What is a vaccine?

[sedoL]

What is a vaccine?
As far as i remember, at school we wuz taught- vaccines could only be made for bacterial illnesses by having a dead or sleepy sample injected so the immune system could dismantle/study it and know how to prepare for in case of infection. Nowadays, these are made for viruses, but don't work in the same principle - they inject something that forxes the body to make a specific something that might work against the virus.
So is it truly a vaccine? If it's not, then why is it called that?
Or is it? Does it still work in the same principle?
Could YOU, Dear Kiwi, explain it?

 

[Sparkletor 2.0]

No, Smallpox was a virus and that was the first vaccine.

 

[McMitch]

Vaccines were always intended as a defense agains viruses. You’re thing of antibiotics for bacterial infection.

Antibiotics are chemical compounds that interfere with the life processes of bacteria. This doesn’t work on viruses because they lack the ability to produce energy or replicate themselves on their own.

Vaccines are deactivated viruses (through various mechanisms) that are injected into your bloodstream. Your body detects these viruses and produces antibodies for the DNA sequence of that virus which propagate throughout your blood. Then, were an activated instance of the virus get into your body, you no longer have the time delay of recognition and antibody production before your immune system fights said virus.

 

[Daddy's Angry Juice]

A fucking lie, nigga.

 

[sedoL]

Vaccines are deactivated viruses (through various mechanisms) that are injected into your bloodstream.

But the recent coof vaccines are not this, or am i wrong? The flu vaccines are also not this, no?

 

[stares at error messages]

Poisons called adjuvans and DNA sequences made on a computer which are then grown in immortal human cell lines.

Injection of any substance into muscle tissue with the intention of modifying the immune system is a dumb idea. Vaccines have never worked dating all the way back to the rabies vaccine allegedly created by Luise Pasteur, but it didn't work.

 

[Mike Matei's Penis]

An autism generator

 

[Town Drunk]

I'll take the bait:

A vaccine is a weakend form of a virus, your body gets a mild shock of it, and forms anti bodies to fight it. So if you contract the stonger version of it, your body knows how to fight it, and you don't get sick.

The Covid vaccine was rushed, untested, etc. I won't argue if it helped you if you actually got Covid, but a vaccine prevents you from getting the illness, so it was not a true vaccine.

I got all my vaccines, and never got polio, mumps, etc.

 

[McMitch]

But the recent coof vaccines are not this, or am i wrong? The flu vaccines are also not this, no?

Caronaviruses warrant a lesser immune response than other viruses, either through normal exposure or traditional vaccines, and antibody production slows to a halt as a result. This is partially why colds come back every year. The mRNA injections that were fast-tracked by Trump (being a novel vaccination concept and therefore subject to at least a decade of clinical trial normally, circumvented by Orange Hitler) aimed to introduce part of the viral proteins into human cell reproduction, wherein it is created in the body and detected by the immune system and antibodies are created. The idea here is that, since the body itself is creating the proteins, then antibodies should always be present and the immunoresponse should be quicker. For a good deal of people, it was by lessening the effects of the virus (people who would have become pneumoniac simply get the coof, people who get the coof get lesser symptoms). The problem is the mechanism changing the immune system to create the proteins to illicit and a immune response has unknown effects over a long period of time, and the production of such is I’ll-refined due to said lack of trials as well as modern day incompetency.

Injection of any substance into muscle tissue with the intention of modifying the immune system is a dumb idea.

This is true, especially with our current understanding of the technologies at work.

Vaccines have never worked dating all the way back to the rabies vaccine allegedly created by Luise Pasteur, but it didn't work.

This is retardation. We can track the efficacy of vaccines, including rabies. What is wrong is vaccines are sold as 100% effective, which is true in 0% of vaccines. What is true is that their efficacy is a spectrum influenced by immune symptoms to the virus, type of cells infected, transmission medium, etc.

We can see where vaccinations have totally eliminated diseases that used to ravage even first-world nations. Where the propaganda comes in is the idea that it was solely vaccines that did so, that they weren’t the final few nails for diseases that had a sudden, massive infection rate followed by a sudden, massive die-off. But vaccinations working as a preventative can be seen in polio, which had a massive spike in exposures but only ever killed over time.

 

[dick brain]

Mostly methylmercury.

 

[stares at error messages]

We can see where vaccinations have totally eliminated diseases

No. Better hygiene has eliminated the diseases you mean. There are many more diseases that doctors now blame on the black box of genetics, which are caused by adjuvans. Hand waving about statistics you know nothing about does not prove you argument. Fast or slow, vaccines still don't work because the immune system is on the outside of the body, the skin, ears, eyes, nose, throat, stomach, and intestines, and not on the inside of the body where blood circulates and your muscles are. Inter-muscular injection can only be a bad idea and is entirely illogical too. The reasoning around the old vaccines was just as flawed as the covid vaccines. The speed of development does not change the results from the whole history of vaccination. Vaccines have always been snake oil because they are based on a fundamentally flawed model of human biology.

But the recent coof vaccines are not this, or am i wrong? The flu vaccines are also not this, no?

They make up a new story all the time. You were told vaccines fight bacteria. I was told that they do nothing against bacteria, but fight viruses. Shouldn't the "vaccine experts" know which it is if their supposed to be experts. Vaccine pushers make up what the vaccine is doing, lie about their methodology, and then jump to pushing toxic chemicals into people's arms. They did it with old vaccines and they do with mRNA vaccines too.

 

[McMitch]

Hand waving about statistics you know nothing about does not prove you argument.

This is a graph of polio cases vs deaths over time. You can see the drastic decline during the 50’s after vaccinations were introduced en masse, without a massive die-off to justify it no longer spreading. You can’t even claim germ theory and hand washing resolved it, because the highest spike was after both were commonly accepted.

Fast or slow, vaccines still don't work because the immune system is on the outside of the body, the skin, ears, eyes, nose, throat, stomach, and intestines, and not on the inside of the body where blood circulates and your muscles are.

This is actual retardation. Your white blood cells literally only exist to combat disease, since your circulatory system is a) a great medium for unchecked disease to travel throughout your body, and b) a great medium for parts of your immune system to travel throughout your body. Injecting into the muscle means you can spread the vaccine out, and maximize exposure to as much blood as possible.

Nigger, you can see under a microscope white blood cells attack disease vectors. You can be wary of the mRNA vaccines, since they’re a novel concept that’s poorly tested, but saying your blood has nothing to do with your immune system is just sticking your fingers in your ears.

 

[HyperboreanRightsActivist]

What is a vaccine?

The mark of the beast, nigga

 

[sedoL]

They make up a new story all the time. You were told vaccines fight bacteria. I was told that they do nothing against bacteria, but fight viruses

I don't mind being wrong about bacteria/virus thing but i got a tetanus shot recently and it was only for one year. Tetanus is an actual bacteria, how is it that i would need to get a vaccine each year for it. Same with the forest ticks (lime disease), i truly appreciate their application (for these instances) but something isn't right when it's only for one year and i swear it was for a lot longer not too long ago.

This is a graph of polio cases vs deaths over time. You can see the drastic decline during the 50’s after vaccinations were introduced en masse, without a massive die-off to justify it no longer spreading. You can’t even claim germ theory and hand washing resolved it, because the highest spike was after both were commonly accepted.

Didn't vaccines cover for a lot longer until quite recently? Tetanus, lime disease for example and these are bacterial ones.

 

[Legalize Asbestos]

Didn't vaccines cover for a lot longer until quite recently? Tetanus, lime disease for example and these are bacterial ones.

Some viruses basically never change. So you get one shot and you're good for life.

But some bacteria and viruses mutate very quickly, so they have to sample what is recent and in that region and then cook up a weak/dead version of it to inject in you. That's why there is a new flu or tetanus shot or whatever all the time.

Sometimes there are multiple strains active in a region. Sometimes injecting to protect you against the wrong strain just means your immune system fights the wrong way, and you end up suffering a deeper sickness. A handful of viruses actually take advantage of a trained immune system - the second time you get the illness it may be lethal, whereas the first time it's just a matter of chicken soup and Seinfeld reruns.

There has been a trend for the last fifty years in America to inject you full of shit that is pointless/harmful because vaccines are a huge cash cow for the industry. Federally mandated means guaranteed business, a product everyone takes, backed by an institution that always pays the bill. The cumulative effect of forcing a baby to launch an immune assault on like forty deadly diseases before wee babby can even speak is not without consequences. Like everything else in America, safety has been shoved aside entirely in the past decade or two, which is how you get Gardasil, Pandemrix, and SpikeVax. We could probably RETVRN to the 1950s vax schedule and be much better off with no consequences.

Jesus puts some water on your head once and gives you some bread and wine.
THE SCIENCE prefers a rougher baptism and shoots its juice right into your butt many times over.

 

[Penis Drager 2.0]

It's a substance used to provide acquired immunity to infection. The term was originally coined to refer to inoculation against smallpox by administering a live, unattenuated, cowpox virus (Variolae vaccinae) but has been used to describe preventative inoculations as a whole since the days of Pasteur.

While a misconception exists that all vaccines prior to the coof jab were "weakened" or "dead" viruses and this is somehow part of the "true definition," this is retarded bullshit. Tetanus and diphtheria vaccines don't contain viral particles at all (both of these infections are bacterial in nature anyway) and are instead what we call "toxoid vaccines." They work by exposing you to adulterated toxic compounds so you have a degree of immunity to the toxin produced by a bacterial agent.

No matter what your thoughts are about novel mRNA vaccines (I am not jabbed), it being a "vaccine" would not be debatable a hundred years ago.