dumb username
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2024
You've probably heard Null talk about the state of free speech online. And there is the Nonprofit he plans to start for that purposes: https://kiwifarms.net/threads/the-charity.179965/
But, I want to ask: how committed is he to that ideal?
I am a sockpuppet of a recently banned user. My behavior was described by the moderator who banned me as "negging" kiwifarms and writing a legal defense for Epik. In simpler terms, I was banned because I was a dissenting voice.
In interest of full disclosure, here is a link to all my posts on that account.
https://kiwifarms.st/members/thrownaway4chan.161002/recent-content (arc: https://archive.fo/RJAMR )
I can further criticize the way I was banned in how it relates to transparency. I can see my ban message, If I log in on that account. However, there is no public ban message on my post. Other users replied to my last post after I was banned, yet none of them were aware that I was banned for what I had just said*. Whether intended as such or not, this serves to silently censor dissenting opinions.
This seems a little ironic considering that Null has complained that ISPs refuse to tell him why they ban him. Given this, if he wishes to ban certain criticism, he should be open about it.
*Most Xenforo sites have a special display ribbon that user gets when they are permanently banned. Kiwifarms doesn't. The only way to tell if a person is banned on Kiwifarms is to attempt to autocomplete their username, which doesn't work if they are banned. This wasn't something special for my case, but it means that users aren't going to be aware if someone has been silently banned.
But, I want to ask: how committed is he to that ideal?
I am a sockpuppet of a recently banned user. My behavior was described by the moderator who banned me as "negging" kiwifarms and writing a legal defense for Epik. In simpler terms, I was banned because I was a dissenting voice.
In interest of full disclosure, here is a link to all my posts on that account.
https://kiwifarms.st/members/thrownaway4chan.161002/recent-content (arc: https://archive.fo/RJAMR )
I can further criticize the way I was banned in how it relates to transparency. I can see my ban message, If I log in on that account. However, there is no public ban message on my post. Other users replied to my last post after I was banned, yet none of them were aware that I was banned for what I had just said*. Whether intended as such or not, this serves to silently censor dissenting opinions.
This seems a little ironic considering that Null has complained that ISPs refuse to tell him why they ban him. Given this, if he wishes to ban certain criticism, he should be open about it.
*Most Xenforo sites have a special display ribbon that user gets when they are permanently banned. Kiwifarms doesn't. The only way to tell if a person is banned on Kiwifarms is to attempt to autocomplete their username, which doesn't work if they are banned. This wasn't something special for my case, but it means that users aren't going to be aware if someone has been silently banned.