the assumption that the cultural patterns associated with white people — from clothes to language to aesthetic preferences to family structure — are normal
But for white people, our culture is normal. A white person walking around mimicking or aspiring to other cultures is seen as a joke, by the other cultures as much as white culture. Wiggers, weeaboos, koreaboos, commies, Indiaboo hippies, Christian zionists- all of them traitors to their own culture, and none of them will ever be accepted as equals by the cultures they demonstrate a preference for.
>and the patterns associated with people of color are inferior.
What if they are? Is it white supremacy to believe that contemporary white Western culture, values and social structure is better than living in a cow dung hut and subsisting on dirt cookies and UN food relief while four of your seven kids die before their fifth birthday?

It's always these crazy cunts that say "white culture leads to white supremacy, which devalues the importance of other cultures", but they aren't exactly applying for emigration to fucking Eritrea.
 
This applies to the author's father as well. He picked the franchise route as it's easier and better chance of a success than a venture of his own creation. Rather than fess up to this he blames the specter of racism to assuage his feelings.
I didn’t even read it this way. He made a rational choice free of emotion. He analyzed the market and exploited it successfully. His son was infected via other vectors, not dad.

If "white supremacy" is me thinking my culture and way of life is better than yours, then every person on earth is guilty of X supremacy. Blacks are certainly guilty of this, just ask any black kid that was bullied in school for "acting white."
It’s really simply ”local and/or dominant culture supremacy.” The only difference is that when it’s white ppl who are locally or culturally dominant, we’re the only ones who are supposed to denigrate our own culture and prefer any other to our own. But not you know, emulate it, since that’s cultural appropriation. We’re supposed to desperately LONG to emulate it but tell ourselves we don’t DESERVE to GET TO because White Supremacy.

"White Supremacy is white people thinking that immigrants to their white nations should be held to white standards and have to follow white rules."

Fuck this retarded bitch, I hope she gets sent back to India.
I can walk around my neighborhood at midnight, knowing I will not be abducted, gang-raped, and murdered. If I moved to India, I would certainly not do so, because I would’ve adapted my standards and rules to fit my new environment.

Lots of families have grandma living with them and you'll even see it in old TV shows and movies. If you think that's only brown immigrant people you must not know many people outside your own bubble.

This person literally had a tantrum over a play (in college not elementary mind you) where a child had their own bedroom. The teacher was wise to tell her to write her own play then instead of whining about the stories written by others.

There's a lot of injustice in the world. But not all of it is about race. Class plays a huge part in everything and it's always going to be the real underlying problem. But as long as we keep dividing everything with race it's always going to be an unwinnable war.
And lol guess what? This son of a Subway franchise owner *most assuredly* had his own bedroom growing up, and some of those involved with the play very well may not have.

Our current state of funhouse extreme racism exists to provide rich brats like this a reason to never think about class at all. That’s why they’re so attracted to it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
I didn’t even read it this way. He made a rational choice free of emotion. He analyzed the market and exploited it successfully. His son was infected via other vectors, not dad.
"People won't buy my sandwiches because I'm Brown" is rational? He has very little facts to back this up because there wasn't even an attempt at Sadruddin Sandwiches. He didn't analyze shit, he instead asked Subway to rent their brand and business model. Which is fine if you are looking to support a family but he had little to add to the conference in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
"People won't buy my sandwiches because I'm Brown" is rational? He has very little facts to back this up because there wasn't even an attempt at Sadruddin Sandwiches. He didn't analyze shit, he instead asked Subway to rent their brand and business model. Which is fine if you are looking to support a family but he had little to add to the conference in my opinion.
It is entirely rational. During the time Subway franchises were a thriving business concern, absolutely it would be rational to open a franchise rather than a sandwich shop with a weird foreign sounding name. I mean, if you were living in some like boutique rich community where they’re super interested in the novel and exotic ok, but in normal places? Subway is disgusting, but leave that aside since at this point they did huge business so were not considered that way. Subway, I know what I’m getting. Sadruddin Sandwiches? Wtf is that? Like curry or something? And me thinking that way isn’t racist. It’s that idk wtf Sadruddin Sandwiches is, but I know what Subway is. He’s trying to sell to Americans, so he picked what would sell to Americans. And white, black, or brown, Americans - certainly at that time - would be more likely to buy from Subway.
 
It is entirely rational. During the time Subway franchises were a thriving business concern, absolutely it would be rational to open a franchise rather than a sandwich shop with a weird foreign sounding name. I mean, if you were living in some like boutique rich community where they’re super interested in the novel and exotic ok, but in normal places? Subway is disgusting, but leave that aside since at this point they did huge business so were not considered that way. Subway, I know what I’m getting. Sadruddin Sandwiches? Wtf is that? Like curry or something? And me thinking that way isn’t racist. It’s that idk wtf Sadruddin Sandwiches is, but I know what Subway is. He’s trying to sell to Americans, so he picked what would sell to Americans. And white, black, or brown, Americans - certainly at that time - would be more likely to buy from Subway.
You seem to be missing my point and I'm not going to workshop out his business I was just using that as example. He absolutely could of established his own business model and won over customers with attractive options that aren't offered at a Subway. However that route is more effort and less chance at success. It's much easier to say it would fail because he's brown and this victim mentality obviously was passed on to his kids.
 
If I saw a place called sadruddin sandwiches next door to a subway, in my mind I'm going to know one of those places has a 99% chance of promoting/donating to BLM and one of them has a 99% chance of not doing that. The choice would be simple for me, white power!
 
  • Like
Reactions: JJLiautaud
H1B visas were a mistake
go to the shithole india and then write about racism because they don't like dark skinned faggots that don't speak english either. Somehow a white person problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cow-Lovin' Fool
You seem to be missing my point and I'm not going to workshop out his business I was just using that as example. He absolutely could of established his own business model and won over customers with attractive options that aren't offered at a Subway. However that route is more effort and less chance at success. It's much easier to say it would fail because he's brown and this victim mentality obviously was passed on to his kids.
Idk I just feel like the sentiment is just rational, and maybe his little bitch of a son is the one with the attitude. If I moved to India to open a restaurant and needed it to be successful fast and had the choice between my own bespoke restaurant serving Southern Cookin’ and an economical successful Indian food franchise I’d pick the franchise. And it wouldn’t be because I felt inferior or gave a shit what they thought about me lol it‘d just be logical to me.

Also full disclosure I worked the desk for a series of hotels when I was in college and many were owned by Indian immigrants. I’m sure the younger ones are garbage now but the ones who came over to start businesses that I experienced were pretty practical and unemotional about things. Like, they liked having white girls as the face and voice of the guest experience because they knew travelers were more comfortable with that. Of course they were also very blatant about it being white girls specifically, no black girls, which would get them in trouble if noticed I’m sure.

In conclusion old school immigrant race realism lands differently with me than modern annoying race fragility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JJLiautaud
Back