What is Kiwifarm's commitment to Free Speech and supporting dissenting opinions? - Banned for Negging the farms.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Seems that the OP is a faggot and should kill themselves. Many such cases. I can direct you to the nearest rope shop if you wish.
What's stopping you from starting your own website with your own money, and publishing whatever you want to say?
Probably a tranny or at the very least a Leftest and therefore has no money.
 
Supporting free speech doesn't mean you have to allow your forum to be an unfiltered hole for unsocialised retards to dribble whatever low-quality gibberish they feel like. You're free to go post somewhere that welcomes that, and nobody here will try to shut down the onionfarms for it.
 
You've probably heard Null talk about the state of free speech online.

He's concerned with macro free speech, the ability for individuals and groups to freely express thoughts and opinions on the Internet, not implementing a micro, pure form of free speech on this website in particular.

You're bitching about this specific group kicking you out because you were doing something antithetical to this group.

Small groups cultivating what they see as their identity is not antithetical to free speech. Imagine if the libertarian party let any and all retards have their say within the party even if it actively harmed their movement 🤔
 
You pissed off Null, and he banned you. Go back to 4chan if you want to see what happens to a site when shitty users aren't dealt with.
 
Free speech absolutism is an untenable position to take, the reason being the existence of colossal faggots like you. Why try to force yourself into a place where you arent welcome? You possess the urge to do so because, at your very core, you are nothing but a nigger.
 
"free speech" is, at its core, the idea that people shouldn't be unfairly punished for speaking earnestly. however, most people will consider it unfair if they're punished for speaking earnestly, even if (especially if) they're a faggot saying a bunch of cringe bullshit. as the poster above noted, free speech absolutism is untenable, so there has to be some degree of censure to maintain the sanity of any community, because some people are just irredeemable faggots who ruin shit. this means that, no matter how staunch your stance on free speech is, there will always be somebody claiming hypocrisy because you rightfully turned them out for being a faggot, in order to maintain the ideal for the people who deserve it. ergo, this thread.
 
this guy has had an account for years which exists only to show up during meta discussions and write explanations for how resistance is futile and we should all lay down and die.
So this forum literally does nothing for this guy and he's actually making things worse. Wow.
 
Null may or may not be a hypocrite, but for better or worse, he is on record claiming that this is not a free speech site. Or at least, he chooses not to call it a free speech site, since free speech means different things to different people. See https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojh...ll-ichverbot-iban.84770/page-26#post-10528259 and https://kiwifarmsaaf4t2h7gc3dfc5ojh...ll-ichverbot-iban.84770/page-27#post-10528564

So, our dear feeder wants free speech for himself, but he does not want others to neg the farms, at least not on the farms.

That being said, I personally find some of the anti-free speech arguments on this thread appalling. They are the same arguments that are used by the mainstream to suppress dissenters. But it is what it is.
1.png 2.png
 
Last edited:
Static means you can't. If it's static, you are kind of fucked with an IP pan.
If you call your ISP and put up enough of a stink or threaten to cancel, most will assign you a new static IP to save you from going to a rival company.
 
*Most Xenforo sites have a special display ribbon that user gets when they are permanently banned. Kiwifarms doesn't. The only way to tell if a person is banned on Kiwifarms is to attempt to autocomplete their username, which doesn't work if they are banned. This wasn't something special for my case, but it means that users aren't going to be aware if someone has been silently banned.

I fully approve of Josh banning retards for shitting up a thread, or generally acting like a massive faggot. But the one thing I agree with is this last point- As site owner, Josh can obviously ban who he wants. But I think there should be more transparency about who's been banned, and why.

Especially for a forum like KF, the possibilty that a user can just be memory-holed with no trace, doesn't look good, and harms confidence in the site. Like most users, I generally trust Josh's judgement, and that he acts in the best interests of KF. But I think more transparency about bans would be in keeping with the sites ethos, as well as with Josh's past statements about transparency, and wanting the site to be trusted as impartial.
 
Back