Culture What Is ‘Dark Woke’? - Democrats are trying out a new attitude. It’s provocative, edgy and perilously toeing the line of not being too offensive

L | A
By Jack Crosbie
0b5f77394561203489783405de6179fa1316f0f9.webp
Representative Jasmine Crockett, Democrat of Texas, has on more than one occasion directed name-calling and insults at her political opponents

There was a time last summer when the Democratic Party was cool.

Kamala Harris had just stepped in as the Democratic Party’s nominee for president in the waning days of Brat summer. She went on the popular podcast “Call Her Daddy.” Tim Walz’s outdoorsy drip led to a Chappell Roan-inspired camo trucker hat. The memes were flowing, and the party’s mood was high.

That moment has long passed.

With Donald J. Trump back in the White House, the culture of dude-heavy pop-podcast programming, provocative insults and so-called masculine energy that helped him get there seems like the dominant one. And to some, the response from the left during the previous Trump era — defined by an earnest “resistance” to the president’s agenda — appears outdated and cringe.

As liberals try to get their groove back, some party insiders say Democratic politicians have been encouraged to embrace a new form of combative rhetoric aimed at winning back voters who have responded to President Trump’s no-holds-barred version of politics.

It’s an attempt to step outside the bounds of the political correctness that Republicans have accused Democrats of establishing. And it requires being crass but discerning, rude but only to a point.

Online, it has a name: “Dark woke.”

“Republicans have essentially put Democrats in a respectability prison,” said Bhavik Lathia, a communications consultant and former digital director for the Wisconsin Democratic Party.

“There is an extreme imbalance in strategy that allows Republicans to say stuff that really grabs voters’ attention, where we’re stuck saying boring pablum. I see this as a strategic shift within Democratic messaging — I’m a big fan of ‘dark woke.’”

“Dark woke,” for now, is a meme that lives mostly online. But its roots have been sown throughout the party for years.

In the waning days of the Biden administration, memes about “Dark Brandon” often referred to the version of the former president that conservatives most feared. Outside the party, the “dirtbag left,” the term for a cohort of leftists provocateurs who eschew civility politics, inspired headlines for their unrestrained derision of conservatives and liberals alike.

36837491c86af7dc925baae66c4e80910cc7aea7.webp
Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota is among those who have tried to embrace the “dark woke” affect

Every so often, these political currents would come to a head.

During a meeting of the House Oversight Committee last May, Representative Jasmine Crockett, Democrat of Texas, found herself in a spat with Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, Republican of Georgia, after Ms. Greene made a jibe about “fake eyelashes” that the chair, Representative James Comer, Republican of Kentucky, declined to prosecute under the committee’s rules on decorum.

“Mr. Chair, a point of order,” Ms. Crockett said. “I’m just curious, just to better understand your ruling. If someone on this committee then starts talking about somebody’s bleach blonde bad built butch body, that would not be engaging in personalities, correct?”

Ms. Crockett’s moment became a meme. It was printed on T-shirts. It got her an appearance on Jimmy Kimmel. And now, Democratic strategists say, it has become a perfect example of “dark woke.”

The reach of Ms. Crockett’s comment seemed to show that Democratic clapbacks could permeate into cultural spaces, giving the leaders who delivered them new platforms to spread their ideas. To a new, younger generation of Democratic staffers, this was exactly the link they had seen their opponents exploiting for years.

“All these new staffers, we grew up seeing extremely vile content overflowing from right-wing spaces into regular spaces,” said Caleb Brock, 23, the director of digital strategy for Representative Ro Khanna, Democrat of California. “We’re ready to combat that by any means necessary.”

Democrats have looked within their own ranks. Chi Ossé, the Brooklyn councilman whose meme-fluent, sometimes confrontational presence on X has put him on the radar of national Democratic organizers, says he was recently asked to help the Senate Democratic Caucus with their social media strategy.

“Being able to use this strategy of being raw and unapologetic and unabashed about our beliefs is something our base really wants,” Mr. Ossé said. He referred to a quote by one of Mayor Eric Adams’s advisers, Ingrid Lewis-Martin, who said, “When they go low, you gotta dig for oil.”

06bdad9dd79165d88c14e450aeed803a009f02b0.webp
Chi Ossé, a young councilman in Brooklyn, said he believes the Democratic base craves politicians who are “raw and unapologetic” about their convictions

It goes against the well-known credo of Michelle Obama, who in 2016 preached, “When they go low, we go high.” Instead, some Democrats want to see how low they can go, too.

In April, Ms. Crockett made headlines again when she referred to Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas, who uses a wheelchair, as “Governor Hot Wheels,” a remark that many in the disability community found offensive. (Ms. Crockett’s office did not respond to a request for comment.)

That backlash, however, was short lived. Lately, the bar on acceptable speech seems to have been set low enough that “you would have to catch someone saying a slur or something for it to really break through,” said Tyson Brody, a Democratic strategist and opposition researcher.

“People are pretty forgiving,” he added.

But others say there is a line that Democrats should be sure to toe as they ramp up their attacks.

“You don’t have to be cruel to be sharp,” said Annie Wu, 29, a communications strategist based in Philadelphia who has worked for both Mr. Khanna and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. “We can be bold, we can be petty, we can be punchy and still have a moral compass. We don’t have to replicate the right’s formula.”

Still, Democrats have embraced some aspects of the right’s tool kit. As Trump advisers like Elon Musk have used slurs and profanity online, communications consultants for Democratic politicians have encouraged — or allowed — more swearing. Profanity, Mr. Brody, 38, said, is often seen as a “shortcut to authenticity,” though it can also be overused and backfire.

“I know I’m doing something right when the Fox News crowd is all just bitching at me like crazy,” Mr. Walz said at a town hall in Lorraine, Ohio, this month. “I’m loving it. Elon Musk was crying last week, ‘Tim is being mean to me!’”

In an email, a spokesperson for the Democratic National Committee said the party’s main account on X had gained one million followers since the beginning of the year, pointing to several examples of viral moments — some embodying the principles of “dark woke” — that had garnered some 800 million impressions across platforms in the same time period.

It’s not resonating with everyone. For some, the universal truism that it can never be cool to try so hard applies here. Others, too, have criticized Democrats for seeming to place a premium on affect over policy.

Alex Peter, a lawyer and left-wing commentator who makes content under the handle LOLOverruled, said the Democrats’ new focus on viral “dark woke” posts was just “a lot of hot air.”

“Part of the problem with the mainstream Democratic Party is that it all kind of rings hollow,” Mr. Peter, 33, said. “I don’t care about another clapback. People want concrete deliverables.”

Republicans, as well, do not seem phased. Vish Burra, 34, the press secretary for the New York Young Republicans Club, said the Democrats’ fledgling attempts to go dark woke were not a significant threat.

“They’re getting spicier and being more vicious in their attacks,” said Mr. Burra, who has advised the former Representatives Matt Gaetz and George Santos. “Whatever. You have no power against us. The best you can squeeze out is Chuck Schumer on TikTok and Cory Booker going on for 25 hours?”
 
Confuse the Woke, during an argument, by saying that you identify as 'Beyond Woke'.

When they ask what it means, tell them it means getting off one's arse in order to make the world a better place; that ranting about racism online etc. doesn't actually solve the problem and that by going out in the real world to help others you went BEYOND what was expected and hence BEYOND Woke.

'but I need to be permanently online in order to defeat racism'

'No, you need to fight IRL otherwise you aren't going to achieve anything and Black people might just think that it's you who are the racist for not wishing to meet them - and we wouldn't want them to think badly of you now would we?'

'NPC 404 DISK ERROR'
 
No, no there wasn't.

You can buy all the celebrity endorsements you want, but when you have a population that's pissed over the prices of food, rich people running around telling you how "cool" your candidate is, is cheesy and fake as fuck.
Ok so they keep trying to make AOC, Kamala Harris, Michelle Obama and Hilary Clinton a thing which is ironic since most women don't give a fuck about those four anyways. And yeah Bernie Sanders still is trying to remain relevant whatever. But when this article mentions Tim Walz multiple times like no fuck off he's never been cool stop trying to pretend he is Democratic PR machine. He's not funny, witty, relatable, likable etc. Fuck off with this bullshit he'd actually go anywhere if he wasn't propped up by the Democrats. It's not happening.
 
The problem is woke, not what font you put "WOKE!" in on the box..... maybe someday you'll learn that and stop trying infinite permutations of woke, sure that one of them MUST be a winner.... have we tried Diet Woke? How about Woke Zero? Woke Lite? Heavy Duty Woke? Oh, oh, I know! DARK WOKE! That'll get em! All mysterious and rebellious and the like !

But it's still shit-flavored.... nobody's gonna buy that!

Nonsense! We just have to help the public reimagine what shit could taste like!



No, no there wasn't.

You can buy all the celebrity endorsements you want, but when you have a population that's pissed over the prices of food, rich people running around telling you how "cool" your candidate is, is cheesy and fake as fuck.
The last time the Dems were honestly cool? Was 1993....
 
Last edited:
The problem here is that you can't offend people when your ideology is built around sensitivity. They can't insult people in a way that has any teeth without becoming hypocrites.
Right, they talk about Republicans boxing them in but they did it to themselves. Big threats to take the gloves off and get serious, but the moment someone in Congress says "tranny tranny tranny" they all lose their shit.
Also the political landscape has changed, fundies were obnoxious in the 90s/2000s because they were overly prudish moral busybodies, which made them easy targets, but ironically the anti-fundies wound up adopting the same fundie mindset, minus the "prudish" part.
Pokemon is the devil, Magic the Gathering is the devil, Dungeons and Dragons is the devil, video games will make you a violent monster, everything fun is bad for your mortal soul. Maybe people just don't want to be lectured and nagged about how their favorite hobby is sinful? Doesn't matter if that sin is Satanism or racism, someone is always going to scold you about being wrong.
 
...both of which were reasonably self-aware, could take a joke and respond in turn...
The emos could, funnily enough, but not the fedora-tippers. They really couldn't. Poke even a little fun at their non-existent beliefs and they'd start REEEEEEE-ing.

...and were mostly live-and-let-live types.
Most were smug holier-than-thou types that instead of quoting bible verses, quoted Carlin, Dawkings, and Hitchens. They absolutely were the type that just couldn't live-and-let-live.
 
Last edited:
Jasmine Crockett and Tim Walz are observably more feminine than the average dc dem/uniparty roach and the same could be said about their clapbacks. Also, clapbacks is a 1%-tier feminine word.

This is what they have? These 2 are the examples they chose to use? This is what they're excited to see how it works as a more primary line of offense? Just lol and the article starts with the ol' journo altered reality that the kamabla campaign was really good with really good candidates and people and ideas. Still a lot of them hanging onto that.
 
I cannot help but grin when they indicate that they intend to keep backing Jasmine Crockett who is one of the stupidest human beings I have seen in office in a long long time. She is supposedly educated but knows nothing about anything.
I can't believe anyone is behind her. She sounds like the Temu version of AOC, and AOC was a politician ordered off of Wish.

For fuck's sake, I think the democratic party is trolling us all, or they're just pulling a "hey fellow kids" with us.
Pokemon is the devil, Magic the Gathering is the devil, Dungeons and Dragons is the devil, video games will make you a violent monster, everything fun is bad for your mortal soul. Maybe people just don't want to be lectured and nagged about how their favorite hobby is sinful? Doesn't matter if that sin is Satanism or racism, someone is always going to scold you about being wrong.
We can talk about the PMRC all day long.

The last time the Dems were honestly cool? Was 1993....
You can make the case that Obama was cool. Hell, when he was running in 2008, he had a distinct moment, where he was giving a speech in the rain, and there were some iconic photos that came from that particular speech, and he takes off his jacket, almost like, "'Scuse me while I whip this out."

Of course, there was a famous quote I read on a forum somewhere that at the DNC where he accepted the nomination, something to the effect of "We've got so much unity, we could be Voltron". Shit, say what you want about Obama, but back then, the Dems had confidence, and that's why they had a lock back then.
 
Of course, there was a famous quote I read on a forum somewhere that at the DNC where he accepted the nomination, something to the effect of "We've got so much unity, we could be Voltron". Shit, say what you want about Obama, but back then, the Dems had confidence, and that's why they had a lock back then.
Helping the dems was Dubya's near-decade debacle. I think if his presidency wasn't half the joke it was the dems wouldn't of been able to brand themselves as the cool kids party.
 
Helping the dems was Dubya's near-decade debacle. I think if his presidency wasn't half the joke it was the dems wouldn't of been able to brand themselves as the cool kids party.
Maybe, but doing that didn't exactly sell Hillary in 2016.

I think what people like is the candidate that, if they don't feel like a particularly "safe" choice (GWB), then they feel closer to anti-establishment. Closer to. Obama was as establishment as it got in 2012, but he wasn't a complete biter like Mitt Romney.

It's why, much to the frustration of me trying to tell everyone I knew Trump would win in 2016 (not because I was a Trump voter), everyone around me tried to get me to shut up and roll with Hillary. Because the Democratic party decided they were still "cool"...and for some bizarre reason, Trump is just cooler than anything that the Democrats offer.
 
Back