What if everyone and everything "problematic" is deplatformed and censored? - Is it better for a man to have chosen evil than to have good imposed upon him?

[GC_Positive]

I often wonder what the endgame is for a lot of the social justice warrior types. Many reactionaries have said that essentially the outrage culture is never ending and that once they've finished with their current targets (caucasians, males, conservatives, gamers, edgy comedy etc.) they'll just pick more things that they find problematic, others have said that we're already in the phase where it is starting to get ridiculous (Clown World).

I wonder what this dystopian future would look like if there is no push back. Do we end up living in a bland world with all the colour sucked out where it's homogenised? Does the clowniness of the clown world get super retarded and we end up with regimes like the Khmer Rouge where they're killing people who are educated and forcing people to starve for equality? Would you be safe if you're an "oppressed class"?

 

[RG 448]

I often wonder what the endgame is for a lot of the social justice warrior types.

I think taking for granted that they’ve thought a minute past overreacting to something on twitter is a generous assumption in and of itself.

 

[エリス]

They don't believe in choice. They think human beings are purely deternimistic products of their environment. They think if you are raised in a perfect environment you will be a perfect person.

 

[GC_Positive]

They don't believe in choice. They think human beings are purely deternimistic products of their environment. They think if you are raised in a perfect environment you will be a perfect person.

I find this hilarious as those types of people got very mad at Jared Diamond who wrote 'Guns Germs and Steel' which basically was written to explain why European countries colonised the entire world and were so successful at subjugating The Americas and Australia. They got mad at Jared Diamonds idea of Environmental Determinism which I think actually makes sense for the most part if we're explaining the success of preindustrial civilisations and empires.

 

[Ghost of Wesley Willis]

Let us say that they do get everything deemed "problematic" to be censored and deplatformed, they will start to cannibalize themselves and start accusing one another of liking "problematic things" by grasping at the weakest straws they can.

They've already done it with atheism (atheism plus anybody?) and feminism (see black and queer feminism and terfs).

 

[エリス]

I find this hilarious as those types of people got very mad at Jared Diamond who wrote 'Guns Germs and Steel' which basically was written to explain why European countries colonised the entire world and were so successful at subjugating The Americas and Australia. They got mad at Jared Diamonds idea of Environmental Determinism which I think actually makes sense for the most part if we're explaining the success of preindustrial civilisations and empires.

It's not that they disagree with it intellectually, it's that they disagree with its effects. Knowing this puts the idea that European countries colonized the entire world and were successful into your head and we can't have that. Instead they're taking the 1984 erase history route, promoting the idea that Europe has always been multiculti and what are you talking about you hate-speaker all peoples have always been equal.

 

[basilosaurus]

There is no endgame, because that's not the point. The point is to subvert social structures in the name of le weak and oppressed unto perpetuity. SJWs are a psychological type who use stupid politics to annoy groups they resent and romanticize their insecurities. This is why their groups and converged institutions have cannibalism problems, and why they act and talk like catty teenage girls. Which they are, mentally.

 

[DragoonSierra]

Eventually everyone will turn against it or just ignore it.

 

[Tetra]

Eventually everyone will turn against it or just ignore it.

this, and eventually companies will wise up and go "this thing we couldn't show in movies/shows/games NOW WE CAN
and get a massive viewing boost from everyone as it's seen as new and cool thing they totally couldn't show before.


And if everyone and everything problematic is deplatformed or censored, those people would likely support somewhere new unless that too is blocked off I imagine the main issue with that would be advertisers.

 

[AnOminous]

They don't have an endgame, not only because they just don't have one because they're too dumb to think that far ahead, but their expire-by date is rapidly approaching. Companies are really slow on the uptake but gradually catching on that getting woke and going broke are connected somehow.

They're operating by rules that go back to postal mail where if you got a letter from some angry customer, or someone saying they were an angry customer, it meant there were thousands of angry customers. So this was worth paying attention to. But now, if you get a bunch of angry tweets from some screech mob, you really have exactly that screech mob. There is absolutely nobody behind these fucking idiots. You have exactly what you're looking at, and that's some fat, shoplifting, parasitic bum who never buys anything and you should just ignore.

Eventually they'll hit the point of being as annoying and out of style as angry Christians picketing a movie and just selling more tickets for it.

Then there will be some other means of weaponizing outrage, maybe even more pernicious and awful.

Note, while they themselves may not have an endgame, it's possible the people enabling them do. But theirs isn't a social justice agenda, it's probably just about power and money and playing divide and conquer to keep people at each other's throats so their own throats don't get divided by a guillotine.

 

[sasazuka]

That should've been the Twilight Zone 2019 version of "It's a Good Life", the kid "deplatforming" everyone problematic to the cornfields.

 

[AnOminous]

That should've been the Twilight Zone 2019 version of "It's a Good Life", the kid "deplatforming" everyone problematic to the cornfields.

SJWs are basically that kid but without any actual power other than that people dumbly give them.

 

[Eryngium]

[removed]

 

[CWCissey]

You ever read Fahrenheit 451?

That.

 

[Slap47]

I often wonder what the endgame is for a lot of the social justice warrior types.

There is no end game. They're middle class idiots that follow trends.

Of course, in the USA they have some vague idea of bring European sensibilities on restricting expression to the USA.

 

[oldTireWater]

Look at the Chinese Cultural Revolution to see how this shit plays out.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

The SJWs would begin cannibalizing each other. They don't have an endgame; they're something of a Frankenstein's monster cobbled together by the "Deep State" (for lack of a better term) to obtain and maintain power. The problem is that the monster is out of control. It has no idea what it's doing or why, only that it needs to do it. A subservient class does not need brains, after all.
But they're gaining power and rapidly discovering they don't have the brainpower for the job (e.g., Ocasio-Cortez); unable to engage in any form of introspection (they've been told since infancy that they're special, unique, and perfect, so they don't need to be introspective), they censor and deplatform anything or anyone that points out that these would be emperors, indeed, have no clothes.
However, when everyone is unique and special, nobody is. Look at the LGBTWTFABCBBQ+ movement as an example- every orientation you can think of, and many you can't, all jockeying to be the most oppressed (and therefore, special.) Once their common enemies (straights, whites, Christians, Jews, Israel, capitalism, etc.) are defeated, they will turn on each other to see who gets the top spot.

Look at the Chinese Cultural Revolution to see how this shit plays out.

Or the Russian Revolution, or the French Revolution, or any of the revolutions that took place in South America in the 60s, 70s, and 80s.
The Revolution always devours its own.

 

[Terminus Est]

Won't happen. They'll always find something that will be problematic. Once they deplatform or censor everyone and everything. They will start turning on their own. Remember that these people are so far left that anything right of them is problematic.

 

[FA 855]

A cornerstone of SJW belief systems is that of a just world hypothesis, the idea that ultimately all bad people (white men, rich men, old men) will have their comeuppance and the 'good' people who haven't done anything to deserve bad treatment (Muslims, blacks, women) will be treated well eventually. So when everyone on the right is censored and de-platformed, and the just world does not manifest, as it ought to if these right wingers have no real say. SJWS will start seeing issues amongst their own, and begin cannibalising each other. Utopia as a word means "perfect place", as SJWS are aware, what fewer are also aware of, is that it means "no place".
But why do they cannibalise each other? That's the identity politics, or tribal politics, you see they have a AA identity group, a troon identity group and so on, they only in the end want what is best for their tribe, but they'll coalition with other tribes for the sake of convenience. What a SJW utopia would look like is a homogenous society where even though people don't look the same, they all hold the same dogmatic beliefs. Of course, one might ask who controls that society if everyone believes the same thing, you ask too many questions goy.

 

[QI 541]

We're already living in a world where everyone and everything problematic is deplatformed and censored, so the world would look like it does now.